跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/30 10:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃耀慶
研究生(外文):Yao-Ching Huang
論文名稱:豐田生產方式應用於中小企業可行性之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Feasibility of Applying Toyota Production System to the Small and Medium-Size Enterprises
指導教授:顧瑞祥顧瑞祥引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立虎尾科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:114
中文關鍵詞:中小企業豐田生產方式詮釋結構模式分析網路程序法
外文關鍵詞:Small and Medium-Size EnterprisesToyota Production SystemInterpretive Structural ModelAnalytic Network Process
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:489
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:25
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
中小企業是我國經濟發展的重要主體,近年來面臨全球化及中國大陸低價勞力市場的競爭,國內中小企業的經營環境面臨嚴竣的挑戰,要解決生產製造型態的困境,必須從根本源頭加以建立,唯有提高生產力、提昇品質及彈性化的生產,才能在競爭激烈的環境下生存。以中小企業在資源較不足的情況下,在導入豐田生產方式(Toyota Production System, TPS)時,相較於大型企業須面臨更多的障礙,為使豐田生產方式推行順利,本研究試圖以專家問卷調查方式,藉由詮釋結構模式(Interpretive Structural Model, ISM)來探討豐田生產方式構成要素間之相互影響關係,並結合分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)進行影響豐田生產方式關鍵要素優先順序權重分析,研究結果顯示以員工意願與向心力(18.34%)、高階管理者的支持(15.78%)、全面品質管理(12.07%)、品管圈(9.68%)、5S活動(7.06%)、六標準差(5.27%)、自主性管理架構(3.9%)、JIT採購(3.14%)、終生僱用制度(3.1%)、年資薪資系統(2.92%)等所佔權重近80%,可作為中小企業在實施豐田生產方式重點規劃之參考,以期提升企業之競爭力。

Small and Medium-Size Enterprises (SMEs) mean an important subject for local economic development. Recently, with the threat of enterprise globalizing and low labor cost from mainland China, business climate makes local SMEs have to face harsh challenges. To ease the hardship of production models1, it is required to establish flexible production systems with high productivity and quality thoroughly. As such, it is just available to survive from the environment with violent competitions. Limited by deficient resources available for SMEs, when Toyota Production System (TPS) is introduced, compared with large enterprises, SMEs actually face more obstacles. To implement TPS smoothly, in this research, expert questionnaires are conducted to explore the mutual influence relationships caused by various production factors by means of Interpretive Structural Model (ISM). Also, it is also combined with Analytic Network Process (ANP) to implement weighting analysis of key factor priorities for TPS. Research results show some factors like employee intention and coherence (18.34%), support from high management ranks (15.78%), overall quality control (12.07%), quality control circles (9.68%), 5S activities (7.06%), 6 Sigma (5.27%), autonomous management structure(3.9%), JIT procurement(3.14%), lifetime employment system(3.1%) and seniority pay system (2.92%) occupy 80% roughly. The reference is available for SMEs to implement TPS focusing on key point planning. It is expected enterprise competence can be improved dramatically.

