臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的是結合行動通訊技術與全球定位系統，來建構出一個具有即時性、方便性的行動學習環境，並命名為行動交通違規舉報系統；同時，探討行動學習與交通違規之間的相關性，藉此以改善學習者的交通違規反思程度。實驗分組樣本包含17位研究生和15位大學生。實驗過程中，學習者可使用行動裝置來傳送當地觀察到的交通違規照片，並與同儕互相交流討論。實驗數據的收集是利用行動學習系統的有用性問卷與交通違規反思問題來進行。實驗結果顯示，運用本系統可有效地提升學習者的交通違規反思程度，並減少各組別間的差異。此外，問卷結果也顯示，不同性別與年級之間對於本系統存在顯著差異的看法。整體而言，從研究發現的涵義是，本研究所提出的系統與行動裝置的整合，對於學習者在交通違規的學習上，呈現出良好的幫助效果。

The purpose of this study is the integration of mobile communication technologies and a global positioning system (GPS) to construct an instant, convenient report of the mobile network service system, termed the Mobile Traffic Violation Reporting System (MTVRS), to explore the effects between mobile learning and traffic violations and then improve learners’ reflection level for traffic violations. Data were collected using a ‘‘usefulness of mobile learning systems” questionnaire and traffic violation reflection questions from a sample consisting of 32 learners in Taiwan. Learners voluntarily participated in a four-week program using mobile devices to transmit photographs of local traffic violations and exchange pictures and observations. Each learner had a convenient method to share personal learning experiences and obtain knowledge of traffic violations by interacting with peers. The experimental results revealed by the questionnaire were satisfactory and encouraging in terms of the effectiveness of the supported mobile learning environment. Moreover, the responses to the questionnaire showed significant differences in regard to both gender and grade. The study also found a positive improvement in reflection levels toward traffic violations among groups following the experiment. The implications derived from the findings were learners’ understanding of traffic violations improved as well as providing preliminary evidence demonstrating both MTVRS and the mobile devices were useful strategies in teaching learners about traffic violations.

CHINESE ABSTRACT...........................................i
ENGLISH ABSTRACT..........................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................................iii
CATALOGUE.................................................iv
TABLE CATALOGUE...........................................vi
FIGURE CATALOGUE.........................................vii
1. Introduction............................................1
1.1 Background and Motivation...........................1
1.2 Purpose of the Study................................7
2. Theoretical Foundations Underpinning this Research......9
2.1 Mobile Learning.....................................9
2.2 Social Constructivist Theory.......................13
2.3 Reflection.........................................17
2.4 Gender and Grade...................................21
2.5 Research Model.....................................24
3. System Implementation..................................26
3.1 Overview of MTVRS..................................26
3.2 Affordance of the MTVRS............................31
4. Method.................................................33
4.1 Participants.......................................34
4.2 Procedure..........................................35
4.3 Instrument.........................................38
4.3.1 Usefulness of Mobile Learning Systems.........38
4.3.2 Reflection Levels.............................39
4.4 Statistical Techniques.............................40
5. Data Analysis and Results..............................41
5.1 Effects of Mobile Learning on Traffic Violations...41
5.2 Comparisons of UMLS Questionnaire in terms of
Gender and Grade...................................48
5.3 Examining the Reflection Levels of the Traffic
Violations among Groups............................54
6. Discussion and Conclusion..............................59
References................................................64
Appendix. Scale and items.................................78
Extended Abstract
About the Author

1. Ameratunga, S., Hijar, M., & Norton, R. (2006). Road Traffic Injuries: confronting disparities to address a global health problem. Lancet, 367, 1533–1540.
2. Aygencel, G., Karamercan, M., Ergin, M., & Telatar, G. (2008). Review of traffic accident cases presenting to an adult emergency service in Turkey. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 15(1), 1–6.
3. Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements. Teachers and Teaching, 5(1), 51–73.
4. Biström, J. (2005). Peer-to-peer networks as collaborative learning environments. Paper presented at HUT T-110.551 Seminar on Internetworking, April, 2005.
