中文部分
江淑卿（2001）。概念構圖與圖示兒童自科學的知識結構、理解能力。教育季刊，
9( 1)，35-54。
吳俊憲（2003）。國中社會領域教科書發展之理念、困境與因應途徑。課程與教
學季刊，6(1)。臺北市：中華民國課程與教學學會。
吳蕙如（2007）。連環圖片及其呈現次序對台灣國中生讀後內容回想及推論之效
益研究。國立臺灣師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
宋曜廷（2000）。先前知識、文章結構與多媒體呈現對文章學習的影響。國立台
灣師範大學教育理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
李文瑞等譯（2002）。教學媒體與學習科技（Instructional Media and Technologies
for Learning）。臺北：雙葉。
卓明慧(2003)。國三學生處理生物學圖片與文字敘述之研究。國立彰化師範大學
科學教育所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林玉雯（2010）。生物概念學習圖形表徵辨識歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學科
學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林英琪（2004）。有關水循環的課文對國小六年級學生閱讀理解之影響。臺北市
立師範學院碩士論文，未出版，台北市
林郁芬（2011）。空間能力、先備知識與表徵順序對七年級概念理解之影響：以
人體呼吸運動單元為例。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所，未出版，台北
市。
林菁（1995）。圖像複雜度與兒童的認知學習。嘉義師院學報，8，173-207。林麗娟（1996）。多媒體電腦圖像設計與視覺記憶的關係。教學科技與媒體，28，
3-12。
林麗娟（1999）。網頁圖像設計與個別差異之考量。視聽教育雙月刊，40（6），
18-27。
邱月玲（2002）。不同的科學圖文配置對學生閱讀學習的影響－以「月相概念」
為例。臺中師範學院碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
姚伊美、羅綸新（1994）。電腦繪圖與其應用。視聽教育雙月刊，35，15-22。張欣怡(1997)。地球科學不同課文表徵教材對學習表現之研究。國立臺灣師範大
學科學教育所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
張春興（2006）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北：東華書局。
莊新怡（2006）。先備知識與動畫學習對學習成效影響之研究。國立彰化師範大
學碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
許良榮（1996）。圖形與科學課文學習關係的探討。教育研究資訊，4（4）， 121-131。
許淑蘭(2011)。星座教學圖像來源對國小中年級學生在星座學習成效與認知負荷
的影響。佛光大學學習與數位科技學系碩士論文，未出版，宜蘭縣。
許照紅（2010）。以認知負荷理論探究以圖為本之任務對人體循環概念的影響。
國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳俊呈（2008）。輔助資訊呈現方式應用在行動載具對學習成效與認知負荷之影
響-以國二氧化還原反應為例。國立交通大學網路學習研究所碩士論文，未
出版，新竹市。
陳數恩（2007）。台灣成人插畫書圖文比例與編排形式對閱讀者之影響研究。嶺
東科技大學視覺傳達設計研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
趙美蘭（1998）。多媒體輔助學習軟體圖文設計策略之研究。國立台南師範學院
資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
潘伯正（2009）。教材媒體組合方式與知覺偏好對學習成效與認知負荷之影響。
國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
盧秀琴、黃瑞琪(2006)。自然系列圖畫書應用在國小高年級生物單元之研究。臺
北立教育大學學報，37(2)，79-110。
賴日生、曾曉青、陳美榮（2005）。從認知負荷理論看教學設計。江西教育學院
學報，26(1)，52-55。
謝琇玲（1996）。插圖對學生閱讀學習的影響研究。高雄工學院學報，3，305-315。韓玉昌、任桂琴 (2003)。小學一年級數學新教材插圖效果的眼動研究。Acta
Psychology Sinica，35(6)，818-822。
簡郁芩（2012）。從圖文閱讀的眼動型態建構與驗證機械動態表徵的認知模式。
國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
藍嘉淑（2000）。圖片在國中生物科教學的角色及其對學生圖片理解之影響。國
立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
藍嘉淑(2000)。圖片在國中生物教學的角度及其對學生圖片理解之影響。國立高
雄師範大學科學科學教育所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
羅綸新、姚伊美（1996）。圖形效益與互動性多媒體教學。視聽教育雙月刊，37 （5），25-29。
外文部分
Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. Th (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning
with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
Alessi& Stephen M.(1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal
of Computer-based Instruction, 15(2).40-47.
Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (1985). Computer-based instruction:Methods and
development.Pi New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.
Antonietti, A.(1991).Why does mental visualization facilitate problem-solving？In
R. H. Logie & M. Denis(Eds.), Mental Images in Human Cognition
(pp.211-227).New York:North-Holland.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of
Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-206.
Blystone, R. V. & Dettling, B. C. (1990). Visual literacy in science textbooks.In What
Research Says to the Science Teacher-The Process of Knowing, Vol. 6. Notional
Science Teachers Association, Washington, D. C.
Carpenter, C. R. (1953). A theoretical orientation for instructional film research. AV
Communication Review, 1, 38-52.
Carr, N. (2011, May 12). E-textbooks flunk an early test [Web log post]. Retrieved
from http://www.roughtype.com/?p=1478
Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of rior
knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science
Education, 90, 1073-1091.
Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: The Dryden Press
Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, Pa:
Learning Services.
Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text:
Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory & Language, 31,
129-151.
Glynn, S. M. & DiVesta, F. J. (1977). Outline and hierarchical organization for study
and retrieval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(1), 69-95.
Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science
textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 24, 95-123.
Hayes, D. A. & Readence, J. E. (1983). Transfer of learning from illustration
dependent text. Journal of Educational Research, 76(4), 245-248.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of
mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &
Cognition, 18, 1084-1102.
Hegarty, M.& ; Just, M. A.(1989). Understanding machines from text and diagrams.In
H. Mandl&; J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledgeacquisition from text and picture
(pp.171-194). New York: North-Holland.
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text
and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742.
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension
of scientific texts. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamili, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Person
(Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol.2) (pp. 641- 668). NewYork:Longman.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The role of mental animations and external
animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21,
325-360.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A
meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
Holliday, W. G. (1975). The effect of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information
in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 12(1 ), 77-83.
Holliday, W. G. , & Benson, G. (1991). Enhancing learning using questions, adjunct
to science charts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 28(6), 523-535.
Hurt, J. (1988). How do young children interpret computer-generated pictures?
Computers in the Schools, 5(1/2).
Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. J., Jr.(1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with
pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 17（5）, 477-483.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A.(1987). Why a diagram is（sometimes）worth ten
thousand words. Education Psychology, 65-99.
Levie, W. H. (1987). Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. In Willows, D. M.
& Houghton, H. A. (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Vol. 1. Basic research
(pp.1-50). New York: Speinger-Verlag.
Levin, J. R., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. B&ton&
Ａ. Woodward (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Processes and principles (pp.
95-134). illsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1985). Topic structure representation and text recall.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 137-148.
Lord, T. R. (1978). The influence of pictorial illustrations with written text and
previous achievement on the reading comprehension of fourth grade science
students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(5), 401-405.
Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2008). Learning with animation: Research implications
for design. New York: Cambridge University Press
Martins, N. (2014). Determining textbook learning enhancement as perceived by
students and lecturers.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 57-63.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning.In R. E. Mayer (Ed.),
Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand
words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand
words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73.
Mayer, R. E., &; Anderson, R.B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experiment
test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4),
484-490.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media
promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in
multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11,
256-265.
Miller, G.A. (1956). “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on
our capacity for processing information,” Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
Moore, D. M. & Sasse, E. B. (1971). Effect of size and type of still projected pictures
on immediate recall of content. AV Communication Review, 19(4), 437-450.
Nadine Marcus, Martin Cooper & John Sweller(1996). ”Understanding Instructions,”
Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 49-63.
Paivio, A. (1983). Empirical case for dual coding.in: J. Yuille(ed.), Imagery, Memory,
and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale,NJ.
Paivio, A. (1986). Dual coding theory. In Mental Representations：A Dual Coding
Approach. New York: Oxford university.
Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning
and Instruction, 3, 227-238.
Pezdek, K., & Chen, H. C. (1982). Developmental differences in the role of detail in
picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33,
207-215.
Pollock, E., Chandler, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex
information. Learning and Instruction, 12 (1), 61-86.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain. Psychological
Bulletin, 80, 1-24.
Reid, D. (1990b). The role of pictures in learning biology: Part 1, preception and
observation. Journal of Biological Education, 24(3), 161-172.
Reid, D. J. (1990a). The role of picture in learning biology﹕Part 2, picture-text
processing. Journal of Biology Education, 24(4), 251-258.
Robinson, S. (2011). Student use of a free online textbook. Academy of Educational
Leadership Journal, 15(3), 1-10.
Salomon (1989). Learning from text and picture: reflect on a meta-level. In H. Mandl
＆ J. R. Levin(Eds.), Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures.
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M.(2003). Construction and interference in learning from
multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
Schnotz, W., & ; Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and
static graphics. In R. K. Lowe, &; W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation:
Research implications for design (pp. 304-356). New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual
presentations. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 74(11), 1.
Sweller, J. (1980). Transfer effects in a problem solving context. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 32, 233-239.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and
instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Van Patten, J., Chao, C. I., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1986). A review of strategies for
sequencing and synthesizing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4),
437-471.
Verdi, M. P., Johnson, J. T., Stock, W. A., Kulhavy, R. W. & Whitman-Ahern, P.
(1997). Organized spatial displays and texts: effects of presentation order and
display type on learning outcomes. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(4),
303-17.
Weisberg , J. S. (1970). The use of visual advance organizers for learning earth
science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 161-165.
Wileman, R. E. (1993). Visual communicating. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational
Technology Publications, Inc.
Winn, W. (1980). The effect of block-word diagrams on the structuring of science
concepts as a function of general ability. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 18, 23-32
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review,
3, 211-247.
Winn.W. (1990). The effect of block-word diagrams on the structuring of science
concepts as a function of general ability. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 17(3), 201-211
Fani,S., Fiona, O., & Jon, O.﹐(2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures
about energy and pupils’ readings of them﹒International Journal of Science
Education﹐24(3)﹐257-283.
Holliday, W. G. (1976). Teaching verbal chains using flow diagrams and texts﹒
Communication Review﹐24﹐63-78.
Holliday, W. G. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow
diagrams in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching﹐14(2)﹐129-138.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J. &; Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating
Functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows &; H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The
psychology of illustration. Vol. 1: Basic research (pp. 51-85). New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Peña, B. M., & Gil Quílez, M. J. (2001). The importance of images in astronomy
education.International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1125-1135.
Reid, D. J., & Beveridge, M.(1986). Effects of text illustration on children’s learning
of a school science topic. British Journal of Education Psychology, 56, 294-303.
Winn, W. (1993). An account of how readers search for icformation in diagrams.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 162-185.
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension
of scientific texts. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamili, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Person
(Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol.2) (pp. 641- 668). New York:
Longman.
Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and
conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.