臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的主要目的是探討產業結構、夥伴關係和創新能力對台灣生物科技新創事業績效之影響，並以組織能力為中介變數做探討。透過文獻探討來確認重要變數及建立研究架構。之後進行分析相關變數之間的關係，並提出研究假設。本研究以問卷分析的方法針對台灣生物科技新創事業廠商進行調查，並以統計方法驗證來研究假設。
產業結構發展勢必將影響該國各產業發展的狀況，而產業結構的成熟、轉型和優化將成為新創事業在未來的創立狀況和發展的關鍵影響因素。新創事業在剛起初時，資源和經驗上較那些大型或是成立已久的公司來得缺乏。然而，若是能夠利用夥伴關係間所獲得的資源提供和經驗的吸收，使得新創事業在經營上能夠快速成長，進而擁有穩固的營運模式來創造利潤。因此，夥伴關係對新創事業績效產生重要的影響。過去的研究顯示創新能力對企業經營具有激發企業績效提昇的作用，對於組織資源的創造和能力的提昇也具功效。組織本身所擁有的資源能力和獲得其他所需求的資源對於企業發展有相當大的重要性，因而組織資源的掌握和能力的運用將深深地影響新創事業的績效。
本研究以迴歸分析方法來分析各變數之間的互動，經實證研究之結果發現，產業結構、夥伴關係、創新能力和組織能力皆對新創事業績效產生正向的影響，同時也發現組織能力對於產業結構、夥伴關係和創新能力與新創事業績效間具有中介效果。本文期盼針對台灣生物科技產業新創事業績效之提昇和其影響因子提出結論與建議，以為台灣生物科技產業新創事業廠商和後續研究者參考。

The study probes that how do the innovation strategy, organizational resource, top management team’s characteristics and relationship affect the new venture performance. Following past researches, we build up our conceptual constructs and research framework. The study analyzes the relationship within these variables. The study tries to investigate the biotechnology new venture in Taiwan. Prior studies show that better industry structure is the key element to affect the future founding condition and development of the new venture. Prior studies also show that innovation strategy can not only encourage the business performance, but also increase the resources and improve the capability of member. Furthermore, the core of organizational resources that firm owned and other resources they need are very important for venture development. Therefore, the core of organizational resources affects the new venture performance deeply. Moreover, team’s characteristics affect the directions of venture development and establishment. When the new venture at the incunabular step, they lack the resources and experiences more than big or established business. However, if the new venture can apply the relationship to get the resources and experiences, they will grow rapidly and own the stable operation mode to create more profit.
This study gives the suggestions for the influencing factors of new venture performance and tries to over the evidence from biotechnology ventures in Taiwan.

中文摘要……………………………………………………………………….…..Ⅱ
英文摘要…………………………………………………………….….....………Ⅲ
誌謝………………………………………………………………………...……..…Ⅳ目錄……………………………………………………………………...…………..Ⅴ
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………Ⅶ
圖目錄………………………………………………………………..……………..Ⅸ
第一章 緒論……………………………………………...……………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………...….....1
第二節 研究目的……………………….…………….……………………5
第三節 研究流程……………………………………..……………………6
第二章 文獻探討…………..…………………………………………………7
第一節 新創事業相關研究………………………………………………7
第二節 產業結構…………………………………………..…………..…..9
第三節 夥伴關係………………………………………….…………..….15
第四節 創新能力…………………………..………..……….………..….21
第五節 組織能力……………………………………..…………………..27
第六節 新創事業績效………………………………………………..…32
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………34
第一節 構面因素之操作性定義與衡量……………………………..34
第二節 研究架構………………………………………………………...39
第三節 問卷設計………………………………………………………....40
第四節 資料蒐集與抽本方法………………………………………….40
第五節 資料分析方法…………………………………………………...41
第四章 研究內容…………………………………………………………....44
第一節 樣本結構分析…………………………………….………..….44
第二節 因素分析………………………………………………………..49
第三節 信度分析………………………………………………………..52
第四節 相關分析………………………………………………………..54
第五節 各相關變數對新創事業績效之迴歸分析……………….56
第五章 結論與建議…………………..……………………………..……..61
第一節 研究結果…………………………………………………..….....61
第二節 研究貢獻…………………………………………………..….…65
第三節 研究建議…………………………………………………..….…66
第四節 研究限制…………………………………………………..….…67
參考文獻………………………………………………………………….....….…68

一、中文部分：
1.大前研一(民 73)。策略家的智慧，長河出版社。
2.方至民(民 89)。企業競爭優勢，台北，前程企管公司。
3.司徒達賢(民 84)。策略管理，遠流出版社。
4.李武釗(民 94)。行銷知識管理、行銷知識能耐、行銷知識管理績效與市場績效的關係－以印刷包裝業為例，國立成功大學工商館李研究所在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
5.吳思華(民 85)。策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：麥田。
6.李鳳梧(民 87)。科技創新育成中心關鍵成功因素之研究，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
7.洪景原(民 91)。生技公司營運特性、組織能力及經營績效之關聯性研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
8.郭淑枝(民 93)。服裝電腦輔助軟體的應用研究－專利創新與迴避設計，輔仁大學織品設計學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。
