臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文主要探討家庭成衣工婦女在家從事成衣代工與家務工作的經驗。婦女在家踩平車的價值，容易因為薪水不多而被視為不重要的工作；家務工作被視為婦女在家工作的主要任務，因此造成家庭成衣代工婦女的工作價值被低估。如何看待婦女踩平車的新資價值是本文問題意識之一；其次要討論婦女們協商成衣代工與家務工作的方式及在家工作認同對她們的工作經驗影響。本文採用Glucksmann 的TSOL（Total social organization of labour）理論，強調不同工作間的關係為社會結構、時間空間所影響。使用質性研究訪談法，訪談10位家庭成衣代工婦女後的研究發現如下：

以「貼補家用」的說法看待在家做成衣代工的薪資意義是不夠的，還需考慮婦女在家從事各項工作的無形價值，才能呈現家庭成衣代工婦女們在家工作的全貌。

婦女們在家的工作經驗是性別化的。時間經驗及工作安排受到妻子/母親的再生產角色影響。為了照顧家人而在家做成衣代工，家務事與成衣代工的安排與時間分配先要滿足家人與代工頭的需求。在家工作不僅讓婦女面對時間壓力，也沒有時間從事個人興趣。

為了兼顧成衣代工與家務工作，婦女們得與家人協商家務工作得進行。家務工作的協商方式與婦女的工作認同有關，認同為家庭主婦者傾向處理大部分的家事，部分婦女平時會要求子女做家事，但與家人對家務工作的責任認定不同時，會造成她們與家人間的衝突；認同為專業工作者的婦女，家務工作的時間或標準都較前兩類婦女為低，她們面對的矛盾在於無法做個稱職的好母親。

從上述研究發現，家庭成衣代工婦女的工作經驗無法以公/私領域、有給/無酬的二元架構來個別分析。產業結構的變化、子女的年紀、婚姻狀態等因素的交互影響，使其工作經驗呈現複雜多樣的面貌。

The main purpose of this paper is to examine the experiences of women manufacturing clothing at home while also doing domestic work. As the pay for manufacturing clothing at home is not much, the work and its value are often regarded as insignificant. Domestic work is viewed as the main task of women working at home, so the value of their work is easily underestimated. How to look at the monetary value of the clothing manufacturing work done on sewing machines at home is one of the focuses of this paper. Secondly, this paper aims to discuss (1) the way women coordinate clothing manufacturing work with domestic work, and (2) how they identify their work at home, which impacts on their work experience. This paper adopted Glucksmann’s TSOL (Total Social Organization of Labor) Theory, putting an emphasis on the relationships between different types of work that are affected by the social structure, time, and space. Using a qualitative research interview method, 10 women doing clothing manufacturing work at home were interviewed. The findings are as follows:
Aside from the “additional income for the family” provided by a female manufacturing clothing at home, it is difficult to evaluate the worth of the woman because it is hard to put a price on her intangible contribution in the various domestic tasks she accomplishes. Nonetheless these should be considered.
The experience of women working at home is colored by their sexual roles. Their reproductive roles as wife and mother make it necessary for them to allocate their time and organize their jobs accordingly. As these women choose to work at home in order to be able to take care of the family simultaneously, their time for clothing manufacturing and their time for domestic chores must be apportioned in such a way as to fulfill the needs of both their boss and their family members. Working at home not only creates time-related pressure on them but also makes it more difficult for them to have any time to pursue their own personal interests.
In order to both take care of domestic chores while manufacturing clothing at home, these women have to consult with their family members and get them to agree to share the domestic work. How the female identifies with her work at home will determine how the domestic chores will be coordinated. Those who see themselves as mainly housewives tend to take on almost all of the domestic work themselves. Some women require the children to share the burden of domestic work, but this may cause conflict between them and create additional emotional stress for the women when the family members disagree. Those who view themselves as professional workers in clothing manufacturing spend less hours in domestic work and the standards they set for these are relatively lower compared to the abovementioned types of women. However, the conflict they face is in their not being able to be good mothers.
Based on the above mentioned, this study discovered that the experience of woman working at home manufacturing clothing can not be analyzed specifically using the rigid binary framework of public vs. private domain and between work with pay and work with no salary. Variables, such as changes in industrial structure, children''s age, marital status, etc., all contribute to the various and complicated facets of the experience of their work.

