臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

面對環境急速變遷及不可避免的都市化，綠建築的概念逐漸獲得各國的重視。然而，長期以來，綠建築的執行與推廣過程備受阻礙，其中一個關鍵因素是多數民眾對綠建築的認知不足，無法理解綠建築所能產生的具體效益。本研究為達教育目的，根據台灣綠建築九大指標(EEWH)，設計一套遊戲時間約為40分鐘，可供二至四人同時進行的綠建築策略遊戲「GBGame」。為驗證教學及學習成效，本研究針對72名高職建築科學生，區分為：遊戲教學的「實驗組」與傳統教學的「對照組」；其次，採用「IMMS教材動機量表」檢測兩者學習動機上的差異，以及根據建築科課程內容及台灣綠建築九大指標所編成的「綠建築測驗卷」檢測兩者學習成效的差異。研究結果顯示：(1) 接受遊戲教學的學生具有高度學習動機，並明顯超越傳統教學的學生；(2) 經測驗發現接受遊戲教學的學生，其學習成效普遍較佳；(3) 將「 IMMS教材動機量表」內ARCS四個部分之問項交叉檢驗後發現，接受遊戲教學的學生在遊戲的注意力(attention)、相關性(relevance)、信心度(confidence)與滿意度(satisfaction)等四個層面均與學習成效呈高度顯著性。此結果亦顯示此遊戲不僅能成功作為綠建築課程教材，經反覆遊戲後更將能有效提升使用者對於綠建築議題的學習動機與學習成效。

In order to improve education about green buildings, we designed a multiplayer (2–4 people) green building strategy game called GBGame, which delivered knowledge about the Taiwanese green building market. To verify both the game’s learning and teaching effect, we conducted separate measurements using the ARCS motivation model and a paper-based exam among 72 students majoring in architecture, divided into an experimental group (who played the game) and a control group (who underwent lecture-based instruction). Furthermore, an “IMMS (Instructional Materials Motivational Scale)” was applied to measure the difference on learning motivations between the two groups. Also, a green building exam designed based on the nine green building indices in Taiwan and the course content of the Department of Architecture in universities was given to the students to examine the difference on learning effects. The results indicate that (1) students who received the game-based education have stronger learning motivation during the game than those who received the traditional education (2) students who learned through games generally exhibited better learning effectiveness than those who did not when examined; and (3) following cross-validation on the four sections of ARCS in IMMS, we discovered a highly significant correlation between the learning effect, attention, perception of relevance, confidence, and satisfaction of students who learned through games. The results also indicate that in addition to being an effective instructional material for green building education, this game can improve users’ learning motivation to learn about green buildings through repeated gameplay.

目 錄

摘　要...........................................................................................................I
誌 謝..........................................................................................................3
第一章 緒論..............................................................................................1
第二章 教育與遊戲..................................................................................6
2.1. 教育與遊戲..........................................................................................6
2.2. 教育遊戲之概述..................................................................................8
第三章 ARCS動機模式及IMMS教材動機量表......................................12
第四章 GBGame的發展與設計...............................................................15
4.1. 遊戲概念............................................................................................15
4.2. 遊戲道具............................................................................................17
4.3. 遊戲規則與步驟................................................................................21
第五章 實驗成果及驗證..........................................................................24
5.1. 遊戲實驗的目的................................................................................24
5.2. 實驗對象............................................................................................24
5.3. 研究工具............................................................................................28
5.4. 數據分析和結果討論........................................................................29
5.4.1. 學習動機之驗證-對照組................................................................29
5.4.2. 學習動機之驗證-實驗組................................................................32
5.4.3. 學習動機檢驗.................................................................................35
5.4.4. 實驗組動機與學習成效之交叉檢驗.............................................36
5.4.5. 學習成效檢驗.................................................................................37
第六章 實驗控制變量之探討..................................................................39
6.1. 計數統計...........................................................................................39
6.2. 分數、經驗及遊戲時間的彼此關係................................................39
6.3. 假說不成立之探討...........................................................................43
第七章 結論與建議.................................................................................45
致謝...........................................................................................................47
參考文獻...................................................................................................48
附錄一： IMMS教材動機量表(遊戲教學組)........................................54
附錄二： IMMS教材動機量表(傳統教學組)........................................58
附錄三： 綠建築成效測驗卷.................................................................62
附錄四： 遊戲規則簡介.........................................................................65


