臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文主要為台灣人工濕地規劃設計之研究，並探討如何以滯洪型人工溼地系統方式，解決大鵬灣過去經常淹水的問題。濕地系統是由多種學科，所結合而成的一門科學。其中包含了自然生態、水利工程、土木工程、社會教育、環境保護、遊憩娛樂等多項學科。近年來也因氣候快速變遷導致瞬間暴雨水的頻率增加，進而對於人工溼地原有之滯洪的功能更加提升。依照目前現行法規之”水土保持技術規範”內之無因次公式，計算設計面積內各重現期距之集流水量，並針對其暴雨水量進行24小時之滯洪，待洪峰過後再排至其相關排洪設施內，以達到滯洪之效果。

本論文區域面積為約155公頃。依目前現行之相關法規所訂定之重現期距規定為10年期。10年重現期距，依”水土保持技術規範”內之無因次公式，所求得之24小時之總水量為10,117,000立方公尺，其所需之滯洪深度約6.5公尺。另50年重現期距，所求得之24小時之總水量為12,658,000立方公尺，其所需之滯洪深度約8.2公尺。雖目前相關法規之規定為10年重現期距，但為因應氣候變遷所造成之瞬間暴雨水，因而於本論文設計中，以50年重現期距為設計滯洪量。

依據相關數據所進行之規劃設計，其所需之滯洪深度須為8.2公尺。而原地形高點高程約為1.8公尺，因此依50年重現期距之滯洪深度約為-8公尺。既可滿足於50年重現期距之滯洪功能。本論文依此設計滯洪量，以初步總配置和細部設計構想，得一案例研究。並依此得建議及將來進一步研究之用。

This thesis is to study Taiwan wetland planning and design which is to explore how a proposed detention wetland system work to solve flooded Southern Taiwan Dapeng Bay. A wetland system is composed of a variety of disciplines such as geography, hydrology and landscape architecture and ecology. It also includes engineering, civil engineering, social education and environmental protection. Due to rapid climate changes, this thesis is to study the design and planning based on the assumption of increased frequency of storm water instantly, and on the upgrade or more duration and detention. This study is to study based on soil and water conservation technical specifications. That is, dimensionless formula to calculate the amount of water set within the design area of each return period, and is 24 hours storm water detention facilities.

The study area of this thesis is about 155 hectares. According to the relevant regulations and codes, this study laid down provisions for a 10-year recurrence period. A 10-year recurrence or storm return period is based on the studies of soil and water conservation technical specifications by Taiwan Government regulations of dimensionless- equation. The total amount of water is to obtain a 24 hour- of 10,117,000 cubic meters, which requires a detention depth of about 6.5 meters. Another estimate of a 50-year return period, 24 hours of total amount of runoff and storm water is about 12,658,000 cubic meters. The said detention depth is estimated about a 8.2 meter-depth for design and planning.

A 50-year return period for the design of detention capacity is thus the designed runoff and storm water volume for this thesis. In the end, this study is to design a detention pond with a depth of 8.2 meters according to the studied data. The original terrain elevation is about 1.8 meters high, so depending on the depth of 50-year return period of detention from approximately -8 meters. Reproduce the detention period can meet the functional distance in 50 years. In this paper, so the design of detention amount to the total initial configuration and detail design, was a case study. And so may recommend further research and in the future.

目 錄
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………1
第一節. 研究緣起………………………………………………………1
第二節. 研究目標………………………………………………………1
第三節. 研究流程………………………………………………………2

第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………3
第一節. 國內相關法規規定……………………………………………3
第二節. 濕地的定義……………………………………………………7
第三節. 溼地的功能……………………………………………………8
第四節. 溼地的組成……………………………………………………11
第五節. 溼地的種類……………………………………………………12
第六節. 人工溼地的種類………………………………………………13
第七節. 滯洪池的種類…………………………………………………16

第三章 研究方法……………………………………………22
第一節. 降雨逕流量推估………………………………………………22
第二節. 三角形單位歷線法……………………………………………25
第三節. 合理化公式法…………………………………………………26

第四章 人工溼地規畫設計…………………………………27
第一節. 現況分析………………………………………………………27
第二節. 水系調查………………………………………………………28
第三節. 土壤與地質……………………………………………………29
第四節. 土地使用………………………………………………………31
第五節. 地形調查………………………………………………………32
第六節. 暴雨雨水流量推估……………………………………………35
第七節. 規劃設計方案…………………………………………………44
第八節. 細部設計構想…………………………………………………45

第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………56
第一節. 結論……………………………………………………………56
第二節. 建議……………………………………………………………56
參考文獻
附錄

