跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/29 13:10
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:戴彩雲
研究生(外文):TAI, TSAI-YUN
論文名稱:顧客關係品質、知識分享與產品創新能力:台灣手工具產業之實證研究
論文名稱(外文):Customer Relationship Quality, Knowledge Sharing and Product Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwan Hand Tool Industry
指導教授:黃延聰黃延聰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Yen-Tsung
口試委員:朱文儀吳立偉
口試委員(外文):Chu, Wen-Yi
口試日期:2017-06-13
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:高階經營管理碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:關係品質知識分享創新能力文化差異
外文關鍵詞:Customer relationship qualityKnowledge sharingInnovation capabilityCulture difference
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:170
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:20
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
現今企業之競爭優勢及能否永續經營,不再只是以低成本,高品質及產品差異
化取勝,而是企業需要不斷地創新,以維持其競爭優勢。在今日全球化高度競爭的
商業環境中,企業要單單以一己之力來面對如此巨大的變化及挑戰,無異是一項艱
困的作法了,唯有和客戶維持良好合作關係,透過彼此知識交流分享,持續不斷的
創新,才能維持企業永續經營。顧客關係品質對於企業競爭力的影響,扮演舉足輕
重之角色,與不同文化之客戶關係品質高低也影響到雙方知識分享。因此,本研究
探討在全球化之競爭環境中,顧客關係品質對夥伴間知識分享,及知識分享對創新
能力是否有顯著影響,加入探討文化差異是否對內隱知識分享有顯著影響。
本研究以台灣手工具產業為研究對象,根據 91 份有效問卷結果,依照研究架
構及假設,進行迴歸分析。實證結果顯示,關係品質構面包括信任、調適、溝通、
承諾與合作對知識分享有正向的顯著影響、外顯知識分享對產品創新能力具有正向
的顯著關係。
【關鍵字】關係品質、知識 分享、文化差異、創新能力
Low cost, high quality and product differentiation could no longer win the war of corporate competitiveness and sustainability. Instead, companies need to innovate continuously to maintain its competitive advantage. In today's highly competitive global business environment, it is too difficult to face such challenge and change alone. Maintaining good customer relationship quality, sharing knowledge and continuous innovation, are the only way to maintain business sustainability. Customer relationship quality plays a signification role in corporate competitiveness. The quality of customer relationship with culture difference also affect the knowledge sharing. Therefore, this study explores whether the quality of customer relationship has a significant impact on the firm’s product innovation capability in the competitive environment of globalization, and whether the cultural differences have significant influence on the implicit knowledge sharing.
Based on the results of 91 valid questionnaires, the regression analysis was carried out according to the research hypothesis. The empirical results show that the relationship quality including trust, adaptation, commitment, communication and cooperation, have a positive and significant impact to knowledge sharing, and explicit knowledge sharing has a significant positive relationship with firm’s product innovation capability.  

Keywords: Customer relationship quality, Knowledge sharing, Culture difference, Innovation capability

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究問題與目的
第三節 研究流程
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 顧客關係品質(CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP QUALITY)
第二節 知識分享(KNOWLEDGE SHARING)
第三節 文化差異(CULTURE DIFFERENCE)
第四節 創新能力(INNOVATION CAPABILITY)
第四節 整體研究架構
第三章 研究方法
第一節 手工具產業
第二節 構念的衡量與問卷的設計
第三節 問卷調查過程與樣本特質分析
第四節 問卷信度與效度分析
第四章 分析結果
第一節 敍述統計及相關分析
第二節 迴歸分析及假設檢定
第五章 結論
第一節 研究結果
第二節 研究意涵
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議
參考文獻
附錄


一、中文文獻
1.白秀雄、李建興等合著(1995)。現代社會學。台北:五南。
2.伍忠賢.王建彬(2001)。知識管理:策略與實務。台北市: 聯經。
3.吳盛、林東清、林杏子(2006)。以社會交換理論觀點探討影響虛擬團隊成員知識分享行為因素。資訊管理學報,13(1),193-219。
4.黃政仁、闕伶倫(2014)。企業創新能力與國際化程度對創新績效及企業績效之影響:以台灣電子資訊業為例。會計評論, 59,107-147。
5.黃政仁、詹佳樺(2013)。創新能力、創新效率與公司價值:以台灣電子資訊業為例。商略學報,5(1),1-17。
6.劉京偉譯(2000)。知識管理第一本書。台北市: 商周。
7.劉宗其教授。http://welcome.nec.com.tw/nuat/045/quarterly45_04.html (檢索時間 2017/03/18)。



