臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

企業在不斷追求存活、茁壯、到永續經營的循環裡，併購這種的投入少、成效快、相對風險低的特性，使其在此時代，成為企業及經理人愈來愈喜愛並頻繁操作的手段。
但是，企業併購是一項兼具複雜性與技術性的專業投資活動。併購的評估與執行過程涉及許多知識層面，堪稱高度結合財力與智力的挑戰。除此之外，併購也是一項兼具高收益與高風險的業務，其背後隱藏的資訊風險、經營風險、財務風險、法律風險…等，都在在考驗著企業管理階層的智慧與勇氣。
本研究之個案主併公司C公司成立時原為純貿易商角色，在歷經同源式併購之換股合作、垂直式併購之製造工廠收購後，發展為現今貿易商兼營製造廠角色。不過回顧這些併購案件，其中不乏未能有效創造出預期綜效之標的，甚至還因整合發展不當造成虧損連連，反過來成為主併公司沉重負擔。
由於正逢C公司布局全新併購策略，評估下一個併購標的之際，本研究藉由進行中之C公司併購標的公司S公司個案，檢視C公司之發展策略後，對標的公司S公司進行營運、財務之審查評鑑，以了解標的公司之真實運作狀況，發掘背後隱藏因素與潛在可能問題，就此得出審查結論並規劃可能之整合發展計劃，總結提出「應不予以收購」之建議與緣由，供主併公司進行參考，以期得以迅速止血保本，避免重蹈過去覆轍，傷害其根本及十數年辛苦結晶。
研究最後，輔以個案後續實際執行成果，對本研究之審查結果與建議為之呼應。

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have the characteristics of relatively small investments and low risks, coupled with quick turn-around. Thus, in the endless cycles of pursuing survival, growth, and sustainability, many businesses have turned to M&As .
However, M&A is a complicated and highly professional investment activity. In depth knowledge is needed during the assessment and execution stages, which implies a high degree of financial and intellectual challenges. In addition, M&A combines high-risk and high-return. The hidden risks, such as information risks, operational risks, financial risks, legal risks, etc., all challenge corporate management’s wisdom and courage.
The target of this study, Company C, was established as a trader. It has engaged in various acquisition activities, and has evolved into a conglomerate with manufacturing capabilities. However, many of these M&A cases were failures that did not lead to expected synergies. Some have even resulted in losses due to improper integration and development, and have become heavy burdens for the acquirer.
This study took the opportunity that Company C is in the process of acquiring Company S, and conducted a due diligence on the Company S, and also to provide recommendations in developing any integration plan for the acquirer. This study did an in depth examination of the target from various aspects, including financial, operations, and R&D. Many problems were identified and analyzed. The conclusion of the due diligence was a “No Go” based on the long term interests of Company C. At the end of this study, a follow-up of the actual decision and the development are provided.

第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 3
1-3 研究目的 3
1-4 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2-1 併購概論 5
2-2 併購的階段與問題 10
2-3 標的審查與整合管理 15
第三章 個案公司簡介 21
3-1 主併公司簡介 21
3-2 主併公司併購回顧 21
3-3 標的公司簡介 32
3-4 標的公司併購回顧 32
3-5 本併購案過程 34
第四章 標的審查 37
4-1 財務審查 37
4-2 產品審查 45
4-3 市場審查 55
第五章 審查結論與建議 63
5-1 財務建議 63
5-2 營運建議 67
5-3 總結 71
第六章 後續執行成果 73
6-1 工程狀況 73
6-2 財務狀況 73
6-3 結語 74
參考文獻 75

