臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

臺灣位處地震帶，地震災害乃臺灣之宿命。以現今之科技，雖無法全然消弭地震所帶來之災害，但只要提升既有建築及橋梁等結構之耐震性能，必能有效減緩地震災害。由歷次震後之災害調查，以校舍之損壞為最，故校舍結構耐震堪虞乃不爭之事實。高中職以下之校舍數量眾多，無法一一拆除重建，必須在有限時間及經費內，提升校舍結構之耐震性能，故於於施工品質、進度之加強及有效管理，乃耐震補強首要課題之一。在下一次大地震來臨之前，作好施工管理工作，只要校舍結構不至於(全面或局部)崩塌，讓師生有足夠之時間及空間逃生，大幅降低人員之傷亡。
自1999年921地震後，國震中心建立南投縣中小學校舍震損資料庫，作為建築物耐震能力詳細評估方法之驗證。教育部自民國98年起逐年編列預算，辦理全國公立高中及國中小校舍耐震評估與補強整建計畫，迄今已完成1萬3,726棟校舍之初步評估、7,935棟校舍之詳細評估、4,439棟校舍之補強工程。綜觀已完成補強工程之校舍，較常見之補強工法有擴柱補強、翼牆補強、RC牆補強等工法。前述各項補強工法皆可有效提升校舍之耐震能力，但對於施工品質、進度之有效管理卻較少提及。
故本研究以新北市汐止區樟樹國民小學為例，探討整建補強校舍結構整建時工程之施工品質及進度管理歷程，以供國內中小學校舍整建時施工管理之參考，期許因此可如質如期完成所承接之案件並提升校舍之耐震能力。

Taiwan is located in the earthquake zone, so there are many inevitable earthquakes. Although today's technology can not completely eliminate the damage caused by earthquake, it can be reduced effectively by retrofitting the seismic performance of structures. The results of several Earthquake Disaster Investigations show that school buildings are the largest number of damaged buildings, so the importance of school buildings’ seismic retrofit is Undoubted. There are large number of school buildings under high school and can’t be rebuilt. The school buildings’ seismic performance must be improved in the limited funds and time, so to improve and manage effectively on construction quality and construction schedule become and important lesson, that when the devastating earthquake hit, the school buildings will not collapse immediately and increase more time for evacuation.
Since the "921 Earthquake" in 1999, the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taiwan established a database of damaged school buildings under high school in Nantou County to evaluate the seismic performance of school buildings. The Ministry of Education has made a budget every year on national municipal high school, senior high school and elementary school’s seismic performance evaluate and retrofit plan since 2009. So far 13,726 school buildings has completed the preliminary assessment, 7,935 school buildings has completed the detailed assessment and 4,439 School buildings has retrofitted. The common retrofit methods are column extension、wing wall reinforcement、shear wall reinforcement、RC wall reinforcement…etc., although these retrofit methods can improve the seismic performance of school buildings, the management of construction quality and construction schedule is rarely mentioned.
This paper discusses the management of construction quality and construction schedule of Zhangshu elementary school in Xizhi District of New Taipei City, provide suggestion for future construction management use and wish to complete the construction in time 、with quality and also improve the seismic performance.

Keywords：school building, Seismic retrofit, column extension, wing wall, shear wall, RC wall, retrofit method, construction management, contractor.

謝誌 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 研究內容與範圍 2
1-4 研究方法與流程 3
第二章 校舍施工管制與檢驗分析概述 5
2-1 前言 5
2-2 施工計畫書 6
2-3 品質管理計畫書 15
2-4 職工安全管理計畫書 24
第三章 學校校舍建築結構修復補強施工管理概述 26
3-1 前言 26
3-2 校舍案例施工程序 27
3-3 施工品質管理概述 28
3-4 整合性進度管理 49
3-5 結論 51
第四章 校舍耐震補強實例分析 53
4-1 前言與目標 53
4-2 工程概述 54
4-3 本案之進度管理 65
4-4 施工作業管理 68
4-5 施工程序 75
第五章 結論與建議 103
5-1 結論 103
5-2 建議 105
參考文獻 107
附錄A本案施工計畫書表格(參考例) A-1
附錄B本案品質計畫書表格(參考例) B-1

1.Tsai, Y.B. A study of disastrous earthquakes in Taiwan, 1683 - 1895 Bull. Inst Earth Sei. Academia Sinica,5,1 - 44,1985.
2.Tsai, T.B.T.L.Teng, J.M. Chin, and H.L. Liu Tectonic indication of the seismicity in the Taiwan region, Mem. Geol. Soc. China,2,13 - 41, (1977) .
3.Wang, J.H. b values of shallow Taiwan earthquakes, Ball Seizm Soc Amer,78, 1243 - 1254,(1988).
4.Wang, J.H., Y.B. Tsai, and K.C. Chen Some Espects of seismicity in Taiwan region Bull Inst. Earth Sci, Academia Sinica,3,87- 104, (1983).
5.Barrows, H.H. Geography As Human 5 Ecology, Annals of the Association of AmericanGeographers, 13:1-14,1923.
6.Burton, I. Types of Agricultural Occupance of Flood Plains in the United States, University of Chicago, Department of Geography Research Paper No. 75, Chicago,1962.
7.Dooley, D., Catalano, R., Mishra, S. and Serxner, S. Earthquakepreparedness： Predictors in a community survey, Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 22:451-470,1992.
8.Farley, J.E., Barlow, H.D., Finkelstein, M.S., and Riley, L. Earthquake Hyseria, before and after：A survey and follow-up on public response to the Browning forecast, International journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,11：305-322, 1993.
9.Jackson, E.L. Public response to earthquake hazard, California Geology,30: 278-280,1977.
10.Jackson, E.L. Response to earthquake hazard: The West Coast of North America, Environment and Behavior, 13: 387-416,1981.
11.Jackson, E.L. and Mukerjee, T. Human Adjustment to the Earthquake Hazard of San Francisco, California, In Natural Hazard：Local, National, Global, ed. G.F. White, pp.160-166, New York: Oxford University press. ,1974.
12.Lindell, M.K. and Perry, R.W. Household adjustment to earthquake Hazard: A review of research，Environment and Behavior, 32(4): 461-501, 2000.
13.Mitchell, J.T. Introduction – Hazard in Changing cities, Applied Geography, 18(1): 1-6,1998.
14.Nichols, J.R. Global summary of human response to natural hazards: earthquakes, In Natural Hazard：Local, National, Global, ed. G.F. White,pp.274-284, New York: Oxford University press,1974.
15.Palm, R. and Hodgson, M.E. After a California Earthquake: Attitude and Behavior Change, University of Chicago Geography Research Paper, No.233, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago,1992.
16.Palm,R. Urban earthquake hazards – The impacts of culture on perceived risk and response in the USA and Japan, Applied Geography,18(1): 35-46,1998.
17.Russell, L., Goltz, J.D., and Bourque, L.B. Preparedness and Hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes, Environment and Behavioural, 27: 744-770,1995.
18.方 豪，"二十世紀以前台灣地震記錄彙"，方豪六十自定稿上冊，1968。
19.徐 弘，"清代台灣天然災害史料彙編"，行政院國家枓學委員會防災枓技究報告72─01號，1982。
20.徐明同，"明清時代破壞性大地震規模及震度之評估"，氣象學報，廿九卷，四期，1─18頁，1983。
21.徐明同，"一九三五年以前之台灣歷史地震"，一九三五年新竹─台中大地震五十周年紀念研討會論文集，1─10頁，1985。
22.宋國城，陳彥傑，"地震與活斷層"，環境科學技術教育專刊，17：1-20，2000。
23.邱昌平，"台灣地區地震災害之防範與應變對策"，國家科學委員會防災科技報告74-54號，1985。
24.徐明同，呂新民，"臺南嘉義地方烈震調查報告"，臺北市：中央氣象局，1969。
25.鄭錦桐，台灣活斷層查詢系統，國立中央大學應用地質研究所工程地質與防災科技研究室，2002。
26.蕭江碧，"九二一集集大地震全面勘災報告：建築物震害調查"，臺北市：國家地震工程研究中心，1999。
27.國家實驗研究所-國家地震工程研究中心校舍專案辨公室報，宋嘉誠，2004。