臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣營建業發展至今已有一甲子更遑論排程方法的應用，該產業一直以來便是具有高動態、高風險等因子造成從業人員排程上的困難。「要徑法」一個較早開發也較直觀的排程法是至今產業常用的方法，但也因該法的特性侷限了排程更多的可能性，主要原因便是營造廠簽約時合約內容只可控制專案整體又或初略工期，意指作業勢必會隨生命週期的推演有所更動，然而目前要徑法唯獨對「單一作業」及「群組作業」有明確的定義，但若當工程師欲對原訂排程欲增加一些細節於「單一作業」或移除「群組作業」部分細節等情境時，原「單一作業」或「群組作業」性質意味必然不合需求，此外更遑論相關先後優先順序邏輯等更高度倚賴人為判斷及操作，造成現有排程方式的僵化及不便。然而反觀「線性排程法」則可依工班視角排程將同性質作業彙整，此乃「要徑法」不及之處。有鑒於上述的窘境，本研究希冀透過案例驗證該系統除提供現有排程功能外，使其更具彈性，換句話說也就是將兩種排程方法彙整於單一系統中，藉此或許能提供後續研究者得以從不同層面延伸構思強化該系統，使營建相關作業更趨完善。

Taiwan’s construction industry has been developing for one decade up to now and not to mention the application of scheduling methods. The industry has always been known for factors such as high dynamics and high risk, which have been causing scheduling difficulties for practitioners. The ‘critical path method (CPM)’ is an earlier developed and more intuitive scheduling method that has been commonly used by the industry to date. However, its features are also the reason why scheduling possibilities are limited and cannot expand mainly because constructors only have grasp over the project as a whole or the approximate duration upon contract signing, which means activities will inevitably change over lifecycle progression. In addition, the current CPM only clearly defines ‘single activities’ and ‘group activities’. However, in situations when engineers wish to add some details to original schedules or remove some details from ‘group activities’, the original ‘single activities’ or ‘group activities’ will definitely no longer meet the requirements in the sense of their properties. Besides, it goes without saying that activities such as prioritization logic that are more highly dependent on human judgment and manual operation are causing rigidity and inconvenience in existing schedule methods. In contrast, the ‘linear scheduling method (LSM)’ can schedule from the perspective of shifts and aggregate activities of the same properties. This is where the ‘CPM’ cannot compare. Given the aforementioned dilemma, the purpose of this study is to verify in actual cases that the system can make existing scheduling functions more flexible in addition to providing them, i.e. integrating the two methods in one system. This may therefore provide some insights for subsequent researchers to enhance the system by extending the concept from different perspectives, making construction-related activities more thorough.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT i
誌謝 i
目錄 ii
表目錄 i
圖目錄 iv
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 研究範圍 2
1.4研究方法 3
1.5 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1名詞定義及特性 5
2.2相關應用及分析 6
第三章 研究方法 11
3.1彈性資源規劃模型(Flexible-relationship scheduling model, FRSM) 12
3.2 彈性物件(Flexibility of objects) 19
3.3 作業的彈性優先關係(Flexibility of activity precedence): 20
3.4 各別模型(Model entity) 20
3.5 各別作業間關係(Relationship between entities) 20
3.6 各別作業角色(Entity's role): 20
3.7 排程模型改變情境： 20
3.8 情境模擬 21
第四章 案例驗證 23
4.1案例背景說明 23
4.2資料建構 24
4.3要徑法結果及分析 27
4.4線性排程法結果及分析 28
第五章結論與建議 35
5.1結論 35
5.2建議 35
參考文獻 37
附件 1 案例工作分解結構 40
附件 2專案作業及工期表 42
附件 3專案父子關係 55
附件 4作業前後續關係 73
附件 5專案彙整 83
附件 6線性排程結果 100
附件 7 MS PROJECT 要徑 149

中文文獻(依年份遞減)
1.陳維東，2015，工程進度規劃與排程技術，雲林縣
2.劉福勳，2003，營建管理概論。台北：詹氏書局
3.呂守陞、楊崇揮，1999。「遺傳演算法在資源限制下工期成本交易最適化排程模式運用之研究」，⟪中國土木水利工程學刊⟫。11卷，3期，p559~566
4.劉述舜、施國銓，1995。「營建專案重排程最佳化模式」，⟪電子計算機於土木水利⟫。

英文文獻
1.Nazila Roofigari-Esfahan 等人,2015”Location-Aware Scheduling and Control of Linear Projects:Introducing Space-Time Float Prisms” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.141
2.Lihui Zhang等人,2014”Improved Strategy for Resource Allocation in Repetitive Projects Considering the Learning Effect” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.140
3.A.Khalili ; D.K. Chua ,2014”Integrated Perfabrication Configuration and Component Grouping for Resource Optimization of Precast Production” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.140
4.Yuanjie Tang 等人,2014”Two-Stage Scheduling Model for Resource Leveling of Linear Projects” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.140
5.Mohammad A. Ammar ,2013”LOB and CPM Integrated Method for Scheduling Repetitive Projects” American Society of Civil Engineers Vol.139 p44~50
6.Tarek Hegazy ; Wail Menesi , 2010”Critical Path Segments Scheduling Technique” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management Vol.136 p1078~1085
7.Alexandros Kallantzis ; John Soldatos ; Sergios Lambropoulos .,2009” Linear versus Network Scheduling : A Critical Path Comparison” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.135 Issue 4. p246~253
8.Daniel Castro-Lacouture 等人,2009 “Construction Project Scheduling with Time, Cost, and Material Restrictions Using Fuzzy Mathematical Models and Critical Path Method” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management Vol.135 p1096~1104
9.Maged E. Georgy ,2007 “Evolutionary resource scheduler for linear projects” Automation in Construction Vol.17 p573~583
10.Kyunghwan Kim ; Jesus M. de la Garza , 2005”Critical Path Method with Multiple Calendars” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management Vol.131 p330~342
11.O. Moselhi ; A.Hassanein , 2003”Optimized Scheduling of Linear Projects” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.129 . p664~673
12.Ming Lu ; HengLi ,2003 “Resource-Activity Critical-Path Method for Construction Planning” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management Vol.129 p412~420
13.Rene A. Yamin ; David J. Harmelink ,2001 “Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model(LSM) and Critical Path Method(CPM)” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.127 Issue 5. p374
14.Tarek Hegazy ; Naglb Wassef , 2001”Cost Optimization in Projects with Repetitive Nonserial Activities” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.127 . p183~191
15.Jonathan Jingsheng shi ,1999”Activity-Based Construction(ABC) Modeling and Simulation Method” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.125 . p354~360
16.David J. Harmelink ; James E. Rowings ,1998”Linear Scheduling Model : Development of controlling Activity Path” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.124. p263~268
17.Robert B. Harris ; Photios G. Ioannou ,1998”Scheduling Projects with Repeating Activities” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.124 . p269~278
18.Kris G. Mattila ; Dulcy M. Abraham ,1998”Resource Leveling of Linear Schedules Using Integer Linear Programming” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.124. p232~244
19.Hojjat Adeli ;Asim Karim ,1997”Scheduling/Cost Optimization and Neural Dynamics Model For Construction” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management Vol.123 p450~458
20.Liang Liu 等人,1995”Construction Time-Cost Trade-Off Analysis Using LP/IP hybrid Method” Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. Vol.121 . p446~454
21.M.Bandelloni 等人,1994”Optimal resource leveling using non-serial dynamic programming” European Journal of Operational Research Vol.78 p162~177
22.Joseph P . Frein , 1980.Handbook of Construction Management and Organization , Second Edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold