臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來國內、外接連發生多起重大的財務報導舞弊案件，使得廣大財報使用者（包括投資人及債權人）蒙受其害，舉凡美國於2001年發生安隆（Enron）、世界通訊（WorldCom）、全錄（Xerox）、泰可（Tyco International）及國內博達等公司財務報導不實及破產案件，造成社會整體損失之金額難以估計，令各界對於公司管理階層與簽證會計師之信賴幾近崩潰瓦解。

在會計醜聞頻傳，財報使用者要求嚴厲追究公司管理階層與簽證會計師之民、刑事責任的陰影下，會計師之接受委任決策便成為一重要的研究議題。惟國內以往有關會計師聘任的探討，多偏向於需求面研究，探究影響客戶主動更換會計師的因素，少有涉及會計師主動終止委任之決策研析，是而本論文擬以2001至2005年臺灣地區上市、上櫃公司向證券主管機關申報並公告之更換會計師資訊，及相關之財報與會計師查核報告等資料，探討臺灣地區會計師主動終止委任之決策因素。實證結果彙述如下：

一、 就會計師主動終止委任的可能性，與財務報表發生錯誤而查核人員未能查出，卻於事後被外界發現的機率（PM）之關連性而言：若受查公司當年度報導淨損、財報重編次數愈高，代表財務報表存有誤述的可能性愈高，因而會計師主動終止委任之可能性亦愈高。此外，會計師之查核年資越長，對其受查客戶較為瞭解，從而審定財務報表發生錯誤的可能性較低，會計師主動終止委任之可能性亦愈低。

二、 針對面臨較高查核錯誤成本以致原任會計師主動終止委任之樣本公司，探究新任會計師接受此一高風險客戶的可能性與查核人員是否具特定專業知識之關連性而論：遭致前任會計師主動終止委任之公司，其具產業專家之繼任會計師接受委任的可能性，伴隨著受查公司之風險等級上升而逐漸下降，亦即市場佔有率較高、位列前四大卅五大之會計師事務所，面臨高風險之受查客戶時，較有可能拒絕接受委任契約，以降低事務所所面臨之訴訟風險。

In recent years, a great number of financial scandals, such as Enron, WorldCom, Xerox, Tyco International, and Procomp’s bankruptcy, etc., have not only surprised the worldwide capital markets, but also led to tremendous financial losses suffered by financial report users, including investors and creditors. These financial frauds resulted in the collapses of the credibility to the function of management and external auditing; thus strong voices of critical investigation into the criminal and civil responsibilities that the in-charge auditors should assume emerged. Consequently, when the law liabilities accelerated, the auditor alignment decision becomes a present and clear issue for the audit research. However, most of the prior research regarding auditor hiring was concentrated on exploring the demand-side decision factors of audit markets, especially concerning auditor switches initiated by the clients. Few papers examined the auditor termination decisions initiated by auditors. Therefore, this thesis tries to study the consideration factors for the auditor-initiated termination decision in Taiwan during the period of 2001-2005. Main empirical findings are summarized as follows.
First, regarding the linkage of the decision of auditor resignation or declination to reappoint with auditor error cost, this thesis suggests that firms are prone to resign from (1) the clients who operated in net loss, or (2) the clients who experienced a number of financial restatements, or (3) the engagements in which the auditors had short tenures.
Second, regarding the firms whose predecessor auditors have resigned from audit engagements or declined reappointment while facing higher audit error costs, this paper shows that the more specific industry expertise, proxied by market shares or firm reputations, the successor auditors possess, the lower likelihood that they accept such engagements.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
致　　謝 iii
目 　錄 iv
表 目 錄 v
圖 目 錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 美、中兩國對更換會計師的行政規定 6
第二節 會計師主動拒絕受委或拒絕續委之文獻回顧 9
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 研究假說之發展與建立 13
第二節 實證模型建立與變數之操作型定義 15
第三節 研究期間、資料來源與樣本選取 26
第四章 實證結果 28
第一節 敘述性統計 28
第二節 相關性檢定 35
第三節 ANOVA分析 35
第四節 迴歸模型分析 39
第五節 強效度檢定 46
第五章 研究結論、限制及建議 60
第一節 研究結論 60
第二節 研究限制及建議 62
參考文獻 63
附錄表一　模型一及模型二之樣本公司配對明細彙總表 66
附錄表二　模型三主動終止委任公司之繼任會計師明細彙總表 72

中文部份

郭志剛，2005，logistic迴歸模型-方法及應用，五南書局，台北市。
林震岩，2007，多變量分析: SPSS的操作與應用，智勝文化，台北市。
陳惠玲，2004，偵測財務舞弊可能性之試作，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第49期：15-36。

英文部份

Berton, L. 1995. Big accounting firms weed out risky clients. The Wall Street Journal 26 (July): B1,B6.
Blackwell, D. W., T. R. Noland, and D. B. Winters. 1998. The value of auditor assurance: evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Spring): 57-70.
Bonner, S. E., and B. L. Lewis. 1990. Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (supplement): 1-20.
Chow, C. W. 1982. The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences. Accounting Review 57 (April): 272-291.
Davis, Harold Edward. 2002. An empirical analysis of auditor resignations. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana Tech University.
Dechow, P. M., R. G.. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring):1-36.
DeFond M.L., M. Ettredge, and D. Smith. 1997. An investigation of auditor resignations. Research in Accounting Regulation 11: 25-45.
Dhaliwal, D. S., J. W. Schatzberg, and M. A. Trombley. 1993. Analysis of the ecomonic factors related to auditor-client disagreements preceding auditor changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 12 (Fall): 22-38.
DeFond, M.L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. Accounting Review 66(July): 643-655.
Francis, J. R., and E. R. Wilson. 1988. Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. Accounting Review 63 (October): 663-682.
Hertz, Kathleen Marie. 2006. Determinants and consequences of auditor resignations and dismissals: The effect of SOX. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University.
Huss, H. F. and F. A. Jacobs. 1991. Risk containment: exploring auditor decisions in the engagement process. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10 ( Fall): 16-32.
Jones, C.L. and S.E. Weingram. 1996. The determinants of industrial concentrations in 10b-5 litigation.Unpublished working paper, Stanford University.
Kinney, W., and L. S. McDaniel. 1989. Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(February)：71-93.
Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1997. Litigation risk and auditor resignations. Accounting Review 72(October) : 539-560.
Krishnan, G. 2003. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons 17 (Supplement) : 1-16.
Loebbecke, J. K., M. M. Eining, and J. J. Willingham. 1989. Auditors’experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Aduiting: A Journal of Practice and Theory 9 (Fall): 1-28.
Lys, T., and R.L.Watts. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement): 65-93.
Menon, K., and D. D. Williams, 1999. Error cost and auditors‘ termination decisions, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance14(Spring): 95-123.
Palmrose, Z. 1986. Audit fees and audit size. Journal of Accounting Research 24(Spring): 97-110.
Raghunandan K. and D.V. Rama.1999. Auditor resignations and the market for audit services. Aduiting: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18 (Spring): 124-134.
Reed. B. J., M. A. Trombley, and D. S. Dhaliwal. 2000. Demand for audit quality: The case of Laventhol and Horwath’s auditees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 15 (Spring): 183-198.
Schroeder, R. G., and K. Verreault. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit withdrawal decisions. Advances in Accounting 5: 205-220.
Schwartz, K., and K. Menon. 1985. Auditor switches by failing firms. Accounting Review 60(April): 248-261.
Simuic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (Spring): 161-190.
Shih, T.C., and Y.C. Tsai.2006.An exploration of the cost characteristics of the Taiwan accounting service industry in a changing environment. 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association, American Accounting Association.
Shu, S. Z. 2000. Auditor resignations: clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (April): 173-205.
Stice, J. D. 1991. Using financial and market in formation to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. Accounting Review 66（July）: 516-533.

Wells, D., and M. Loudder. 1997. The market effects of auditor resignations. Auditing 16,(Spring): 138-144.
Williams, D. D. 1988. The potential determinants of auditor change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 15 (Summer): 243-261.