跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.101) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/21 01:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張佑如
研究生(外文):You-ru Chang
論文名稱:台灣國際觀光旅館策略聯盟型態之多評準決策
論文名稱(外文):Employing MCDM to Select the Types of Strategic Alliance for Taiwan''s International Tourist Hotels
指導教授:石素娟石素娟引用關係
指導教授(外文):Su-chuan Shih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:靜宜大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:155
中文關鍵詞:策略聯盟網絡分析程序
外文關鍵詞:Analytic Network ProcessStrategic Alliance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:554
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
隨著台灣經濟的日益繁榮,產業結構重心也從製造業轉為服務業。國內觀光產業在實施週休二日、開放大陸客來台觀光等計畫,及政府積極推動與發展下,觀光旅遊市場持續地穩定成長,國際觀光旅館業者也紛紛設立或調整原有經營方式。在面對競爭日趨激烈的經營環境下,愈來愈多的國內觀光旅館業者以策略聯盟方式,進行同業或異業合作,希望藉此快速取得所需的資源、技術、知識和能力等,以滿足不同層級顧客的需求,進而維持或提升本身的競爭優勢,創造雙贏局面。
本研究透過文獻回顧、專家訪談與問卷調查的方式,採用網絡分析程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP),整合多位專家的意見,建立一套評選策略聯盟型態的決策模式。本研究結果顯示,台灣國際觀光旅館在進行策略聯盟型態評選時,最重視的關鍵準則為策略聯盟績效目標,其次為策略聯盟管理作為,再者為聯盟夥伴評估準則,對於策略聯盟動機則最不重視。在評估指標權重方面,以獲利率為首要的考量,其次為銷售成長率,期望透過策略聯盟的合作方式,提升本身的獲利與銷售能力,達成聯盟目標,以提高對聯盟運作的滿意度。
在聯盟型態的評分上,前三名分別依序為多重活動聯盟、電子通路聯盟、實體通路聯盟,由於國際觀光旅館業為了提高顧客接觸率,以滿足不同消費者的需求,通常會從事一項以上的聯盟活動,並以通路為其主要的客源管道,因此上述三種為國際觀光旅館業最常採用的聯盟型態,同時也最能有效達到聯盟的績效目標;第四名為聯合促銷聯盟,此項聯盟通常會與同業或異業共同合作,推出套裝行程,以提高銷售率,需要較高的規劃與控制,屬於中等的聯盟型態;第五名為交叉促銷聯盟,第六名為一般廣告聯盟,第七名為戶外廣告聯盟,這三種聯盟型態主要是藉由與異業合作的方式,達到廣告的宣傳效果,較能夠提升知名度。基於國際觀光旅館業聯盟型態的不同,其所重視的關鍵準則與評估指標,亦會有所差異。
The economy of Taiwan with the prosperity day by day, structure of industry weight gradual transfer from manufacturing industry to a service industry, when the project has been implementation that the two-day weekend and China tourists comes to Taiwan visit, the tourist industry is under the circumstances that the government actively to promotes and develops, the market of tourist grows up continuously, the international tourist hotels to set up all the time, faced the management environment of intensity competition day by day, the international tourist hotels often adopt the of strategic alliance, with the cooperation and learn among the partners, obtain necessary resources, and satisfaction different demands of the customer, keep or increase one''s own competition advantage, reach the win-win situation.
This study had collected data through reference reviewing, expertise interviewing and questionnaire survey, and evaluated the group decision-making strategies model of strategic alliance in different alliance types by applying the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method. The results had revealed that while Taiwan international tourist hotels evaluating the strategic alliance type, the performance goal of strategic alliance is the most important key criterion that Taiwan’s international tourist hotels considered, the second one is the manage conduct of strategic alliance, and the third one is the partners assess criteria of strategic alliance, and does not pay attention to the motive of strategic alliance. The results of assess index weighing ranking are as follows. The major consideration is profit rate, and the second is sale growth rate, expect to increase one''s own the profit and selling ability through the strategic alliance cooperative way, reach alliance goal, and enhance the satisfaction of alliance operation.