9.黃哲彬(民 92)。國民小學校長賦權增能行為與學校效能關係之研究，國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
10.陳佩佩(民90)。影響新事業技術商品化與績效相關因素之研究--以高科技產業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
11.陳順宇(民 89)。多變量分析，第二版，台北：華泰。
12.陳建南(民 91)。電子商務、夥伴關係、供應練管理與競爭優勢之關係。長榮大學經營管理所碩士論文，未出版，台南縣。
13.陳智明(民 92)。組織內部因素對新事業績效影響之研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
14.陳維新(民 80)。創業策略與創業績效－台灣創業家之實證研究，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
15.黃銘章(民 90)。影響代工供應商與顧客間夥伴關係因素之研究-以台灣電子資訊產業為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
16.曾耀輝(民 75)。我國高科技-企業創業領導者特徵、創業決策之研究--以新竹科學園區資訊電子工業為實證，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
17.張蓮生(民 85) 。企業從傳統產業轉入高科技產業之考量因素，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
18.董瓊雲(民 91)。創新活動創新者與其顧客互動關係研究-以封裝測試產業為例，中華大學科技管理研究所碩士，未出版，新竹市。
19.楊雅媛(民 86)。產業環境、事業策略與企業文化對人力資源管理策略及組織績效之影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
20.蔡玉慧(民 91)。專利權、創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究─以研發投資宣告為例，國立成功大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
21.劉明全(民 92)。培育組合、創業團隊特性及創新育成中心之資源基礎對進駐新創事業績效影響之研究，實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
22.鍾育榮(民 93)。以組織能力、鑲嵌連結觀點探討對台灣電子商務新創事業經營績效之影響，銘傳大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
23.龔鴻裕(民 88)。影響中小企業以創新育成中心進行新產品開發行為之相關因素研究，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
24.鄧欣豪(民 92)。創業策略、創業團隊特性和根源對新事業績效之影響－以IC設計業為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
25.郭明秀(民 90)。高階管理團隊與組織運作、競爭優勢、競爭策略及經營績效之關係研究－傳統產業與高科技產業之比較。成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。

二、英文部分：
1. Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (1990). The economics of small firms: A European challenger. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Allan N.A. and Nik. Bahram, (1995). The hypercube of innovation. Research Policy, 24, pp. 51-76.(1995).
3. Bamford, C. E., Dean, T.J. and McDougall, P. P. (2000). An Examination of the Impact of Initial Founding Conditions and Decisions upon the Performance of New Bank Start-Ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), pp. 253-277.
4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99–120.
5. Boulton, et al. (2000). Cracking the Value Code: How Successful Business Are Creating Wealth in the New Economy. New York: Harper Business.
6. Bell, C. and McNamara, J. (1991). High-Tech Ventures: The Guide for Entrepreneurial Success. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
7. Berry, W., & Cooper, M. (1999). Manufacturing flexibility: Methods for measuring the impact of product variety on performance in process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 17, pp. 163–178.
8. Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. (1987). The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. The Free Press: New York.
9. Berry, W. & Cooper, M. (1999). Manufacturing flexibility: Methods for measuring the impact of product variety on performance in process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 17 , pp. 163–178.
10. Campbell, A. J. and R. G. Cooper, (1999). Do Customer Partnerships Improve New Product Success Rates? Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), pp. 507-519,.
11. Carey, J., Freundlich, N., Flynn, J., & Gross, N. (1997). The biotech century., Business Week, 3517, pp. 78–90.
12. Cooper, A. C., and Bruno, A.V. (1977).Success Among High-Technology Firms. Business Horizons. 20(2), pp. 16-22.
13. Cooper, R.G. (1984a). How New Product Strategies Impact on Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2, pp. 5–18.
14. Cooper, R.G. (1984b). New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2, pp. 151–164.
15. Cooper A.C., Willard, G. E. and Woo, C. Y. (1986), Strategies of high performance new firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, pp. 247-260.
16. Cravens, D. W., Piercy N. F., and Shipp, S. H. (1996). New Organizational Forms for Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments: The Network Paradigm, British. Journal of Management, 7, pp.203-218.
17. Day GS. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, pp. 37-52.
18. Daft, R.L., (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21, pp. 193–210.
19. Daft, R.L., (1982). Bureaucratic versus non-bureaucratic structure and the
process of innovation and change. In: Bacharach, S.B., (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, CT: JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 129–166.
20.Damanpour, F., Evan, W.M., (1990). The adoption of innovations over t ime:structural characteristics and performance of organizations. Proceedings of the National Decision Science Institute Conference, San Diego.
21. David, Wan., Chin Huat, Ong. and Francis, Lee.(2005). Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore. Technovation, 25(3), pp. 261-268.

22. Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp. 709–728.
23. Deng, Z., B. Lev, and F. Narin, (1999). Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysis Journal, (May/June), pp. 20-32.
24. Dess, G. C. and Robinson R. B., Jr. (1984), Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), pp. 265-273.
25. Dewar, R.D., Dutton, J.E., (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations : an empirical analysis. Management Science, 32, pp. 1422–1433.
26. Dierickx, Ingemar; Cool, Karel; Barney, Jay B. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation And Sustainability Of Competitive, Management Science, 35(12), pp. 1504.
Ding, Hung-bin ＆ Lois Peters, (1999). Inter-firm Knowledge Management Practices for Technology and New Product Development in Discontinuous Innovation, International Journal of Technology Management, forthcoming.
27.Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. N.Y.: Harper and Row.
During R&D Innovation and Commericalization Stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp. 770-786.
28.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic de-cision making in high-velocity environment: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737-770.
29.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 504–529.
30.Ellram, L.M.(1991).Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distributional Logistics Management, 12(1), pp. 13-33.
31.Ensley M. D., Pearson A. W.and Amason Allen. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, pp. 365–386.
32.Ettlie, J.E., Bridges, W.P., O’Keefe, R.D., (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30, pp. 682–695.
33. Etzioni, A. (1961), A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates, New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
34.Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick D. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes：The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administratiive Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 484-503.
35.Hair, Anderson, Tatham, and Black(1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Maxwell MacMillan International.
36.Hagedoom, J. (1993), Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering : interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), pp. 371-385.
37.Hall, R.(1993). A Framework Linking Intangible Resources & Capabilities to Substainable Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 607-618.
38.Hall, B. H., A. B.Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg (2001). The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insight and Methodological Tools. University of California, Berkeley, Dept.
39.Hambrick, D.C. and Mason P.A.(1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 193-207.
40.Hamel, G. & C.K. Prahalad(1993). Strategy As Stretch and Leverage. Harvard Business Review, Mar./Apr., pp. 75-84
41..Hamilton, W. F., Vila, J., & Dibner, M. D. (1990). Patterns of strategic choice in emerging firms: Positioning for innovation in biotechnology. California Management Review, Spring, pp. 73–86.
42.Henderson, R., and Cockburn,I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 63.
43..Hofer, Charles W. and Schendel, Dan.(1978). Strategic Formulation: Analytical Concept, N.Y.: West Publishing Company.
44.Hofer, C.W. 1975. Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 18, pp. 784-810.
45.Hutt, D.M., E.R. Stafford, B.A. Walker and P.H. Reingen(2000). Defining the social network of a strategic alliance. Sloan Managemen Review, Winter, pp. 51-62.
46.Hyungrae .J& Jinjoo L. (1996).The relationship between an entrepreneur’s background and performance in a new venture. Technovation, 16(4), pp.161-171
47.Itami, H. and Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 119-135
48.Johnson, P.(1986).New firms: An economic perspective. London, Allen and Unwin.
49.Kale, P., H. Singh, and H. Perlmutter(2000). Learning and protection of proprietary in strategic alliances : Building relation capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 217-231.
50.Karl Vesper, (1980), New Venture Strategies. Prentice-Hall, p.2.
51.Kaufman, A., Wood, C. H. and Theyel, G.(2000). Collaboration and Technology Linkages : A strategic supplier typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 649-663.
52..Keeley, R., & Roure, J. (1990). Management, strategy, and industry structure as influences on the success of new firms: A structural model. Management Science, 36, pp. 1256–1267.
53.Kelm, K. M., Naraynan V. K. and Pinches G. E. (1995). Shareholder Value Creation During R&D Innovation and Commercialization Stages, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), pp.770-786.
54.Kimberly, J.R., Evanisko, M., (1981). Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, pp. 689–713.
55.Kirchhoff, B.A. (1977), Organization effectiveness measurement and policy research. Academy of Management Review, 2, pp. 347-355.
56.Knight, K.E., (1967). A descriptive model of intra-firm innovation process. Journal of Management, 41, pp. 478-496.
57.Lefebvre, L., Langley, A., Harvey, J., and Lefebvre E. (1992). Exploring the Strategy-Technology Connection in Small Manufacturing Firms. Production and Operations Management, 1, pp. 269–284.
