臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

工程設計是由建築師、結構、機電等多個不同專業領域的工程師個別進行設計後再行整合的成果，前述的這些工程元件若在空間上彼此重疊或接近而造成元件機能或施工性上的影響，稱為「設計衝突」。在實務上，設計衝突在所難免。輕微的設計衝突致生重作、增加工程費用，嚴重的則可能導致變更設計，因而成本超支、進度延誤，甚至產生勞安等問題。過去2D工程圖的時代，設計衝突不易發現，對工程造成諸多影響。近年來BIM軟體的出現，使設計衝突檢測變得容易，衝突檢測已是許多BIM軟體的基本功能之一。
然而，由於工程界面眾多，即使規模再小的工程，BIM軟體檢測的衝突結果往往成百上千，BIM軟體的管理人必須逐一檢視並手動彙整、分析每一項衝突，這個過程往往費時耗力。因此有研究指出，自動化的判定方法乃是迫切需要的功能，否則衝突檢測可能因資訊的過量而淪為形式。
經本研究觀察實際案例以及專家訪談發現，BIM軟體衝突檢測報告中，絕大多數的衝突屬於可允許的偽衝突(pseudo clashes)或本身為合法碰撞的「刻意衝突(deliberate clashes)」，在實務上並不需進行檢討獲解決。若能自動化篩掉衝突檢測報告中的這些衝突，讓工程人員專注於真正需要進行解決的衝突上，就能大幅改善前述耗時費力的人工判定作業。本研究透過專家訪談法嘗試擷取專家判讀設計衝突的經驗，將之轉化為許多可編程的法則，最後再以實際案例進行驗證。初步測試的結果顯示，本研究開發的法則式雛型系統約可成功判定近六成的衝突類型。

Engineering design is the result of individual design and integration by engineers in different professional fields such as architects, structures, electromechanical, etc. The above-mentioned engineering components are spatially overlapping or close to each other, resulting in component function or construction. The impact is called 「design conflict」。In practice, design conflicts are inevitable。Minor design conflicts can cause heavy work and increase engineering costs. Seriously, it may lead to changes in design, resulting in cost overruns, delays in progress, Even safety issues。In the era of 2D engineering drawings, design conflicts are not easy to find and have many impacts on engineering。In recent years, the emergence of BIM software has made design conflict detection easy, and conflict detection has become one of the basic functions of many BIM software。
However, due to the large number of engineering interfaces, even with small scale projects, the conflicts of BIM software detection often result in hundreds of thousands of conflicts。The administrator of the BIM software must review and manually analyze and analyze each conflict one by one. This process is often time consuming and labor intensive。Therefore, some studies have pointed out that automated judgment methods are urgently needed functions, otherwise conflict detection may become a form due to excessive information。
According to the actual case and expert interviews in this study, most of the conflicts in the BIM software conflict detection report are allowable pseudo clashes or Itself as a legitimate collision of deliberate clashes, There is no need for a review to be resolved in practice。If can automatically screen out these conflicts in the conflict detection report, let the engineers focus on the conflicts that really need to be resolved, Can greatly improve the aforementioned time-consuming and laborious manual determination。This study attempts to learn from experts' experience in design conflicts through expert interviews, Transform it into a number of programmable rules and finally validate it with actual case, The results of the preliminary test show, The law-based prototype system developed in this study can successfully determine the conflict type of nearly 60%。

目　　錄
第一章 緒論
1.1 研究動機
1.2 研究目的
1.3 研究流程
1.4 研究限制
第二章 文獻探討
2.1 設計衝突
2.2 BIM碰撞檢查
2.3 小結
第三章 研究方法
3.1 研究架構
3.2 案例介紹
3.3 衝突類型標示
第四章 法則式系統
4.1 專家訪談
4.2 法則擷取
4.3 案例測試
第五章 結論與建議
5.1 研究發現
5.2 後續研究
參考文獻
附錄

[1] E. A. Pärn, D. J. Edwards, Michael C.P. Sing, Origins and probabilities of MEP and structural design clashes within a federated BIM model, Automation in Construction,85: 209-219, 2018.
[2]H. Son, F. Bosche, C. Kim, As-built data acquisition and its use in production monitoring and automated layout of civil infrastructure: a survey, Advanced Engineering Information, 29 (2)(2015) 172–183.
[3]吳翌禎、邱彥彰，「建築資訊模型應用於工作空間衝突分析 研究」，土木水利（BIM專輯），第三十七卷，第五期，59-63 頁，2010。
[4]陳珧華、李昀隆、廖祐政，2013，「 BIM於水電環控工程之運 用—以松山分局、中工處、機工處辦公大樓為例」，捷運技術 半年刊，第47期，台北。
[5]邱垂德、鄭紹材、余文德、劉得廣、曾楷婷、張育晧，2015， 「我國BIM協同作業指南之研訂 —設計與施工階段資訊交 換」，內政部建築研究所委託研究報告。
[6]林育陞，2015，「應用BIM於設計與施工流程精進之研究-以Tekla為例」，碩士論文，逢甲大學土木工程學系。
[7]張家安，2017，「BIM 軟碰撞衝突檢查應用於營建檢討流程」，碩士論文，逢甲大學建築專業學院。
[8]Gilligan, Brian & Kunz, J. (2007). VDC use in 2007: Significant val-ue, dramatic growth, and apparent business opportunity. TR171.
[9]黃隆茂，2016，「BIM的施工管理」，臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌。