跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.9) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/19 19:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:何靜宜
研究生(外文):Jing-Yi He
論文名稱:學前及學齡兒童的構音、語音知覺、聲韻覺識與中文識字之關係
論文名稱(外文):The Relation between Articulation, Speech Perception, Phonological Awareness and Word Recognition Abilities in Mandarin Speaking Young Children
指導教授:李俊仁李俊仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jun-Ren Lee
口試委員:劉惠美、童寶娟
口試委員(外文):Huei-Mei Liu、Pao-Chuan Torng
口試日期:2014-01-16
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北護理健康大學
系所名稱:聽語障礙科學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:復健醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:聲韻表徵、聲韻覺識、語音知覺、構音、識字、噪音時長
外文關鍵詞:phonological representation、phonological awareness、speech perception、articulation、word recognition、frication duration、noise duration
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1377
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:237
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本研究旨在探討聲韻表徵指標(聲韻覺識、語音知覺和構音表現)與中文識字能力的關係,以及書面符號的熟悉度是否會影響聲韻表徵。研究對象為一般學前及學齡兒童各25名和成人28名。檢測學前兒童的語音知覺、構音表現、聲韻覺識和注音符號辨識表現,檢測學齡兒童語音知覺、構音表現、聲韻覺識、識字正確性和閱讀流暢性表現,以及成人語音知覺、構音表現、識字正確性和流暢性表現。這些測驗乃用於探討三組不同文字符號熟悉度的族群:學前兒童、學齡兒童和成人,其組間聲韻表徵指標差異及組內聲韻表徵與中文識字的相關性。研究結果發現學前兒童組部分,控制月齡後語音知覺和構音表現無顯著相關,語音知覺、聲韻覺識和注音符號辨識表現三者間均有顯著相關;學齡兒童組部分,控制月齡及非語文智力測驗後,只有聲韻覺識和識字正確性及閱讀流暢性有顯著相關;成人組部分,構音表現、語音知覺和識字正確性及流暢性均無顯著相關;組間比較部分,聲韻覺識:學齡組優於學前組。語音知覺:成人優於學齡組,學齡組優於學前組。聲韻表徵指標對於初學中文識字表現存在關聯性,以及書面符號熟悉有助於聲韻表徵品質。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between phonological judgment tasks, namely phonological awareness (PA), speech perception (SP), articulation (AR), and word recognition. Another interesting issue is whether the familiarity of written symbol will influence ones phonological representation. A total of 25 normal preschool children, 25 normal school children, and 28 young adults were recruited in the present study. All participants preformed AR, SP and PA tasks, except for young adults there is no PA task. Preschool children also accomplished the Zhu Yin identification task, whereas school children were tested the assessment of Chinese character lists and single word reading fluency task. And lastly, young adults performed the Chinese naming task. In sum, the current study investigated the relationship of variables between and within groups with respect to different familiarity of written symbol. Overall results are as below: In the preschool children group, the SP, PA, Zhu Yin identification task correlated with each other significantly after controlling for the effect of age. In the school children group, the PA task was significantly related to assessment of Chinese character lists and single word reading fluency task after controlling for the effect of age and nonverbal IQ. In the young adults group, there was no significant relationship discovered among variables. Overall, the young adults group performed significantly better than the school children group in the SP task, whereas the school children group performed significantly better than the preschool children group both in the SP and PA task. Phonological processing was crucial for word identification ability in Taiwanese young children. Zhu Yin symbol or written symbol learning was helpful for building the quality of phonological representation.

