臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要探討家族所有權與董事會特性對國際化程度的影響，並以2001年至2006年臺灣上市、上櫃公司為樣本，利用追蹤(panel data)資料分析方法，探討變數間相互之關係，其中家族樣本共3240 個觀察值，非家族樣本共3792個觀察值。結果發現，當以外國營運的國家數為國際化的代理變數時，和非家族企業比較，家族企業的國際化程度較低，而在家族企業中，若其控制權與現金流量權偏離越大，則營運國家數越多；若外部董事比例越高，則營運國家數越多；若董事平均任期越長，則營運國家數越少；若董事長兼任總經理的情形越多，則營運國家數越多；若外部董事的外部連結數越多，則營運國家數越少。當以外銷比例為國際化的代理變數時，家族企業和非家族企業的國際化程度沒有顯著差異，而在家族企業中，若雇用家族CEO，則外銷比例越低；若董事會規模越大、則外銷比例越低；若外部董事的經歷越多樣化，則外銷比例越高。整體研究結果顯示，家族所有權與董事會特性是決定國際化程度的重要因子。

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of family characteristics and board characteristics on internationalization. We collect data from listed firms in Taiwan between 2001 and 2006, and use panel data regression models for analysis. The results, with the numbers of operational country as the proxy of internationalization,
show that compared with non-family business, family business has lower level of internationalization; firms with higher deviation between control right and cash flow
right is, higher outside director percentage, duality have more operational countries. By contrast, firms with longer average tenure of directors and higher external connections of outside directors have fewer operational countries. When using foreign sales/ total sales as the proxy of internationalization, we find that family businesses with family CEO, larger board size have lower the foreign sales. To the contrary, those with more abundant outside directors have higher foreign sales. The overall research results show that family ownership and board characteristics are important factors to decide the level of internationalization.

摘要.................................................... ii
Abstract ............................................... iii
目錄.................................................... iv
表目錄................................................... v
壹、緒論................................................. 1
貳、文獻探討與研究假說................................... 5
第一節 家族企業特性與國際化關係...............................5
1.1 家族企業、非家族企業對國際化程度的影響 5
1.2 家族企業控制權與現金流量權偏離對國際化的影響 8
1.3 家族投入對國際化影響 9
第二節 家族企業特性、董事會特性與國際化關係...................10
2.1 董事會中外部董事的比例與國際化程度的關係 11
2.2 董事的平均任期與國際化程度的關係 12
2.3 董事會的規模與國際化程度的關係 13
2.4 Duality 與國際化程度的關係 14
2.5 董事經驗與專長與國際化程度的關係 16
参、研究方法............................................ 19
第一節 資料來源及樣本..........................................19
第二節 變數定義與實證模式......................................20
肆、實證結果與分析...................................... 24
第一節 基本敘述性統計分析......................................24
第二節 實證模型結果............................................26
第三節 穩健性檢定..............................................36
伍、結論................................................ 37
陸、參考文獻..............................................39

參考文獻：
洪榮華, 陳香如, &柯璟瑩, 2005。從代理理論的角度探討董事會特性、股權結構與負債之關聯。管理與系統, 第十二卷第四期, 33-53。
洪榮華, 陳香如, &王玉珍, 2005。公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係─股權結構與董事會特性的觀點。輔仁管理評論, 第十二卷第三期, 23-40。
張瑞當, 方俊儒, & 曾玉琦, 2007。核心代理問題與盈餘管理：董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討。管理學報, 24 卷, 1 期, 17-39。
葉銀華, 1999。家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較。管理評論, 第十八卷第二期, 59-86。
Adedeji, A., 1998, Does the Pecking Order Hypothesis Explain the Dividend Payout Ratios of Firms in the UK? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting l25, 1127-1155.
Alderfer, C., 1986, The invisible directors on corporate boards, Harvard Business Review 64 (6), 38–50.
