臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著社會開放與經濟繁榮，國內大學院校得以快速擴增。在教育資源有限下，大學院校的快速增加，將造成教育資源分散。在此環境下，各大學的經營將面臨日趨激烈的競爭，大學如何在競爭環境中求得生存，成為大學院校經營者必須深思與解決的問題。近年來，大學策略聯盟的案例日漸增多，顯示策略聯盟已成為大學院校合作經營的有效方法之一。對於大學策略聯盟的態勢如能事先進行詳實的評估，必能提高合作的可行性及有效性。
鑑此，本研究進行大學策略聯盟的態勢分析，首先針對大學策略聯盟的類型、成功因素及現況等相關文獻進行回顧。本研究在資料取得的部分區分為兩個階段，第一階段利用專家問卷調查，選取大學進行策略聯盟的關鍵因素及可行聯盟方式。根據第一階段的調查結果，構建大學策略聯盟態勢評估模式，其中分別考量四個向度共十八個關鍵因素重要程度及十種可行聯盟方式達成程度。第二階段利用專家問卷，彙整五所佛教學校的管理者及華梵大學校務研究發展委員會委員的專業看法，據以進行大學策略聯盟可行方式的評估。最後本研究以佛教人士已興辦大學為例，進行實證分析。根據評估結果顯示，五所大學的管理者及華梵大學校務研究發展委員會委員共同認為「圖書、設備及資訊分享」、「共同舉辦活動」、「校際選課及學分相互承認」、「研究計畫合作」、「遠距教學聯盟」、「交換教師及學生」及「聯合招生及文宣」等七個可行聯盟方式為進攻型策略，專家間的看法頗為一致。

With the society and economy growing up, the domestic colleges increased. Under the limited educational resources, the increasing colleges will cause educational resources dispersed. According to this situation, the management of each college is going to face the competition increasingly. Therefore, how to survive under this competitive environment has become the most important issue for those managers of colleges. For recent years, the cases of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan have increased. It showed that strategic alliances of universities has become one of the effective methods in cooperative business operation among these colleges. If we could estimate the situation of strategic alliances of universities fully and accurately beforehand, the cooperative business operation must be feasible and effective.
Based on the reasons above, this study analyze the situation of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan. First of all, the research will focus on surveying the types, successful factors and present situation of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan. This research will divide into two stages on the part of acquiring data of analysis. At the first stage, utilizing the expert questionnaire survey to choose the key factors and feasible alliances methods of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan. According to the results of first stage, we can establish the evaluative model of the situation of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan. Besides, we also considered the four quadrants including the important degree of eighteen key factors and the reachable degree of ten feasible alliances methods. At the second stage, utilizing the expert questionnaire survey to categorize the professional points of view from the managers of five colleges by Buddhist and the research development committee of administrative affairs of Hua-Fan University to evaluate the feasibility of strategic alliances of universities in Taiwan.
Finally, we took a case study of the private universities by Buddhist to prove the prediction. According to the evaluative results, the mangers of these five colleges and the research development committee of administrative affairs of Hua-Fan University have a common view of that “Books, Facilities and Information Shared”, “Hold Activities Together”, “Courses Registered and Credits Admitted Mutually”, “Research Projects Collaborated”, ”The Alliances of Distance Education”, “Teachers and Students Exchanged”, “ Recruit students United” these seven feasible alliances methods are aggressive strategies. The points of view among these experts are identically.

誌　謝 I
摘　要 II
ABSTRACT III
目　錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 X
第一章　緒論 1
1.1　研究動機 1
1.2　研究目的 2
1.3　研究內容 3
1.4　研究方法 4
1.5　研究流程 5
第二章　文獻回顧 7
2.1　策略聯盟定義 7
2.2　策略聯盟動機及目標的探討 10
2.3　大學策略聯盟型態與成功因素 14
2.4　我國大學策略聯盟之回顧 16
第三章　佛教人士已興辦大學現況分析 29
3.1　華梵大學 29
3.2　佛光人文社會學院 32
3.3　玄奘人文社會學院 35
3.4　南華大學 38
3.5　慈濟大學 41
3.6　小結 44
第四章　策略聯盟意願調查與分析 47
4.1　關鍵因素之研擬 47
4.2　可行策略聯盟方式之研擬 51
4.3　專家問卷設計與分析方法 54
4.4　關鍵因素與策略的評選 54
4.5　調查結果分析 59
第五章　模糊策略定位與行動評估方法 68
5.1　SPACE評估法 68
5.2　模糊語意法 71
5.3　Fuzzy SPACE評估模式 72
5.4　簡例說明 79
第六章　策略聯盟態勢之評估 94
6.1　佛教人士已興辦大學策略聯盟態勢之評估 94
6.2　華梵大學進行策略聯盟態勢之評估 106
第七章　結論與建議 118
7.1　研究結論 118
7.2　建議事項 120
參考文獻 121
附錄Ⅰ　佛教人士已興辦大學之策略聯盟評估調查表 128
附錄Ⅱ　佛教人士已興辦大學策略聯盟方式評估調查表 137

大學教育政策白皮書(2001)，http://www.high.edu.tw/hiedu_asp/intranet /d5/白皮書上網版.doc。
中央日報(2002/06/18)，http://news.yam.com/cna/culture/news/200206/ 200206171820251.html。
中央日報(2002/07/27)，http://www.to100.com.tw/university/unews/ un_ 54.htm。
中央日報(2002/08/06)，第十版。
中央日報(2003/04/24)，第十四版。
中國時報(2001/11/07)，http://www.sfmoe.org/asp_c/news_ltr/0111.htm。
王保進(1993)，高等教育表現指標研究，政治大學教育研究所博士論文，台北。
全面提升大學整體競爭力計畫(2001)，http://www.high.edu.tw/01/1_1/。
江岷欽(1996)，「學術機構合併對組織文化之影響：美國大學之實證分析」，技術及職業教育　35，29-32。
江義平(1999)，台灣中小企業策略聯盟決策模式建構與分析之研究，中興大學企業管理學系博士論文，台中。
吳青松(1990a)，「國際策略聯盟與經營績效評估─美國電腦製造業實例」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會論文集，1-22。
吳青松(1992b)，「產業策略聯盟之國際發展型態與趨勢」，台灣經濟研究月刊，15(5)，23-27。
亞洲週刊(2002/03/17)，http://www.cdn.com.tw/live/2002/03/04/text/ 910304e4.htm。
柯丁萍(1994)，策略聯盟伙伴選擇決定因素之研究，台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，台北。
高孔廉(1979)，「中小企業之合作型態及其困難」，企銀季刊，3(2)，77-81。
國立大學校院區域資源整合發展計畫(2001)，http://www.high.edu.tw/01/1_1/。
國語日報(2002/02/08)，第二版。
梁金盛(2000)，台灣地區大學院校整併策略之研究，政治大學教育學系博士論文，台北。
郭昭佑(1999)「高等教育辦學取向政策之探究：及群分析在大學表現指標之應用」，教育政策論壇　2(2)，68-97。
陳裕升(2001)，應用模糊多準則決策於貨櫃船公司服務品質評估之研究，海洋大學航運管理研究所碩士論文，基隆。
劉仁智(1994)，多評準則決策：分析層級程序尺度之研究，國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文，台北。
歐用生(2000)，高等教育中多校合併一校之教育發展：以國立師院與鄰近國立大學合併為例，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
蔡志宏(2001)，巨變時代下中型醫院策略聯盟之研究，中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文，台中。
蔡秀英(2001)，我國高等教育整併模式研究，中原大學企業管理學碩士論文，桃園。
蔡明田、張淑昭、程永明(2001)，「台灣封裝產業發展晶圓級封裝之策略態勢與發展方向之模糊評價分析」，成功大學學報　36，135-160。
鄧振源(2002)，投資計畫：方法與應用，運籌規劃與管理研究中心，基隆。
鄧振源(2002)，策略管理講義，華梵大學工業管理學系，台北。
薛天祥(1999)，「高校合併的理性思考」，跨世紀海峽兩岸高等教育展望學術研討會論文集，台灣大學教育學程中心，台北。
Aaker, D. A.(1992), Developing Business Strategies, 3rd ed., Wiley & Sons, New York.
Borys, B. and D. B. Jemison (1989), “Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations,” Academy of Management Review 14(2), 234-249.
Buckley, P. J. and M. Casson (1988), “A theory of cooperation in international business”, in F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange(eds.), Cooperative Strategic in International Business, Mass./ Toronto：D.C. Heath & Co./Lexington.
Chambers. G. S. (1987), Merger between Private College: An Empirical Analysis, The University of Rochester.
Chen C. T.(2000), “Extensions of TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 1-9.
Chen, S. J. and Hwang, C. L. (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making : Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Contractor. F. J and P. Lorange(1988), “Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures,” In F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds), Cooperative Strategic in International Business, 1-28, Toronto MA.
Deuben, C. J. (1992), Factors Facilitating or Inhibiting Institutional Merger among three Catholic Institutions of Higher Education, Wayne State University.
Devlin, G. and M. Bleackley (1988), “Strategies alliances-guidelines for Success,” Long Range Planning 21(5), 18-23.
Forrest, J. E. (1990), “Strategic alliance and the small technology-based firm,” Journal of Small Business Management 28(3), 37-45.
Ghertman, M. and J. Obadia (1992), “Balance of complementary assets and stability conditions of a dynamic transaction cost theory of alliances: The case of US biotechnology,” Working Paper, Chamber de Commerce et D’industrie de Paris.
Grassmuck, K. (1991), “More small college merge with large one, but some find the process can be painful,” Chronicle of Higher Education 38(4), 37-39.
Gulati, R (1998), “Alliance and networks,” Strategic Management Journal 19(3), 293-317.
Harrigan, K. R. (1988a), “Strategic alliance and partner asymmetries,” Management International Review, 53-72.
James, B. G. (1985), Business Wargames, New York: Lexington Books.
James, B.G.(1985), “Alliance: the new strategic focus,” Long Range Planning 18(3), 76-81.
Killing, J. P. (1988), “Understanding alliances: The role of task and organizational complexity,” in F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (eds.),Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Toronto, MA.
Le Tarte, W. P. (1992), “The financial implications of school district consolidation michigan,” Dissertation Abstracts International 53(5), 1345A.
Lewis, J. D. (1990), Partnerships for profit, N. Y. The Free Press.
Lynch, R. P. (1989), The Practical Guide to Joint Ventures and Corporate Alliance, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lyons, M.P. (1991), “Joing-venture as strategic choice-a literature review,” Long Range Planning, Aug., 130-144.
Magasaysay, J. (1989), “Strategic: Why compete? Collaborate!” World Executive’s Digest, Oct,. 29-34.
Mariti, P. and R. H. Smiley (1983), “Comparative agreements and the organization of industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics 31, 437-451.
Matin, J. and Samels, J. (1994), “The new kind of college mergers,” Planning for Higher Education 22(2), 31-34.
Mohr, J. and R. Sperkman (1994), “Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques,” Strategic Management Journal 15, 135-152.
Mulver, T. M. (1993), An Analysis of the Mergers of American Institutions of Higher Education (Institutional Mergers), University of Massachusetts.
Murray Jr., E. A. and J. F. Mahon (1993), “Strategic alliance: Gateway to the new Europe? ,” Long Range Planning 26(4), 102-111.
Nelson(1985), School Consolidation. ERIC Digest, No. 13.
Parkhe, A. (1991), “Interfirm diversity, organization learning and longevity in global strategic alliance,” Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter, 579-601.
Perlmutter, H. V. and D. A. Heenan (1986) , “Cooperate to compete globally,” Harvard Business Review, Mar./ Apr., 136-152.
Peters, M. H. (1977), Merger of institutions of higher education,” College and University 52(2), 202-210.
Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free, New York.
Porter, M. E. and M. B. Fuller (1986), “Coalitions and global strategy,” in M. E. Porter (ed.), Competitive in Global Industries, 315-343, Boston, MA.
Root, F. R. (1988), “Some taxonomies of international cooperative arrangement,” in F.J. Contractor & P. Lorange (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Toronto, MA.
Rowe, A. J., Mason, R. O. and K. E. Dickel (1982), Strategic Management and Business Policy: A Methodological Approach, Addison-Wesley.
Rowley, G. (1997), “Merger in higher education: A strategic analysis,” Higher Education Quarterly 51(3), 251-263.
Singh, K. (1997), “The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival,” Academy of Management Journal 40(2), 339-367.
Takac, P. F. and C. P. Singh (1992), “Strategic in banking,” Management Decision 30(1), 32-43.
Temple, P. and Whitchurch, C.(1994), “Recent growth mergers in british higher education, in J. Martin, J. E. Samels and Associates (eds), “Merging Colleges for Mutual Growth: A New Strategy for Managers,” Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, London.
Teng, J. Y. and G. H. Tzeng(1996), “A multiobjective programming approach for selecting non-independent transportation investment alternatives,” Transportation Research 30(4), 291-307.
Thompson, H. L. (1985), “Considering a merger ?,” Planning for Higher Education 13(3) Spring, 21-26.
Williamson, O. E. (1990), “Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly 36.
Yoshino, M. Y. and U. S. Rangan (1995), Strategic Alliances-An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Zuckerman, H. S. and T. A. D’Aunno (1990), “Hospital alliances: Cooperative strategy in a competitive environment,” Health Care Management Review 15(2), 21-30.
Zadeh L. A. (1975), “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Ⅰ,” Information Science, 199-251.
Zadeh L. A. (1975), “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Ⅱ,” Information Science, 301-357.
Zadeh L. A. (1975), “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoningⅢ,” Information Science , 43-80.