跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/05 17:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:葉新榮
研究生(外文):Hsin-Rung, Yen
論文名稱:物種相似性指標之估計量研究
論文名稱(外文):Statistical Estimator of Species Similarity Index
指導教授:潘宏裕潘宏裕引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hung-Yu, Pan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:應用數學系研究所
學門:數學及統計學門
學類:數學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:共同種類相對豐富度Morisita相似性指標多元尺度分析法
外文關鍵詞:shared speciesrelative abundanceMorisita similarity indexmultidimensional scaling
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:414
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:32
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在環境生態學上,生態學家對於兩個群落中的物種分布結構是相當感興趣的課題,例如共同種類數的多寡或是兩個群落的相似程度為何?然而共同種類數僅考慮物種出現與否,並未考慮物種的相對豐富度之資訊。Morisita(1959)提出豐富度的相似性指標,其除了考慮物種數之外,亦考慮其相對豐富度。Morisita(1959)和Horn(1966)分別各自提出一估計量,然而這兩個估計量在小樣本時都會產生偏誤(分別為高估和低估的情形)。本文以修正係數的概念,提出新的估計方式來改善其偏誤的情形;並且藉由電腦模擬方式,改變樣本大小以及不同的共同種類數,來探討本文所提出的方法與原先的估計方法之間的差異。最後,本文所提出之方法將以嘉義縣好美里海岸線水生生物(蝦、蟹和螺貝類等)的資料加以應用分析,並結合多元尺度(multidimensional scaling)分析法探討物種在調查期間的變化情形。
In environmental ecology, the ecologists are interest in the species structure of two assemblages, such as the number of shared species or their similarity of the two assem-blages. However, shared species richness only consider the species appear or not, but it ignores their relative abundance. Morisita (1959) proposes the similarity index which not only considering the number of species but also including the relative abundance of species. Morisita (1959) and Horn (1966) propose the different estimators of similarity index, respectively. Their estimators are bias under the small sample size. In the thesis, we propose the idea of the coefficient of adjustment to modify the bias. We compare our method with others by changing the sample sizes and the number of shared species in the simulation result. Finally, we will analysis the marine organism in the Haomei Vil-lage, Chiayi County, Taiwan. Furthermore, we use the multidimensional scaling (MDS) to realize the variation of species during the survey period.
中文摘要..............................................I
英文摘要..............................................II
感謝詞................................................III
目錄..................................................IV
第一章 緒論...........................................1
第二章 模式及符號說明與文獻回顧.......................4
2.1 模式及符號說明.................................4
2.1.1 模式介紹..................................4
2.1.2 符號說明..................................4
2.2 文獻回顧..........................................7
2.2.1 出現性指標...................................7
2.2.2 豐富度指標...................................10
2.2.3 其他相似性指標...............................15
第三章Morisita相似性指標之估計量研究..................17
3.1 Morisita相似性指標................................17
3.1.1 Morisita 修正估計量..........................18
3.1.2 Morisita-Horn 修正估計量.....................22
3.2 估計量之變異數....................................26
第四章 模擬研究與分析.................................28
4.1 修正估計量偏誤之模擬比較.......................30
4.2 本文估計量之模擬...............................31
4.3 拔靴重抽法之變異數模擬.........................33
第五章 實例分析-好美里水生生態系資料..................36
第六章 結論和未來研究.................................41
附表..................................................43
參考文獻..............................................98
李易庭。2005。Morisita 相似性指標推廣至三群落之比較。國立清華大學統計學研究所生物環境統計組碩士學位論文。新竹。
蘇郁如。2005。生物多樣性相似性指標之統計分析。國立清華大學統計學研究所生物環境統計組碩士學位論文。新竹。
蘇芳儀。2007。兩區域物種相似性的新指標。國立成功大學統計學系碩士學位論文。台南。
Chao, A., Chazdon, R., Colwell, R., and Shen, T.J. (2005). A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters, 8, 148-159.
Chao, A., Chazdon, R., Colwell, R., and Shen, T.J. (2006). Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in sample. Biometrics, 62, 361-371.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1, 54-77.
Horn, H. (1966). Measurement of ”overlap” in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist, 100, 419-424.
Jaccard, P. (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin Society Vaud Science Natural, 44, 223-270.
Morisita, H. (1959). Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu Univ., Series E (Biology), 3, 215-235.
Sorensen, T. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter (K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. NS), 5, 1-34.
Vermeij, G.J. (1986). The Preservation of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton. NJ.
Watson, R.T., Dias, B., Ghmez, R., Heywood, V.H., Janetos, T., Red, W.V., and Ruark, G. (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment. Summary for Policy-Makers. Published for the United Nations Environment Programme by Cambridge University.
Whittaker, V.P. (1960). Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and california. Ecological Monographs, 30, 279-338.
Wolda, H. (1981). Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia, 50, 296-302.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top