Aldrich, H., 1979, Organizations and Environments, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Alexander, J. A., Fennell, M. L., & Halpern, M. T., 1993, Leadership instability in hospitals: The influence of board –CEO relations and organization growth and decline, Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 74-99.
Alpay, G., Bodur, M., Ener, H., & Talug, C., 2005, Comparing board-level governance at MNEs and local firms: Lessons from Turkey, Journal of International Management 11, 67-86.
Amy, J. H., & Thomas, D., 2003, Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives, Academy of Management Review 28, 383-396.
Anderson, C. A., & Anthony R. N., 1986, The New Corporate Directors, Wiley, New York.
Anderson R. C., &Reeb D. M., Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, June 2003, The Journal of Finance, vol. LVIII, NO. 3, 1301-1327.
Baliga, B. R., & Moyer, R. C., 1996, CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What’s The Fuss? Strategic Management Journal 17, 41-43.
Baysinger, B., & Butler, H., 1985, Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1, 101-134.
Baysinger, B., &Hoskisson, R., 1990, The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy, Academy Management Review 15 (1), 72–87.
Bazerman, M., & Schoorman, F., 1983, A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates, Academy of Management Review 8, 206-217.
Brickley, J., Coles, J., &Jarrell, G., 1997, Leadership structure: separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board, Journal of Corporate Finance 3, 189–220.
Boeker, W., & Goodstein. J., 1991, Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition, Academy of Management Journal 34, 805-826
Boyd, B., 1990, Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model, Strategic Management Journal 11(6), 419-430.
Boyd, B., 1995, CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model, Strategic Management Journal 16, 301-312.
Buchanan, B., 1974, Building organization commitment: the socialization of managers in work organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly 19, 533–546.
Burt, R., 1980, Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing, Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 557-581.
Burt, R., 1983, Corporate profits and cooptation, New York: Academic Press.
Certo, T., Daily, C., & Dalton, D., 2001, Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 26(2), 33-50.
Charkham, J. P., 1994, Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Chris Graves, &Jill Thomas, 2006, Internationalization of Australian Family Businesses: A Managerial Capabilities Perspective, Family Business Review, vol. XIX--（19）, no. 3, 207-224.
Cochran, P., Wood, R., Jones, T., 1985, The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes, Academy Management Journal 28, 664–671.
Crick D., Bradshaw R., & Chaudhry S., 2006, Successful Internationalising UK Family and non-Family- Owned Firms: A Comparative Study, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 13(4), 498-512.
Daniels, J., Bracker, J., 1989, Profit performance: do foreign operations make a difference? Management International Review 29(1), 46–56.
Daily, C. & Schwenk, C., 1996, Chief executive officers, top management teams and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces? Journal of Management 22, 185-202.
D''Aveni, R., 1990, Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organization Science 2, 121-142.
Denis, D.K., &McConnell, J.J., 2003, International corporate governance, ECGI Finance Working Papers, (online, no: 05/2003, viewed 25 June 2003, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=320121).
Dunning, J.H., 1958, American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry. George Allen & Unwin, London.
Dyer, J. G., 1989, Integrating professional management into a family owned business. Family Business Review 2(3), 221-235.
Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, C., 1990, Organizational growth: linking the founding team, strategy, environment and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures (1978–1988), Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 543–576.
Eppink, D., Van Rhijin, B., 1988, The internationalization of the Dutch industry. Long Range Planning 21 (5), 54–60.
Tsang, W. K., 2002, Learning from Overseas Venturing Experience—The Case of Chinese Family Businesses, Journal of Business Venturing 17, 21-40.
Fama, E. F., &Jensen, M., 1983, Separation of ownership and control, J. Law Econ 26, 301– 325.
Fernandez Z., Nieto M. J., Internationalization Strategy of Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses: Some Influential Factors, March 2005,Family Business Review, vol. XVIII--（18）, no. 1, 77-89.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., 1990, Top management tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 484–503.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D., 1996, Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organizations, West, Minneapolis, MN.