5. Borae, J., & Joohan, K. (2005). In a different voice (and text): Gender differences in communication motives and uses of mobile phone. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international communication association, New York, NY.
6. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning, London, Kogan page, 18–40.
7. Chang, H. L., & Yeh, T. H. (2007). Motorcyclist accident involvement by age, gender, and risky behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(2), 109–122.
8. Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229–236.
9. Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Lorna U. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283–291.
10. Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347–359.
11. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
12. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 289–297.
13. Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (2008). Educational affordances of PDAs: A study of a teacher’s exploration of this technology. Computer & Education, 50(4), 1439–1450.
14. Cole, M. (2009). Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52(1), 141–146.
15. Colley, A., & Comber, C. (2003). Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: What has changed? Educational Research, 45(2), 155–165.
16. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, (2008). The statistical table of cause of death in Taiwan. Retrieved from <http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DisplayStatisticFile.aspx?d=73104>.
17. Derry, S. J. (1999). A fish called peer learning: Searching for common themes. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, 197–212. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Edwards, W. K., Newman, M. W., Sedivy, J. Z., Smith, T. F., Balfanz, D., Smetters, D. K., Wong, H.C., & Izadi, S. (2002). Using speakeasy for ad hoc peer-to-peer collaboration. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW’02, 256–265.
19. Elvik, R., & Christensen, P. (2007). The deterrent effect of increasing fixed penalties for traffic offences: The Norwegian experience. Journal of Safety Research, 38(6), 689–695.
20. Evangelos, T., Elissavet, G., & Anastasios, A. E. (2008). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1319–1330.
21. Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van-Nostrand Reinhold.
22. Freitas S. d., & Neumann T. (2009). The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers & Education, 52(2), 343–352.
23. Garrett, B. M., & Jackson, C. (2006). A mobile clinical e-portfolio for nursing and medical students, using wireless personal digital assistants (PDAs). Nurse Education Today, 26, 647–654.
24. Geneva: World Health Organization, (2003). The World health report: 2003: shaping the future. Retrieved from <http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2003/en/whr03_en.pdf>
25. Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390.
26. Granie, M. A. (2007). Gender differences in preschool children’s declared and behavioral compliance with pedestrian rules. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(5), 371–382.
27. Guerrero, L. A., Ochoa, S. F., & Pino, J. A. (2006). Selecting computing devices to support mobile collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 243–271.
28. Harre, N., Field, J., & Kirkwood, B. (1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 163–173.
29. Hativa, N., & Shorer, D. (1989). Socioeconomic status, aptitude, and gender differences in CAI gains of arithmetic. Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 11–21.
30. Hijar, M., Arredondo, A, Carrillo, C, & Solorzano, L. (2004). Road traffic injuries in an urban area in Mexico An epidemiological and cost analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(1), 37–42.
31. Homan, S., & Wood, K. (2003). Taming the mega-lecture: wireless quizzing. Syllabus Magazine, October, 7–8.
32. Hoppe, H. U., Joiner, R., Milrad, M., & Sharples, M. (2003). Guest editorial: Wireless and mobile technologies in education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 255–259.
33. Hsi, S. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 308–319.
34. Huang, Y. M., Huang, T. C., & Hsieh, M. Y. (2008). Using annotation services in a ubiquitous Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 3–15.
35. Huang, Y. M., Jeng, Y. L., & Huang, T. C. (2009). An Educational Mobile Blogging System for Supporting Collaborative Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 163–175.
36. Huang, Y. M., Kuo, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2008). Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1205–1226.
37. Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). Effectiveness of a Mobile Plant Learning System in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education, 54(1), 47–58.
38. Huseyin, U., Nadire, C., & Erinc, E. (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers & Education, 52(2), 381–389.
39. Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823–2837.
40. Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135–150.
41. Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen., T. (2007). Structuring and Regulating Collaborative Learning in Higher Education with Wireless Networks and Mobile Tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79.
42. Joo, K. H., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Development and application of an efficient ubiquitous teaching and learning model. ICACT 2009, 11th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 3, 2165–2168.
43. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17–27.
