臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究區域位於台北縣三峽鎮，樂佩山及喀博山西北側坡面上，海拔介1135至1165公尺間。於1990年設立1公頃永久樣區，至1994年調查完畢。調查得31科、49屬、70種木本植物共12875株，其中以茶科（8種）、灰木科（7種）、薔薇科（6種）、冬青科（6種）所佔種類最多。以種的優勢度而言，錐果櫟為最優勢(17.08%)、次為紅花八角(13.80%)、毽子櫟(11.68%)、紅楠(10.64%)、綠樟(5.55%)等。優勢度集中於少數種類，排名前五名樹種累積重要值已達58.75%。並依雙向列表分析法（TWINSPAN）將整個樣區切分為四種生育地類型。
植株分布與地形相關分析結果顯示：樣區之地形因子中，坡向與植株密度、植株平均胸高斷面積明顯相關；海拔則與植株密度呈明顯相關。趨勢大致為東北坡植株密度高於西坡、且東北坡植株平均胸高斷面積小於西坡，隨海拔增加兩坡面植株密度逐漸縮小。依不同物種進行分析，則可區分出東北面坡分布型、西面坡分布型及廣泛分布型，並從分析數據可觀察各物種在空間上漸進變化。
空間分析法則以Ripley’s K Analysis及L-function分析全樣區所有木本樹種，有80%以上呈現群聚分布；而分別對四種生育地類型分析時，發現明顯有群聚型比例降低、隨機型比例升高現象。顯示生育地因子可能是影響植物空間分布的主要因素之一。於各型生育地中發現冠層大樹間皆呈現顯著的規則分布，顯示個體間存在排斥作用，其範圍約在2至5公尺間。從優勢種群體（前五優勢種綜合）來看，植株間4公尺內存在競爭排除的現象，並隨著徑級成長，其作用範圍及作用程度有逐漸增強的情形。以單樹種來說則個體間的競爭情形仍然存在，但不若與鄰樹之關係明顯；然而部分樹種大樹周邊2至7公尺內小樹有偏向規則分布的情形，可能受到傳播機制與幼苗存活機率所造成。
就目前分析結果而言，植物在本森林中的分布受到多重因子的影響，且各因子影響的空間尺度各異。如大尺度生育地環境差異、鄰近植株成長過程中的資源競爭、以及同種個體間競爭與繁殖機制等。使植物個體的分布呈現我們所觀察到的情形。

Abstarct
From 1990 to 1994, a permanent 1-ha plot of warm-temperate rain forest was estabilished at Mt. Lopei, North Taiwan. All free-standing woody plants in this plot with DBH ≥ 1cm were identified, tagged, and mapped.
A total of 70 tree species ( 12875 stems ), belonging to 31 families and 79 genera were recorded. The total basal area was about 47.53 m2/ha. The forest was dominant by Cyclobalanopsis longinux (17.58%), Illicium arborescens (13.79%), Cyclobalanopsis sessilifolia (11.68%), Machilus thunbergii (10.64%), and Meliosma squimulata (5.54%). Cumulative important value of these five species reached 58.75%.
TWINSPAN analysis revealed four distinct groups of quadrats. Sites of the first and second group were located at the north-eastern hillside and the hilltop. These two groups was thought to be a windward community because of its high density, low canopy and specific species composition, while the other two group was thought to be the oppsite. Tree species was divided into three types, north-eastern, western, and random, by their distribution. Most species were patchily distributed, showing high correlation with aspect and elevation.
Spatial patterns of tree species were studied by Ripley’s K analysis and L-function. Out of the 44 species occuring with ≥ 15 individuals in whole plot, 81.82% had an aggregated distribution, 15.91% were randomly distributed and just 2.27% showed regular distribution. But in each habitat, obviously, most species were randomly distributed. We suggest that habitat factors, such as wind and topography, played an important role in spatial distribution of tree species, and they may cause the difference between whole plot and each habitat.
Spatial patterns of canopy trees showed a regular distribution between 2 to 5 meters. Adult trees of dominant groups also showed a regular distribution in 4 meters, and as tree individuals grew, this range became wider. It is revealed that tree individuals, especially adult ones, compete anainst each other for some recources, such as space or light, etc.
Spatial relationships between conspecific adults and juveniles mostly showed a regular pattern between 2 to 7 meters, or longer. We are confident that adults affect the survival of juveniles. It could caused by some factors such as resource limiting, competition, herbivores, and pathogens, etc.
This study suggest that this forest is subjected to multiple factors, eg., topography, wind, inter- and intra-specific competition, seed dispersal and germination. The importance of each factor changes across spatial and temporal scales.