The ranking of each kind of type for strategic alliance is listed as follows: the first three in order are multiple activity alliance, electronic place alliance and entity place alliance respectively. The three types had adopted most frequently in international tourist hotels industry, and can reach the performance goal of the alliance effectively. The fourth is the joint promote the alliance, this alliance usually introduce the package that cooperate with the same or the different industry, increase the sales rate and need the higher planning and control, belong to the medium-sized alliance type. The fifth, sixth and seventh is alternately promote alliance, general advertising alliance and outdoor advertising alliance, these three alliance types are cooperation with the different industry, reach the propaganda result of the advertisement, can relatively enhance the reputation. Due to the alliance types of international tourist hotels are different, the key criteria and assess index will also be difference.
目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 Ⅳ
表目錄 Ⅴ
圖目錄 Ⅵ
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第四節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 策略聯盟理論探討 6
第二節 夥伴的選擇準則 14
第三節 策略聯盟的管理作為 20
第四節 策略聯盟的績效目標 24
第五節 策略聯盟的型態 26
第六節 國際觀光旅館的經營現況 30
第三章 研究方法 36
第一節 國際觀光旅館聯盟型態關鍵準則之選定 36
第二節 國際觀光旅館聯盟型態評選模型之建構 43
第三節 研究設計 49
第四節 網絡分析程序法 55
第四章 資料分析與結果 63
第一節 國際觀光旅館策略聯盟型態之研究步驟 63
第二節 實證分析結果 93
第五章 結論與建議 101
第一節 研究結論 101
第二節 管理意涵 104
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 105
參考文獻 107
附錄 124
表目錄
表2-1 策略聯盟之定義及特性彙總表 7
表2-2 策略聯盟動機理論彙整表 14
表2-3 各學者對於策略聯盟的夥伴評選準則彙整表 20
表3-1 策略聯盟動機理論彙整表 38
表3-2 策略聯盟型態之關鍵準則與評估指標的定義及說明 42
表3-3 策略聯盟型態的定義及說明 49
表3-4 AHP法與ANP法之差異比較 56
表3-5 四位專家之群體決策下關鍵準則間之相對權重表 59
表3-6 AHP評估尺度之意義與說明 60
表3-7 隨機一致性指標平均值 61
表4-1 各關鍵準則之權重值與一致性檢定彙總表 66
表4-2 多人決策下關鍵準則間之相對權重表 67
表4-3 多人決策下關鍵準則間之影響權重表(控制矩陣) 68
表4-4 各項評估指標的相對權重評比 71
表4-5 超級矩陣 81
表4-6 權重後之超級矩陣之計算說明表 82
表4-7 權重後之超級矩陣(Weighted) 82
表4-8 終極超級矩陣 84
表4-9 各聯盟型態在各評估指標之評比 86
表4-10 加權計算七種聯盟型態在十六項評估指標之權重 92
圖目錄
圖1-1 本研究流程圖 5
圖2-1 我國旅館業分類 31
圖3-1 國際觀光旅館業評選策略聯盟型態之網絡分析圖 46
圖3-2 評選聯盟型態之ANP研究流程圖 57
圖4-1 國際觀光旅館業評選策略聯盟型態之網絡分析圖 64
一、中文部份
1.丁永陽,2005,策略聯盟類型及聯盟管理作為對聯盟經營績效及永續經營之研究—以台灣餐飲業為例,碩士論文,大葉大學國際企業管理學系。
2.方至民,2006,國際企業管理─建構全球營運優勢,前程文化。
3.王正璞,1993,企業策略聯盟之管理作為與績效關係之研究-以共同研發聯盟為例,碩士論文,中原大學企業管理學系。
4.王雪梅,2002,國際觀光旅館競爭策略之研究—以晶華酒店為例,碩士論文,國立台北大學企業管理學研究所。
5.王宇晨,2003,電子商務策略聯盟之研究-以B2C資訊商品為例,碩士論文,台北大學企業管理學系。
6.王緒鴻,2006,探討國際觀光旅館之經營績效—結合平衡計分卡及資料包絡分析法,碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅學院旅遊管理研究所。
7.王慧貞,2006,運用模糊多準則評估方法建立「國際觀光旅館經營管理」之評量模型—以新竹地區國際觀光旅館為例,碩士論文,玄奘大學國際企業學系。
8.石素娟,2006,評選海外市場進入模式之群體決策程序,博士論文,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所。