中文摘要 --------------------------------------------- i
英文摘要 --------------------------------------------- ii
誌謝 --------------------------------------------- iii
表目錄 --------------------------------------------- vi
圖目錄 --------------------------------------------- vii
符號說明 --------------------------------------------- ix
第一章 緒論----------------------------------------- 1
1.1 研究背景------------------------------------- 1
1.1.1 中小企業------------------------------------- 1
1.1.2 中小企業的發展與貢獻------------------------- 3
1.2 研究動機------------------------------------- 6
1.3 研究目的------------------------------------- 8
1.4 研究流程------------------------------------- 9
第二章 文獻探討------------------------------------- 10
2.1 豐田生產方式概論----------------------------- 10
2.1.1 及時化--------------------------------------- 12
2.1.2 自働化--------------------------------------- 19
2.2 實施豐田生產方式的原則----------------------- 22
2.2.1 實施豐田生產方式績效衡量指標----------------- 22
2.2.2 實施豐田生產方式的效益----------------------- 25
2.2.3 實施豐田生產方式的限制----------------------- 27
2.3 導入豐田生產方式的步驟----------------------- 27
2.4 構成豐田生產方式的關鍵要素------------------- 30
2.5 多準則決策方法------------------------------- 32
2.5.1 ANP法應用文獻回顧---------------------------- 34
2.5.2 ISM法應用文獻回顧---------------------------- 35
第三章 研究方法------------------------------------- 37
3.1 分析層級程序法------------------------------- 37
3.1.1 AHP法的發展及運用---------------------------- 37
3.1.2 AHP法的理論架構------------------------------ 41
3.2 分析網路程序法------------------------------- 45
3.2.1 ANP法與AHP法殊異比較------------------------- 45
3.2.2 ANP法的分析程序------------------------------ 46
3.3 詮釋結構模式--------------------------------- 54
3.3.1 ISM法概論------------------------------------ 54
3.3.2 ISM法的架構---------------------------------- 56
3.3.3 ISM法的決策程序------------------------------ 58
3.4 研究架構------------------------------------- 61
3.5 問卷設計------------------------------------- 63
第四章 研究分析------------------------------------- 66
4.1 ISM法之應用---------------------------------- 66
4.1.1 企業組織文化層面關聯關係分析----------------- 66
4.1.2 企業管理活動層面關聯關係分析----------------- 71
4.2 ANP法之應用---------------------------------- 76
4.2.1 建立ANP法的決策模型-------------------------- 77
4.2.2 建立成對比較矩陣與一致性檢定----------------- 78
4.2.3 超級矩陣計算--------------------------------- 81
4.2.4 相對權重計算--------------------------------- 86
4.3 實證研究------------------------------------- 88
4.3.1 個案公司現況分析----------------------------- 88
4.3.2 個案公司豐田生產方式導入分析----------------- 90
第五章 結論----------------------------------------- 93
5.1 結論----------------------------------------- 93
5.2 建議----------------------------------------- 94
參考文獻 --------------------------------------------- 96
附錄A ISM專家問卷---------------------------------- 103
附錄B ANP專家問卷---------------------------------- 110
英文大綱
簡歷


1.大野耐一著,林耀川、成玉山譯 (1985),豐田生產方式與現場管理,中華企業管理發展中心。
2.于宗先、王金利 (2000),台灣中小企業的成長,聯經出版社,台北。
3.王姿潔 (2007),建構以職能為基礎之工程專業人員評選模式-以C公司為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文。
4.王派榮 (2002),豐田生產方式運作之研究-台灣國瑞汽車公司及其協力廠之成功案例,中原大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
5.門田安弘著,黃一魯譯 (1987),豐田式生產體系,中國生產力中心。
6.林羿吟 (2006),溫泉旅館服務品質評估模式之構建,中華大學科技管理研究所,碩士論文。
7.林原宏 (1995),「層級分析法:理論與應用之探討(一)」,測驗統計簡訊,8期,頁31-34。
8.林原宏 (1996),「層級分析法:理論與應用之探討(二)」,測驗統計簡訊,9期,頁23-26。
9.林原宏 (1996),「層級分析法:理論與應用之探討(三)」,測驗統計簡訊,12期,頁9-16。
10.林原宏 (2004),「詮釋結構模式」,教育研究月刊,118期,頁120-121。
11.林原勗、曾明朗、蕭玉婷、陳耀茂 (2007),「利用ISM 與AHP 探討生物科技產業選擇園區之研究」,明道學術論壇,3卷,1期。
12.林輝泉 (2003),臺北縣教師資訊素養之需求分析與發展策略,淡江大學教育科技學系研究所,碩士論文。
13.周添城、林志誠 (1999),台灣中小企業的發展機制,聯經出版社,台北。
14.相志強 (1995),JIT 生產系統之績效衡量,台灣工業技術學院管理技術研究所,碩士論文。
15.根津和雄 (1995),CALS であざす米國製造業躍進のシナリオ,工業調查會。
16.徐承義 (2003),臺灣地區國際港埠發展國際物流策略之研究-以基隆港為例,臺灣海洋大學河海工程學系研究所,碩士論文。
17.徐淑瑜 (2001),企業資源規劃(ERP)系統評選之研究-應用分析網路程序法(ANP),淡江大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。
18.許天維、林原宏 (1994),「詮釋結構模式(Interpretive Structural Modeling)的理論與應用簡介」,國教輔導,34卷,1期,頁31-35。
19.張聖麟 (1998),卓越化生產管理(二版),華泰文化事業股份有限公司,台北。
20.張錫銘 (1984),物料需求規劃與豐田生產方式之比較研究,政治大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
21.陳虹遐 (2004),應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估,成功大學工業設計研究所,碩士論文。
22.傅和彥 (1991),突破困境邁向繁榮-中小企業經營法,前程企管,台北。
23.黃志堅 (1993),永不停止的生產線,統領雜誌,1月號,頁114-116.