目次
附表目次………………………………………………………….………i
附圖目次…………………………………………………………………ii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………….…I
英文摘要………………………………………………………………... II
壹、前言…………………………………………………………………1
貳、研究區域概述………………………………………………………3
參、研究方法……………………………………………………………6
肆、結果…………………………………………………………………14
伍、討論…………………………………………………………………81
陸、結論…………………………………………………………………88
柒、參考文獻……………………………………………………………90
捌、附錄…………………………………………………………………93

柒、參考文獻
1. 陳益明。1991。台灣東北季風影響下植群生態之研究-以東北部基隆火山群一代為例。國立台灣大學森林學研究所資源保育組碩士論文。
2. 趙偉村。1997。南仁山亞熱帶雨林樹種分布類型之研究。國立台灣大學植物學研究所碩士論文。
3. 謝長富、陳尊賢等。1992。墾丁國家公園亞熱帶雨林永久樣區之調查。墾丁國家公園管理處保育研究報告第85號。
4. 蘇夢淮。1993。南仁山區亞熱帶雨林樹冠層葉片結構之研究。國立台灣大學植物學研究所碩士論文。
5. Augspurger, C.K. 1983. Seed dispersal of the tropical trees, Platypodium elegans, and the the escape of its seedling from fungal patogens. Ecology. 65: 1705-1712.
6. Chapin, F.S., McGraw, J.B. & Shaver, G.R. 1989. Competition cause regular spacing of alder in Alaskan tundra. Oecologia. 79: 412-416.
7. Christensen, N.L. 1977. Cahnges in structure, pattern and diversity associated with climax forest maturation in Piedmont, North Carolina. Am. Midl. Nat. 97: 176-188.
8. Clark, D.B. and Clark, D.A. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain-forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. Am. Nat. 124: 769-788.
9. Collinet, F. 1997. Essai de regroupement des principales especes strucrantes d’une foret dense humide d’apres l’analyse de leur repartition spatiale ( Foret de Paracou-Guyane francaise ). These de doctorat, Universite Claude Vernard, Lyon.
10. Condit, R., Hubbell, S.P. & Foster, R.B. 1994. Density dependence in two understory tree species in a neotropical forest. Ecology. 75: 671-680.
11. Connell, J.H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: den Boer, P.J. & Gradwell, G.R. (eds). Dynamics of numbers in populations, pp. 298-312. Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute, Pudoc, Wageningen.
12. Cremer, K.W. 1965. Dissemination of seed from Eucalyptus regnans. Aust. For. 33-37.
13. Dale, R.T.M. 1999. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University press.
14. Duncan, R.P. 1991. Competition and the coexistence of species in a mixed podocarp stand. J. Ecol. 63:883-896.
15. Fonteyn, P. & Mahall, B. 1978. Competition among desert perennials. Nature. 275: 544-545.
16. Fowler, N. 1986. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 89-110.
17. Greig-Smith, P & Chadwick, M.J. 1965. Data on pattern within plant communities. III. Acacia-Capparis semi-desert scrub in the Sudan. J. Ecol. 53: 465-474.
18. Hasse, P., Pugnaire, F.I., Clark, S.C. & Incoll, L.D. 1996. Spatial patterns in a two-tiered semi-arid shrubland in southeastern Spain. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 527-534.
19. He F., Legendre, P. & LaFrankie, J.V. 1997. Districution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 105-114.
20. Hubbell, S.P. & Foster R.B. 1990. Structure, dynamics, and equilibrium status of old-growth forest on Barro Colorado Island. pp. 522-541. Four neotropical rain forests. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
21. Janzen, D.H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forest. Am. Nat. 104: 501-528.
22. Kenkel, N.C. 1988. Pattern of self-thinning in jack pine: testing the random mortality hypothesis. Ecology. 69: 1017-1024.
23. King. T.J. & Woodell S. 1973. The cause of regular pattern in desert perennials. J. Ecol. 61: 761-765.
24. Nakagoshi, N., Takamatsu, S. & Nehira, K. 1983. Post-fire vegetation at 21 years old stand in Otake, Southern Japan. Bull. Biol. Soc. Hiroshima University. 49: 23-33.
25. Newbery, D.M. & Proctor, J. 1984. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forest in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. IV. Association between tree distribution and soil factors. J. Ecol. 72: 475-193.
26. Pelissier, R. & Goreaud, F. 2001. A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 99-108.
27. Peterson, C.J. & Pickett, S.T.A. 1990. Microsite and elevation influences on early regeneration after catastrophic wind throw. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 657-662
28. Sterner, R.W., Ribic, C.A. & Schatz, G.E. 1986. Testing for life historical changes in spatial patterns of four tropical tree species. J. Ecol. 74: 621-633.
29. Woodell, S., Mooney, H. & Hill A. 1969. The behavior of Larrea divaricata ( Creosote Bush ) in response to rainfall in California. J. Ecol. 57: 37-44.
30. Wright, S.J. 1982. Competition, differential mortality, and their effect on the spatial pattern of a desert perennial Eriogonum inflatum Torr and Frem ( Polygonaceae ). Oecologia (Berl). 54: 35-49.