臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

大學主要功能為研究與教學，大學排名有的是注重人為評分方式；有的則是注重科學評比方式。大學排名對形象及知名度有深遠影響。而學術論文的評鑑，不僅可以瞭解學術研究結果的差異，也可當作選擇就讀學校的參考。
大學排名評比方式各有不同，數據取得來源也不盡相同。本研究是以大家隨手可得的免付費學術搜尋引擎Google Scholar為資料來源。
取樣自國內國立大學之資訊學院學者，從學者的學術論文被引用之角度，參考上海交通大學與台灣高等評鑑中心評估指標，去建構符合臺灣區域性質、學科背景的學術論文評估指標。
以學者個人論文被引用情形，得出該學院之學術研究能力；以不同角度去建構學術論文評估指標，再去作排名，以見樹也見林方式，來探討它的意義。

The main function of the university is research and teaching. In university ranking, someone pay attention rating in the way artificially, but someone pay attention in scientific.University ranks have far-reaching about image and popularity. It not only merely understands the difference of academic results of research, but also regard as choose the reference that study in the school.
There are many different ways in ranking university, and data source is also different too. The search engine of this research is Google Scholar. It is easily to get and free to everyone.
We use the scholars of computer science of domestic national university as sample. Cited papers of scholars in the angle and consult indicator from Shanghai Chiao Tung University and Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan.We construct evaluation indicators on scholarly literature which meet the nature of Taiwan region and academic background.
It quoted the situation for scholar's personal thesis, and then obtains the academic research ability of this institute. We construct the evaluation indicators on scholarly literatures under citation network with different angles and go to rank. By the way of seeing trees and see the forest too, and probe into its meaning.

ABSTRACT IV
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 RELATED WORK 3
2.1 UNIVERSITY EVALUATION 3
2.2 CITATION NETWORK 5
2.3 GOOGLE SCHOLAR 7
2.4 ACADEMIC RANKINGS USED 10
3 THE MODEL 14
3.1 DEFINITION OF EVALUATION INDICATORS 14
3.2 EQUATION OF MODEL 15
3.3 FRAMEWORK OF SYSTEM 17
4 EXPERIMENTS 19
4.1 DATA 19
4.2 DESCRIPTION FOR EXPERIMENT 20
5 RESULT 22
5.1 EVALUATION FORMULA I 22
5.2 EVALUATION FORMULA II 23
5.3 EVALUATION FORMULA III 24
5.4 COMPREHENSIVE RESULTS 25
6 CONCLUSION 26

[1] D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998).
[2] Watts, D. J. Small Worlds, The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness .Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ (1999).
[3]Mei-Ling Wang. University Research Assessment and Citation Analysis. Journal of Library and Information Science 31（1）：5 – 13(Apr., 2005)
[4]李聰明，大學評鑑的研究(臺北：中國文化大學出版部，民86 年)，頁13。
[5] Donald Kennedy著，楊振高譯，學術這一行(臺北：天下，民89 年)，頁2。
[6]Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D.Z. Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419-435(2006).
[7] Mu-Hsuan Huang. Application of H-index for Research Evaluation at University Level. 高教評鑑 1:2(Feb 2008)
[8]Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
[9]Ball, P. (2005).Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436,900.
[10] Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
[11]Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
[12] Cawkell, A. E. (1971). Science Citation Index: Effectiveness in locating articles in the anaesthetics field: ‘Perturbation of ion transport’. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 43: 814
[13] R.N.Kostoff, “The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation”,
Scientometrics, 43:1(1998):27-29
[14] A.T.Balaban,”How should citations to articles in high- and low-impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth?” Scientometrics, 37:3(1996):495
[15] S. Redner. How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B, 4(2):131–134, 1998.
[16] How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication: Journal of the American society for information 51(7):635-645, 2000
[17] 19.Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D. (2008) A new look at evidence of scholarly citations in citation indexes and from web sources, Scientometrics, vol. 74, no. 2. pp. 317-330.
[18]Smith, Linda C., "Citation Analysis," Library Trends 30:1(Summer 1981): 94-98.
[19] Google Scholar，http://scholar.google.com
[20]Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes Libri, 2005, vol. 55, pp. 170–180
[21]Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M. (2007) Google Scholar Citations and Google Web/URL Citations: A Multi-Discipline Exploratory Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1055-1065.
[22] Jacsó, P. (2005) Google Scholar: the pros and the cons, Online Information Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 208-214.
[23] http://www.usnews.com/rankings
[24]http://www.usnews.com/education/worlds-best-universities/articles/2010/09/21/worlds-best-universities-top-400-?PageNr=8
[25] http://www.arwu.org/Chinese/ARWUMethodology2009.jsp
[26] http://ranking.heeact.edu.tw
[27]http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/methodology/simple-overview