臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於外國性(Foreignness)對於國際化影響之動態(Dynamic)觀點尚未受到廣泛的注意，本研究以中國對外直接投資的288間上市企業為樣本，探討外國性對多國籍企業國際化之影響與動態關係，首先我們具體化外國性的概念，將其區分為四個構面，分別為來源國(Country of Origin)、同形化(Isomorphism)、制度距離(Institutional Distance)與外來者(Outsider)，鑒於過去研究強調兩者間的線性關係，本研究檢驗外國性對國際化之影響為先增後減的動態關係。研究結果發現，除了同形化效果外，外國性的來源國、制度距離、外來者效果與多國籍企業的國際化確實存在著倒U型關係，也就是說長遠而言，先產生正向影響，但是當外國性的效果超過最適水準時，會對多國籍企業之國際化產生負向影響。

The literature of foreignness lacks in-depth study of Chinese MNEs and the dynamic perspective with internationalization. This study examined the dynamic relationship of foreignness with internationalization. We test the dynamic relationship between foreignness and internationalization with four facets, ranging from the original country, the isomorphism, the institutional distance, to the outsider. In contrast to prior research that emphasizes the linear relationship, this paper examined a curvilineal relationship between foreignness and internationalization. Research results first showed a positive impact on internationalization up to specific level, and then, foreignness effect has a negative impact on the internationalization of Chinese OFDIs. In other words, an inverted U-shaped relationship between foreignness effect and internationalization was supported of facets of original country, institutional distance, outsider, except isomorphism.

目次

致謝辭 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目次 iv
圖目次 vi
表目次 vii
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 章節架構 3
第貳章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 外國性之多層面性 4
第二節 外國性之雙元性 10
第三節 外國性之動態性 14
第四節　國際化 17
第參章 假說建立 19
第一節 外國性的來源國效果與國際化之倒U型關係 19
第二節 外國性的同形化效果與國際化之倒U型關係 20
第三節 外國性的制度距離效果與國際化之倒U型關係 21
第四節 外國性的外來者效果與國際化之倒U型關係 22
第肆章 研究設計 24
第一節 樣本 24
第二節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量 24
第三節 研究方法 28
第四節 模型 29
第伍章 實證結果與分析 30
第一節 敘述性統計分析 30
第二節 相關分析 33
第三節 迴歸分析 37
第陸章 結論 39
第一節 研究結論.............................................39
第二節 對理論之貢獻.........................................42
第三節 對實務之建議.........................................43
第四節 研究建議與限制.......................................43
參考文獻 45
一、中文部分 45
二、英文部分 45
三、Working paper 55

圖目次
圖1.1 1999-2013年中國對外直接投資流量情形..........................1
圖1.2 2002-2013年中國對外直接投資存量情形..........................1

表目次
表2.1 外國性劣勢文獻回顧..........................................11
表2.2 外國性的多層面與雙元特性....................................14
表2.3 外國性之動態性..............................................15
表3.1 外國性的假說................................................23
表4.1 研究變數定義................................................27
表5.1 各年投資案件數..............................................30
表5.2 樣本投資國家分佈............................................31
表5.3 相關分析結果................................................34
表5.4 迴歸分析結果................................................35
表5.5 迴歸結果整理................................................38

