跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.24) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/08 01:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:謝欣妤
研究生(外文):HSIEH,HSIN-YU
論文名稱:臺灣地方財政永續性與公共財務管理之實證分析
論文名稱(外文):The Fiscal Sustainability of Local Governments and Public Financial Management: the Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授:林恭正林恭正引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIN, KUNG-CHENG
口試委員:李顯峰蘇建榮
口試委員(外文):LEE,HSIEN-FENGSU,JAIN-RONG
口試日期:2016-07-06
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:財政學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財政學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:地方財政永續性公共財務管理政府債務追蹤資料模型固定效果模型
外文關鍵詞:fiscal sustainability of local governmentspublic financial managementpublic debtpanel modelfixed effects model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1026
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:209
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
由於臺灣地方政府債務不斷攀升財政狀況逐年惡化,近年來又發生地方政府財務調度不佳,甚至影響公務員薪水的發放,因此本研究以Bohn (2005)模型為理論基礎,探討臺灣地方財政是否具永續性?蒐集臺灣23個直轄市及縣(市)政府2001年至2014年資料,除延續劉品柔(2014)的研究方法進行探討外,在相關變數的選取上,鑒於過去研究中公共財務管理良莠對地方財政的影響僅有敘述性分析,因此本研究特別納入臺灣地方財務行政實務運作的相關變數,如預決算差額、短期借款及借入款等與公共財務管理相關的變數,以確實符合探討臺灣地方政府是否具有永續性之研究。

以單根檢定、共整合檢定、向量自我迴歸分析以及追蹤資料固定效果迴歸分析,探討債務占所得的比率對預算賸餘占所得的比率之影響,依據單根檢定的結果,人均公共債務總額占所得之比率為非定態序列,表示臺灣地方政府2001年至2014年的人均公共債務總額占所得之比率並未收斂至0或維持不變,不符合財政永續性的定義。而迴歸結果顯示短期債務總額及未償債務餘額占所得比率對預算賸餘占所得之比率影響不顯著,表示長期債務及短期債務並不影響財政永續性。

公共財務管理變數方面,固定效果模型結果顯示歲入預決算差異比率增加,預算賸餘占所得之比率會降低,代表地方政府可能藉由虛增預算以增加債限,膨脹債務也致使預算賸餘占所得之比率降低,赤字比率擴大,不利於地方財政永續性。

本研究發現臺灣各直轄市及縣(市)政府可能藉由虛增預算以增加債限,以及少數縣市以借入款來掩飾債務,規避公共債務法之債限規定,使得臺灣地方財政持續惡化,影響地方財政永續經營,本研究建議地方政府編列預算時,預算數額應準確估計,以及中央政府應重視地方政府的財務調度是否恰當。財政部在考核地方財政是否健全時,亦應將虛增預算(預決算的差短)、短期借款及借入款等情況納入考核指標。


The increasing debt of Taiwan’s local governments gradually worsened their fiscal condition. Furthermore, poor financial regulation of some local governments delayed the salaries dispatching of civil servants in recent years. Based on the theoretical model of Bohn (2005), this study follows and explores the research methodology of Liu (2014). The data of Taiwan’s 23 counties/cities from 2001 to 2014 are employed to evaluate the fiscal sustainability of Taiwan’s local governments. In the study of relation between public financial management and fiscal condition of local governments, beside the descriptive analysis we further quantify some of explanatory variables about public financial management to study the fiscal sustainability of Taiwan’s local governments. These practical operation variables of Taiwan's local public finance include the shortage between budget and final account of revenue, short-term loan and borrowings.

The unit root test, cointegration test, Panel vector autoregression model and fixed effects model are performed to estimate the impact of debt-to-income ratio per capita on primary surplus-to-income ratio per capita in Taiwan’s local governments. The results of unit root test show debt-to-income ratio per capita do not converges to zero, which means that local governments in Taiwan do not reveal fiscal sustainability. The regression results show the effect of debt-to-income ratio on primary surplus-to-income ratio in Taiwan’s local governments is not significant, which means that long-term debt and short-term debt does not significantly affect the financial sustainability.

