跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.134) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/22 11:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:馬思漢
研究生(外文):Hisham Mirza
論文名稱(外文):The Economic Impact of CAFTA-DR on Honduras
指導教授:張榮農張榮農引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHANG, Rolando J.N.
口試委員:蕭力愷張翰中
口試委員(外文):HSIAO, Bruce L.K.CHANG, HANG-CHUNG
口試日期:2018-06-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:國際事務碩士學位學程
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:國際事務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:英文
論文頁數:57
外文關鍵詞:Free trade agreementEconomic impactVAR modelCAFTA-DRCentral AmericaEconomic developmentTradeAgreementHondurasGDP
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:152
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:2
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
This research looks at the Economic Impact CAFTA-DR, Central America and the Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement with the USA, has had on the small economy of Honduras with a regression model. After the implementation of NAFTA in the northern part of America, the USA decided to enact a new form of agreement with a set of different countries. With the slow and lacking economy of Central American countries being noticeable, this was the prime area to implement such type of agreement. However, many people doubt the overall help of such, so there are a lot of benefits of understanding the impact of this free trade agreement on Macro Economic data. This research also understands the overall implementation of this agreement and explains the impact if a possible annulment is imposed. Overall, and after testing the real GDP, there was an impact seen at the start of CAFTA-DR. However, after working its way through the years and other countries joining, the positive impact became a negative one. This suggests that the overall use of an agreement like this only helps short term, but lags behind after a while which hurts the long term effect. This study overall suggests the importance of having an economic impact and that this agreement wasn’t beneficial on the long term.
Chapter 1..................................................................1
INTRODUCTION...............................................................1
1.1 Background Information.............................................1
1.2 Motivation.........................................................5
1.2.1 The Possible annulment of CAFTA-DR.................................6
1.2.2 The need for an Economic Impulse...................................7
1.2.3 The use of Neo-liberal Agreements for Economic Integration.........8
1.3 Research Question and Objectives...................................9
1.4 Expected Contribution..............................................9
1.5 Definition of Terms...............................................10
Chapter 2.................................................................12
LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................12
2.1 The Use of Free Trade Agreements..................................12
2.2 Free Trade Agreements vs. World Trade Organization................13
2.3 Free Trade Agreements with the USA................................14
2.4 CAFTA-DR..........................................................15
2.5 Economic Impact of Free Trade Agreements..........................16
2.6 The use of QVAR as a Macro economic Impact tool...................17
Chapter 3.................................................................18
METHODOLOGY...............................................................18
3.1 Framework.........................................................18
3.2 Data Description..................................................19
3.3 Model Specification...............................................20
3.4 Hypothesis Test...................................................23
3.5 Research Hypothesis...............................................25
Chapter 4.................................................................27
DATA AND RESULTS..........................................................27
4.1 GDP Data..........................................................27
4.2 Growth Rate.......................................................28
4.3 Descriptive Statistics............................................29
4.3.1 Agriculture, Cattle Raising, Hunting, Forestry, and Fishing.......29
4.3.2 Mining and Quarries...............................................30
4.3.3 Manufacturing Industries..........................................31
4.3.4 Electricity and Water Distribution................................32
4.3.5 Construction......................................................32
4.3.6 Commerce, Vehicle Repair, Motorcycles, Personal Belongings, Household goods, Hotels and Restaurants...................................33
4.3.7 Transport and Storage.............................................34
4.3.8 Communications....................................................35
4.3.9 Financial Intermediary............................................35
4.3.10 Residential Property, Real Estate and Business Activities.........36
4.3.11 Public Admin. and Defense, Social Security Plans and Mandatory Affiliation...............................................................37
4.3.12 Teaching Services, Social and Health Services.....................37
4.3.13 Community Social, and Personal Services...........................38
4.3.14 Subtraction of Intermediary Financial Services Indirectly Measured..................................................................39
4.3.15 Net Taxes on Subsidy over Production and Imports..................39
4.3.16 GDP...............................................................40
4.4 GDP Regression....................................................41
4.5 Analysis Summary..................................................42
Chapter 5.................................................................44
CONCLUSION................................................................44
5.1 Concluding Remarks................................................44
5.2 Policy making and Implications....................................46
5.3 Limitations and Clarification.....................................46
5.4 Further Remarks...................................................48
REFERENCES................................................................49
Anindititha. P. & Mirza. H. (2017) The Effect of QE on the G20 Countries
Armstrong, S. (2015). The economic impact of the Australia–US free trade
agreement. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(5), 513-537.