參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.邱皓政，(2005)，量化研究法一：研究設計與資料處理，台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。
2.中國 [專題研究 走出去戰略] 之分析: 跨世紀中國經濟的轉變. 展望與探索, 2008, 6.8: 45-62.
二、英文部分
1.Aharoni, Y. (1966). The foreign investment decision process (Vol. 403). Boston.
2.Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2001). Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs a multi-level analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013-1034.
3.Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Pedersen, T. (2001). Subsidiary performance in multinational corporations: the importance of technology embeddedness.International Business Review, 10(1), 3-23.
4.Annavarjula, M., & Beldona, S. (2000). Multinationality-performance relationship: A review and reconceptualization. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1), 48-67.
5.Barnard, H. (2010). Overcoming the liability of foreignness without strong firm capabilities—the value of market-based resources. Journal of International Management, 16(2), 165-176.
6.Bae, J. H., & Salomon, R. M. (2010). Institutional distance in international business research. ADVANCES IN INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT: THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 23.
7.Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2012). The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(2), 107-122.
8.Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460-1480.
9.Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of international business studies, 13(1), 89-100.
10.Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2002). Young people's time perspectives: from youth to adulthood. Sociology, 36(3), 513-537.
11.Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of international business studies, 38(4), 499-518.
12.Calhoun, C. J. (2002). The class consciousness of frequent travelers: toward a critique of actually existing cosmopolitanism. The South Atlantic Quarterly,101(4), 869-897.
13.Caves, R. E. (1971). International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 1-27.
14.Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge university press.
15.Cordell, V. V. (1992). Effects of consumer preferences for foreign sourced products. Journal of International Business Studies, 251-269.
16.Cosset, J. C., & Roy, J. (1991). The determinants of country risk ratings.Journal of International Business Studies, 135-142.
17.Daniels, J. D., & Bracker, J. (1989). Profit performance: do foreign operations make a difference?. Management International Review, 46-56.
18.Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be same? It's a question (and theory) in strategy balance. Strategy Management Journal, 20(1): 147-166.
19.Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J. F. (2012). Liabilities of foreignness revisited: a review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 322-334.
20.Dox, Y. L., Bartlett, C., & Prahalad, C. K. (1981). Global competitive pressures and host country demands: Managing tensions in MNCs. California Management Review (pre-1986), 23(000003), 63.
21.Dunning J. H. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
22.DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory», in LG Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge, MA, De.
23.Dimofte, C. V., Johansson, J. K., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2010). Global brands in the United States: How consumer ethnicity mediates the global brand effect.Journal of International Marketing, 18(3), 81-106.
24.Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2001, August). OPENING THE BLACK BOX: MULTINATIONALS AND THE COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS ABROAD. InAcademy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2001, No. 1, pp. C1-C6). Academy of Management.
25.Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in international management, 16, 187-221.
26.Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion.Administrative science quarterly, 484-503.
27.Garcia‐Pont, C., & Nohria, N. (2002). Local versus global mimetism: The dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 307-321.
28.Glynn, M. A., & Dacin, M. T. (2000). Pluralism and the problem of variety.Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 726-734.
29.Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 82-97.
30.Guillén, M. F., & Suárez, S. L. (2005). Explaining the global digital divide: Economic, political and sociological drivers of cross-national Internet use.Social Forces, 84(2), 681-708.
31.Han, C. M. (1989). Country image: Halo or summary construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 222-229.
32.Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations.American journal of sociology, 929-964.
33.Hawley, A. (1968). Human Ecology in: Sills, DL (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: MacmillanHawleyHuman Ecology in328International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences1968, 328-337.
34.He, W., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). China's outward foreign direct investment.Business Horizons, 51(6), 485-491.
35.Hennart, J. F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. Univ of Michigan Pr.
36.Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 361-382.
37.Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms.Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
38.Holburn, G. L., & Zelner, B. A. (2010). Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1290-1315.
39.Huber, J., & McCann, J. (1982). The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 324-333.
40.Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment (Vol. 14, pp. 139-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
41.Insch, G. S., & Miller, S. R. (2005). Perception of foreignness: Benefit or liability?. Journal of Managerial Issues, 423-438.
42.Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim‐Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm—four swedish cases 1. Journal of management studies, 12(3), 305-323.
43.Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of international business studies, 23-32.
44.Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of international business studies, 40(9), 1411-1431.
45.Johansson, J. K., Douglas, S. P., & Nonaka, I. (1985). Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective.Journal of Marketing Research, 388-396.
46.Jonsson, S., & Regnér, P. (2006, August). NORMATIVE BARRIERS TO IMITATION: SOCIAL COMPLEXITY OF CORE COMPETENCES IN A MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. MM1-MM6). Academy of Management.
47.Kaiser, U., & Sofka, W. (2006). The pulse of liability of foreignness: dynamic legitimacy and experience effects in the German car market. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (06-070).
48.Kim, H., & Jensen, M. (2014). Audience Heterogeneity and the Effectiveness of Market Signals: How to Overcome Liabilities of Foreignness in Film Exports?. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1360-1384.
49.Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of international business studies, 411-432.
50.Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management review, 24(1), 64-81.
51.Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects.Academy of management journal, 45(1), 215-233.
52.Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.
53.Kwok, C. C., & Tadesse, S. (2006). National culture and financial systems.Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 227-247.
54.Lampert, S. I., & Jaffe, E. D. (1998). A dynamic approach to country-of-origin effect. European Journal of Marketing, 32(1/2), 61-78.
55.Li, J., Yang, J. Y., & Yue, D. R. (2007). Identity, community, and audience: How wholly owned foreign subsidiaries gain legitimacy in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 175-190.
56.Luo, Y., & Rui, H. (2009). An ambidexterity perspective toward multinational enterprises from emerging economies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 49-70.
57.Luo, Y. (2005). Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 209-230.
58.Luo, Y., & Mezias, J. M. (2002). Liabilities of foreignness: Concepts, constructs, and consequences. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 217-221.
59.Martinez, R. J., & Dacin, M. T. (1999). Efficiency motives and normative forces: Combining transactions costs and institutional logic. Journal of Management, 25(1), 75-96.
60.Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. "Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony." American journal of sociology (1977): 340-363.
61.Mezias, J. M. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229-244.
62.Min Han, C. (1990). Testing the role of country image in consumer choice behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 24(6), 24-40.
63.Moeller, M., Harvey, M., Griffith, D., & Richey, G. (2013). The impact of country-of-origin on the acceptance of foreign subsidiaries in host countries: An examination of the ‘liability-of-foreignness’. International Business Review,22(1), 89-99.
64.Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. (2008). Perspectives on China's outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 337-350.
65.Nachum, L. (2014). The Liability of Foreignness. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
66.Nachum, L. (2010). When is foreignness an asset or a liability? Explaining the performance differential between foreign and local firms. Journal of Management, 36(3), 714-739.
67.Nachum, L. (2003). Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1187.
68.Nadolska, A., & Barkema, H. G. (2007). Learning to internationalise: the pace and success of foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies,38(7), 1170-1186.
69.Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products. The Journal of Marketing, 68-74.
70.Nebenzahl, I. D., & Jaffe, E. D. (1997). Measuring the joint effect of brand and country image in consumer evaluation of global products. Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 3(3), 190-207.
71.North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
72.Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), 145-179.
73.Palmer, D., & Barber, B. M. (2001). Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 87-120.
74.Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of international business studies, 39(5), 920-936.
75.Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Coping with liability of foreignness: Different learning engagements of entrant firms. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 339-350.
76.Perrewé, P. L., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Personality Research in the Organizational Sciences.
77.Qian, G., Li, L., & Rugman, A. M. (2013). Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6), 635-647.
78.Ralston, D. A., Holt, D. H., Terpstra, R. H., & Kai-Cheng, Y. (1997). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 177-207.
79.Ramamurti, R. (2012). What is really different about emerging market multinationals?. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41-47.
80.Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy1. American journal of sociology, 108(4), 795-843.
81.Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management review, 16(2), 340-361.
82.Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2007). Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: a response to Dunning et al.(2007). Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 200-205.
83.Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. (2012). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 343-367.
84.Sauvant, K. P. (2005). New sources of FDI: the BRICs-outward FDI from Brazil, Russia, India and China. J. World Investment & Trade, 6, 639.
85.Schooler, R. (1971). Bias phenomena attendant to the marketing of foreign goods in the US. Journal of International Business Studies, 71-80.
86.Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
87.Selznick, P. (2011). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Quid Pro Books.
88.Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of international business studies, 519-535.
89.Shirin, K., & Kambiz, H. H. (2011). The effect of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions.Chinese Business Review, 10(8), 601-615.
90.Sofka, W. (2006). Innovation activities abroad and the effects of liability of foreignness: Where it hurts. Center for European Economic Research (ZEW) Discussion Paper, (06-029).
91.Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm.Journal of International Business Studies, 325-342.
92.Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management journal, 39(1), 179-196.
93.Tseng, C. H., Tansuhaj, P., Hallagan, W., & McCullough, J. (2007). Effects of firm resources on growth in multinationality. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 961-974.
94.Un, C. A. (2011). The advantage of foreignness in innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1232-1242.
95.Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. The quarterly journal of economics, 190-207.
96.Welch, Lawrence S., and Reijo Luostarinen. "Internationalization: evolution of a concept." The Internationalization of the firm 14 (1988): 83-98.
97.Williamson, O. E. (2007). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (pp. 61-75). Gabler.
98.Yang, Z., Su, C., & Fam, K. S. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 41-55.
99.Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management journal, 38(2), 341-363.
100.Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic management journal, 18(6), 439-463.
101.Zaheer, S. (2002). The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 351-358.
102.Zhou, N., & Guillén, M. F. (2015). From home country to home base: A dynamic approach to the liability of foreignness. Strategic management journal,36(6), 907-917.
三、Working paper
Hsin-Mei Lin, Yi-Tien Shih, I-Fan Yen, Working Paper, The foreignness effect on internationalization: The perspective of multi-complexity, duality, and dynamics.