臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

面對全球市場的劇烈競爭，區域經濟整合業已成為當前全球經貿的核心議題。在這兩千年歐盟正式啟用歐元後，揭開一連串區域經濟整合的風潮序幕，亞太地區自然不能置身事外，目前亞太最主要的區域經濟組織東協(ASEAN)，在中日韓的相繼加入下，對世界貿易的影響更顯重要。本文針對全球四十二個國家，七個區域經濟組織之間相互貿易的長期趨勢，利用「引力模型」以1997年到2004年共八年時間的貿易與相關經濟資料，來研究東南亞國協貿易密集關係。主要實證結果如下：(1)東協國家之間的貿易區塊已經形成，且根據迴歸分析，係數有逐年上升，顯示東協之間的貿易流量逐年上升。(2) 距離、人口、國內生產毛額、政治穩定度等因素，確實影響貿易流量。
有鑒於東協貿易區塊儼然成形，大陸與東協自由貿易區乃至於「東協十加三」對台灣的影響十分重大，在本文最後就避免國內經濟發展邊陲化的方面，提供政策上的建議。

In the face of fierce global market competition, regional economic consolidation has already become the main topic of discussion concerning current global economics and trade. The adoption of the Euro by the European Union in 1999 brought about a succession of regional economic consolidation. The Asian and Pacific areas, naturally have been unable to remain unaffected. With the continuous involvement of China, Japan and Korea, the Association of South East Asian Nations is having a greater affect on world trade. This paper uses the “Attraction Model” together with eight years of trade and economic data from 1997 to 2004 to look at the long term trend of trade between 42 countries and 7 regional economic organizations. An investigation is made of the close relationship between South East Asian countries regards trade cooperation. The main conclusions made from the empirical analysis are as follows: (1) Trade blocks (groups of countries) have already formed. According to our regression analysis, we find there are increasing numbers of blocks formed each year, which shows that trade volume is increasing each year between ASEAN countries.(2) It was found that distance between countries, population, gross national product and a country’s political stability all have an influence on a country’s trade volume.

With the formation of ASEAN trade blocks; China and the ASEAN Free Trade Area(AFTA) and even the ASEAN Plus Three(APT) are all having an extremely significant impact on Taiwan. This paper avoids looking at the domestic economies of ASEAN countries but rather looks at inter border trade between these countries. Finally some recommendations are made about policy.

目　錄

中文摘要 I
Thesis Abstract II
目　錄 III
表目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節　研究目的 2
第三節　研究架構 4
第二章　相關理論與文獻探討 5
第一節　貿易區塊 5
第二節　引力模型 7
第三章　研究方法 13
第一節　研究假說 13
第二節　模型說明 15
第四章　實證分析 17
第一節　資料來源 17
第二節　實證結果 33
第五章　結論與建議 38
第一節　研究結論 38
第二節　政策上之建議 40
第三節　研究限制及後續研究建議 42
參考文獻 43

表目錄

表1.1　經濟整合 (Economic Integration) 的層次 3
表4.1　1997年至2004年42國貿易流量筆數 17
表4.2　兩國間之地理距離 20
表4.3　Institutional Investor之國家信用評等指標 31
表4.4　各年度迴歸結果 34

圖目錄

圖1.1　論文架構 4

參考文獻

中文部份
1.李紀珠、林靖，民國92 年，「從歐盟整合經驗看歐盟及大中華經濟體雙邊貿易之特徵」，國政研究報告，財金(研)090-068 號 。

2.郭錦婷，民國89 年，「引力模型應用在雙邊貿易之分析—以亞太國家為例」，政治大學碩士論文。

3.黃璀娟、郭迺鋒、李國賓，民國93年，「全球化下區域貿易組織對雙向貿易的影響：二十八國追蹤資料的實證研究」，經濟情勢暨評論，第十卷，第二期。

4.黃登興、黃幼宜，民國92 年，「兩岸三地的經貿分合:引力模型的驗證」。

5.歐陽勛、黃仁德 ，民國99年，「國際貿易理論與政策」，台北：三民書局

6.朱真慧，民國92年，「海外專利活動與政治民主化：跨國資料之研究」，世新大學碩士論文。


英文部份
1.Anderson, J. E. (1979), A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation, The American Economic Review, Vol.69, No.1, pp.106-116.

2.Balassa, B.(1962), The Theory of Economic Integration, London: Allen & Unwin, pp.38.

3.Bergstrand, J. H. (1985), The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.67, No.3, pp.474–481.

4.Bergstrand, J. H. (1989), The Generalized Gravity Equation Monopolistic Competition and the Factor-proportions Theory in International Trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.71, No.1, pp.143–153.

5.Christenson, B. (1994), World Trade in Apparel: An Analysis of Trade flows Using the Gravity Model, International Regional Science Review, Vol.17, pp.151-166.

6.Deardorff, A. V. (1984), Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows, Handbook of International Economics, Vol.1, pp.467-517.

7.Feenstra, R. C., J. A. Markusen, and A. K. Rose (2001), Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol.34, No.2, pp.430–447.

8.Inmaculada, M. Z. (2003), Gravity Model: An Application to Trade between Regional Blocs, Atlantic Economic Journal.

9.Mátyás, L. (1997), Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model, The World Economy, Vol.20, pp.363-369.

10.Mátyás, L. (1998), The Gravity Model: Some Econometric Consideration, The World Economy, Vol.21, pp.397-401.

11.Oguledo, V. I., and C. R. Macphee (1994), Gravity Models: A Reformulation and an Application to Discriminatory Trade Arrangements, Applied Economics, Vol.26, pp.107-120.

12.Paas, T. (2000), Gravity Approach for Modeling Trade Flows between Estonia and the Main Trading Parners, Tartu University Press Tiigi 78.

13.Rahman, M. M. (2003), A Panel Data Analysis of Bangladesh’s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach.

14.Sanso, M., R. Cuairan, and F. Sanz (1993), Bilateral Trade Flows, the Gravity Equation, and Functional Form, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.75, No.2, pp.266–275.

15.Srivastava, R., and R. Green (1986), Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows, The Journal of Business, Vol.59, No.4, pp.623-640.

16.Stone, S. F., and B. N. Jeon (1999), Gravity-Model Specification for Foreign Direct Investment: A Case of the Asian Pacific Economics, The Journal of Business and Economic Studies, Spring, 5, 1.

17.Wall, H. J. (2000), Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-U.S.Border, Working Paper, Federal Reserve bank of St. Louis.

18.Yu, C. J., and D. S. Zietlow (1995), The Determinant of Bilateral Trade among Asia-Pacific Countries, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol.11, No.3, pp.298-305.