3M. (2013). 3M™ Tape & Reel. Retrieved from 3M™: http://solutions.3m.com.tw/wps/portal/3M/zh_TW/TapeReel/Home/
Ansoff, H. I., & Mcdonnell, E. J. (1990). Implanting Strategic Management. New York: Prentice Hall.
Berggren, C. (2003). Mergers, MNES and innovation - The need for new research approaches. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(2), pp. 173-191.
Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motivates for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), pp. 347-361.
BoardWin Technology. (2012). Embossed Carrier Tape Forming Machine ---BoardWin Technology. Retrieved from BoardWin Technology: https://sites.google.com/site/boardwintechnology/
Bradley, J. W., & Korn, D. H. (1979). Acquisition and Merger: A shifting route to corporate growth. Management Review, 68(3), pp. 46-51.
Brouther, K., Hastenburg, P., & Joran, V. (1998). If Most Mergers Fail Why Are They So Popular? Long Range Planning, 31(3), pp. 347-353.
Brushman, B., Sanderson, S., & Voorde, M. V. (1998). How to achieve value behind the deal during merger integration. Oil & Gas Journal, 96(37), pp. 21-28.
Business Week. (1990). The Best and Worst Deals of the 80s. Business Week, Jan. 15, 40-45.
Copeland, T. E., & Weston, J. F. (1979). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Datta, D. K. (1991). Organizational Fit and Acquisition Performance: Effects of Post-Acquisition Integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), pp. 281-297.
Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy. Journal of Law and Econamics, 16(1), 1-9.
Drucker, P. E. (1981). Five Rules for Successful Acquisition. The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 15, 28.
Fluck, Z., & Lynch, A. (1999). Why Do Firms Merge and Then Divest? A Theory of Financial Synergy. Journal of Business, 72(3), pp. 319-346.
Gammelgaard, J. (2004). Access to Competence: an Emerging Acquisition Motive. Europe Business Forum, 17(Spring), pp. 44-47.
Gupta, P., & Leske, N. (2012, 11 21). UPDATE 7-HP accuses UK unit Autonomy as takes $9 bln hit. Retrieved from Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/21/hp-results-idUSL4N0902ZH20121121
Haspeslagh, P., & Jemison, D. (1991). Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value through Corporate Renewal. New York: The Free Press.
Jemison, D. B., & Sitkin, S. (1986). Acquisition: the process can be a problem. Harvard Business Review, 64(2), 106-116.
Kitching, J. (1967). Why do mergers miscarry? Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 84-100.
Levy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1970). Diversification, Portfolio Analysis and the Uneasy Case for Conglomerate Mergers. The Journal of Finance, 25(4), pp. 795-802.
Lewellen, W. G. (1991). A Pure Financial Rationale for Conglomerate Merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2), pp. 521-537.
Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1997). Joining Forces: Making One Plus One Equal Three in Mergers, Acquisitions, and Alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
MBA Lib. (2012年7月19日). 併購. 擷取自 MBA Lib: http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/併購
MBA Lib. (2012年8月23日). 併購盡職調查. 擷取自 MBA Lib: http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/併購盡職調查
MBA Lib. (2013年1月17日). 財務盡職調查. 擷取自 MBA Lib: http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/Due_diligence
Paine, F. T., & Power, D. J. (1984). Merger Strategy: A Examination of Drucker's five rules for Successful Acquisition. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp. 99-110.
Scherer, F. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Seth, A. (1990). Value Creation in Acquisitions: A Re-Examination of Performance Issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), pp. 99-115.
Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate Acquisition Strategies And Economic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), pp. 377-386.
Stigler, G. J. (1983). The Organization of Industry. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999). Beating the Odds of Merger and Acquisition Failure: Seven Key Practices that Improve the Chance for Expected Integration and Synergies. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), pp. 22-36.
Weissman, K. A., & Childs, R. L. (2006). Nine months before your merger - planning for a healthy merger "baby". Community Banker, 15(8), pp. 40-44.
Weston, J. F., & Chung, K. S. (1983). Do Mergers Make Money? A Research Summary. Mergers and Acquisitions, 18(3), pp. 40-48.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1977). The vertical integration of production: Market failure consideration. The American Economic Review, 61(2), pp. 112-123.
余尚武, & 江玉柏. (1998). 影響企業購併成敗之因素與策略探討. 經濟情勢暨評論季刊, 四(二), 頁 125-146.
享豐科技有限公司. (2011年8月3日). MT600 Tape Reel 載帶包裝機. 擷取自 享豐科技有限公司: http://www.hca-tech.com.tw/eyp/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=MT600
奇菱科技. (2011年6月30日). 電子元件包裝材. 擷取自 奇菱科技: http://www.chilintech.com.tw/products-3_108-tchinese.html
東森新聞國際中心. (2012年11月22日). 惠普併購案被騙2563億！震驚華爾街、FBI要查. 擷取自 ETtoday: http://www.ettoday.net/news/20121122/130595.htm
徐俊明, & 楊維如. (2011). 財務管理理論與實務 (第 五 版). 台北市: 新陸書局.
恩柏仕精密工業. (2012). 滾輪式載帶成型機. 擷取自 恩柏仕精密工業: http://www.mpak.com.tw/productdetail.asp?ProductID=30
瑋鋒公司. (2005). 公司願景. 擷取自 瑋鋒公司: http://www.upak.com.tw/about-3.htm
瑋鋒科技. (2005). 產品. 擷取自 瑋鋒科技: http://www.upak.com.tw/product-1.htm
葉仰哲. (2013). 2012年第四季及全年我國半導體產業回顧與展望. 工研院IEK.
趙祖佑. (2013). 2012年第四季及全年我國電子零組件產業回顧與展望. 工研院IEK.
簡國帆. (2012年11月22日). 惠普收購軟體商鉅額虧損 FBI調查. 擷取自 聯合新聞網: http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=425788