44. Koch, S. C., Müller, S. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1795–1803.
45. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2002). Cognitive, ergonomic and affective aspects of PDA use for learning. In The European workshop on mobile and contexual learning, Birmingham, UK, 32–33.
46. Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365–375.
47. Lage, E. (1991). Boys, girls, and microcomputing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 6(1), 29–44.
48. Lai, C. H., Yang, J. C., Chen, F. C., Ho, C. W., & Chan, T. W. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 326–337.
49. Lai, C. Y., & Wu, C. C. (2006). Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 284–297.
50. Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(3), 187–210.
51. Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 3, 743–770. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Liu, T. C. (2007). Teaching in a wireless learning environment: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(1), 107–123.
53. López, G. J. L, Royo, T. M., Laborda, J. G., & Calvo, F. G. (2009). Methods of adapting digital content for the learning process via mobile devices. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2673–2677.
54. McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30.
55. McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent student’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171.
56. Mehmood, A. (2010). An integrated approach to evaluate policies for controlling traffic law violations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(2), 427–436.
57. Mohan, D. (2002). Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(3), 527–532.
58. Mohan, D. (2008). Road traffic injuries: a stocktaking. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 22(4), 725–739.
59. Montazeri A. (2004). Road-traffic-related mortality in Iran: a descriptive study. Public Health, 118(2), 110–113.
60. Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581–596.
61. Moyano Diaz, E. (2002). Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5(3), 169–175.
62. Nantulya, V.M., & Reich, M.R. (2002). The neglected epidemic: Road traffic injuries in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 324, 1139–1141.
63. Neo, M., & Neo, T.-K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated Constructivist learning-Students’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 254–266.
64. Oltedal, S., & Rundmo, T. (2006). The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety Science, 44(7), 621–628.
65. Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., Stradling, S. G., Reason, J. T., & Baxter, J. S. (1992). Intention to commit driving violations: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 94–101.
66. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 151–161.
67. Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2009). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 1–14.
68. Rogers, Y., Stanton, D., Thompson, M., Weal, M., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., & Randell, C. (2004). Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community, New York: ACM, 3–10.
69. Rosenbloom, T., Nemrodov, D., & Barkan, H. (2004). For heaven’s sake follow the rules: pedestrians’ behavior in an ultra-orthodox and a non-orthodox city. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(6), 395–404.
70. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In Proceedings of MLearn 2005 conference 25–28 October, Cape Town, South Africa.
71. Shashaani, L. (1997). Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37–51.
72. Sieverding, M., & Koch, S. C. (2009). (Self-)Evaluation of computer competence: how gender matters. Computers & Education, 52(3), 696–701.
73. Simon, F., & Corbett, C. (1996). Road traffic offending, stress, age, and accident history among male and female drivers. Ergonomics, 39, 757–780.
74. Soloman, J. (1987). New thoughts on teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), 267–274.
75. Storie, V. (1977). Male and female car drivers: Drivers observed in accidents (Report no. 761). Crowthorne, UK: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
76. Tan, T. H., Liu, T. Y., & Chang, C. C. (2007). Development and evaluation of an RFID-based ubiquitous learning environment for outdoor learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 253–269.
77. Trifonova, A. (2003). Mobile learning - review of the literature. Technical report DIT-03-009, University of Trento, Department of Information and Communication Technology.
78. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182–1192.
79. Vavoula, G., Sharples M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286–299.
80. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., Lin, H. M., & Chuang, S. C. (2004). Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis. Computers & Education, 43(3), 237–248.
82. Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1–22.
83. Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502.
84. Wu, C. C., & Lai, C. Y. (2009). Wireless Handhelds to Support Clinical Nursing Practicum. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 190–204.
85. Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1766–1783.
86. Yagil, D. (1998). Gender and age-related differences in attitudes toward traffic laws and traffic violations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 123–135.
87. Yagil, D. (2000). Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians’ self-reported behavior at signal-controlled crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(1), 1–13.
88. Yilmaz, V., & Celik, H. E. (2008). A model for explanation of personal attitudes toward traffic of candidate drivers attending drivers’ courses: Risky candidate driver’s attitude model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), 233–241.
89. Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203–228.