The effect of inflated budget ratio on primary surplus-to-income ratio is negative based on the fixed effects model, which means that local governments increase debt limit by inflated budget. The considerable deficit caused by the inflated budget would really harm the financial sustainability of local governments in Taiwan.

This study finds Taiwan’s local governments increase debt limit by inflated budget and some counties use borrowings to avoid the limit regulation of Public Debt Act, which make local public finance of Taiwan deteriorative and disadvantage the fiscal sustainability of Taiwan’s local governments. Therefore, this study suggests that the budget of the local governments should be accurate estimate and that central government should pay attention to the fund dispatching of local government whether it is appropriate. When Ministry of Finance evaluates the fiscal condition of local governments, fiscal performance indicators should also consider the degrees of inflated budget, the condition of short-term loan and the size of borrowings.


第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及背景 1
第二節 研究目的 11
第三節 研究架構 11
第二章 文獻回顧 12
第一節 財政永續性國外相關文獻 14
第二節 財政永續性臺灣相關文獻 17
第三節 探討臺灣地方財政惡化相關文獻 18
第三章 理論模型與研究方法 21
第一節 理論模型 21
第二節 追蹤資料研究方法 23
第四章 實證模型 31
第一節 變數定義及資料來源 31
第二節 敘述性統計 36
第三節 實證模型 46
第五章 實證結果分析 49
第一節 單根檢定結果 49
第二節 共整合檢定結果分析 51
第三節 向量自我迴歸結果 53
第四節 追蹤資料迴歸結果 55
第六章 結論與建議 58
第一節 主要結論 58
第二節 研究限制及未來研究建議 60
參考文獻 61
附錄 66

中文部分
王有康 (2013),「我國當前地方政府財政赤字之研究」,《德明學報》,37(1),35-52。
王菀禪 (2008),《從結構性赤字探討我國財政永續性問題》,國立臺北大學財政學研究所碩士論文。
李建興 (2015),「債務土石流5 ― 全台8個議會沒刪一毛預算」,《遠見雜誌》,351,112-114。
林向愷、陳錦稷 (2010),「全面性的租稅改革勢在必行 ― 財政惡化且結構性赤字問題嚴重」,《新世紀智庫論壇》,52,72-96。
周信佑 (2013),「我國財政健全之道」,《當代財政》,25,6-18。
姚名鴻 (2011),「我國地方財政赤字之理論與實證分析」,《公共行政學報》,39,37-70。
徐仁輝 (2014),《公共財務管理:公共預算與財務行政》,6版,台北:智勝文化。
陳怡如 (2006),《我國財政政策永續性之實證研究》,國立臺北大學財政學研究所碩士論文。
彭杏珠 (2015),《地方潛藏負債 竟高達6兆1682億》,《遠見雜誌》,351,80-81。
蔡吉源 (2006),「當前地方財政困難及其解決方向」,《財稅研究》,38(3),127-149。
蔡馨芳 (2013),「臺灣財政永續性之研究:政府角色的反思」,《公共行政學報》, 44,41-72。
劉品柔 (2014),《臺灣地方政府財政永續性之實證分析》,國立臺北大學財政學研究所碩士論文。
蘇建榮 (2005),《我國政府財政永續性之實證分析》,國立台北大學社會科學院經濟系第九屆經濟發展學術研討會。

網站資料
中華民國統計資訊網, http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4。
台灣地區家庭收支調查, http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/。
財政部國庫署,檔名「93-103年各級政府債務負擔表」, https://www.nta.gov.tw/web/AnnC/uptAnnC.aspx?c0=86&p0=755。
審計部總決算審核報告, http://www.audit.gov.tw/files/11-1000-97.php。