24.黃俊榮 (2007),運用分析網路程序法於供應商評選之實證研究-以連鎖生鮮超市乳品供應商評選為例,勤益科技大學流通管理系研究所,碩士論文。
25.彭順雄 (2009),製造業品質系統績效評估模式,開南大學企業與創業管理學系研究所,碩士論文。
26.新鄉重夫 (1980),トヨタ生產方式のIE 考察,日刊工業新聞社,東京都。
27.經濟部中小企業處 (2009),2009年中小企業白皮書,經濟部中小企業處,台北。
28.劉仁傑 (1992),日本的產業策略,聯經出版社。
29.劉昭宜 (2008),結合分析網路程序法與詮釋結構模型於農產物流中心選擇模式,高雄第一科技大學運籌管理系研究所,碩士論文。
30.蔡宜芳 (2007),中高階管理才能評鑑模式之研究-以U公司為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所,碩士論文。
31.鄧振源 (2005),計畫評估:方法與應用(二版),海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心,基隆市。
32.關根憲一 (1981),實踐トヨタガンバン方式:ムダ排除による利益の生みだし方,日刊工業新聞社,東京都。
33.Crawford, K.M., Blackstone, J.H. & Cox, J.F. (1988). “A Study of JIT Implementation and Operation Problems”, International Production Research, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp.1561-1568.
34.Das, C. & Goyal, S.K. (1989). “A Vendor’s View of JIT Maun-facturing System”, International Journal of Operations and Production Managerment, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp.106-117.
35.Ebrahimpour, M. & Schonberger, R.J. (1984). “The Japanese Just-In-Time/Total Quality Control Production System: Potential for Developing Countries”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp.422-426.
36.Finch, B.J. (1986). “Japanese Management Techniques in Small Maun-facturing Companies: A Strategy for Implementation”, Production and Inventory Mansgement Journal, Vol. 27, pp.30-38.
37.Finch, B.J. & Cox, J.F. (1986). “An Examination of Just-in-Time Management for the Small Manufacturer: With an Illustration”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.392-342.
38.Golhar, D.Y., Stamm, L.S. & Smith, W.P. (1990). “JIT Imple-mentation in Small Manufacturing Firms”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp.44-48.
39.Hall, Jr. & Ernest, H. (1989). “Just-In-Time Management A Critical Assessment”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.315-318.
40.Hannah, K.H. (1987). “Just-In-Time: Meeting the Competitive Challenge”, Production and Inventory Management, 3rd Quarter, pp.1-3.
41.Harrison, A. (1992). Just-In-Time Manufacturing in Perspective, Prentice Hall, Boston, USA.
42.Hernandez, A. (1989). Just-in-time Manufacturing - A Practical Approach, Prentice Hall, Boston, USA.
43.Huge, E.C. (1987). “Building Top Management Commitment to JIT/TQC Implementation”, APICS, Conference Proceedings, pp.368-372.
44.Inman, R.A. (1988). “Implications for the Implementation of the Just-In-Time Philosophy in Manufacturing Firms”, DBA Dissertation, Memphis State University.
