臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究利用作者共引文的分析法(Author co-citation analysis, ACA)去針對資訊系統成功模式(Information System Success Model)做分析。ACA提供了一個完善的方法讓我們去檢視其研究發展趨勢及架構，ACA主要的概念是藉由計算兩個作者被其他人所共同引用的次數，來了解他們彼此之間的相關性。本研究所採用有關資訊系統成功模式的資料均來自SSCI , SCI 資料庫。

本研究依據資訊系統成功模式領域中，其論文被引用的次數，依序蒐集前100篇，並取其之第一作者作為我們分析的資料，再經由ACA的方法處理這些數據，接著利用多元尺度化分析 Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) 以及群集分析 Clustering Techniques (CT) 去展現資訊系統成功模式的動態知識架構，最後利用因素分析 Factor Analysis(FA)去驗證其完整性。經過上述的分析結果，我們可以勾勒出一個在資訊系統成功模式領域中的知識架構圖，可以大致將其區分為三大區塊 : 1) 科技接受模式 &; 資訊系統成功模式的關係與應用, 2) 資訊系統成功模式在企業及管理上的應用, 3) 資訊系統成功模式在其他領域的應用，希望透過這個架構圖，能提供未來的研究者一個較為明確的方向。

This thesis shows the analysis of Information System (IS) Success Model by using Author co-citation analysis (ACA). ACA offers a good technique that contributes to the understanding of intellectual structure in the sciences and possibly in other areas to the extent that those areas rely on formal scholarly communication. It is a form of document coupling the frequency with two authors which their paper are cited by the same person. In this thesis we make an experiment by using data from SSCI, SCI database system to identify clusters of highly inter-related documents in the subject of IS Success Model.

The study ranks the Information System Success Model documents by times cited and collects first top 100 articles’ authors. Also, we use Multidimensional scaling (MDS) and clustering techniques (CT) to create the two-dimensional maps to display the dynamic intellectual structure of IS success model, based on scholars citing their work by its ranking. The conclusion would provide further research for the researchers.

Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................................... i
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... iv
List of Figures ................................................................................................................ v
List of Tables ................................................................................................................. vi
I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1
II. Literature review ....................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Information System Success Model................................................................. 3
2.1.1 The Importance of Information System Success Model ....................... 3
2.1.2 The Definition of Information System Success Model ......................... 3
2.1.3 The History of Information System Success Model ............................. 5
2.2 Author Co-citation Analysis ............................................................................. 9
III. Proposed Method ................................................................................................... 12
3.1 Objective ........................................................................................................ 12
3.2 Overview of Author Co-citation analysis ...................................................... 12
3.3 Author Co-citation Method ............................................................................ 13
3.4 Multidimensional Scaling and Hierarchical Clusters .................................... 15
3.5 Factor Analysis............................................................................................... 18
IV. Experimental Results ............................................................................................. 20
4.1 Data Collection .............................................................................................. 20
4.1.1 Selection of Authors ............................................................................ 20
4.1.2 Retrieval of Author Co-citation Matrix............................................... 20
4.2 Results and discussion ................................................................................... 27
4.2.1 Results of the Author Co-citation Analysis ......................................... 27
4.2.2 Multidimensional Scaling and Hierarchical Clusters ......................... 28
4.2.3 Factor Analysis ................................................................................... 30
V. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 37
5.1 Summary ........................................................................................................ 37
5.2 Discussion ...................................................................................................... 38
5.3 ACA Drawbacks &; Limitation....................................................................... 40
Reference ..................................................................................................................... 41
Appendix A - Authors of Top 100 most citing papers .................................................. 45
Appendix B – Core 52 Reference ................................................................................ 47
Appendix C - Limited Web of Science Area ................................................................ 51
Appendix D - C# Program for co-citation frequency .................................................. 52

Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., &; Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource‐based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621-636.
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., &; Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
Au, N., Ngai, E. W., &; Cheng, T. (2002). A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework. Omega, 30(6), 451-478.
Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., &; McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 444-452.
Braam, R. R. (1991). Mapping of science: foci of intellectual interest in scientific literature: DSWO Press, University of Leiden.
Culnan, M. J., O'Reilly, C. A., &; Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972–1984: a cocitation analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 453-458.
Delone, W. H. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
DeLone, W. H., &; McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.
Doll, W. J., &; Torkzadeh, G. (1998). Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information &; Management, 33(4), 171-185.
Gelderman, M. (1998). The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Information &; Management, 34(1), 11-18.
Griffith, B. C. (1989). Understanding Science Studies of Communication and Information. Communication research, 16(5), 600-614.
Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., &; Segars, A. H. (1996). Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patters of application. Information &; Management, 31(4), 177-191.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., &; Cavaye, A. L. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS quarterly, 279-305.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., &; Carr, C. L. (2002). Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS quarterly, 145-166.
Kärki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 323-334.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston: Inc.
Larson, R. R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. Paper presented at the PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING-AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE.
Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information &; Management, 1(4), 219-234.
McCain, K. W. (1983). The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics, 5(5), 277-289.
McCain, K. W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: the changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American society for information science, 35(6), 351-359.
McCain, K. W. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American society for information science, 37(3), 111-122.
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 433-443.
McGill, T., Hobbs, V., &; Klobas, J. (2003). User developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 16(1), 24-45.
Mombers, C., Van Heeringen, A., Van Venetie, R., &; Le Pair, C. (1985). Displaying strengths and weaknesses in national R&;D performance through document cocitation. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 341-355.
Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., &; Prybutok, V. R. (1997). A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 10(1), 6-26.
Nadel, E. (1981). Citation and co-citation indicators of a phased impact of the BCS theory in the physics of superconductivity. Scientometrics, 3(3), 203-221.
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. Journal of the American society for information science, 45(1), 31-38.
Pierce, S. J. (1990). Disciplinary work and interdisciplinary areas: Sociology and bibliometrics. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, 46-58.
Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., &; Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS quarterly, 173-187.
Price, L. L., &; Arnould, E. J. (1999). Commercial friendships: service provider-client relationships in context. The Journal of Marketing, 38-56.
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., &; Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information systems research, 13(1), 50-69.
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., &; Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics, 44(3), 533-546.
Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253.
Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., &; Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the AIS, 2(3es), 5.
Shannon, C. E., &; Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication (Urbana, IL. University of Illinois Press, 19(7), 1.
Small, H., &; Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science studies, 4(1), 17-40.
White, H. D. (1983). A cocitation map of the social indicators movement. Journal of the American society for information science, 34(5), 307-312.
White, H. D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1250-1259.
White, H. D., &; Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American society for information science, 32(3), 163-171.
White, H. D., &; McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327-355.
Zviran, M., &; Erlich, Z. (2003). Measuring IS user satisfaction: review and implications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 5.
Bartholomew, D., Steele, F., Galbraith, J., &; Moustaki, I. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data: Routledge.
Borg, I. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications: Springer.
Kaufman, L., &; Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis (Vol. 344): Wiley. com.
Kruskal, J., &; Wish, M. Multidimensional scaling. 1978. Beverly Hills, CA.