跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.240) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/13 10:25
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡孟頻
研究生(外文):TSAI, MENG-PIN
論文名稱:市場條件、股市交易者下單行為及投資績效之關係
論文名稱(外文):Market Conditions, Order Submission, and Investment Performance
指導教授:洪碧霞洪碧霞引用關係
指導教授(外文):HUNG, PI-HSIA
口試委員:陳瑞璽黃永成
口試委員(外文):CHEN, RUEI-SHIHUANG, YUNG-CHENG
口試日期:2016-06-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:47
中文關鍵詞:下單行為委託單積極度委託單規模市場條件投資績效
外文關鍵詞:Order SubmissionOrder AggressivenessOrder SizeMarket ConditionsInvestment Performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:250
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:17
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文研究市場條件對股市交易者下單行為的影響,使用臺灣證券交易所提供之日內交易資料,探討 (1) 市場條件是否影響整體投資人之下單行為 (包括委託單積極度及委託單規模)?(2) 在不同類別的投資人下,市場條件與投資人下單行為間之關係。(3) 最後,本文研究市場條件、投資人下單行為及長短期的投資績效之關係。本文研究結果發現,投資人之下單決策會受到市場條件的影響,而散戶投資人在臺灣股市中佔了六成以上的交易量,因而主導了市場的主要走向。此外,專業投資人 (即外資與投信基金) 在面臨市場條件變化時,可能會藉由專業知識而做出相同的投資決策。最後,從投資績效中可以看出買賣方之間具有不對稱效果,績效表現在買方交易時較佳,此不對稱效果會影響到市場參與者的投資策略。
This study examines whether market conditions have impacts on the order submissions of market traders. We use intraday trading data from Taiwan Stock Exchange to investigate the following research topics. First, we examine whether market conditions affect investors’ order submission behavior, including the order aggressiveness and order size. Second, we analyze the relationship between market conditions and order submissions across investor types. Third and lastly, we explore the relationship among market conditions, order submissions of investors, and investment performances in the short- and long-term periods. Our results are as follows. First, we find that market conditions have influence on the order submissions of investors. Individuals account for about 60% of TWSE’s trading volume. This is why the market is dominated by individuals. Second, professional investors (including mutual funds and foreign investors) may make same decisions by their professional knowledge when they face market conditions change. Finally, there exist asymmetric effects between buy and sell orders in investment performance results. The asymmetric effects will influence the investment strategies of market participants.
致謝辭 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
表目次 VI
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究架構 2
第貳章 相關文獻探討 4
第一節 市場條件及下單行為相關文獻 4
第二節 下單行為及投資人類別相關文獻 4
第三節 投資人類別及交易績效相關文獻 5
第參章 研究資料 6
第一節 資料來源 6
第二節 相關變數 6
第肆章 研究方法 10
第一節 市場條件是否影響整體投資人之下單行為 10
第二節 在不同類別的投資人下,市場條件與投資人下單行為間之關係 11
第三節 市場條件、投資人下單行為及投資績效之關係 13
第伍章 實證分析 15
第一節 主要變數之敘述統計 15
第二節 市場條件是否影響整體投資人之下單行為 16
第三節 在不同類別的投資人下,市場條件與投資人下單行為間之關係 18
第四節 市場條件、投資人下單行為及投資績效之關係 22
第陸章 研究結論 25
參考文獻 27
一、 中文部分 27
二、 英文部分 27

表 1 敘述統計 30
表 2 市場條件與投資人下單行為之關係 31
表 3 在不同類別的投資人下,市場條件與投資人下單行為間之關係 34
表 4 加入投資人類別與市場條件之交乘項後,在不同類別的投資人下,市場條件與投資人下單行為間之關係 37
表 5 市場條件、投資人下單行為與投資績效之關係 42
表 6 加入投資人類別與市場條件之交乘項後,市場條件、投資人下單行為與投資績效之關係 45
一、 中文部分
陳孝琪、劉曦敏,2010,「價差、深度、及市價單和限價單的最適下單策略」,經濟研究,第46卷第1期,頁1-67.

二、 英文部分
Anand, Amber, Sugato Chakravarty, and Terrence Martell, 2005, Empirical evidence on the evolution of liquidity: Choice of market versus limit orders by informed and uninformed traders, Journal of Financial Markets 8 (3), 288–308.
Angel, James J., 1994, Limit versus market orders, Working paper, School of Business Administration, Georgetown University.
Bae, K. H., H. Jang, and K. S. Park, 2003, Traders’ choice between limit and market orders: Evidence from NYSE stocks, Journal of Financial Markets 6 (4), 517–538.
Barber, B.M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., Odean, T., 2009, Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Review of Financial Studies 22 (2), 609–632.
Beber, A. and C. Caglio, 2002, Orders submission strategies and information: Empirical evidence from the NYSE, Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
Biais, B., P. Hillion, and C. Spatt, 1995, An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse, Journal of Finance 50 (5), 1655–1689.
Bloomfield, Robert, Maureen O’hara, and Gideon Saar, 2005, The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidity, Journal of Financial Economics 75 (1), 165–199.
Cao, C., O. Hansch, and X. Wang, 2008, Order placement strategies in a pure limit order book market, Journal of Financial Research 31 (2), 113–140.
Chung, K. H., B. F. Van Ness, and R. A. Van Ness, 1999, Limit orders and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 53 (2), 255–287.
Cohen, Kalman J., Steven F. Maier, Robert A. Schwartz, and David K. Whitcomb, 1981, Transaction costs, order placement strategy, and existence of the bid-ask spread, Journal of Political Economics 89 (2), 287–305.
Duong, H. N., P. S. Kalev, and C. Krishnamurti, 2009, Order aggressiveness of institutional and individual investors, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 17 (5), 533–546.
Ellul, A., C. W. Holden, P. Jain, and R. Jennings, 2007, Order dynamics: Recent evidence from the NYSE, Journal of Empirical Finance 14 (5), 636–661.
Foucault, T., 1999, Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market, Journal of Financial Markets 2 (2), 193–226.
Foucault, T., S. Moinas, and E. Theissen, 2007, Does anonymity matter in electronic limit order markets? Review of Financial Studies 20 (5), 1707–1747.
Harris, Lawrence, 1991, Stock price clustering and discreteness, Review of Financial Studies, 4 (3), 389–415.
Harris, Lawrence, 1998, Optimal dynamic order submission strategies in some stylized trading problems, Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 7 (2), 1–76.
Hung Pi-Hsia, An-Sing Chen and Yun-Lin Wu, 2015, Order aggressiveness, price impact, and investment performance in a pure order-driven stock market, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 44 (4), 635–660.
Kamesaka, Akiko, John R. Nofsinger, and Hidetaka Kawakita, 2003, Investment patterns and performance of investor groups in Japan, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11 (1), 1–22.
Kaniel, Ron, and Hong Liu, 2006, So what orders do informed traders use? Journal of Business 79 (4), 1867–1914.
Keim, Donald B. and Ananth Madhavan, 1996, The upstairs market for large-block transactions: Analysis and measurement of price effects, Review of Financial Studies 9 (1), 1–36.
Lee, Y. T., Y. J. Liu, R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, Order imbalances and market efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39 (2), 327–341.
Lo, I. and S. G. Sapp, 2010, Order aggressiveness and quantity: How are they determined in a limit order market? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 20 (3), 213–237.
Menkhoff, Lukas, Carol L. Osler, and Maik Schmeling, 2010, Limit-order submission strategies under asymmetric information, Journal of Banking and Finance 34 (11), 2665–2677.
Parlour, C. A., 1998, Price dynamics in limit order markets, Review of Financial Studies 11 (4), 789–816.
Ranaldo, A., 2004, Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets, Journal of Financial Markets 7 (1), 53–74.
Wald, J. and H. Horrigan, 2005, Optimal limit order choice, Journal of Business 78 (2), 597–619.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top