臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

跨國公司會藉由租稅規劃移轉在各國所獲取的利潤。其中，制定內部交易移轉訂價策略，是其移轉各國利潤之重要租稅規劃工具。因此，近來很多國家制定移轉訂價相關規範法令，並加強移轉訂價的查核。
為與世界接軌，以及減少稽徵機關與跨國公司間的衝突，我國亦於2004 年12 月28 日參照OECD的指導方針及各國稅法，訂定「營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價查核準則」。
本文主要研究，對臺灣跨國公司而言，內部交易之移轉訂價，是否為重要的租稅規劃工具。利用一個考慮跨國公司內部交易移轉訂價的簡化理論模型，推論若內部交易價格是依據稅率來制定，當銷售國當地的法定稅率提高，則銷售國對購買國的內部銷售會減少；而當購買國當地的法定稅率提高，則銷售國對購買國的內部銷售會增加。再以此推論結果，作為實證分析之依據。
實證分析部分，以2004至2006年間臺灣上市及上櫃公司為研究對象，資料來源為臺灣經濟新報文化事業股份有限公司 (TEJ) 資料庫。實證結果顯示，隨著子公司當地稅率提高，則子公司內部銷售規模會減少，而母公司內部銷售規模會增加。因此可推論，內部交易之移轉訂價確實為公司移轉利潤的主要管道。

Multinational companies have enhanced tax planning opportunities by means of crossborder profit shifting. In particular, it is supposed that transfer pricing of intrafirm trade constitutes an important channel for companies to shift profits between countries. Consequently, a number of countries have recently tightened transfer pricing legislation and have been increasingly engaging in transfer pricing audit and investigation.
In order to follow the international trend and reduce conflict between tax administration and multinational corporations, Taiwan has established the regulation, Regulations Governing of Assessment of Profit-Seeking Enterprise Income Tax on Non-Arm’s-Length Transfer Pricing, on December 28, 2004. This regulation was established in accordance with the OECD guidelines on transfer pricing and the regulation of every country.
This paper investigates whether transfer pricing of intrafirm sales within multinational companies represents an important channel of company tax planning in Taiwan. A simple theoretical model, considering transfer pricing of intrafirm sales of a multinational company, is set up to obtain empirical implications. The theoretical analysis suggests that if transfer prices are tax driven, intrafirm sales will decrease with an increasing statutory tax rate at the supplying affiliate’s location and increase with an increasing statutory tax rate at the receiving affiliate’s location.
The empirical analysis uses data of the listed companies of Taiwan Stock Exchange and Gre Tai Securities Market from 2004 to 2006. Firm-level data are taken from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database. The empirical results show that the size of intrafirm sales from the controlled affiliate will decrease with an increasing tax rate of the affiliate’s location. The empirical results also show that the size of intrafirm sales from the parent company will increase with an increasing tax rate of the affiliate’s location. Thus, it can be confirmed that profit shifting by means of transfer pricing of intrafirm sales works effectively.

口試委員會審定書..........................................i
謝辭.....................................................ii
中文摘要................................................iii
英文摘要.................................................iv
目錄.....................................................vi
表目錄.................................................viii
圖目錄...................................................ix
第一章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究動機........................................ 1
第二節 研究目的........................................ 1
第三節 研究限制.........................................2
第四節 研究架構.........................................2
第二章 我國營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價查核制度之發展...4
第一節 我國營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價
查核準則立法背景.................................4
第二節 我國營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價
查核準則之規定...................................5
第三章 文獻探討..........................................17
第一節 國外文獻回顧....................................17
第二節 國內文獻回顧....................................19
第三節 本章小結........................................20
第四章 理論模型..........................................22
第五章 實證研究分析......................................30
第一節 實證研究模型之建構 ..............................30
第二節 敘述統計分析....................................35
第三節 實證結果分析....................................44
第六章 結論與建議........................................51
第一節 結論............................................51
第二節 建議............................................52
參考文獻.................................................55
附錄.....................................................61

一、中文部分
1.中央銀行網站 http://www.cbc.gov.tw。
2.公開資訊觀測站網站 http://newmops.tse.com.tw。
3.朱培誠 (2006), 《移轉計價下企業營所稅差異數之研究─國內貿易公司之個案探討》, 國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
4.李宜萍 (2004), 〈兩岸移轉訂價政策下，如何訂定全球優勢租稅規劃〉, 《管理雜誌》, 358, 60-64。
5.余景仁、馬嘉應 (2005)，〈探討我國營利事業所得稅不合常規移轉訂價查核準則〉, 《財稅研究》, 37(3), 90-102。
6.邱有相 (2006),《我國移轉訂價制度實施問題之研究》, 國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士專班碩士論文。
7.林妙雀 (1995), 《國際移轉計價決策之影響因素研究─台灣企業之實證分析》, 國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
8.林秀芬 (2005), 《關聯企業移轉訂價租稅議題之研究》, 國立彰化師範大學會計研究所碩士論文。
9.吳金好 (2003), 《國際移轉計價影響因素之研究─台灣企業之實證分析》,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
10.吳德豐 (2004), 〈移轉訂價新制對台灣租稅環境的影響〉, 《會計研究月刊》, 228, 24-26。
11.周靜孜、唐啟發 (2005), 〈進入移轉訂價的時代〉, 《財稅研究》, 37(5), 123-136。
12.周釧培 (2004), 〈移轉訂價之探討與分析(上)〉, 《稅務》, 1894, 41-43。
13.周釧培 (2004), 〈移轉訂價之探討與分析(下)〉, 《稅務》, 1895, 33-35。
14.徐永堅 (2003), 《台商全球化的思維兼論國際移轉訂價租稅問題─以個案公司探討》, 國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程會計組碩士論文。
15.郝文英 (2005), 《台灣企業投資大陸面對移轉訂價問題之研究─以X公司為例》, 義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
16.馬嘉應、陳柏綸 (2005), 〈移轉訂價交易模型探討〉, 《財稅研究》, 37(6), 33-69。
17.莊義雄、魏敏全 (2005), 〈關係企業移轉訂價之因應策略〉, 《今日會計》, 98, 62-74。
18.財政部臺北市國稅局 (2005), 《營利事業所得稅移轉訂價制度》。
19.許祺昌、廖庭璉 (2005), 〈營利事業應評估移轉訂價查核準則實施之風險及因應之道〉, 《稅務》, 1921, 29-31。
20.郭心潔 (2005), 〈我國移轉訂價新制對企業之影響及因應策略〉, 《內部稽核》, 51, 45-50。
21.張永維 (2003), 《國際租稅規避與查核之研究》, 逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文
22.張書瑋 (2007), 〈面對移轉訂價查核新制，您好好稅了嗎？〉, 《會計研究月刊》, 256, 27-43。
23.黃栖堂 (2003), 《關係企業非常規交易租稅問題之研究》, 逢甲大學會計與財稅所碩士論文。
24.葉素綿 (2005), 《我國移轉訂價課稅制度之研究》, 國立臺北大學會計研究所碩士論文。
25.蔡麗雯 (2005), 《移轉訂價與盈餘管理之研究》, 輔仁大學會計研究所碩士論文。
26.羅斌賢 (1997), 《營利事業藉移轉訂價規避稅負之研究》, 朝陽大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
27.蘇麗蛾 (2001), 《跨國企業移轉計價與國際租稅策略之研究》, 義守大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1.Baldenius, T. , N. D. Melumad and S. Reichelstein (2004),”Integrating managerial and tax objectives in transfer pricing,” Accounting Review, 79, 591-615.
2.Bernard, Andrew B. , J. Bradford Jensen and Peter K. Schott (2006),”Transfer Pricing by U.S.-Based Multinational Firms,” NBER Working Paper, 12493.
3.Capithorne, L. W. (1971),”International corporate transfer prices and government policy,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 4 (August), 324-341.
4.Clausing, K. A. (2001),”The impact of transfer pricing on intrafirm trade,” in J.R. Hines (ed.), International taxation and multinational activity, Chicago, 173-194.
5.Clausing, K. A. (2003),”Tax-motivated Transfer Pricing and US Intrafirm Trade Prices,” Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2207-2223.
6.Clausing, K. A. (2006),”International tax avoidance and U.S. international trade,” National Tax Journal, 59, 269-287.
7.Eden, Lorraine (1998), Taxing Multinationals: Transfer Pricing and Corporate Income Taxation in North America, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
8.Grubert, H. and J. Mutti (1991),”Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 285-293.
9.Grubert, H. (2003),”Intangible income, intercompany transactions, income shifting, and the choice of location,” National Tax Journal, 56, 221-242.
10.Hirshleifer, J. (1957),” Economics of the divisionalized firm,” Journal of Business, 30, 96-108.
11.Horst, Thomas (1971),”The theory of the multinational firm: Optimal behavior under different tariff and tax rates,” Journal of Political Economy, 79 (September/October), 1059-1072.
12.Halperin, Robert M. and Bin Srinidhi (1987),”The effects of U.S. income tax regulations’ transfer pricing rules on allocative efficiency,” The Accounting Review, 62 (October), 686-706.
13.Hines, J. R. and E. M. Rice (1994),”Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and American business,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 149-182.
14.Hines, James R. (1997),”Tax policy and the activities of multinational corporations,” in Auerbach, A. J. (ed.), Fiscal Policy: Lessons from Economic Research, MIT Press, Cambridge, 401-445.
15.Harris, David G. and Richard C. Sansing (1998),”Distortions caused by the use of arm’s-length transfer prices,” The Journal of the American Taxation Association, Spring, 40-50.
16.Haufler, A. and G. Schjelderup (2000),”Corporate tax systems and cross country profit shifting,” Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 306-325.
17.Huizinga, H. and L. Leaven (2005), International profit shifting within European multinationals, Mimeo, Tilburg University.
18.Hyde, Charles E. and Chongwoo Choe (2005),”Keeping two sets of books: The relationship between tax and incentive transfer prices,” Journal of Economics, Management and Strategy, 14(1), 165-186.
19.KPMG International (2006), KPMG’s Corporate Tax Rate Survey.
20.Martini, J. T. , R. Niemann and Simons Diek (2007) , “Transfer pricing or formula apportionment? Tax-induced distortions of multinationals’ investment and production decisions,” CESIFO Working Paper, 2020.
21.Overesch, Michael (2006) ,“Transfer pricing of intrafirm sales as a profit shifting channel ─ Evidence from German firm data,” ZEW Discussion Paper, 06084.
22.Schjelderup, G. and L. Sørgard (1997),”Transfer pricing as a strategic device for decentralized multinationals,” International Tax and Public Finance, 4, 277-290.
23.Samuelson, Larry (1982),”The multinational firm with arm’s length transfer pricing limits,” Journal of International Economics, 13, 365-374.
24.United Nations, 聯合國網站 http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm.
25.Yuka, Sakurai (2004),”Comparing cross cultural regulatory styles and processes in dealing with transfer pricing,”Centre for Tax System Integrity, Research School Sciences, Australian National University Working Paper, 51.