45.Jharkharia, S. & Shankar, R. (2004). “IT Enablement of Spply Chains: Modeling the Enablers”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 53, No. 8, pp700-712.
46.Johnson, D.C. (1987). “How to Implement JIT in a Process Industry”, APICS, Conference Proceedings, pp.219-221.
47.Johnston, S.K. (1989). “JIT: Maximizing Its Success Potential”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp.82-86.
48.Masselwhite, W.C. (1987). “The JIT Production Challenge”, Training and Development Journal, 1st Quarter, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.27-29.
49.McLachlin, Ron, & Chris, P. (1990). “Just-In-Time Production”, Business Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.36-41.
50.Meade, L. & Sarkis, J. (1998). “Strategic Analysis of Logistics and Supply Chain Management Systems Using the Analytical Network Process”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.201-215.
51.Patrick, R. & Hang, P.Y. (1987). “An Investigation of the Factors Influencing the Number of Kanbans Required in the Implementation of the JIT Techniques with Kanban”, Production Research, Vpl. 25, No. 3, pp.457-472.
52.Ravi, V., Shankar, R. & Tiwari, M.K. (2005). “Productivity Improvement of A Computer Hardware Supply Chain”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp.239-255.
53.Saaty, T.L. (1977). “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structural”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, pp.274-281.
54.Saaty, T.L. (1978). “Exploring the Interface Between Hierarchies, Multiple Objectives and Fuzzy Sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, pp.57-68.
55.Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
56.Saaty, T.L. (1982). Decision Making for Leaders, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, USA.
57.Saaty, T.L. (1986). “A Note on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expected Value Theory”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp.397-398.
58.Saaty, T.L. (1987). “Rank Generation, Preservation, and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Decision Process”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 18, pp.157-177.
59.Saaty, T.L. (1990). “An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp.259-268.
60.Saaty, T.L. (1996). “Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
61.Saaty, T.L. & Forman, E.H. (1996). “The Hierarch on: A Dictionary of Hierarchies”, Expert Choice, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
62.Sarkis, J. (2003). “A Strategic Decision Framework for Green Supply Chain Management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 11, pp397-409.
63.Schonberger, R.J. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity, The Free Press, New York, USA.
64.Schonberger, R.J. (1988). “The Pull of Kanban”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.54-58.
65.Shyur, H.J. & Shih, H.S. (2006). “A Hybrid MCDM Model for Strategic Vendor Selection”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 44, pp.749-761.
66.Singh, R.K., Garg, S.K., Deshmukh, S.G. & Kumar, M. (2007). “Modelling of Critical Success Factors for Implementation of AMTs”, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.232-250.
67.Sohal, A.S. & Naylor, D. (1992). “Implementation of JIT in a Small Maunfacturing Firm”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, pp.20-25.
68.Souza, S.A. (1987). “Performance Measurements: Successful Application to JIT”, APICS, Conference Proceedings, pp.393-394.
69.Tatsuoka, K.K. (1995). “Architecture of Knowledge Structures and Cognitive Diagnosis: A Statistical Pat-tern Recognition and Classification Approach”, In Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F. & Brennan R.L. (Eds.), Cognitively Diagnostics Assessment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp.327-359.
70.Warfield, J.N. (1974a). “Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models”, IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.405-417.
71.Warfield, J.N. (1974b). “Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling”, IEEE Transportation System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.81-87.
72.Warfield, J.N. (1982). “Interpretive Structural Modeling”, Chapter 5, In Olsen S.A. (Eds.), Group Planning and Problem Solving Methods in Engineering. Wiley, New York, USA.
73.Warfield, J.N. & Ayiku, M.N.B. (1989). “Sociotechnical Modeling for Developing Nations”, System & Cybernetics in Management (SCIMA). Published in India, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, pp.25-40.
74.White, R.E. (1993). “An Empirical Assessment of JIT in U.S. Manufacturers”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.38-42.
75.William, J.S. (1990). Operations Management, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York, USA.



QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top