臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過往的研究將要徑空間定義為施工空間中沒有寬裕空間，本研究則修正為在此空間內不允許施工或動線衝突之發生，因衝突發生必會造成生產力折損。此定義對施工管理更有助益，因過往的定義不一定會造成生產力折損，而本研究的目的即在利用空間邏輯特性找出要徑空間避免施工或動線衝突發生造成生產力折減。研究擬定五個空間變數，包含空間語法指標(相對便捷值、相對控制值)以及本研究依施工空間特性所提出的空間變數(單元阻塞率、垂直動線流量以及出口動線流量)，將其導入DEA-DA模型以判別可能的要徑空間，並結合多目標決策TOPSIS排序法從其中找出最重要之要徑空間。研究結果發現三種不同分析方法中，唯DEA-DA結合TOPSIS的方法判別相關性超過80%。利用DEA-DA結合TOPSIS將可有效研判出要徑空間，要徑空間中不允許衝突發生可以作為建築工程作業空間規劃時發生擁擠衝突解析之要件，一旦在要徑空間中發生擁擠衝突必須重新安排工期，可以在等待、分割以及平移工期對策中者出最小時間延遲對策。

Critical Space had been defined as its slack space is equal to zero. This Study offers the further and improved following definition of critical space: "Critical Space is in whom conflicts aren’t allowed to occur due to significant productivity loss once occurred.” The definition is more accurate and helpful to construction management. The space with zero slack space doesn’t necessarily cause productivity loss. The purpose of this study is to calculate and find the critical space by using logics of space structures then to avoid conflicts occurred in critical space.The quantitative parameters including integration value and control value derived form Space Syntax and other three parameters including unit blocking rate, vertical direction flow and exit direction flow derived form identities form building construction can be used to the DEA-DA with TOPSIS model to predict critical space. DEA-DA can be modeled to predict financial crisis of construction companies and TOPSIS is a multi-criteria decision analysis method for finding ideal solutions. Among three prediction models featuring in this study, only DEA-DA model with TOPSIS method can be defined highly correlated as correlation coefficient of it is larger than 0.8.Critical space analysis in DEA-DA and Topsis method not only can define crtical spaces, also can be used in layout planning and conflict analysis in Buliding Construction. Critical Space had been defined as its slack space is equal to zero. Conflict occurred in crtitical space will cause the activity re-scheduled in sessions, accepting waiting or re-schedued to other duration. The best solution is the one caused minimum time delay of above three solutions.

中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與方向 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 2
1.4 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 要徑空間(Critical Space) 5
2.2 空間語法(Space Syntax) 6
2.2.1 空間結構之分解 7
2.2.2 空間結構之圖論 9
2.2.3 結構之量化表達與解析 10
2.2.4 近期國內相關文獻 15
2.3 工地配置理論 15
2.3.1 靜態工地配置 16
2.3.2 動態工地配置 17
2.4 空間衝突 18
2.4.1 空間衝突定義 18
2.4.2 空間衝突種類與定義 19
2.4.3 空間衝突分析因子 22
2.4.4 空間衝突分析流程 25
第三章 以空間語法結合DEA-DA法建立要徑空間分析模型 28
3.1 資料分析法 28
3.1.1 要徑空間指數介紹 28
3.1.2 DEA-DA介紹 28
3.1.3 TOPSIS排序法介紹 29
3.2 模型架構說明與空間變數設計 31
3.2.1 模型架構 31
3.2.2 空間變數設計 32
3.3 模型運算程序說明 34
第四章 案例研究與最適模型分析 37
4.1 研究案例 37
4.1.1 研究案例說明 37
4.1.2 研究案例之空間語法結構 43
4.2 模糊問卷設計與問卷結果分析 47
4.2.1 模糊語意與模糊集合 47
4.2.2 模糊問卷設計 50
4.2.3 問卷統計結果分析 52
4.3 DEA-DA結合TOPSIS法最適要徑空間模型檢測及結果分析 55
4.3.1 空間變數的模型推演 55
4.3.2 DEA-DA結合TOPSIS法模型運算分析 62
4.3.3 模型相關性與顯著性檢驗 67
4.3.4 最適模型判定 68
第五章 應用要徑空間於建築工程作業空間規劃與衝突解析 72
5.1 以要徑空間強化施工作業空間衝突解析 72
5.1.1 以空間語法解析動態動線配置 74
5.1.2 以備選要徑空間模型分析結果作為空間衝突主要決策因子 78
5.1.3 以要徑空間結果作為空間衝突最適對策判斷基準 80
5.2 建築工程全施工階段要徑空間分析與衝突因子和判斷基準之建立83
5.3 小結 93
第六章 結論與建議 95
6.1 結論 95
6.2 研究貢獻 96
6.3 未來研究建議 96
參考文獻 97
附錄、本研究問卷內容 101

[1]Akinci, B. and M. Fischer. 1998. Time-space conflict analysis based on 4D production models. In Proceeding of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 342-353.
[2]Akinci, B., M. Fischer, and T. Zabelle. 1998. Proactive approach for reducing non-value adding activities due to time-space conflicts. In Proceeding of the 6th Ann. Conference Lean Construction, Guaruja, Brazil.
[3]Akinci, B., M. Fischer, J. Kunz, and R. Levitt. 2000. Formalization and Automation of Time-Space Conflict Analysis. CIFE working paper 58, Stanford University.
[4]Barnett, J.H. 2005. Early Writings on Graph Theory: Euler Circuits and the K&;ouml;nigsberg Bridge Problem. Colorado State University.
[5]Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444.
[6]Cheng, M.Y., and J.T. O’Connor. 1996. ArcSite: Enhanced GIS for Construction Site Layout. J .Constr .Eng. Manage. 122(4): 329-336.
[7]G&;uuml;ndo&;#287;du, M., and H. &;Ccedil;&;#305;rac&;#305;. 2007. The relation between integration values and land values from spatial configuration characteristics: the Galata-Pera example. In Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, pp.109, 01-06.
[8]Hegazy, T. 1999. Optimization of Resource Allocation and Leveling Using Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 125(3): 167-175.
[9]Hillier, B. and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[10]Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag.
[11]Janic, M. 2003. Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology. 26(6): 419-512.
[12]Jiang B., C. Claramunt, and B. Klarqvist. 2000. An integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2(3-4): 161-171.
[13]Jiang, B. and C. Claramunt. 2002. Integration of space syntax into GIS: new perspectives for urban morphology. Transactions in GIS. 6(3): 295-309.
[14]Kim, Y.O. 1999. Spatial Configuration, Spatial Cognition and Spatial Behaviour: the role of architectural intelligibility in shaping spatial experience. PhD Thesis. University of London.
[15]Kr&;uuml;ger, M. 1989. On Node and Axial Grid Maps: Distance measures and related topics. European conference on Management and Representation of Urban Change, Cambridge, UK.
[16]Kunigahalli, R., J. Russell, and D. Veeramani. 1995. Extracting Topological Relationships from Wire-Frame CAD Model. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 9(1): 29–42.
[17]Li, H. and P. Love. 1998. Developing a theory of construction problem solving. Constr. Manage. Econom. 16: 721–727
[18]Lofti, F.H., R. Fallahnejad, and N. Navidi. 2011. Ranking Efficient Unit in DEA by Using TOPSIS Method. Applied Mathematics Sciences. 5(17): 805-815.
[19]Riley, D.R. and V.E. Sanvido. 1995. Patterns of construction-space use in multistory buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE, 121(4): 464-473.
[20]Riley, D.R. and V.E. Sanvido. 1997. Space planning method for multistory building construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 123(2): 464-473.
[21]Sanders, S. R., H. R. Thomas, and G. R. Smith. 1989. An analysis of factors affecting labor productivity in masonry construction. PTI#9003, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
[22]Sueyoshi, T. 1999. DEA-discriminant Analysis in the View of Goal Programming. European Journal Operational Research. 115: 564-582.
[23]Sueyoshi, T. 2003. Mixed integer programming approach of extended DEA-discriminant analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 152 (1): 45-55.
[24]Sueyoshi, T. and M. Goto. 2009. DEA-DA for bankruptcy-based performance assessment: Misclassification analysis of Japanese construction industry. European Journal of Operational Research. 199(2): 576-594.
[25]Thabet, W.Y. and Y.J. Beliveau. 1994. Modeling work space to schedule re- petitive floors in multistory buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 120(4): 96-116.
[26]Thabet, W.Y. and Y.J. Beliveau. 1997. SCaRC: Space-constrained resource- constrained scheduling system. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 11(1): 48-59.
[27]Tommelein, I.D., R.E. Levitt, and B. Hayes-Roth. 1992. SightPlan model for site layout. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 118(4): 749-766.
[28]Tommelein, I., R. Dzeng, and P. Zouein. 1993. Exchanging layut and schedule data in a real-time distributed environment. In “the 5th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering” ASCE, New York: 947–954.
[29]Winch, G.M. and S. North. 2006. Critical Space Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 132(5): 473-481.
[30]Wu, L.W. and S.J. Guo. 2013. An Application of Space Syntax to Critical Working Space Analysis: The Case of Building Construction. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, to be published.
[31]Zouein, P. and I. Tommelein. 1994. Time-space trade off strategies for space-schedule construction. , J. Comput. Civ. Eng., ASCE, New York: 1180–1187.
[32]Zouein, P. and I. Tommelein. 1999. Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method. Journal of construction engineering and management. 125(6): 400-408.
[33]王堯弘。2001。以模糊理論解析作業空間限制與衝突下之生產力折減程度-以建築工程為例。碩士論文。臺北: 國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所營建工程與管理組。
[34]仲闓&;#63991;，吳&;#63991;文，郭斯傑。2006。以SPACE SYNTAX(空間語法)分析施工空間特性之研究。出自“第十屆營建工程與管&;#63972;研究成果&;#63895;合發表會”。pp.A7,CD-ROM version。中壢: 中央大學。
[35]李岳能。1997。營建工程考量降雨因素之排程輔助系統研究-以國道信件工程為例。碩士論文。臺北: 國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所營建工程與管理組。
[36]吳翌禎。2010。建築資訊模型應用於工作空間衝突分析之研究。土木水利（BIM專輯 37(5): 59-63。
[37]吳俊達。2000。建築工程施工作業空間規劃與衝突分析流程之研究。碩士論文。台北: 國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所營建工程與管理組。
[38]林家群。2003。施工作業空間衝突下工班間等待行為造成支生產力折減程度。碩士論文。臺北: 國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所營建工程與管理組。
[39]張峻誠。2005。以空間語法分析空間衝突之研究—以逆打工法為例。碩士論文。臺北: 國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所營建工程與管理組。
[40]張皓祐。2005。應用模糊方法於評估工地現場管理瑕疵程度之研究。碩士論文。高雄: 私立義守大學土木工程學研究所。
[41]黃麗鳳。1993。模糊統計在問卷調查上之分析與應用。碩士論文。臺北: 國立政治大學統計研究所。
[42]溫宏洋。1993。模糊理論在知識擷取與問卷設計上之應用。碩士論文。高雄: 國立中山大學資訊管理管研究所。
[43]蕭家湧。1995。模糊理論在生產排程的應用。碩士論文。台北: 國立台灣大學機械工程學研究所。