壹、中文部分
王瑋樺（2001）。國小三年級數學學習障礙學生加法文字題解題歷程與補救教學之研究。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，屏東。古明峰（1999）。加減法文字題語意結構、問題難度及解題關係之探討。新竹師院學報，12，1-25。林永吉（1990）。師鐸電腦輔助教學編輯系統CAITOOL。台北：松崗。
林清山（譯）（1997）。教育心理學－認知取向。台北：遠流出版公司。（Mayer, R. E., 1987）。
吳淑珠（1997）。國小學童自我概念、數學學習動機與數學成就的關係。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，屏東。邱志賢、毛國楠（2001）國小六年級學童解未知數文字題之另類概念分析。台東師院學報，13（下），23-60。侯鳳秋（1998）。適性CAI中個人化文意範例對國小學生解數學文字題之影響。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，花蓮。侯鳳秋、陳龍川（1999）。適性CAI中個人化文意範例對國小學生解數學文字題之影響。科學教育學刊，7（3），233-254。秦麗花（2007）。數學閱讀指導的理論與實務。台北：洪葉。
徐偉民、徐于婷（2009）。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析：台灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究，22（2），67-94。郭秀緞(2006)。以認知負荷理論探討數學問題設計與後設認知策略教學對國小高年級學生數學解題之影響。高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。未出版，高雄。教育部國教專業社群網（2009）：取自於http://teach.eje.edu.tw
教育部國民教育司網站（2009）：取自於http://www.edu.tw/eje/index.aspx
湯茹君（2008）。運用電腦教學光碟提升國小低年級學生英文字母學習成效之研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處語文教學碩士論文，未出版，新竹。張春興（1996）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華書局。
莊松潔（2005）。不同年級學童在具體情境中未知數概念及解題歷程之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，高雄市。陳立倫（2000）。兒童解答數學文字題的認知歷程。國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文。未出版，嘉義。黃寶彰（2003）。六、七年級學童數學學習困難部分之研究。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，屏東。數學領域部編本教科書編輯委員會（2009）。國民小學數學教師手冊第八冊（四下）。國家教育研究院籌備處出版，台北。
蔡文標（2002）。影響國小數學低成就學生數學成就的相關因素及直接教學效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特教系博士論文。未出版，彰化。貳、英文部分
Anand P. D., McCormick D., Krisak N., ＆ Ross, S. M. (1985). Personalizing context in teaching mathematical concepts: Teacher-managed and computer-assisted models. Journal of Education Communication Technology, 33(3), 169-178.
Anand, P. D., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1988). Personalizing math problem:A modern technology approach to an old idea. Educationl Technology,28(5),20-25.
Anand, P. D., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 72–78.
Bates, E. T., ＆ Wiest, L. R. (2004). Impact of personalization of mathematical word problems on student performance. The Mathematics Educator, 14(2), 17–26.
Briars, D. J., ＆ Larkins, J. H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245-296.
Chen, C. J. ＆ Liu, P. L. (2007). Personalized computer-assisted mathematics problem-solving program and its impact on Taiwanese students.The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 105-121.
Cordova, D.I., & Lepper, M.R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.
Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children’s interpretations of arithmetic word problem Cognition and Instruction, 8, 261-289.
Davis- Dorsey, J., Ross, S. M., Morrison, G.R. (1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 61-68.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and Effort in Education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
Hart, J. M. (1996). The Effect of Personalized Word Problems. Teaching
Children Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 504- 505.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., ＆ Green, C. E.(1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students eye fixations. Journal of Education Psychology, 84, 76-84.
Herndon, J.N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 11–14.
Ku, H. Y., & Sullivan, H.J. (2000). Personalization of mathematics word problems in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 49–59.
Ku, H. Y., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Student performance and attitudes using personalized mathematics instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1),21–34.
Li, F. L. N. (1992). The effect of superfluous information on children’s solution statements in arithmetic word problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363-371.
Lopez, C. L., ＆ Sullivan, H. J. (1991). Effects of personalized math instruction for Hispanic students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(1), 95-100.
Lopez, C. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1992). Effect of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of Hispanic students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(4), 5–13.
Lwo, L. S. (1992). Effects of Individualized Examples and Personalized Contexts in Computer-Based Adaptive Teaching of Algebra Word Problems. Oregon State University doctoral dissertation.
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition: Second Edition. New York: Freeman.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(2), 49–63.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. (2ndED), New York: Doubleday.
Renninger, K. A., Ewen, L., & Lasher, A. K. (2002). Individual interest as context in expository text and mathematical word problems. Learning and Instruction, 12, 467–491.
Simsek, N. & Cakir, O.(2009). Effect of Personalization on Students' Achievement and Gender Factor in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4:4.
Wright, J. P., & Wright, C. D. (1986). Personalized verbal problems: An application of the language experience approach. Journal of Educational Research, 79(6), 358–362.