9.江若嵐,2005,國際觀光旅館員工組織公平工作滿意、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究,碩士論文,銘傳大學觀光研究所。
10.交通部觀光局,2009,http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/auser/b/wpage/page1.htm
11.何西哲,1984,餐旅管理會計,台北:自行出版。
12.何亞蘋,2001,連鎖經營體系管理控制與協調機制之研究-以咖啡連鎖店為例,碩士論文,中國文化大學國際企業管理學系。
13.李文瑞、曹為忠、吳美珍,2000,我國資訊電子廠商策略聯盟夥選擇之研究,管理評論,第十九卷第三期,頁1-24。
14.李文瑞,曹為忠,林志豪等,2000,策略聯盟類型與績效影響因素之研究,中山管理評論,第八卷第二期,頁73-302。
15.李璧如,2002,台灣有線電視系統業者策略聯盟夥伴選擇因素之研究,碩士論文,銘傳大學傳播管理學系。
16.林芳如,1993,策略聯盟型態與營運績效之關聯性研究-以台灣航空業為例,碩士論文,中山大學國際高階經營學系。
17.吳克,2001,策略聯盟的形成與夥伴選擇,金屬工業,第35卷第2期,頁138-143。
18.吳青松,1992,國際產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估-美國電腦製造業實例,產業科技研究發展管理研討會,台北:中國生產力中心。
19.吳青松,1996,國際企業管理,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
20.吳青松,1996,策略聯盟之國際發展趨勢,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第二卷第三期,頁8-13。
21.吳青松,1997,國際企業管理理論與實務,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
22.吳青松,2002,國際企業管理─理論與實務,台北:智勝書局。
23.吳思華,1996,策略九說―策略思考的本質,台北:臉譜文化事業股份有限公司。
24.吳清山、林天祐,2001,策略管理,教育資料與研究,第四十一期,頁67。
25.吳勉勤,1998,旅館管理―理論與實務,台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
26.周建平,2008,國際觀光旅館顧客飲食消費文化與行為關聯性之探討,碩士論文,淡江大學企業管理學系在職專班。
27.柯丁萍,1994,策略聯盟夥伴選擇決定因素之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所。
28.高明宏,2004,e-管理學建立競爭優勢,台北:台灣西書出版社。
29.柯博瑜,1997,聯盟資源與企業特性對國際策略聯盟類型選擇之影響,碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學國際企業研究所。
30.陳秉宏,1997,國內電腦廠商運用策略聯盟提升其產品形象之研究,第二屆中小企業研究碩博士論文獎論文輯錄。
31.陳志孟,1999,國際觀光旅館經營策略-台中地區產業之個案研究,碩士論文,東海大學工業工程學系。
32.陳春宏,2003,台北市國際觀光商務旅館異業聯盟之聯盟現況、聯盟型態、競合關係與聯盟績效關係之研究,碩士論文,屏東科技大學企業管理學系。
33.陳綉里,2000,國際企業管理,台北:華泰事業股份有限公司。
34.陳正源,2006,策略聯盟之動機類型、互動機制與聯盟績效之關係―以台灣製藥廠為例,碩士論文,南華大學管理科學系。
35.張智為,2003,核心資源與網絡關係對技術創業公司經營績效之研究,碩士論文,中原大學企業管理學系。
36.張德儀,2003,台灣地區國際觀光旅館業資源能力與經營績效因果關係之研究,博士論文,銘傳大學管理科學研究所。
37.莊銘中,2007,台北市國際觀光旅館基層人員招募策略之研究,碩士論文,淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班。
38.許士軍,1990,管理學,台北:東華書局。
39.許耀謙,2008,台灣市旅館業設備及服務品質之研究—以一般旅館及商務旅館為例,碩士論文,淡江大學建築學研究所。
40.黃雪晴,2000,國內資訊電子業聯盟夥伴選擇模式之研究,碩士論文,成功大學工業管理學系。
41.黃意婷,2006,電信產業策略聯夥伴評選準則之研究—以民營化後之中華電信為例,碩士論文,國立成功大學電信管理研究所。
42.黃國平、陳邦誠與王明坤,2008,應用模糊層級分析法於電信產業策略聯盟夥伴評選,電子商務學報,第十卷第三期,頁545-571。
43.楊上輝,2004,旅館事業概論,台北,揚智文化事業服份有限公司。
44.趙郁文,2000,國際企業管理─系統化理論與分析,台北:華泰文化。
45.蔡正揚、許政郎,1992,企業策略聯盟探討—照明設備個案研究,科技管理研討會論文集,交通大學科技管理研究所。
46.蔡宜菁,2001,國際觀光旅館之高階經營團隊、組織結構、經營策略、關鍵成功因素與績效之關聯-以台灣國際觀光旅館為實證,碩士論文,成功大學企業管理學系。
47.鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,第二十七卷第六期,頁5-28。
48.鍾東仁,2003,大陸台商策略聯盟管理作為與績效之關聯性,碩士論文,中原大學企業管理研究所。
49.譚天譯,Freidheim, C.F. 2000. 策略聯盟—聯盟企業將使全球商務改頭換面,台北:智庫文化。
50.蘇雲華,2005,行銷管理,台北:滄海書局。
二、英文部份
1.Aaker, David A. 2001. Developing Business Strategies. New York John Willey and Sons, 35-36.
