臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
本研究旨在了解國際認證對亞太地區高等教育機構的影響，藉由比較與分析三所通過AACSB國際認證大學商管學院院長於申請AACSB認證之目的、申請AACSB認證所制定之策略、重組校內資源以利申請AACSB認證之情形、設置教師專業獎勵機制之情形、通過認證後學校國際化發展狀態以及探討國際認證影響三校各面向如組織發展策略、財務資源規劃、學生學習成效、教師專業發展與課程改革等重要性之排序，以增進對此議題的了解。
本研究的研究方法為文件分析法、比較研究法、電子郵件訪問法與電話訪問法。研究對象為亞太地區三所公立大學，這三所大學之師生數規模相當，且這三校接受華人文化影響甚深並且在發展趨向上有所相近。本研究藉由訪問這三校商管學院院長並輔以訪問兩位國際學者之意見，進行資料蒐集與分析。
透過資料分析與討論，獲得以下結論：
一、 香港、新加坡與台灣之高等教育越趨重視國際認證。
二、 國際認證對於三所個案學校之發展皆有極大影響。
三、 三所個案學校於獲得國際認證之目的仍具差異性。

關鍵字：國際認證、亞太地區高等教育機構、AACSB國際認證

THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION ON HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN ASIA PACIFIC REGION-THREE CASES OF AACSB ACCREDITED BUSINESS SCHOOLS IN HONG KONG, SINGAPORE AND TAIWAN

Li-Ching Tung

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of international accreditation on higher education institutions in Asia Pacific region by three cases of AACSB accredited business schools in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. The study compared the opinions and attitudes toward the purpose of applying for AACSB accreditation, developing policies for applying for AACSB accreditation, making rearrangement in human resources for applying for AACSB accreditation, establishing any faculty reward system to encourage faculty to improve their academic contributions, getting more internationalized after gaining the AACSB accreditation and realizing the importance of impact items like institutional mission, faculty professional development, financial resources, curriculum reform and student learning outcomes with gaining international accreditation in the three schools in charge of the three business schools’ deans and two international well-known scholars.
The study adopted qualitive research methods including the interview by e-mail and phone call and documentary analysis to analyze the current situation and problems encountered by three business schools in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan selected as research subjects. There are several findings:
1. The influence of international accreditation on higher education in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan gets more and more important.
2. The three cases of business schools in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan have been influenced by gaining international accreditation gradually.
3. The purposes of gaining international accreditation in the three cases of business schools in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan are not alike.

目 次
謝 詞 v
摘 要 vii
目 次 xi
附 錄 xii
表 次 xiii
圖 次 xiv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的、待答問題與研究方法 6
第三節 名詞釋義 7
第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 高等教育國際化發展 9
第二節 亞太地區高等教育發展 19
第三節 高等教育跨國認證發展 38
第四節 AACSB認證的發展 45
第三章 研究設計與實施 57
第一節 研究對象 57
第二節 研究方法 59
第三節 研究流程 60
第四節 研究實施 62

第四章 研究結果分析 65
第一節 三所個案學校發展現況 65
第二節 三所個案學校發展趨向、課程與研究特色分析 75
第三節 三所個案學校申請AACSB認證情形分析 77
第四節 AACSB認證對三所個案學校影響之分析 85
第五章 結論與建議 95
第一節 結論 95
第二節 建議 96
參考文獻 99
中文部分 99
英文部分 100
附錄 107
一 107
二 110
三 113
四 117
五 119







表 次

表2 1 跨國高等教育架構表 12
表2 2 高等教育貿易模式表 16
表2 3 高等教育跨國發展基本因素與影響之比較 18
表2 4 1991-2007年全球各區域高等教育學生數 20
表2 5 國家層級、區域層級與替代區域層級機構之目標、施行國家與服務項目等 23
表2 6 財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會背景與認證狀態表 34
表2 7 台灣高等教育四種評鑑類型表 35
表2 8 國內通過AACSB認證的高等教育機構及其通過年份表 37
表2 9 三大高等教育品質保證組織相關資料表 41
表2 10 CHEA與USDE對於美國高等教育品質認可機構審查之範圍類別與目的
44
表2 11 亞太地區高等教育機構通過AACSB國際認證基本資料表 55
表3 1 通過AACSB認證三所學校之商管學院狀況一覽表 58
表3 2 訪問對象簡明編碼表 59
表3 3 訪問大綱整理表 63
表4 1 三所個案學校發展趨向比較表 76
表4 2 三所個案學校商管學院課程與研究特色之比較表 77
表4 3 三所個案學校於獲得AACSB認證情形與所生影響之比較表 93
表4 4 兩位國際學者於亞洲商管學校參與AACSB認證情形之意見表 94