Fredrickson, J., Hambrick, D., & Baumrin, S., 1988, A model of CEO dismissal, Academy Management Journal 13, 255–270.
Gales, L., & Kesner, I., 1994, An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations, Journal of Business Research 30, 271-282.
Geringer, J., Beamish, P., &Costa, R., 1989, Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance. Strategic Manage Journal 10 (1), 109–119.
Gerard Sanders W. M., & Carpenter M. A., 1998, Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure, The Academy of Management Journal 41(2), 158-178.
Graves C., & Thomas J., 2006, Internationalization of Australian Family Businesses: A Managerial Capabilities Perspective, Family Business Review, vol. XIX--（19）, no. 3, 207-224.
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S., 1993, Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: role of environmental turbulence and discretion, Academy Management Journal 36, 844–863.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein S., 1987, Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes, Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 369-406.
Hambrick, D., & D''Aveni. R., 1992, Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies, Management Science 38, 1445-1466.
Hambrick, D., Geletkanycz, M., &Fredrickson, J., 1993, Top executive commitment to the status quo: some tests of its determinants, Strategic Manage Journal 14, 401–418.
Harrison, R., 1987, The strategic use of corporate board committees, California Manage Review (Fall), 109–125.
Haunschild, P., & Beckman. C., 1998, When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence, Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 815-844.
Hillman. A., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L, 1999, Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government, Strategic Management Journal 20, 67-82.
Hillman, A., Keim, G., & Luce, R., 2001, Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business & Society 40, 295-314.
Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., &Kim, H., 1997, International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms, Academy of Management Journal 40 (1), 767–798.
Hoy, F., & Verser, T. G., 1994, Emerging business, emerging field: Entrepreneurship and the family firm. Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice 19(1), 9-23.
Johnson, R., Hoskisson, R., & Hitt, M., 1993, Board of director involvement in restructuring: the effects of board versus managerial controls and characteristics, Strategic Manage Journal 14, 33–50.
Judge, W. Q., & Miller, A., 1991, Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts, Academy of Management Journal 34, 449-463.
Judge, W., & Zeithaml, C., 1992, Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process, Academy of Management Journal 35, 766–794.
Katz, R., 1982, The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance, Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 81–104.
Keats, B. & M. Hitt, 1988, A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro-organizational characteristics, and performance, Academy of Management Journal 31, 570-598.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., &Vishny R. W., 1999, Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance 54, 471-517.
Levinson, H., 1971, Conflicts that plague family business, Harvard Business Review 49(2), 90-98.
Li, S., Park, S.H., & Li, S., 2004, The great leap forward: the transition from relation-based governance to rule-based governance, Organizational Dynamics 33 (1), 63– 78.
Lipsey, R., 2002, Home and host country effects of FDI. NBER Working Paper No. w9293 (Online. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9293).
Liu Y., Ahlstrom D., &Yeh K. S., 2006, The Separation of Ownership and Management in Taiwan’s Public Companies: An Empirical Study, International Business Review 15, 415-435.
Lorsch, J., & Maclver, E., 1989, Pawns or potentates: The reality of America''s corporate boards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Mallette, P., &Fowler, K., 1992, Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of poison pills, Strategic Management Journal 13, 1010–1035.
Muth M. & Donaldson L., 1998, Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach, Scholarly Research and Theory Papers 6, 5-28.
Mintzberg, H., 1983, Power in and around organizations, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mizruchi, M., & Stearns, L., 1988, A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 194-210.
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S., 2002, Relational and contractual governance in family firms：Effects on strategic decision making, Family Business Review 15, 205-222.
Okoroafo S. C., 1999, Internationalization of Family Businesses: Evidence from Northwest Ohio, U.S.A., Family Business Review 10(2), 147-158.
Palmer, D., 1983, Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination, Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 40-55.
Pearce, J., &Zahra, S., 1992, Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective, Journal Manage Study 29, 412–438.
Pfeffer, J., 1972, Size and the composition of corporate boards of directors: the organization and its environment, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 218–229.
Pfeffer, J., 1973, Size, composition, and function of hospital Boards of Directors: a study of organization–environment linkage, Administrative Science Quarterly 18(3), 349– 365.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G., 1978, The external control of organizations, Harper and Row, New York.
Pfeffer, J., 1991, Organizational theory and structural perspectives on management, Journal of Management 17, 789-803.
Pollak, R. A., 1985, A transaction cost approach to families and households, Journal of Economic Literature 23, 581-608.
Priem, R., 1990, Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance, Strategic Manage Journal 11, 469–477.
Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J., 1994, Shareholder wealth effects when an officer of one corporation joins the board of directors of another, Managerial and Decision Economics 15, 317-327.
Sanders, WM. & Carpenter M., 1998, International and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Composition, and Board Structure, The Academy of management Journal 41, 158-178.
Schulze, S., Lubatkin, M., Dino, R., & Buchholtz, A., 2001, Agency relationship in family firms：Theory and evidence, Organization Science 12, 99-116.
Selznick, P., 1949, TVA and the grass roots: A study of the sociology of formal organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
Silva F., Majluf N., &Paredes R. D., 2006, Family Ties, Interlocking Directors and Performance of Business groups in Emerging Countries: The Case of Chile, Journal of Business Research 59, 315-321.
Shaw, M., 1981, Group dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sherman, H. D., Kashlak, R. J., & Joshi, M. P., 1998, The effect of the board and executive committee characteristics on the degree of internationalization, Journal of International Management 4, 311-335.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., 1997, A survey of corporate governance, Journal of Finance 52, 759-783.
Singh, J., House, R., & Tucker, D, 1986, Organizational change and organizational mortality, Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 367-388.
Smith B. F., &Amoako-Adu B., 1999, Management Succession and Financial Performance of Family Controlled Firms, Journal of Corporate Finance 5, 341-368.
Stearns, L., & Mizruchi, M., 1993, Board composition and corporate financing: the impact of financial institution representation on borrowing. Academy Management Journal 36 (3), 603–618.
Stoeberl, P. A., & Sherony, B. C., 1985, Board efficiency and effectiveness. In E. Matter and M. Ball(eds.), Handbook for Corporate Directors. McGraw-Hill, 12.1-12.10.
Stopford, J., &Wells, L., 1972, Managing the multinational enterprise, Basic Books, New York.
Stopford, J., &Dunning, J., 1983, The world directory of the multinational enterprises 1982–82, Gale Research Company, Detroit, MI.
Sullivan, D., & Bauerschmidt, A., 1989, Common factors underlying barriers to export: a comparative study in the European and U.S. paper industry, Manage International Review 29 (2), 46–63.
Terborg, J., Castore, C., & DeNinno, J., 1976, A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition on performance and cohesion, Journal of Personality Soc Psychol 34, 787–791.
Thompson, J., 1967, Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Tsang E. W. K., 2002, Learning from Overseas Venturing Experience—The Case of Chinese Family Businesses, Journal of Business Venturing 17, 21-40.
Useem, M., 1984, The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vance, S., 1983, Corporate leadership: boards, directors and strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Vernon, R., 1966, International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal Economic (May), 190–207.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R., 2006, How do family ownership , control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economic 80, 385-417.
Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K., 1992, Top management team demography and corporate strategic change, Academy Management Journal 35 (1), 91–121.
Williamson, O., 1984, Corporate governance, Yale Law Journal 93, 1197-1229.
Zahra, S., & Pearce, J., 1989, Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model, Journal of Management 15 (2), 291–344.
Zahra S. A., 2003, International Expansion of U.S. Manufacturing Family Businesses: The Effect of Ownership and Involvement, Journal of Business Venturing 18, 495-512.
Zald, M., 1969, The power and functions of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis, American Journal of Sociology 75, 97-111.