2.Adler and Hlavacek A. 1976. Partner choice and linkage characteristics of international joint ventures in Japan. Management International Review, 2(22):20-29.
3.Ahuja, G. 2000. The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 317-343.
4.Al-Khalifa, A. and Peterson, S.E. 1999. The Partner Selection Process in International Joint Ventures. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12): 1064-1081.
5.Anderson, A. L. 1988. America’s money maniacs. Business & Society Review, 66:13-17.
6.Anderson, E. 1990. Two Firms, on Frontier: On Assessing Joint Venture Performance. Sloan Management Review, 31(2): 19-30.
7.Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 42-58.
8.Ariño, A. Abramov, M. Skorobogatykh, I. Rykounina, I. and Vila, J. 1997. Partner Selection and Trust Building in West European-Russian Joint Ventures: A Western Perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(1): 19-37.
9.Auty, S. 1992. Consumer Choice and Segmentation in the Restaurant Industry. The Service Industries, 12(3): 324-339.
10.Aulake, P. S., Masaaki, K., and Arrind, S. 1996. Trust and Performance in CrossBroader Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral.
11.Barney, J. 1986. Strategic Factor Market: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231-1241.
12.Barney, J.B. 1997. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive, NY: Addition-Wesley Publishing Company.
13.Baranson, J. 1990. Transnational Strategic Alliances: Why, What, Where and How. Multinational Business, 2(1): 54-61.
14.Badaracco, J.L. 1991. The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliance, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
15.Baum, J.A.C. Calabrese, T. and Silverman, B. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startup’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 267-294.
16.Beamish, P.W, 1984. Joint Venture Performance in Developing Countries. Doctorsl Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London.
17.Beamish, P. W. 1994. Joint Ventures in LDCS: Partner Selection and Performance. Management International Review, 34(special issue):60-74.
18.Beamish, P. W. 1998. Joint Ventures in LDCs:Partner Selection and Performance. Management International Review, 34,(special issue): 60-74.
19.Brouthers, K.D. Brouthers, L.E. and Wilkinson, T.J. 1995. Strategic Alliance: Choose Your Partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3): 18-25.
20.Bronder, C. and Pritzl. 1992. Developing StrategicAlliances: A Conceptual Framework for Successful Cooperation. European Management Journal, 10(4): 412-421.
21.Coase, R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 386-405.
22.Cai, L., & Hobson, P. 2004. Marking hotel brands work in a competitive environment. Journal of vacation marketing, 10(3):197-208.
23.Chakravarthy, B.S. 1986. Measuring Strategic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3): 437-458.
24.Chung. K. H., and Lee, H.C. 1989. national differences in managerial practices. Korean managerial dynamics, New York :Praeger.163-180.
25.Chung, S., Singh, H. and K. Lee. 2000. Complementarity, Status Similarity and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21:1-21.
26.Chandler and Hanks .1993. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3): 437-458.
27.Contractor, F.J. and Lorange, P. 1988. Why Should Firms Cooperate? The Strategy and Economics Basis for Cooperative Venture. Cooperative Strategies in International Business, NY: Lexingion Books, 3-30.
28.Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. 1992. Measuring service quality:A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56:55-65.
29.Daniels.1971. International Joint Ventures:A Framework for Analysis. Journal of General Management,14(2):78-91.
30.Day, G. S. and Klein, S. 1987. Cooperative Behavior in Vertical Markets: he Influence of Transaction Costs and Competitive Strategies. Review of Marketing, Houston ed, American Marketing Association.
