臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

若公司或機構能夠掌握核心的技術，除了可能影響其在產業中的地位；更可能影響其未來發展的前景。從Gilbert P. Hyatt的例子及半導體產業的歷史一再顯示核心技術在此產業中尤其重要；掌握核心技術將可能帶來龐大的獲利。本研究利用半導體產業在USPTO的專利作為廠商技術革新的指標；並透過專利引文網絡作為研究方法，探討半導體產業廠商在不同專利佈局下與其核心技術掌握能力間的關係。本研究的研究結果顯示，在幾個時間區段下半導體產業主要技術軌跡有移轉或變革的可能；且由迴歸分析結果顯示，專利廣度與核心創新者的創新生存能力之間有正向且顯著的關係。本研究認為公司或機構未來發展專利時，若能夠廣泛地在各技術領域下有所琢磨，將增加其掌握核心技術能力的可能性。除了以專利的角度探討半導體技術發展歷史外，本研究為廠商在專利策略上提供一個更明確的佈局方向。並建議未來研究可改善迴歸分析以提升研究結果之強度。此外，亦可建立預測模型，加以探討半導體產業中核心技術變化的可能性。

Histories show that firms or inventors contribute to the mainstream industrial evolution by contributing key technologies as have been proven by many well known patent applications. This dissertation; thus, start by defining the main innovations owned by firms utilizing the patents owned by firms with best centrality in the evolving patenting networks. Utilizing United Stated Patent and Trademark Office dataset this research then shows that firms own the patents with better generality will survive better in the consecutive innovative path. That is to say technologies patented with more supportive background knowledge are easier to find later on applications to be disseminated into more future innovative fruits. This insight could be expected to shed some light for the evaluation of the patent qualities own by firms.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 核心技術的重要性 1
第二節 專利的價值 2
第三節 章節架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 引文網絡與知識傳遞 6
第二節 主要路徑與技術分析 8
第三節 專利發展的特質與佈局 9
第三章 研究方法 11
第一節 專利引文網絡 11
第二節 研究模型 21
第三節 變數 22
第四節 資料 25
第四章 研究結果 27
第一節 敘述性統計 27
第二節 半導體產業主要Component專利分布 36
第三節 專利廣度及深度與核心創新者創新生存能力相關性 42
第四節 核心創新者創新生存能力與各期Domain分布 45
第五章 結論與建議 49
第一節 結論 49
第二節 未來研究方向與建議 50
參考文獻 53

李雅明著(2012)，從半導體看世界，第一版，天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
李雅明著(2013)，半導體的故事，第一版，暖暖書屋文化事業股份有限公司。
東哥，Apple新專利數量落後Samsung、LG，排名跌出前十位！，Qooah，民國107年9月7日。
林菁樺，〈封面故事-專利王篇〉專利變成現金，鴻海不拚數量，自由時報，民國107年12月10號。
思行享徐俊峰，比英特爾更早提出微處理器架構，苦等20年的專利讓他狠賺一筆，每日頭條，民國106年2月15日。
洪友芳，7奈米之戰延燒！美商英特格再告家登EUV光罩盒侵權，自由時報，民國108年7月4日。
蔣士棋，USPTO：專利品質就是國家競爭力！，北美智權報，180期。
Bhupatiraju, Samyukta, Nomaler, Önder, Triulzi, Giorgio & Verspagen, Bart (2012). Knowledge flows – Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies. Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), 1205-1218
Chuang, Thomas, Liu, John, Lu, Louis & Lee, Yachi (2014). The main paths of medical tourism: From transplantation to beautification. Tourism Manage, 45: 49–58.
Davida, Barberá-Tomás Davida, Fernando, Jiménez-Sáez & Castello, Itziar (2011). Mapping the Importance of the Real World: The Validity of Connectivity Analysis of Patent Citations Networks. Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 473-486.
Epicoco, Marianna (2013). Knowledge patterns and sources of leadership: Mapping the semiconductor miniaturization trajectory. Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), 180-195.
Fontana, Roberto, Nuvolari, Alessandro & Verspagen, Bart (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4), 311-336.
Gao, Xia & Guan, Jiancheng (2012). Network model of knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 90, 749–762.
Hirshleifer, David, Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Dongmei (2018). Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns. The Review of Financial Studies, vol 31(7), 2553-2605
Hsiao, Chun-Hua, Tang, Kai-Yu & Liu, John (2015). Citation-based analysis of literature: A case study of technology acceptance research. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1091–1110.
Hsu, Po-Hsuan, Lee, Hsiao-Hui, Peng, Shucing & Yi, Long (2017). Natural Disasters, Technology Diversity, and Operating Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming.
Martinelli, Arianna & Nomaler, Önder (2014). Measuring knowledge persistence: A genetic approach to patent citation networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(3), 632-52.
Newman, Mark (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical review E, 69(6), 066133.
Hummon, Norman Paul & Carley, Kathleen (1993). Social networks as normal science. Social Networks 15(1):71–106.
Hummon, Norman Paul & Dereian, Patrick (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11, 39-63.
Song, Binyang, Triulzi, Giorgio, Alstott, Jeffrey, Yan, Bowen & Luo, Jianxi (2016). Overlay Patent Network to Analyze the Design Space of a Technology Domain: The Case of Hybrid Electrical Vehicles. 14th International Design Conference, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 16–19, pp. 1145–1154.
Triulzi, Giorgio (2015). Looking for the right path : technology dynamics, inventive strategies and catching-up in the semiconductor industry. Doctor of Philosophy, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
Tu, Yi‐Ning & Hsu, Shu‐Lan (2015). Constructing conceptual trajectory maps to trace. The development of research fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Valentini, Giovanni (2012). Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3): 336–346.
Verspagen, Bart (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: a study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93-115.