58.Lambert, D.M., Emmelhainz, M.A. and Gardner, J.T.(1996). Developing and Implementing Supply Chain Partnerships. The International Journal of Logistics management, 7(2), pp. 1-17.
59.Leavy, B.(1994). Two Strategic Perspective on the Buyer-Supplier Relationship. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 35(2), pp.47-51.
60.Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S. (1987). Appropriating the Returns for Industrial Research and Development. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 3:783–820.
61.Lussier, R.N.(1995). A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction model for young firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1), pp. 7-20.
62.Marino, K. E., & DeNoble, A. F. (1997). Growth and early returns in high technology-based manufacturing ventures. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(2), pp. 225–242.
63..McGrath, R.G., Venkatraman, S., and MacMillan, I.C. (1994). The advantage chain: Antecedents to rent from internal corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, pp. 351-369.
64.McGrath, M.E. (1994). Product Strategy for High-Technology Companies: How to Growth, Competitive Advantage and Increased Profits. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
65.Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.Miller, A., & Camp, B. (1985). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, pp. 87-105.
67.Mintzberg, Henry（1987）, “Five Ps For Strategy”. California Management Review, pp. 11-14.
68.Mohr, J. and Spekman(1994), Characteristics of partnership success : partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), pp. 135-152.
69.Murray, A. I.(1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 125-141.
70.Ng, S.C., Pearson, A.W. and Ball, D.F. (1992), Strategies of biotechnology companies, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 4(4), pp. 351-61.
71.Norburn, David & Sue Birley, (1988), The Top Management Team and Corporate Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 9(3), pp. 25-238.
72..Penrose, E., (1959). A Theory of the Growth of Firms. Blackwell Press: Oxford, UK.
73.Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
74..Pisano, G. P., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1995). The new logic of high-tech R&D. Harvard Business Review, Sept–Oct, pp. 93–105.
75.Poon, Jessie P.H., MacPherson, A. (2005). Innovation strategies of Asian firms in the United States. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22 (4), pp. 255-273.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Strategy; Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press (Macmillan).
Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr, (1996), Interorganizational Collaboration and The Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116-145.
78.Robinson, R. B. and J. A. II Pearce.(1988). Planned Patterns of Strategic Behavior and Their Relationships to Business-unit Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 43-60.
79.Roure, J.B. & Maidique, M.A. (1986). Linking Prefunding Factors and High Technology, The Venture Capital Start-Up, Journal of Business Venturing, 3(Aug), pp. 415-423.
80.Rumelt, Richard P. (1982). Diversification Strategy and Profitabi lity. Strategic Managerment Journal, 3, pp. 359-369.
81.Sandberg, W. R. (1986). New venture performance: The role of strategy and industry structure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
82.Sandberg, W. R., & Hofer, C. W. (1987). Improving new venture performance: the role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), pp. 5–29.
83.Scherer F.M. (1970). Industry Market Structure and Economic Performance. Rand McNally: Chicago, IL.
84.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, M.A.:Harvard University Press.
85.Shan, W. (1990). An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Strategies by Entrepreneurial High-Technology Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 129–139.
86.Spekman R. E., Isabella L. A., MacAvoy T. C., Forbes T. (1998). Creating strategic alliances which endure. Long Range Planning, 29(3), PP. 346-357.
87.Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In: J. G. March (Ed.). Handbook of organizations, pp. 142–193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
88.Straits Times, a leading Singapore newspaper (in English).
89.Teece, D. (1982). Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, pp. 39–63.
90.Teece, D.J. (1986). Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy 15:285–305.
91.Tidd, J., J. Bessant & K. Paritt (1997). Managing Innovation : Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, N.Y.: Wiley.
92.Utterback, J.M., (1971). The process of technological innovation within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14, pp. 75-88.
93.Van de Ven, A.H., Hudson, R. & Schroeder, D.(1984). Designing new business start-ups: entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management, 10, pp. 87-107.
94.Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance on strategy research : A comparison of approach. Academy of management Review, 11(4), pp. 801-804.
95.Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13, pp. 109-122.
96.Wiersema M. F. and Bantel K. A.(1992), Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), pp. 91-125.
97.Weinzimmer L.G. (1997). Top management team correlates of organizational growth in a small business business context：A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), pp. 1-9.
98.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171–180.
99.Yamin, S., Mavondo, F., Gunasekaran, A., Sarros, J. C. (1997). A study of competitive strategy, organisational innovation and organisational performance among Australian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1-2), pp. 161-172.
100.Zahra, S. and Covin, J. (1993). Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Company Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 451–478.
101.Zahra, S.A.(1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), pp. 289-321.
102.Zahra, S. A., Bogner, W. C.(2000). Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance : Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), pp. 135-173.