31.Dacin, M.T. Hitt, M.A. and Levitas, E. 1997. Selection Partner for Successful International Alliance, Examination of U.S. and Korean Firm. Journal of World Business, 32(1): 3-16.
32.Das, K.T. and Teng, B.S. 2000. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61.
33.Deyo, F. C. 1987. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithica, NY: Cornell University.
34.Devlin, G. and Bleackley, M. 1988. Strategic Alliances-guidelines for Success. Long Range Planning, 21(2): 18-23.
35.Demirbag, M., Mirza, H., and Weir, D. T. H. 1995. The dynamics of foreign–local joint venture formation and performance in Turkey and the role of industrial groups. Management International Review, 35(special issue): 35–51.
36.Dodgson, M. 1993. Organization Learning: A Review of Some Literatures.Organization Studies, 14(3): 375-394.
37.Doz, Y.L. and Hamel, G. 1998. Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering. MA: Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
38.Dyer. 2001. UK-Western European Strategic Alliances: Motives and Selection Criteria. Journal of Euromarketing, 5(4): 5-35.
39.El-Namaki, M. S. S. 1986. The strategic positioning of some newly industrialized countries in the international market. Advances in strategic management, 4:279-295
40.Elg. 2000. Joint Ventures in LDCs: Partner Selection and Performance. Management International Review, 34(special issue):60-74.
41.Eric W. K. Tsang. 1998. Motives For Strategic Alliance: A Resource-Based Perspective. Journal of Management, 4(3): 207-221.
42.Forrest,J.E. (1990).Strategic alliances and the small technology based firm. Journal of Small Business Management, 54: 37-45.
43.Geringer, J.M. 1988. Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developed Countries, CT: Quorom Books, Westport.
44.Geringer, J.M. 1991. Strategy Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Venture. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1): 42-62.
45.Geringer, J.M. and Hebert, L. 1991. Measuring Performance of International Joint Venture. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 249-263.
46.Geringer, J. M. and Hebert, L. 1991. Measuring Performance in International Joint Venture. Journal of International Studies, 22(1):249-263.
47.Gersony, N. 1996. Sectoral Effects on Strategic Alliances Performance for New Technology Firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2): 175-189.
48.GE Aircraft Engines News Release.1995. CFM International Success built on commitment. http://www.ge.com/aircraftengines.
49.GE Aircraft Engines News Release. 1996. Malaysia Airlines and GE to form joint venture. http://www.ge.com/aircraftengines.
50.Ghemawat, P.1986. Sustainable advantage. Harvard Business Review, 53-58.
51.Grant, R. M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114-135.
52.Gulati, R. 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 85-112.
53.Gulati, R 1998 .Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 239-317.
54.Hamel, G. Doz, Y.L. and Prahalad, C.K. 1989. Collaborate with Your Competitors-And Win. Harvard Business Review, 61(1): 133-139.
55.Harrigan, K.R. 1987. Joint Ventures: a Mechanism for Creating Strategic Change, in Pettigrew, A. (Ed.), The Management of Strategic Change, Basil Blackwell, London.
56.Harrigan, K.R. 1988. Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1): 83-103.
57.Harrigan K. R. and Newman, W. 1990. Bases of Interorganizational Cooperation: Propensity, Power, Persistence. Journal of Management Studies, 27: 417-434.
58.Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., and Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 53(1):133-139.
59.Hill, C. W. L. and G.. R. Jones 1995. Strategic Management Theory, Boston: Houghton Mifflen Company.
60.Hitt, M. A. Tyler, B. B. Hardee, C. and D. Park. 1995. Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(2):12-19.
61.Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Tyler, B. B., & D. Park .1997. Understanding the differences in Korean and U.S. executives strategic orientations. Strategic Management Journal.
62.Hitt, M.A. Dacin, M.T. Levitas, E. Arregle, J-L. and Borza, A. 2000. Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 449-467.
63.Hwang, S. and Chang, T. 2003. Using Data Envelopment analysis to Measure Hotel Managerial Efficiency Change in Taiwan . Tourism management , 24: 357-369.
64.Hyder.1988.Assessing the Performance of Strategic Alliances: Matching Metrics to Strategies. European Management Journal, 18(5): 529-540.
65.James, B.G. 1985. Alliances: The New Strategic Focus. Long Range Planning, 18(3):76-81.
66.Johnson, K. and Ball, S. 1989. Productivity Measurement in Hotels. Tourism Marketing and Management Handbook, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood, 319-323.
67.Karen, C. Nigel, P. and David, C. 2000. Assessing the Performance of Strategic Alliances: Matching Metrics to Strategies. European Management Journal, 18(5): pp.529-540.
68.Kaufman, A., C. H. Wood and G. Theyel . 2000. Collaboration and Technology Linkage: A Strategic Supplier Typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6): 649-663.
69.Kearney, R. M. 1987. Collaborative Advantage: The Art of Alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(2):96-108.
70.Killing, J.P. 1988. Understanding Alliance: The Role of Task and Organizational Complexity, Cooperative Strategic in International Business, NY: Lexington.
71.Kim,D.H. 1993. The Link Between Individual And Organizational Learning. Sloan Management Review, 37-50.
72.Knsynski, B.R. and McFarlan, E.W. 1990. Information Partnerships-Shared Data, Shared Scale. Harvard Business Review, 68(5): 114-120.
73.Knutson, B.J. 1988. Ten Laws of Customer Satisfaction. Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly, 29: 14-17.
74.Kogut, B. 1988. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspective. Strategic Management Review, 9(4): 319-332.
75.Kogut, B. 1989. The Stability of Joint Venture: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38: 183-198.
76.Kotler, P., J. Bowen, and J. Makens. 1999. Marketing for Hospitality Tourism, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
77.Lambe ,C. J. ,and Spekman,R. E.1997. Alliances, External Technological Change. Jprod innov manag 14: 102-116.
78.Lewis, J.D. 1990. Making Strategic Alliances to Work. Research Technology Management, 33: 12-15.
79.Lei, D. 1993. Offensive and Defensive Uses of Alliance. Long Range Planning,.26(4): 32-41.
80.Lorange, P. and Ross, J. and Bronn, R. 1992. Building Successful Strategic Alliances. Long Range Planning, 25(6): 10-17.
81.Luo, Y. 1998. Joint Venture Success in China: How Should We Select a Good Partner. Journal of World Business 33(2): 145-166.
82.Lynch R.P. 1989. The Practical Guide to Joint Venture and Corporate Alliance, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
83.Lyles and Balrd .1994. Jonathan. Relational incentive contracts. American Economic Review ,93(3): 835-868.
84.McGee, J.E. Dowling, M.J. and Megginson, W.L. 1995. Cooperative Strategy and New Venture Performance: The Role of Business Strategy and Management Experience. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2):135-152.
85.Merrifield. 1989. Performance of International Joint Ventures in two European Countries: The case of Hungry and Poland. MIR, 34(4): 313-329.
86.Meyer, P.W. 1990. Non-linear Learnuing in Large Technological Firms:Period Four Impilies Choas. Research Policy, North-Holland, 19: 97-115.
87.Medcof, J. W.1997. Why Too Many Alliances End in Divorce?. Long Range Planning, 30(5):718-732.
88.Meade, L. M. and Sarkis, J. 1999. Analyzing Organizational Project Alternatives for Agile Manufacturing Process: An Analytical Network Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 37: 241-261.
89.Miller, K.D. 1993. Industry and Country Effects on Manager’s Perception of Environment Uncertainty, Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 693-714.
90.Michael, Edward, Jean-Luc and Anca. 2000. Partner Selection In Emerging And Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based And Organizational Learning Perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 449-467.
91.Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2): 135-152.
92.Morey, R. and Dittman, D. 1995. Evaluating a Hotel GM’s Performance: A Case Study in Benchmarking. Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly, 36(5): 30-35.
93.Monckza, R.M., Peterson, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L. 1998. Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision Sciences, 29(3):81-101.
94.Mowery, D. Oxley, J. and Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic Alliance and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1): 77-91.
95.Niederkofier, M. 1991. The Evolution of Strategic Alliance: Opportunities for Managerial Influence. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 237-257.
96.Noria, N. and Garcia-Pont, C. 1991. Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 105-124.
97.Ohmae, K. 1989. The Global Logic of Strategic Alliance. Harvard Business Review, 67(2): 143-154.
98.Parkhe, A.1993. Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 794-829.
99.Pekar .1989. Interorganizzational Cooperation and Decision Making Autonomy in a Consortium Multihospital System. Academy of Management Review, 9(3):494-504.