圖 次

圖2 1 雙聯學位模式圖 13
圖2 2 授權課程模式圖 13
圖2 3 雙重或聯合學位課程模式圖 14
圖2 4 遠距教學課程模式圖 14
圖2 5 亞太地區替代區域品保機構網絡模式圖 22
圖2 6 學習成效評鑑流程圖 53
圖3 1 研究流程圖 …………………………………….. …………………………. …61

參考文獻
中文部份
中大工商管理學院通過國際評審邁向東亞最佳商學府 (1999)。2011年6月10日，取自 http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ipro/990505c.htm
中大會計生就業再創新高平均每人獲三份「五大」聘書 (2001)。2011年6月10日，取自 http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ipro/pressrelease/press2001c.htm
王如哲 (2009)。台灣高等教育發展的迷思與契機。教育新知，35-38。
台灣C大學商學院 (2011)。2011年七月十五日，
取自 http://units.nccu.edu.tw/server/publichtmut/html/w300/cw300.html
台灣C大商學院與AACSB聯手協助各商學院校確保學習成效 (2011)。2011年7月28日，取自http://www.aacsb.nccu.edu.tw/20110404.php
全台第一C大商學院獲EQUIS認證 (2010)。2011年7月24日，取自http://www.aacsb.nccu.edu.tw/20100519.php
商學院獲AACSB認證為北區國立大學為一獲認證學院 (2007)。2011年7月24日，取自 http://www.nccu.edu.tw/news/detail.php?news_id=16
世界知名大學校長雲集中大共商全球教育發展趨勢 (1999)。2011年5月6日，取
自http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/cpr/pressrelease/990415c.htm
池俊吉 (2009)。高等教育國際化的品質保證-國際品保組織扮演的角色。評鑑雙月刊，17，54-56。
周行一、張逸民、畢文玲 (2008)。國際商管教育認證對臺灣商管教育的影響-
從政大商學院申請AACSB認證經驗談起。評鑑雙月刊，11，33-37。
侯永琪 (2008)。亞洲高等教育品質保證制度的推動與挑戰。評鑑雙月刊，16，22-27。
侯永琪、蔡小婷（2009）。雙聯學位國際認證初探。評鑑雙月刊，17，28-33。
侯永琪（2010a）。全球高等教育評鑑機構國際認證發展對我國評鑑機構與大學的影響。國科會計劃書，3-17。
侯永琪 (2010b)。臺灣評鑑機構的角色與全球責任-高等教育品質保證與排名的跨國發展及國際參與。評鑑雙月刊，25，47-51。
侯永琪 (2010c)。國際大師 世紀對談-2010年評鑑中心國際學術研討會精華實錄。評鑑雙月刊，26，45-48。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會 (2010)。自我評鑑報告書。台北市：作者。
莫家豪 (2002)。中、港、台高等教育市場化：源起與理解。載於高等教育市場化-台、中、港趨勢之比較 (頁42-64)。台北市：高等教育。
陳向明 (2002)。教師如何做質的研究。台灣：洪葉文化。
黃慕萱、張瓊文、李恆宇、游哲遠、謝清妤、何蕙菩、紀佩姍 (2007)。台灣學術研究競爭力分析研究成果報告(精簡版)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告 (NSC95-2745-C-002-001-)。台北市︰國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。
黃慧心 (2009)。國際瞭望台-香港高等教育品質保證體系。評鑑雙月刊，17，42-48。
黃俊傑 (2005)。二十一世紀大學教育的新展望。台北市：台大出版中心。
張以希 (2009)。我國高等教育機構品質保證研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
孫震 (2009) 。臺灣高等教育發展的方向。台北市：台大出版中心。
楊瑩 (2005)。高等教育的品質保證。臺灣教育，632，13-20。
楊靜子（2004）。全球化下大學組織困境之探討及其對台灣高等教育經營之啟示。國民教育研究學報，13，101-121。
葉重新 (2008)。教育研究法（二版）。臺北：心理。
戴曉霞 (2002)。全球化及國家/市場關係之轉變:高等教育市場化之脈絡分析。載於高等教育市場化-台、中、港趨勢之比較 (頁4-39)。台北市：高等教育。
戴曉霞 (2005)。高等教育的國際化：外國學生政策之比較分析。載於二十一世紀大學教育的新展望 (頁97-140)。台北市：臺大出版中心。
蘇錦麗 (2006)。評鑑達人香港高等教育評鑑制度開路先鋒-黃慧心女士。評鑑雙月刊，4，41-43。

英文部分
AACSB International (2006). Business and Business Schools: A Partnership for the Future. FL: AACSB.
AACSB International (2007, November). AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards: An Interpretation. Paper presented at the AACSB Accreditation Coordinating Committee and AACSB Accreditation Quality Committee, FL.
AACSB opens a home in Asia. (2009a, July) Biz Ed,p.10.
AACSB International (2009b, November). AQ/PQ Status:Establishing Criteria for Attainment and Maintenance of Faculty Qualifications. An Interpretation of AACSB Accreditation Standards. Paper presented at the AACSB Accreditation Coordinating Committee and AACSB Accreditation Quality Committee, FL.
AACSB International (2009-2010). Assurance of Learning (AoL) is Tough to Perfect-But Your Students Will Thank You. Retrieved May 5, 2011 from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/resources/articles/eNEWSLINE_AoL.pdf
AACSB International (2010a). Accreditation: Effective Strategic Planning. Retrieved May 15, 2011 from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/enewsline
AACSB International (2010b). Business Schools on an Innovation Mission: Report of the AACSB International Task Force on Business Schools and Innovation. FL: AACSB.
AACSB International (2011a). Website. Retrieved Jan. 5, 2011 from http://www.aacsb.edu
AACSB International (2011b). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. Retrieved Jan. 31, 2011 from http://www.aacsb.edu
AACSB International (2011c). Major Research Findings-Internal Benefits for Schools. Retrieved Jan. 29, 2011 from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/enewsline/accreditation.asp
Altbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the university, and development. Greenwich, CT: Alblex Publishing Coporation.
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher Education Cross Borders. Change, 36(3), 1-12.
Altbach, P. G. & Knight, J. (2006). The internationalization of higher education: motivations and realities. In The NEA 2006 Alamance of higher education (pp.28-36).
Blackmur, D. (2007). A critical analysis of the UNESCO/ OECD guidelines for quality provision of cross-border higher education. Quality in higher education, 13(2), 117-130.
Cann, W. & Brumagin, L. (2008). How Project Management Tools Aid in Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International Maintenance of Accreditation. Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), 31-39.
CBS. (2011, Jane 5). Message posted to http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/
Cheng, J. (1995). Higher Education in Hong Kong-the approach to 1997 and the China factor. Higher Education, 30, 257-271.
Damme, D. (2002). Trends and Models in International Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Relation to Trade in Education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(3), 93-136.
De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. London: Greenwood Press.
Durand, R. & McGuire, J. (2009). Legitimating Agencies in the Face of Selection: The Case of AACSB. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from http://oss.sagepub.com
Eaton, J. (July, 2011). Personal communication. CHEA, the USA.
El-Khawas, E. (1998, October). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Recent Progress; Challenges Ahead. Paper presented at the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, Paris.
Gudmund, H. (2008). Accreditation and the global higher education market. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning. (No.20)
HCD, (August, 2011). Personal communication. HC, Hong Kong.
Hinaga, T. (2004). Networking of Quality Assurance Agencies in the Asia-Pacific Region and the role of Japan University Accreditation Association. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 37-41.
Hou, Y. C. (2009). International Accreditation in Taiwan Higher Education. Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan. 1-14.
Hou, Y. C. & Chen, C. Y. (2009) International Accreditation in Taiwan Higher Education. Taipei: Higher Education Evalution and Accreditation Council of Taiwan.
Hou, Y. C. (2010). Quality assurance at a distance: International Accreditation in Taiwan Higher Education. Higher Education, 61(2), 179-191.
Kelly, C., Tong, P. & Choi, B. (2010). A Review of Assessment of Student Learning Programs at AACSB Schools: A Dean’s Perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 299-306.
Knight, J. (1999). Quality and Internationalization in Higher Education. Paris: OECD.
Knight, J. (2005). The international race for accreditation. International Higher Education, 40. Retieved Nov.13, 2008, from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number40/p2_Knight.htm
Koys, J. (2008). Judging Academic Qualifications, Professional Qualifications, and Participation of Faculty Using AACSB Guidelines. Journal of Education for Business, 207-213.
Law, W. (2004). Translating Globalization and Democratization into Local Policy: Education Reform in Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Review of Education, 50(5-6), 497-524.
Lincicome, M. (2005). Globalization, education, and the politics of identity in the asia-pacific. Critical Asian studies. 37(2), 179-208.
Lenn, M.P. (2004). Strengthening world bank support for quality assurance and accreditation in higher education in east Asia and the Pacific. Education sector unit east Asia and the Pacific region. 17-85.
Li, M. & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education 53:791-818.
Mamun, M.A. & Mohamad, A.B. (2009). Management Education for Contemporary Challenges: The Role of Business School. European Journal of Scientific Research,30(4),649-661.
Marginson, S. (2010, June). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore:
rise of the Confucian Model. Paper presented at the Higher Education Evaluation and Assessment Council of Taiwan, Taipei.
Marginson, S. & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher education. 43(3), 281-309.
Mcburnie, G. & Ziguras, C. (2001). The regulation of transnational higher education in southeast asia: case studies of hong kong, Malaysia and Australia.
Higher education. 42, 85-105.
Ministry of Education in Singapore. (2011, May 15). Higher Education Division. Message posted to http://www.moe.gov.sg/about/org-structure/hed/
Montgomery, D. (2005). Asian Management Education: Some Twenty-First-Century Issues. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 150-154.
Morse, J.A. (2006). The inqaahe gudlines of good practice for external quality assurance agencies: assessment and next steps. Quality in higher education, 12(3), 244-252.
Mok, K.H. (2008). Varities of regulatory regimes in asia: the liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The pacific review, .21(2), 147-170.
Mok, K.H. (2010). When state centralism meets neo-liberalism:managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia. Higher education. 60, 419-440.
NBS. (2011, Jane 15). Message posted to http://www.nbs.ntu.edu.sg/
NTU. (2008, October). The Nanyang MBA is 1st among Singaporean business schools in EIU’s ranking of Top 100 MBAs. Retrieved July 3, 2011 from http://www.nbs.ntu.edu.sg/Corporate/NewsHub/Media/Documents/101.pdf
OECD (2004a). Internationalisation and Trade in Higher Education-Opportunities and Challenges. Paris: OECD. (ISBN:92-64-01504-3)
OECD (2004b). Quality and recognition in higher education- the cross-border challenge.Paris: OECD. (ISBN:92-64-01508-6)
OECD (2007). Cross-border tertiary education- a way towards capacity development. Paris: OECD. (ISBN:978-92-64-03363-4)
Pritchard, R., Saccucci, M. & Potter, G. (2010). Evaluating a Program Designed to Demonstrate Continuous Improvement in Teaching at an AASCB-Accredited College of Business at a Regional University: A Case Study. Education for Business, 85, 280-283.
Qiang, Z. (2003). Internationalization of Higher Education: towards a conceptual framework. Policy Futures in Education, 1(2), 248-270.
SND, (July, 2011). Personal communication. SN, Singapore.
Sidhu, R., Ho. K. C. & Yeoh, B. (2011). Emerging education hubs: the case of Singapore. Higher Education, 61, 23-40.
Stella, A. (2006). Quality Assurance of Cross-border Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 257-276.
TCD, (August, 2011). Personal communication. TC, Taiwan.
Trapnell, B. (2007). Commentary AACSB international accreditation: The value proposition and a look to the future. Journal of Management Development. 26(1), 67-72.
UNESCO (2005). Guidelines for quality provision in cross-border higher education. Paris:UNESCO.
Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Eduation, 48, 483-510.
Woodhouse, D. (2006). The Role of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education in The 21st Century. APQN.
Woodhouse, D. (2010). The internationalization of quality assurance: the role played by the networks. Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://www. X:\Website\Internationalisation of Quality Assurance
Woodhouse, D. (August, 2011). Personal communication. Auqa, Australia.