圖目錄

圖1研究流程圖..........................................................................................5
圖2 環境牌及相對應之功能牌示意圖....................................................17
圖3 遊戲道具示意圖................................................................................20
圖4 遊戲步驟流程圖................................................................................23
 

表目錄

表1 遊戲教學暨成果發表之案例..............................................................7
表2 遊戲卡牌功能內容表.........................................................................15
表3 實驗現況紀錄表.................................................................................24
表4 對照組教材動機量表之描述性統計.................................................30
表5 實驗組教材動機量表之描述性統計.................................................33
表6 學習動機差異分析表.........................................................................35
表7 注意力、相關性、信心及滿意度與學習成效間之關連分析表.......36
表8 實驗組及對照組之成績對照表.........................................................37
表9 學習成效檢驗表.................................................................................38
表10 玩家遊戲時間及得分表...................................................................40
表11 遊戲時間與得分分析表...................................................................41
表12 經驗與遊戲時間分析表...................................................................42
表13 玩家經驗與遊戲時間分析表...........................................................42

林憲德 (2007)。綠色建築解說與評估手冊：2007年更新版。台灣台北：內政部建築研究所。
林憲德、郭柏巖 (2008)。亞熱帶的綠建築挑戰。台灣台北縣新店市：內政部建築研究所。
苑舉正 (2013)。從H. Arendt與M. Nussbaum的觀點論培育公民的重要性。教育研究月刊，227，5–17。
柴昌維 (2002) 。工程教育創造發明教學方法之研究，國立臺灣大學機械工程研究所(博士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號090NTU00489100)
張世宗 (2006)。游藝學應用模式初探：以博奕遊戲的功能性分析為例。國立台北教育大學學報，19(1)，99–116。
Arrow, K. (1997). The benefits of education and the formation of preferences. The social benefits of education, 11-16.
Arslan, H. O., Moseley, C., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2011). Taking attention on environmental issues by an attractive educational game: enviropoly. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 801-806.
Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714-722.
Chang, K. F., Chiang, C. M., & Chou, P. C. (2007). Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005—searching for suitability in Taiwan. Building and Environment, 42(1), 310-316.
Chau, C. K., Tse, M. S., & Chung, K. Y. (2010). A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Building and Environment, 45(11), 2553-2561.
Cole, R. J. (1998). Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information, 26(1), 3-16.
De Freitas, S. I. (2006). Using games and simulations for supporting learning. Learning, media and technology, 31(4), 343-358.
de Voogt, A., Dunn-Vaturi, A. E., & Eerkens, J. W. (2013). Cultural transmission in the ancient Near East: twenty squares and fifty-eight holes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(4), 1715-1730.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (translated by Myra Bergman Ramos). Harmondworth.
Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation. Communication Education, 44(1), 40-50.
GEOlino Meltdown, (2014, May 8) . Re: Save the polar bears before the ice melts [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from http://meltdown-game.com/
Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of environmental management, 86(3), 451-464.
Green, M., & Sulbaran, T. (2006). Motivation assessment instrument for virtual reality scheduling simulator. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. 45-50).
Guielford, J. P. (1973). Fundamental Statistics in Psychologyand Education, 4th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofer, B.K. (2006). Motivation in the College Classroom, In McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Metz, B., Davidson, O., De Coninck, H. C., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. A. (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 4.
Jeamu, L., Kim, Y., & Lee, Y. (2008). A web-based program to motivate underachievers learning number sense. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(2), 185–194.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1, 383-434.
Keller, J. M. (1987). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Florida State University.
Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
Keller, J. M. (2006). Development of two measures of learner motivation, Unpublished manuscript. Florida State University.
Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. New York, NY: Springer.
Kruijver, E., De Grund, A., Schipper, D., Rijnsent, M., Van Hoewijk, J., Bender, J., Breed, P., & Hilberink, S. (2010). Friendships, intimate relationships and sexuality a program for adolescents to enhance self-confidence and social skills. Transitions Conference 5 - Partnerships together for life, Abstractbook: 15.
Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., & Liu, X. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and urban planning, 72(4), 325-336.
Luterbach, K. J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1994). School's Not Out, Yet. Educational Technology, 34(4), 47-54.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
Nolan, M. R., & Jones, P. R. (1987). ‘Consolidate or bust’—the development and evaluation of an academic game in a student nurse introductory course. Nurse education today, 7(6), 258-264.
Nordbo, A., Jarvi, L., Haapanala, S., Wood, C. R., & Vesala, T. (2012). Fraction of natural area as main predictor of net CO2 emissions from cities. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(20).
Pan, Y., Yin, R., & Huang, Z. (2008). Energy modeling of two office buildings with data center for green building design. Energy and Buildings, 40(7), 1145-1152.

Parlett, D. (1999). The Oxford history of board games (Vol. 5). New York: Oxford University Press.
Perng, Y. H., Juan, Y. K., & Chien, S. F. (2006). Exploring the bidding situation for economically most advantageous tender projects using a bidding game. Journal of construction engineering and management, 132(10), 1037-1042.
Polanyi, M., 1967. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 195-206.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational technology research and development, 44(2), 43-58.
Rodgers, D. L., & Withrow-Thorton, B. J. (2005). The Effect of Instructional Media on Learner Motivation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 333.
Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., Flores, P., ... & Salinas, M. (2003). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71-94.
Shi, Q. (2008). Strategies of implementing a green building assessment system in mainland China. Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(2), P13.
Small, R. V., & Gluck, M. (1994). The Relationship of Motivational Conditions to Effective Instructional Attributes: A Magnitude Scaling Approach. Educational technology, 34(8), 33-40.
Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. The American Economic Review, 1-37.
Tam, V. W. (2014, January). What Affects Implementation of Green Buildings? An Empirical Study in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 1089-1098). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Torres, M., & Macedo, J. (2000). Learning sustainable development with a new simulation game. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 119-126.
van der Stege, H. A., van Staa, A., Hilberink, S. R., & Visser, A. P. (2010). Using the new board game SeCZ TaLK to stimulate the communication on sexual health for adolescents with chronic conditions. Patient education and counseling, 81(3), 324-331.
Vlassi, M., & Karaliota, A. (2013). The Comparison between Guided Inquiry and Traditional Teaching Method. A Case Study for the Teaching of the Structure of Matter to 8th Grade Greek Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 494-497.
Wang, S., Yan, C., & Xiao, F. (2012). Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings. Energy and Buildings, 55, 873-888.
Wang, Y., Chen, C., Chang, C., & Chen, G. (2009). The Comparison of Motivation and Interaction between Virtual characters and Robots in Mixed Reality. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education(pp. 743-747). Hong Kong.
Wanjohi, G. J., & Wanjohi, G. W. (Eds.). (2005). Social and religious concerns of East Africa: a Wajibu anthology (Vol. 10). CRVP.
Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). A framework for assessing the sustainability of brownfield developments. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(1), 23-40.
Zhai, X. Q., Wang, R. Z., Dai, Y. J., Wu, J. Y., & Ma, Q. (2008). Experience on integration of solar thermal technologies with green buildings. Renewable Energy, 33(8), 1904-1910.
Xiuping, Z. (2002). The combination of traditional teaching method and problem based learning. The China Papers, 1(1), 30-36.