100.Pekar, J.P. and Allio, 1994. Marking Alliance Work-Guidelines for Success. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 791-811.
101.Pfeffer, J. and P. Nowak .1976. Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: -418.
102.Pfeffer J. and G.. Salanick. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resources Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper and Row.
103.Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, NY: The Free Press.
104.Porter M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creation and Substaining Superior Performance New York: The Free Press.
105.Porter, M.E. and Fuller, M.B. 1986. Coalitions and Global Strategy. In M.E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
106.Randall, R. M. 1989. Upping the Odds for Strategic Alliance Success. Planning Review, 3(1):136-153.
107.Reed, R. and R. J. Defillippi. 1990. Casual ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 88-102.
108.Remer, 1999. Strength Numbers. Restaurant Business, 98(6): 143.
109.Reuer, J. and Zollo, M. 2000. Managing Governance Adaptations in Strategic Alliances. European Management Review, 18, 164-172.
110.Ring, P.S. 2000. The Three T’s of Alliance Creation: Task, Team and Time. European Management Journal, 18(2): 152-163.
111.Robbins, S. P. 1990. Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Application,Englewood Cliffs, New York:PrenticeHall, 49:439-450.
112.Root, F.1988. Some Taxonomics of International Cooperative Arrangements, in F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business. NY: Lexington Books.
113.Rothaermel, F. T. and Deeds, D. L. 2006. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4): 429-460.
114.Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
115.Saaty, T. L., and Kearns, K. P. 1985. Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
116.Saaty, T. L. 1996. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publication.
117.Saaty, T. L. 2001. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publication.
118.Saaty, T.L. and Kearns, K.P. 1985. Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
119.Sakakibara, M. 1997. Heterogeneity of Firm Capabilities and Cooperative Research and Development: An Empirical Examination of Motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 143-164.
120.Shamdasani, P.N. and Sheth, J.N. 1995. An Experimental Approach to Investigating Satisfaction and Continuity in Marketing Alliance. European Journal of Marketing, 29(4): 6-23.
121.Sherida, M. 1998. Head Count. Restaurants and Institutions, 108(1): 59-66.
122.Sierra, C.M. 1995. Managing Global Alliance-Ket Step for Successful Collaboration, NY: Wesley Publishing Company.
123.Souder, M.E. and Nassar, S. 1990. Managing a R&D Consortium for Success. Research Technology Management, 33(5): 44-50.
124.Spekman, R.E. Forbes, T.M. Isabella, L.A. and MacAvor, T.C. 1998. Alliance Management: A View from the Past and a Look to the Future. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6): 747-772.
125.Sriram, V. Krapfel, R. and Spekman, R.E. 1992. Antecedents to buyer-seller Collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 25(4): 303-321.
126.Stanek, A. 2004. Theaccession countries benefit in the field of plant protection products. Academic Search Premier , 49(1): 429-442.
127.Szilagyi, A. D. 1984. Management and Performance, 2nd ed. NJ:Scott Foresman.
128.Tallman, S. B., and Shenkar, O. 1990. International co-operative venture strategies: Outward investment and small firms from NICs. Management International Review, 30: 299-315.
129.Teece, D. J. 1982. Towards and Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1): 39-63.
130.Terry, L. Hanqin, Z. and Tom, B. 2001. An Investigation of Employees’ Job Satisfaction: The Case of Hotels in Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 22: 157-165.
131.Tsaur, S.H. 2000. The Operating Efficiency of International Tourist in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 6(1): 29-37.
132.Walters, B.A. Peters, S. and Dess, G.G. 1994. Strategic Alliance and Joint Venture: Making them Work. Business Horizons, 37(4): 5-10.
133.Werner H. and Roman. 2001. Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises - An empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34(3): 357-381.
134.Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: An-analysis and Antirust Implications. New York: Free Press.
135.Williamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-292.
136.Yan, A. M., and Gray, B. 1994. Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States–China joint ventures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1478-1517.
137.Yasuda, H. 2005. Formation of Strategic Alliances in High-Technology Industries: Comparative Study of the Resource-Based Theory and The Transaction Cost Theory. Technovation, 25(7): 763-770.
138.Yoshino, and Rangan, R. 1995. Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
139.Zukin, S., and DiMaggio, P. 1990. structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. Cambridge. MA: Cambridge university press.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top