臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文主旨在提出一個以最佳經濟成本為考量決策模式，計算當TFT-LCD組裝完成後，成本包裝出貨至客戶手中前，該如何行動以使期望總成本為最小。模式考量產品檢驗成本、抽樣資訊以及產品失效成本，可選擇行動方案分兩階段：(一)決定抽樣數，(二)根據抽樣結果對批量剩餘組件之最佳處置。研究方法以決策樹為工具，來建立問題決策模式，並以決策樹理論推導出整體決策目標函數，並據此分析模式性質，再以C++語言撰寫模式程式。
文中採用案例公司所提供的實際數據，透過Arena裡的Input Analyzer的轉換分析求得機率分配與其參數並搭配自行撰寫的程式來計算期望最小支出成本。由計算出的結果發現，當產品檢驗成本/產品失效成本的比值與產品期望良率相差不大時，100％檢驗與0％檢驗時，經常並非最佳選擇。因此，本文旨在建立一個適用於TFT-LCD產業的最佳經濟型抽樣檢驗計畫，並且針對該產業的期望良率與產品檢驗成本/產品失效成本的比值作敏感度分析，並彙整所得到的結果，建立幾組符合TFT-LCD產業製程良率的最佳經濟型抽樣檢驗計畫表，以供決策者使用。

This thesis proposes a decision tree model to minimize expected total cost for handling the TFT-LCD products after assembly. The factors that influence the total cost include inspection cost, product failure cost, product quality, and lot size. The model consists of a two-stage decision: At stage 1, determining the sample size, and at stage 2, deciding what to do about the remaining products of the lot after observing the sampling outcome. The objective function of the model can be derived according to the decision tree theory. Some properties of this model using Beta priors to represent the product quality are presented, and such findings will help facilitate the computation of the model objective function. A computer program coded in Visual C++ is provided for computing the optimal decisions and the optimal objective value of this model.
We studied a real life case in the TFT-LCD industry. A set of data regarding the product quality of a company was collected and used to construct the prior distribution of the product quality. The inspection cost and product failure cost are also estimated using the relevant information from that company. An optimal decision policy on the TFT-LCD products for that company is provided and discussed. Sensitivity analysis as to the model parameters is also performed and the results will provide a good reference for the management to improve their operational procedure. Finally, the research provides several inspection tableaus that can be easily used by the work persons in the assembly line.

目 錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
附錄 VX
第一章、緒論
1.1 研究背景與研究動機 1
1.2 研究範圍 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 研究架構 4
第二章、文獻探討 6
2.1 決策樹 6
2.2 抽樣檢驗模式 12
第三章、問題描述與零組件概述 22
3.1變數符號說明 22
3.2問題描述 23
3.3零組件概述 25
3.3.1 彩色濾光片概述 25
3.3.1.1 彩色濾光片良品與次級品之判定 26
3.3.2 背光模組概述 27
3.3.2.1 背光模組良品與次級品之判定 28
3.3.3 偏光板概述 30
3.3.3.1 偏光板良品與次級品不良之判定 31
第四章、研究方法 34
第五章、實驗結果分析 42
5.1 實驗所使用之電腦設備及軟體 42
5.2 最小成本決策模式之解算 42
5.3 案例公司之實例說明 43
5.4 本研究所提出之決策模式使用表 46
第六章、結論與後續建議 48
附錄一 50
附錄二 52
參考文獻 58

參考文獻

1.Anderson, M. T., B. S. Greenberg and S. L. Stokes,” Acceptance Sampling With Rectification When Inspection Errors Are Present,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp.493-505, 2001.
2.Barlow, R. E. and X. Zhang,” A Critique of Deming’s Discussion of Acceptance Sampling Procedure,” In: A.P. Basu, Ed., Reliability and Quality and Control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp21-32, 1986.
3.Barlow, R. E. and X. Zhang,” Bayesian Analysis of Inspection Sampling Procedures Discussed by Deming,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol.16, North-Holland, 1987.
4.Burke, R. J., D.D. Hobert and F.C. Kaminsky,” The (k1, k2) game,” Quality Progress, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.49-53, 1993..
5.Hillson. David（2005年，12月）決策樹， http://www.risk-doctor.com/pdf-briefings/risk-doctor18c.pdf
6.Kaminsky F. C. and Haberle K. R.” Probability Distributions for the Deming Cost Models,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.355-362, 1995.
7.Kirkwood. C.W, “An Algebraic Approach to Formulating and Solving Large Models for Sequential Decisions under Uncertainty,” Management Science, 39:900-914, July 1993。
8.Lam, Y. and C. V. Lam,” Bayesian double-sampling plans with normal distributions,” The Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.193-207, 1997.
9.Lorenzen, T. J.,“ Minimum Cost Sampling Plan Using Bayesian Methods,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp.57-69, 1985.
10.Moskowitz, H. and K. Tang,” Bayesian Variables Acceptance- Sampling Plans: Quadratic Loss Function and Step-Loss Function,” Technometrics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 340-347, 1992 pp.
11.Papadakis, E. P.,” The Deming Inspection Criterion for Choosing Zero or 100 Percent Inspection,” Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.121-127, 1985.
12.Rigdon, S. E.,” Mood’s Theorem, Deming’s kp Rule, and The Death of Acceptance Sampling,” Quality Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.129-136, 1995
13.Schnoy P.P., “A Comparison of graphical Techniques for Decision Analysis ,” European Journal of Operational Research,78: 1-21, Oct.13, 1994.
14.Sheil, J.,” Towards economically optimal first-off inspection,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 94, pp.179-185, 1996.
15.Vander Wiel, S. A. and S. B. Vardeman,” A Discussion of All-or-None Inspection Policies,” Technometrics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.102-109, 1994
16.林鴻欽，「貝氏檢驗計劃之設計」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1992 年6 月。
17.林世偉，「不可修復產品原料供應商之選擇─貝氏決策模式」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1998 年6 月。
18.邵嘉瑀，「變異數不確定下計量型戴明抽樣檢驗模式之貝氏分析」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2002年6月。
19.劉采筠，「集體決策在經驗貝氏抽樣檢驗計畫之應用」。真理大學數理科學研究所碩士論文，2002年6月。
20.陳慧雯，「貝氏方法應用於計量型戴明檢驗模式」，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，2003年6月。
21.黃乾怡，「電子產品可靠度預估與逐次抽樣計畫─以數位相機為例」，華梵大學工業管理學系碩士論文，2004年6月。
22.黃珮菁，「模糊理論在單次抽樣檢驗計畫之應用」，國立成功大學統計學系碩士論文，2005年6月。
23.李慶豐（2003年）彩色率光片產業概況http://lin-li.elo.com.tw/product-6.htm