目次
摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………i
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………ii
目次……………………………………………………………………………………iii
表次……………………………………………………………………………………iv
圖次………………………………………………………………………………………v
第一章緒論………………………………………………………………………………1
第二章文獻探討…………………………………………………………………………3
第一節聲韻表徵……………………………………………………………………3
第二節聲韻表徵與識字的關係…………………………………………………14
第三章研究方法…………………………………………………………………………23
第一節實驗一……………………………………………………………………23
第二節實驗二……………………………………………………………………30
第四章結論………………………………………………………………………………43
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………47
中文部分……………………………………………………………………………47
英文部分……………………………………………………………………………49
附錄………………………………………………………………………………………56
附錄一語音辨識測驗呈現圖示…………………………………………………56
附錄二挑異音作業材料…………………………………………………………57
附錄三閱讀流暢性測驗記錄紙…………………………………………………58

表次
表2-1 塞音、塞擦音和擦音的噪音時長關係表………………………………………13
表2-2 擦音-塞擦音的語音分類知覺聲學特徵…………………………………………13
表3-1 構音、語音辨識和中文唸名測驗的描述性統計………………………………29
表3-2 構音、語音知覺、識字正確性和識字流暢性之相關矩陣………………………29
表3-3 學齡兒童聲韻表徵和識字表現變項的描述性統計……………………………35
表3-4 學齡組控制月齡和非語文智力後變項間的淨相關……………………………35
表3-5 學前兒童聲韻表徵和注音辨識表現變項的描述性統計………………………37
表3-6 學前組控制月齡後變項間的淨相關……………………………………………37
表3-7 學前預測注音辨識表現的階層回歸性分析…………………………………39
表3-8 學前組控制月齡和注音正確性後變項間的淨相關……………………………40
表3-9 構音、語音辨識和聲韻覺識測驗結果的平均數(標準差)………………………40

圖次
圖2-1 塞音的標記辨識和區辨表現圖……………………………………………………7
圖2-2 塞擦音、擦音的波形圖和聲譜圖…………………………………………………11
圖3-1 /tɕi˥/和/ɕi˥/構音語音的波形圖與聲譜圖…………………………………………24
圖3-2 平均擦音反應率圖………………………………………………………………28
圖3-3 成人語音知覺與構音表現之關係散佈圖………………………………………29
圖3-4 學齡識字正確性與聲韻覺識表現之關係散佈圖………………………………36
圖3-5 學齡隨機流暢性與聲韻覺識表現之關係散佈圖………………………………36
圖3-6 學前語音知覺與聲韻覺識表現之關係散佈圖…………………………………38
圖3-7 學前聲韻覺識與注音辨識表現之關係散佈圖…………………………………38
圖3-8 學前語音知覺與注音辨識表現之關係散佈圖…………………………………39
圖3-9 學前與學齡兒童的語音知覺盒形圖……………………………………………40
圖3-10 學前與學齡兒童的聲韻覺識盒形圖……………………………………………41
圖3-11 三組受試者的語音知覺盒形圖……………………………………………41
圖3-12 三組的平均擦音反應率圖………………………………………………………42

中文部分
何大安(1987)。聲韻學中的觀念和方法。台北:大安。
李俊仁(2009)。從不同亞型學習障礙者的認知與神經生理成因論中文的閱讀以及數字計算歷程--驗證學習障礙亞型分類。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC98-2511-S003-061-MY3),未出版。
李俊仁(2011)。閱讀研究議題二:從識字及詞彙量建立文本可讀性分析指標。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC100-2420-H003-002-MY2),未出版。
李俊仁、柯華葳(2009)。台灣學生聲韻覺識作業之聲韻表徵運作單位。教育心理學報,41(1),111-124。
李淑娥(1988)。國音聲譜圖之理論分析與運用。聽語會刊,5,61-67。
卓士傑(2008)。台灣學齡前三到六歲兒童構音/音韻發展(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北護理學院,台北市。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧(2008)。修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧(2009)。修訂學齡兒童語言障礙評量表指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
宣崇慧、盧台華(2006)。聲韻覺識能力及口語詞彙知識與國小一至二年級學童字、詞閱讀發展之探究。特殊教育研究學刊,31(4),73-92。
柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生聲韻覺識與認字能力的發展一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報,7,29-47。
洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁芬、陳秀芬、陳慶順(2006)。識字量評估測驗使用手冊。教育部特殊教育小組。
國立師範大學國音教材編輯委員會(2008)。國音學。台北:正中。
國語辭典簡編本編輯小組(1997)。國語辭典簡編本編輯資料字詞頻統計報告。台北:教育部。民102年1月,取自:http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/M0001/pin/biau1.htm?open。
教育部國語推行委員會(1999)。八十六年常用語詞調查報告書。台北:教育部。民102年12月,取自:http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/M0001/86news/index.htm。
陳達德、蔡素娟、洪振耀(1998)。國語聲母音長之聲學基礎研究與臨床意義。聽語會刊,13,138-149。
陳榮華、陳心怡(2008)。瑞文氏矩陣推理測驗指導手冊。台北:中國行為科學。
陳慶順(2001)。識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成份之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊,21,215-237。
張維珊(2005)。二至六歲幼兒塞音化音韻歷程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北護理學院,台北市。
張毓仁、邱皓政、柯華葳、曾世杰、林素貞(2011)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度和流暢性對中文閱讀理解的影響:結構方程模式與增益效度之探究。教育與心理研究,34(1),1-28。
曾世杰(2004)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中文閱讀障礙。台北:心理。
黃秀霜、詹欣蓉(1997)。閱讀障礙兒童之音韻覺識、字覺識及聲調覺識之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,5,125-138。
綺寶香(2009)。兒童語言與溝通發展。台北:心理。
潘重規、陳紹棠(1981)。中國聲韻學。台北:東大。
鄭靜宜(2005)。不同言語速度、發語單位和發語位置對國語音段時長的影響。南大學報,39,161-185。
鄭靜宜(2011)。學前兒童華語聲母之音韻歷程分析。特殊教育學報,34,135-170。

英文部分
Adams, M. J. (1991). Beginning to read. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat. From http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
