|
[1]Acedo, F., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. (2006). The resource-based theory: Dissemination and
main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621-636.
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390.
[2]Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.
[3]Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University
Press Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive: Harvard Univ Pr.
[4]Bidault F. and Jarillo C.J. (1997) Trust in Economic Transactions in Trust: Firm and
Society, ed. by Francis Bidault , Pierre-Yves Gomez and Gilles Marion, London: Macmillan Press
[5]Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life: Transaction Publishers.
[6]Blomqvist, K. (1997). The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management,
13(3), 271-286.
[7]Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., & Seppanen, R. (2005). Playing the collaboration game
right--balancing trust and contracting. Technovation, 25(5), 497-504.
[8]Blomqvist, K., & Stahle, P. (2000). Building organizational trust.
[9]Boon, S. D., and Holmes, J. G. (1991). “The Dynamics of Interpersonal Trust: Resolving
Uncertainty in the Face of Risk,” Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior, R. A. [10]Hinde and J. Groebel (eds.), Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190-211.
[11]Borgatti, S., & Everett, M. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks,
19(3), 243-269.
[12]Bradach, J., & Eccles, R. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural
forms. Annual review of sociology, 15(1), 97-118.
[13]Butler, R.,&Gill, J. (1995, September). Learning and knowledge in joint-ventures: The
importance of trust. Paper presented to the British Academy of Management annual conference, Sheffield.
[14]Child, J. (2001). Trust-The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational
Dynamics, 29(4), 274-288.
[15]Coleman, J. (1994). Foundations of social theory: Belknap Press.
[16]Cook. J & Wall. T. (1980). New Work attitude measures of trust, organizational
commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
[17]Creed, W., & Miles, R. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking
organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations:Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 16-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[18]Dertouzos, M., Lester, R., & Solow, R. (1989). Made in America: Regaining the
productive edge.
[19]Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of conflict resolution, 2(4), 265.
[20]Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion.
Human Relations, 13(2), 123-139.
[21]Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. Nebraska Symposium
on Motivation: 275-320. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.
[22]Dunn, J. (2000). Trust and political agency. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative
Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, 73-93.
[23]Dwyer, F., Schurr, P., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. The
Journal of Marketing, 11-27.
[24]Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Haward
University Press
[25]Ennett, S., & Bauman, K. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking:
a social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(3), 226-236.
[26]Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.Friar, J., & Horwitch, M. (1985). The emergence of technology strategy:: A new dimension of strategic
management. Technology in Society, 7(2-3), 143-178.
[27]Fukuyama, Francis. Trust. (1955). New York: Free Press.
[28]Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. New York: Basil
Blackwell
[29]Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and
commitment in customer relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70-87.
[30]Garfield E. (2001). From Bibliographic Coupling to Co-Citation Analysis via Algorithmic
Historio -Bibliography. Drexel University, Philadelphia Article can viewed at [online] :
http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/drexelbelvergriffith92001.pdf
[31]Gmur, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A
methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
[32]Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for
contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.
[33]Hagen, J. M., & Simons, T. (2003). Differentiating trust-in-the-company from
trust-in-the-executive in supply chain relations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management 2003 Annual Meetings, Seattle, WA.
[34]Hardy, C.,&Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical
examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9(2), 217-230.
[35]Holtari, T. and Saarikangas, M. 11994) Katta paalle kaukalon aarella (Hand-shaking by
the icehockey ring). Finnish Business Journal Fakta 1, 44-47.Macalay, S. (1963) Non-contractual relations
[36]Hosmer, L. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and
philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
[37]Janowicz, M., & Noorderhaven, N. (2002). The role of trust in interorganizational
learning in joint ventures.
[38]Jones, A., James, L., & Bruni, J. (1975). Perceived leadership behavior and employee
confidence in the leader as moderated by job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 146-149.
[39]J. Scott. (1987). Social network analysis: a hand book.