目錄

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究背景與問題意識 5
第三節 文獻回顧 9
第五節 研究方法與倫理 18

第二章「踩平車」與其薪資意義 23
第一節 在家「踩平車」的原因 23
第二節 「平車」與「踩」平車的內容 28
第三節 「踩平車」生涯的轉變 35
第四節 「車整件」與「車部分」的薪資差異 41
第五節 「踩平車」的薪資意義 47

第三章 空間、家務工作與母職 52
第一節 工作內容與空間配置的關係 52
第二節 家務工作的運作 56
第三節 家庭成衣代工婦女的母職實踐 64
第四節 在家工作的困境與能動性 68

第四章 結論 73
第一節 研究發現 73
第二節 研究建議 77
參考文獻 79
附件一：受訪者基本資料列表 82
附件二：訪談大綱 84

王實之（1997）《資本主義、父權社會下的紡織女工：台灣工業化的案例研究》，中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。

尹慶春 簡文吟（2001）〈已婚婦女的持續就業：家庭制度與勞動市場的妥協〉，《台灣社會學》，1：149-182。

古學斌、邱延亮（1997）〈香港中年女工生命史與僱傭策略初探〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，26：167-207。

林津如(2007) 〈父系家庭與女性差異認同：中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨 世代比較〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》，68: 1-73。

李悅端、柯志明（1994）〈小型企業的經營與性別分工-以五分埔成衣業社區為案例的分析〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，17：41-81。

李瑩芝（2002）《看不見的勞動—1940-1960年台灣女性勞工的生命歷程、家戶動力與僱傭策略》，東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

胡幼慧、姚美華（1996），〈一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析？〉，《質性研究》。台北：巨流。

范情（2001）〈當代社會主義女性主義〉，《女性主義理論與流派》。台北：女書。

唐先梅（1999）〈從家務工作的本質談雙薪家庭夫妻家事分工〉，《應用心理研究》，4：131-173。

---------（2002）〈雙新家庭夫妻家務工作公平觀差異之研究〉，《中華家政學刊》，32：59-73。

張晉芬（1995）〈台灣婦女工作處境之探討〉，《勞資關係論叢》，3：153-171。

張晉芬、黃玟娟（1997）〈兩性分工觀念下婚育對女性就業的影響〉，劉毓秀編《女性、國家、照顧工作》，227-252。台北市：女書文化。

張晉芬、李奕慧（2006）〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」：家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，19：203-229。

馮淑貞（1995）《無路可逃-家與工作之間：以河下里已婚紡織業女工的生活為分析》，東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文

彭桂枝（2004）《女人與工作：一群客家農村中年女工的工作經驗》，清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

黃怡瑾（2001）〈「私」領域中的女性困境：生育、教養與照顧工作之分工〉，《台南師院學報》，34：341-365。

葉孟峰（2002）《加工區女性工作者的就業困境》，中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。

蔡麗玲(1998)。《母職作為女性主義實踐》，清華大學社會人類學研究所所碩士論文。

潘淑滿（2005）〈臺灣母職圖像〉，《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，20：41-90。

劉毓秀等(1996)，《女性主義理論與流派》，台北：女書文化。

蕭英玲（2005）〈台灣的家務分工：經濟依賴與性別的影響〉，《台灣社會學刊》，34：115-145。

謝國雄（1992）〈隱形工廠：台灣的外包點與家庭代工〉，《台灣社會學刊》，13：137-160。

Abbott P. & Wallace C. (1995) 《女性主義觀點的社會學》（俞智敏、陳光遠、陳素梅、張君玫合譯）。台北：巨流。

Anthias, Yuval-Davis(1983) Contextualizing feminism-gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15:62-75.

DeVault, M.L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contribution of Feminist Methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22:29-50.

Diamond, N. (1979) Women and industry in Taiwan. Modern China, 5(3): 317-340.
(丁庭宇、馬康莊編（1986）《台灣社會變遷的經驗-一個新興的工業社會》。台北：巨流。)

Elchardus M. & Glorieux I.(1994). The search for the Invisible 8 hours: the Gendered use of time in a society with a high labour force participation of women. Time and Society , 3(1): 5-27.

Everingham C.(2002) Engendering time: gender equity and discourse of workplace flexibility. Time and Society, 11(2/3):335-352.

Estrada, S. (2002) Work, Gender, and Space: Women''s Home-based Work in Tijuana, Mexico. Journal of Developing Societies, 18(2/3): 169-195.

Folbre, N. (2002) 《心經濟，愛無價？》(許慧如譯)。台北：新新聞。

Glucksmann, M.(1995).Why ‘work’? Gender and the ‘Total social organization of labour. Gender, work and organization, 2(2):63-75.

Glucksmann, M.(2002). Cottons and casuals: the Gendered organisation of labour in time and space. Durham: Sociologypress.

Jurczyk, K.(1998). Time in wowen’s everyday life: Between self-determination and conflicting demands. Time and Society, 7(2):283-308.

Kung, L.(1976). Factor Work and Woman in Taiwan: Changes in Self-image and Status,” Signs 2, 1(Autumn): 35-58.

Ramazanoglu, C. & Holland, J.（2002）. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage. P60-79.

Sirianni C. & Negrey C.(2000). Working time as gendered time. Feminist Economics , 6(1):59-76.

Silverman, D. (2000). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage. P144-170.

Vanek, J.(1974) Time spent in housework. Scientific American , 231:116-120.

Wang, S.C.(2006). Transforming the Gendered Organisation of Labour:Factory Women and Industrilisation in Taiwan,1960-2000., University of Essex.