跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/01 08:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:彭盛寬
研究生(外文):Sheng-Kuan Peng
論文名稱:考量景氣循環之智慧型投資策略
論文名稱(外文):Smart Beta Investment Considering Business Cycle
指導教授:張嘉倩張嘉倩引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chia-Chien Chang
口試委員:張嘉倩紀宗利李勝榮
口試委員(外文):Chia-Chien ChangZong-Li JiSheng-Rong Li
口試日期:2019-07-22
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄科技大學
系所名稱:金融資訊系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:40
中文關鍵詞:因子投資景氣循環等權重組合資產配置
外文關鍵詞:Factor InvestingBusiness CycleEquity WeightsAsset Allocation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:411
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:5
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
自從2008年金融海嘯以來,投資人尋找較以往更低風險與更多超額報酬的商品。Smart Beta是一個介於主動投資與被動投資之間的投資工具,融合了兩者的優點,藉由對於特定風格的因子曝險以及不同的投資組合調整,以達到更多的彈性。過去相關文獻(Chow, Hsu, Kalesnik, and Little, 2011; Fama and French, 2015) 發現Smart Beta投資組合的表現能夠超越大盤。再者,其表現可能會受到景氣循環的影響,然而很少文獻提到該關聯性和影響。因此,本文研究目的嘗試探討因子投資的報酬是否受到景氣循環的影響。
本文採用台灣上市上櫃公司的月與季資料,樣本期間從1992年1月至2017年12月共26年,以景氣燈號做為景氣循環的變數之代理變數。本文使用廣泛之五種因子、九個代理變數,資產配置則是採用等權重模型,並且進一步建立投資組合,比較其報酬是否受到景氣循環的影響。實證結果顯示,在多頭時加碼品質因子可以增加報酬,空頭時減碼價值因子可以減少損失和風險。再者,實證結果證實,考量景氣循環下的投資組合之報酬,同時勝過未考量景氣循環的投資組合與大盤報酬。
After Asian financial storm (2008), investors try to find out financial instruments which are less risk and more excess return. Smart Beta is between active and passive methods of investing and flexible through specific factors combination and asset allocation. Previous studies (e.g., Chow, Hsu, Kalesnik, and Little, 2011; Fama and French, 2015) also find that the performances of smart beta portfolio are higher than their benchmarks.
The performances of smart beta portfolio may be affected by business cycle; however, rare literatures focus on the smart beta factors considering business cycle. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to investigate that how the returns of factor investing are caused by business cycle.
In this study, we use monthly and quarterly data of financial statements and fundamentals of stocks from the all listed companies of Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over-The-Counter from 1st of January 1992 to 31th of December 2017, totally 26 years. The business cycle is measured by monitoring indicators. Considering the business cycle, we use well-known factors (size factor, momentum factor, value factor, quality factor, liquidity factor) for the stock selection. Based on the equity weights model, we further compute the performances of allocation portfolios. We intend to analyze whether the performances of allocation portfolios with considering business cycle beat without considering business cycle and their benchmarks. The empirical results show that the returns of smart beta portfolio increase when we add the capital to quality factor in bull market, and reduce the capital to value factor in bear market that can reduce the risk and loss. Furthermore, the performances of allocation portfolios with considering business cycle are higher than without considering business cycle and also beat benchmark.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 1
1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2
2. METHOD 5
2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN 5
2.2 SUBJECTS / MATERIALS AND ASSUMPTION OF DATA 8
2.2.1 MONITORING INDICATOR 8
2.2.2 UNION AND INTERSECTION 11
2.2.3 ASSET ALLOCATION 12
2.2.4 SHARPE RATIO 12
3. DEFINITION OF FACTORS 13
4. EMPIRICAL RESULT 17
4.1 MONITORING INDICATORS AND RETURNS OF SINGLE FACTOR (WITHIN SAMPLE) 19
4.2 PERFORMANCE OF UNION AND INTERSECTION PORTFOLIOS 27
5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 31
6.Reference 39
1.Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A. & Pedersen, L.H. (2013). Quality Minus Junk. Working Paper. Available at SSRN 2312432.
2.Black, F., Jensen, M. C., and Scholes. M, (1972). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests. New York: in Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets
3.Chen, Y-J. (2007) Four Factor Model in Taiwan Stock Returns-Quantile Regression. I-SHOU University Department of Finance, Master’s Thesis.
4.Chow, T. M., Hsu, J., Kalesnik, V., and Little, B. (2011). A Survey of Alternative Equity Index Strategies. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 67, No. 5
5.DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2007). Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? The review of Financial studies, 22(5), 1915-1953.
6.Ercument C. &Lei J. (2016). Asian Equity Fundamental Factor Model. Portfolio & Risk Analytics. A Bloomberg Professional Service Offering.
7.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Rreturns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
8.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. The Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
9.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. The Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
10.He, L-Z. (2016). Factor-based Asset Allocation of Investment. Standard Chartered Bank, Asian Central Bank Foreign Exchange Management Seminar, Singapore
11.Ibbotson R.G., Chen, Z., Kim, D. Y.-J., and Hu W. Y. (2013) Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 69, Number 3.
12.Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 1., pp. 65-91.
13.Lintner, J. (1975). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 131-155.
14.Liu, Z-S., Huang, Z-T., Lin, Z-Y., Li., M-X., Chen, Y-R., Chen, W-Z., Wang, S-Y., Liao, Z.W., Zhang, J-Y., Zeng, M-L.(2017), Advanced ETF Investment: Smart Beta ETF Investment and Application, Business Culture, Taipei.
15.Malkiel, B. G. (2014). Is Smart Beta Really Smart? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(5), 127-134
16.Rukthuanthong, K. and Roll, R. W. (2014) A Protocol for Factor Identification. - The Review of Financial Studies
17.Roll, R. (1981) A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect. The Jorunal of Finance, Vol. 36, Issue, 4.
18.Ross, S. A. (1976). The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 32, Issue 4, Pages 1573–1607,
19.Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
20.Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21 (1) 49-58
21.Treynor, J. L. (1962). Toward a Theory of Market Value of Risky Assets.London: Place of publication not identified.
22.Tu, H-H. (1999) A Study on the Common Factors Affecting Taiwan's Stock Returns and the Characteristics of Firms--Fama-French Three-factor Model. Kinetic Energy Strategy and Trading Factors. National Sun Yat-Sen University, National Institute of Enterprise Management.
23.XIAO, C-Y. (1988). An Empirical study on the scale Effect of Stock Returns in Listed Companies in Taiwan. National Sun Yat-Sen University, National Institute of Enterprise Management, Master’s thesis
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