二、英文文獻
1.Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
2.Armbrecht, F. M. R. Jr., Chapas, R. B., Chappelow, C. C., and Farris, G. F. (2001), "Knowl edge management in research and development," Research Technology Management,44(2), 28-48
3.Baum, J. A., & Ingram, P. (1998). Survival enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry 1898-1980. Management Science, 44(7), 996-1016.
4.Carbonell, P. and Rodriguez, A.I.,2006. The Impact of Market Characteristics and Innovation Speed on Perceptions of Positional Advantage and New Product Performance, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 1-12
5.Carr, A. S. and Pearson, J. N. (1999), "Strategically managed buyer-supplier relationships and performance outcomes," Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 497-519.
6.Chen, Y. H., Lin, T. P., & Yen, D. C. (2014). How to facilitate inter-organizational knowledge sharing: The impact of trust. Information & Management, 51(5), 568-578.
7.Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling:An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81.
8.Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing,65(4), 33-50.
10.Duysters, G., Kok, G., & Vaandrager, M. (1999). Crafting successful strategic technology partnerships. R&D Management, 29(4), 343-351.
11.Fynes, B., Burca, S., & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,10(4-5), 179-190.
12.Fynes, B., Voss, C., & De Búrca, S. (2005a). Supply chain relationship quality, the com-petitive environment and performance. International Journal of Production Research,43(16), 3303-3320.
13.Fynes, B., Voss, C., & De Búrca, S. (2005b). The impact of supply chain relationship dynamics on manufacturing performance. International Journal of Operations &Production Management, 25(1), 6-19.
14.Fynes, B., Voss, C., & De Búrca, S. (2005c). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3),339-354.
15.Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding
transaction-specific assets in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 20-35.
16.Helper, S. R. and Sako, M. (1995), "Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: Are they converging?" .Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 77-84.
17.Hong, P., Doll, W. J., Nahm, A. Y., and Li, X. (2004), "Knowledge sharing in integrated product development”.European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 102-112.
18.Hofstede,G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41.
20.Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J. (2011). The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer to peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 21(6), 557-577.
21.Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assetsin strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal,21(3), 217-237.
22.Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370-385.
23.Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
24.Lall, S.,1992. Technological Capabilities and Industrialisation.World Development, 20(2),165-186.
25.Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., and Chen, C. C. (2007), "Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity,and innovation capability: An empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries,". Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
26.Lee, J.-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 38(5), 323-335.
27.Lorenzoni, G. and Fuller, C. B. (1995), "Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partner," .California Management Review, 37(3), 146-163.
28.Lowendahl, B. R., Revang, O., & Fosstenlokken, S. M. (2001). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations,54(7), 91-931.
29.Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers andusers of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations.Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314-328.
30.Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
31.Nancy, M. D. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.Naude, P., & Buttle, F. (2000). Assessing relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(4), 351-361.
33.Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.
34.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
35.Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
36.Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
37.Reid, F. (2003). Creating a knowledge sharing culture among diverse business units.Employment Relations Today, 30(3), 43-49.
38.Robbins, S. P. (2001), Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jersey, U.S.A.
39.Samson, D. (1991), Manufacturing and Operations Strategy, Melbourne: Prentice Hall.
40.Sanchez-Peinado, E., Pla-Barber, J., & Hébert, L. (2007). Strategic variables that influence entry mode choice in service firms. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 67-91.
41.Santomero, A. M. and Trester, J. J. (1998), "Financial innovation and bank risk taking," .Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35(1), 25-37.
42.Schrader, S. (1990). Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Research Policy, 20(2), 153-170.
43.Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, R. F. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product development in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-40.
44.Su, Q., Song, Y. T., Li, Z., & Dang, J. X. (2008). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on cooperative strategy. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,14(4), 263-272.
45.Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge based assets.San Francisco, CA: Bervett Koehler.
46.Tsai, C. T., Huang, K. L., and Kao, C. F. (2001), "The relationships among organizational factors, creativity of organizational members and innovation capability," .Journal of Management, 18, 527-566.
47.Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
48.Wilson, T. D. (2002). The nonsense of ‘knowledge management’. Information Research,8(1). Retrieved February 15, 2009, from: http://informationr. net. proxyl. cl. msu.edu:2047/ir /8-1/paper144. html
49.Woo, K. S., & Ennew, C. T. (2004). Business-to-business relationship quality: An IMP interaction-based conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Market ing, 38(9/10), 1252-1271.
50.Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technologi-cal capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1070-1079.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top