中文:
1.余濬降雨強度之推算與應用詹氏書局
2.余濬 ，(2005)， 山坡地排水與滯洪設計 科技圖書(股)有限公司。
3.大鵬灣國家風景區管處，(2004)，「大鵬灣國家風景特定區區外截流系統綜合規劃」。
4.大鵬灣國家風景區管處，(2005)，「大鵬灣人工溼地規劃研究」期中報告書。
5.大鵬灣國家風景區管處，(2006)，「大鵬灣流域大潭新支線、新分線與新高地排水溝等排水改善規劃研究」。
6.大鵬灣國家風景區管處，(2004)，「大鵬灣鵬村農場濕地生態公園新建工程基本設計說明書」。
7.行政院農業委員會，(2000)，「水土保持技術規範」。
8.行政院農業委員會，(2003)，「水土保持技術規範」。
9.葉台生 ，(2003)，「滯洪池蓄洪效率之評估」，屏東科技大學土木工程系碩士論文。
10.郭進慶，(2007)，「社區排水系統暴雨初期污水處理規劃之可行性研究」 國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所。
11.丁澈士、李易蒼、蔡欣恬、簡銘成、簡新洋、張祥仁 ，(2008)，「半感潮性濕地水文系統與滯洪功能可行性研究 －以大鵬灣鵬村濕地為例」農 業工程學報 第 54 卷第 1 期P56-P69頁。
12.吳瑞賢、余濬 ，(1996)，「滯留池節省容量及集中沈砂之設計方法探討」，中華水土保持學報第27卷1期，pp. 29-38。

英文:
1.Armstrong J and Armstrong W (1990) Light-enhanced convective throughflow increases oxygenation in rhizomes and rhizosphere of Phragmites australis (Cav.) New Phytology 114: 121–128.
2.Bavor, H.J., Roser, D.J., McKersie, S., (1997). Nutrient removal using shallow lagoon-solid matrix macrophyte systems. In: Reddy, K.R., Smith,W.H. (Eds.), Aquatic Plants forWaterTreatment and Resource Recovery. Magnolia Publishing, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 227–235.
3.Brix, H., (1998). Denmark. In: Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P.F., Green, M.B., Haberl, R. (Eds.), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 123–152.
4.Brix, H., Arias, C., Johansen, N.H., (2003). Experiments in a two-stage constructed wetland system: nitrification capacity and effects of recycling on nitrogen removal. In: Vymazal, J. (Ed.), Wetlands: Nutrients, Metals and Mass Cycling. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 237–258.
5.Burka, U., Lawrence, P.,(1990). A new community approach to waste treatment with higher water plants. In: Cooper, P.F., Findlater, B.C. (Eds.), Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 359–371.
6.Cooper, P.F. (Ed.), (1990). European Design and Operations Guidelines for Reed Bed Treatment Systems. Prepared for the European Community/EuropeanWater Pollution Control Association Emergent Hydrophyte Treatment System Expert Contact G-roup. WRc Report UI 17, Swindon, UK.
7.Cooper, P.F., (1999).Areviewof the design and performance of vertical flow and hybrid reed bed treatment systems.Water Sci. Technol. 40 (3), 1–9.
8.Cooper, P.F., Job, G.D., Green, M.B., Shutes, R.B.E., (1996). Reed Beds and ConstructedWetlands forWastewater Treatment. WRc Publications, Medmenham, Marlow, UK.
9.Hodgkiss, I.J. (1986) Aspects of mangrove ecology in Hong Kong. Mem. Hong Kong nat. Hist. Soc. p107-116.
10.Johansen, N.H., Brix, H., (1996). Design criteria for a two-stage constructed wetland. In: Proceeding of Fifth International Conference Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, IWA and Universit¨at f¨ur Bodenkultur, Vienna, (Chapter IX/3).
11.Kadlec, R.H., (2003). Status of treatment wetlands in North America. In: Dias, V., Vymazal, J. (Eds.), The Use of Aquatic Macrophytes for Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands. ICN and INAG, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 363–401.
12.Schueler,T.R.(1992).Design of Stormwater Wetland Systems: Guidelines for Creating Diverse and Effective Stormwater Wetland Systems in the Mid-Atlantic Region.Washing,DC:Metroplitan Washington Council of Covernments.
13.Seidel, K., (1965)a. Phenol-Abbau in Wasser durch Scirpus lacustris L. wehrend einer versuchsdauer von 31 Monaten. Naturwissenschaften 52, 398–406.

網頁
1.U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration ，http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ecosystems/ultraurb/3fs5.asp
2.洲仔博物村，http://www.wetland.org.tw/Chouchai/page/index.htm
3.高雄市政府工務局網站，http:pwse.kcg.gov.tw/。