Boets, B., Vandermosten, M., Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Wouters, J. et al. (2011). Preschool impairments in auditory processing and speech perception uniquely predict future reading problems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 560-570.
Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137-155.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-521.
Brandt, J., & Rosen, J. J. (1980).Auditory phonemic perception in dyslexia: Categorical identification and discrimination of stop consonants. Brain Language, 9, 324–337.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 874-886.
Carroll, D. W. (2008). Psychology of language (5th ed.).Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Chen, H., & Stevens, K. N. (2001). An acoustical study of the fricative /s/ in the speech of individuals with dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 44, 1300-1314.
Cheung, H., Chung, K. K. H., Wong, S. W. L., McBride-Chang, C., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S. H. (2009). Perception of tone and aspiration contrasts in Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(6), 726–733.
Cole, R. A., & Cooper, W. E. (1975). Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58. 1280-1287.
Godfrey, J. J., Syrdal-Lasky, A. K., Millay, K.K., & Knox, C. M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401-424.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago, IL: Harvester Wheatssheaf.
Goswami, G. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6, 133-151.
Goswami, G. (2003). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford Press.
Grunwell, P. (1997). Natural phonology. In M. Ball & R. Kent (Eds.), The new phonologies: Developments in clinical linguistics. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Hedrick, M. (1997). Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 925-938.
Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 946-951.
Hoelterhoff, J., & Reetz, H. (2007). Acoustic cues discriminating German obstruents in place and manner of articulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(2), 1142-1156.
Hogan, T. P., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 285–293.
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(2), 249-268.
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Cough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243-255.
Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30-60.
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
Levelt, W. J., & Whelldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary ? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(5), 358-368.
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1-36.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1-28.
Liu, W., Shu, H., & Yang, Y. (2009). Speech perception deficits by Chinese children with phonological dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 338-354.
Liu, H. M., Tseng, C. H., & Tsao, F. M. (2000). Perceptual and acoustic analysis of speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(6), 447-464.
Lowenstein, J. H., & Nittrouer, S. (2008). Patterns of acquisition of native voice onset time in English-learning children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1180-1191.
Mahmoodzade, Z., & Bijankhan, M. (2007, August). Acoustic analysis of the Persian fricative-affricate contrast. Poster presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, University of Saarbrücken, Germany.
McBride-Chang, C. (1995a). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 179-192.
McBride-Chang , C. (1995b). Phonological processing, speech perception, and reading disability: An integrative review. Educational Psychologist, 30, 109-121.
McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1856-1876.
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C. S.-M., & Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological and morphological awareness to reading in Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and America. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140-160.
McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., & Chang, L. (1997). Growth modeling in phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 621-630.
Mildner, V., & Liker, M. (2008). Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(10-11), 845-856.
Mitani, S., Kitama, T., & Sato, Y. (2006). Voiceless affricate/fricative distinction by frication duration and amplitude rise slope. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,120(3), 1600-1607.
Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199-231.
Moore, B. C. J. (2003). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.). England: Emerald Group.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P.(1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331.
Newman, R. S. (2003). Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2850-2860.
Newman, R. S., Clouse, S. A., & Burnham, J. L. (2001). The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1181–1196.
Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,112(2), 711-719.
Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In K. Koda & A. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 13-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Stockmann, E. et al. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116 (4), 2338–2344.
Raaymakers, E. M. J. A., & Crul, T. A. M. (1988). Perception and production of the final /s-ts/ contrast in Dutch by misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 262–270.
Reed, M. A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270-292.
Reep, B., Liberman, A., Eccardt, T., & Pesetsky, D. (1978). Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4), 621-637.
Rvachew, S. (2006). Longitudinal predictors of implicit phonological awareness skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology/ American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 15(2), 165-176.
Rvachew, S. (2007). Phonological processing and reading in children with speech sound disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 260-270.
Rvachew, S., & Grawburg, M. (2006). Correlates of phonological awareness in preschools with speech-sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 74-87.
Rvachew, S., & Jamieson, D. G. (1989). Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(2), 193-208.
Rvachew, S., Ohberg, A., Grawbug, M., & Heyding, J. (2003). Phonological awareness and phonemic perception in 4-yeae-old children with delayed expressive phonology skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(4), 463-471.
Scarborough, H. S., & Brady, S. A. (2002). Toward a common terminology for talking about speech and reading: A glossary of the phon words and some related terms. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 299-334.
Schneider, W., Ennemoser, M., & Roth, E. (1999). Kindergarten prevention of dyslexia: does training in phonological awareness work for everybody? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 429-436.
Serniclaes, W., Van Heghe, S., Mousty, P., Carré, R., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 336-361.
Shinn, P. C. (1985). A cross language investigation of the stop, affricate and fricative manners of articulation. Ph.D. dissertation, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Silliman, E. R., & James, S. (1997). Assessing children with language disorders. In D. K. Bernstein & E. Tiegerman-Farber (Eds.), Language and communication disorders in children (pp. 197-271). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M., & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 489-507.
Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 18-41.
Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161-181.
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75(4), 1067-1084.
Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2006). Perception of native and non-native affricate-fricative contrasts: cross-language tests on adults and infants. The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, 120(4), 2285-2294.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生聲韻覺識與認字能力的發展一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報,7,29-47。
2. 宣崇慧、盧台華(2006)。聲韻覺識能力及口語詞彙知識與國小一至二年級學童字、詞閱讀發展之探究。特殊教育研究學刊,31(4),73-92。
3. 李淑娥(1988)。國音聲譜圖之理論分析與運用。聽語會刊,5,61-67。
4. 李俊仁、柯華葳(2009)。台灣學生聲韻覺識作業之聲韻表徵運作單位。教育心理學報,41(1),111-124。
5. [10] 黃靜純、管倖生(2010)。網站瀏覽環境之品質評估架構與特徵屬性判定。設計學報,3,49-67。
6. [7] 許峻誠(2011)。數位典藏藝術類網站頁面之使用者經驗研究。藝術教育研究,22,79-103。
7. 陳達德、蔡素娟、洪振耀(1998)。國語聲母音長之聲學基礎研究與臨床意義。聽語會刊,13,138-149。
8. 陳慶順(2001)。識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成份之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊,21,215-237。
9. 張毓仁、邱皓政、柯華葳、曾世杰、林素貞(2011)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度和流暢性對中文閱讀理解的影響:結構方程模式與增益效度之探究。教育與心理研究,34(1),1-28。
10. 黃秀霜、詹欣蓉(1997)。閱讀障礙兒童之音韻覺識、字覺識及聲調覺識之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,5,125-138。
11. 鄭靜宜(2011)。學前兒童華語聲母之音韻歷程分析。特殊教育學報,34,135-170。