Retrieved December 28, 2017.
Burfisher, M., Robinson, S., & Thierfelder, K. (2001). The Impact of NAFTA on
the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 125-144.
Retrieved December 28, 2017.
Banco Central de Honduras (2018) Reporte de Series PIB Trimestral. Retrieved
from https://see.bch.hn/portalPIBT/SeriePIBTrimestral.aspx
Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). (n.d.). Retrieved December 27,
2017, from https://www.citizen.org/our-work/globalization-and-
trade/nafta-wto-other-trade-pacts/cafta
Dueker. M. (2005) Dynamic forecasts of qualitative variables: a qual var model
of U.S. recessions J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 23, pp. 96–104
Frutos, D., Teekasap, P., & Samii, M. (2011). CAFTA-DR Effects on FDI Inflows,
Growth, and Distribution of the Workforce in Costa Rica: A System
Dynamics Approach. The International Trade Journal, 25(3), 372-393.
Retrieved December 28, 2017.
Hicks, R., Milner, H., & Tingley, D. (2014). Trade Policy, Economic Interests,
and Party Politics in a Developing Country: The Political Economy of
CAFTA-DR. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 106-117. Retrieved
December 28, 2017.
International Agricultural Trade Reports. (2015, March 30). Central America
and the Caribbean: Prospects for U.S. Agricultural Exports. Retrieved
December 27, 2017, from https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/central-america-
and-caribbean-prospects-us-agricultural-exports
Kazutomo, A. (2007). Assessing the Economic Impacts of Free Trade Agreements:
A Computable Equilibrium Model Approach. RIETI, 07-e-053. Retrieved
December 28, 2017.
Lake, J., & Yildiz, H. (2016). On the different geographic characteristics of
Free Trade Agreements and Customs Unions. Journal of International
Economics, 103, 213-233. Retrieved December 28, 2017, from
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.09.003.
Lee, H., & Song, B. (2008). Quantitative Estimates of the Economic Impacts of
a Korea–United States Free Trade Agreement*. Asian Economic Papers, 52-
73. Retrieved December 28, 2017.
Mayda, Anna M., and Dani Rodrik. (2005) Why Are Some People (and Countries)
More Protectionist than Others? European Economic Review 49: 1393–1430.
Meinusch A. (2015) the macroeconomic impact of unconventional monetary policy
shocks
Office of the United States Trade Representative. (n.d.). CAFTA-DR Final Text.
Retrieved December 27, 2017, from https://ustr.gov/trade-
agreements/free-trade-agreements/cafta-dr-dominican-republic-central-
america-fta/final-text
Paggi, M. S., Kennedy, P. L., Yamazaki, F., & Josling, T. (2005, Spring).
Regional Trade Agreements and Implications for US Agriculture: The Case
of CAFTA-DR. Choices, 20(2), 137-141.
Subramanian, A., & Wei, S. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but
unevenly. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 151-175. Retrieved
May 4, 2018, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199606001140.
The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (n.d.). Honduras. Retrieved from
https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/hnd/
World Bank. (n.d.). Overview of Central America. Retrieved December 27, 2017,
from http://www.worldbank.org/en/region/lac/overview
World Bank. (n.d.). Overview of Honduras. Retrieved May 4th, 2018, from
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/honduras/overview

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