[40]Kansalliskirjasto, K. Partnering in the Dynamic Environment: The Role of Trust in
Asymmetric Technology Partnership Formation.
[41]Karki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis
on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of information science, 22(5), 323.
[42]Kmmer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[43]Larson, R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An exploratory analysis of the
intellectual structure of cyberspace.
[44]Lawley, D., & Maxwell, A. (1962). Factor analysis as a statistical method. The
Statistician, 12(3), 209-229.
[45]Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social forces, 63(4), 967-985.
[46]Lorenz, E. (1991). Neither friends nor strangers: informal networks of subcontracting in
[47]Luhmann, Niklas (1979). Trust and Power. Wiley, Chichester French industry. Markets,
hierarchies and networks: the coordination of social life, 183-191.
[48]Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study.
American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55-67.
[49]Martins B. Class CoCitation.
[online] :http://webla.sourceforge.net/javadocs/pt/tumba/links/CoCitation.html
[50]McCain, K. (1983). The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics,
5(5), 277-289.
[51]Meyerson, D., Weick, K., & Kramer, R. (2006). Swift trust and temporary groups.
Organizational trust: a reader, 415.
[52]Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1999). The new network firm: a spherical structure built on a
human investment philosophy. Strategic human resource management, 448.
[53]Mishra, A. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust.
[54]Mombers, C., Van Heeringen, A., Van Veneti , R., & Le Pair, C. (1985). Displaying
strengths and weaknesses in national R&D performance through document cocitation. Scientometrics, 7(3), 341-355.
[55]Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary
cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213.
[56]Nadel, E. (1981). Citation and co-citation indicators of a phased impact of the BCS theory
in the physics of superconductivity. Scientometrics, 3(3), 203-221.
[57]Newman, M. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404.
[58]Nielsen, B. (2004). The role of trust in collaborative relationships: a multidimensional
approach. M@ n@ gement, 7(3), 239-256.
[59]Noordewier, T., John, G., & Nevin, J. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing
arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 80-93.
[60]Orgnet.com.[online]: http://www.orgnet.com/sna.html
[61]Powell. W. W. (1987). Hybrid organizational arrangements. California Management
Review, 30(1): 67-87
[62]Price, D. (1957). Networks of scientific papers. Nuovo Cimento, 5, 199.
[63]Putnam, R. (2002). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy: Princeton
university press.
[64]Ramos-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of
strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
[65]Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 95-112.
[66]Rotter, J. B. (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of
Personality 35, 651-665.
[67]Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2002). Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent
systems.
[68]Shapiro, S. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. ajs, 93(3), 623.
[69]Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment. In A. L. Weber & J. H. Harvey (Eds.),
Perspectives on close relationships: 110-130. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[70]Sitkin, S., & Roth, N. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic" remedies"
for trust/distrust. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 4(3), 367-392.
[71]Sitkin, S. B. & Stickel, D. (1996), “The Road to Hell: The Dynamics of Distrust in an Era
of Quality.”, In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, 196-215
[72]Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the
relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
[73]Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of
collagen research. Social studies of science, 7(2), 139.
[74]Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social studies of science, 8(3),
327.
[75]Soziologie, R., & Series, S. Trust and Institutions.
[76]Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration,
collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
[77]Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of
embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1).
[78]White, H. (1983). A cocitation map of the social indicators movement. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science, 34(5), 307-312.
[79]White, H., & Griffith, B. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual
structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
[80]White, H., & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis
of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
[81]Williamson, 0. E. (1974). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
[82]Worchel, P. (1979). Trust and distrust. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social
psychology of intergroup relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
[83]Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects
of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 9(2), 141-159.
[84]Zucker, L., Darby, M., Brewer, M., & Peng, Y. (1995). Collaboration structure and
information dilemmas in biotechnology: Organizational boundaries as trust production. NBER Working Paper.
[85]Zucker, L. G. (1986). The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure,
1840-1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 8: 53-1 ll. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
|