英文部分
Akamatsu, R. and K. Hiraga (2015) “Fiscal Sustainability of Japanese Prefectural Government Debt.” Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 88-92.
Arghyrou, M. G. (2004) “Debt Sustainability, Structural Breaks and Non-linear Fiscal Adjustment: A Testing Application to Greek Fiscal Policy.” Economics and Finance Discussion Paper, No.04-01.
Berrittella, M. and J. Zhang (2015) “Fiscal Sustainability in the EU: From the Short-term Risk to the Long-term Challenge.” Journal of Policy Modeling, 37, 261-280.
Bohn, H. (1995) “The Sustainability of Budget Deficits in a Stochastic Economy.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27, 257-271.
Bohn, H. (2005) “The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in the United States.” CESifo Working Paper, No.1446.
Burret, H. T., L. P. Feld and E. A. Köhler (2014a) “Fiscal Sustainability of the German Laender Time Series Evidence.” CESifo Working Paper, No.4928.
Burret, H. T., L. P. Feld and E. A. Köhler (2014b) “Panel Cointegration Tests on the Fiscal Sustainability of German Laender.” CESifo Working Paper, No.4929.
Camarero, M., J. L. Carrion-I-Silvestre and C. Tamarit (2015) “The Relationship between Debt Level and Fiscal Sustainability in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries.” Economic Inquiry, 53(1), 129-149.
Cizkowicz, P., A. Rzonca and R. Trzeciakowski (2015) “Membership in the Euro Area and Fiscal Sustainability. Analysis through Panel Fiscal Reaction Functions.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper, 61570, 25.
Ehrhart, C. and M. Llorca (2008) “The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from a Panel of Six South-Mediterranean Countries.” Applied Economics Letters, 15(10), 797–803.
Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987) “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
Hamilton, J. D. and M. A. Flavin (1986) “On the Limitations of Government Borrowing a Framework for Empirical Testing.” The American Economic Review, 76(4), 808–819.
Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
International Monetary Fund (2014), Government Finance Statistics Manual 2014.
Johansen, S. (1988) “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.
Ko, J.-H. and H. Morita (2015) “Fiscal Sustainability and Regime Shifts in Japan.” Economic Modelling, 46, 364-375.
Levin A., C.-F. Lin, C.-S. J. Chu (2002) “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu (1999) “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-652.
Mahdavi, S. (2012) “Bohn's Test of Fiscal Sustainability of the American State Governments.”UTSA Working Paper Series, No.0030ECO.
Miyazaki, T. (2014) “Fiscal Reform and Fiscal Sustainability: Evidence from Australia and Sweden.” International Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 141-151.
Oyeleke, O. J. and O. T. Ajilore (2014) “Analysis of Fiscal Deficit Sustainability in Nigerian Economy: An Error Correction Approach.” Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4(2), 199-210.
Pedroni, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-670.
Potrafke, N. and M. Reischmann (2012) “Fiscal Equalization Schemes and Fiscal Sustainability.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 3948.
Potrafke, N. and M. Reischmann (2014) “Fiscal Transfers and Fiscal Sustainability.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 4716.
Quintos, C. E. (1995) “Sustainability of the Deficit Process with Structural Shifts.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 409-417.
Sarno, L. (2001) “The Behavior of US Public Debt: A Nonlinear Perspective.” Economics Letters, 74, 119–125.
Tekelia, R. and H. Hotunluoğlub (2014) “Analysing the Fiscal Sustainability of Central and Local Governments in Turkey.” Business and Economics Research Journal, 5, 113-127.
Trehan, B. and C. E. Walsh (1991) “Testing Intertemporal Budget Constraints: Theory and Applications to U.S. Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23 (2), 206-223.
Yildiz, H. and D. Ç. Yıldırım (2014) “An Empirical Study on Fiscal Sustainability in Eurozone.” Serbian Journal of Management, 9 (1), 59-70.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top