1.王紀軒(2016)。鑑識會計於追訴虛假財報犯罪之運用與檢討。輔仁法學，(51)，221-277。2.任慶宗、余佳臻(2015)。公共事務委外契約監督條款之研究。 International Journal，7(2)，129-144。
3.朱斌妤、李洛維(2009)。電子治理的發展與挑戰。研習論壇月刊，(107)， 1-13。4.江瑞祥(2009)。臺灣公共治理指標建立之研究。研考雙月刊，273， 29-44。5.余一鳴(2015)。關係與貪瀆: 華人關係文化脈絡下的公務員倫理行為。行政暨政策學報，(60)，1-40。6.吳佳蓉(2016)。淺談古今中外吹哨者制度沿革與發展。證券服務，(654)，25-27。
7.林本源(2016)。臺灣公共治理研究中心智慧治理與創新服務論壇活動紀實。國土及公共治理季刊 4卷3期 ( 2016/09)，142-143。
8.林嘉誠(2004)。公部門績效評估技術與指標建立。國家政策季刊，3(2)，1-20。9.林銘芳(2014)。績效審計的受惠者-經濟部國營漢翔公司。內部稽核，(85)，55-56。
10.邱怡如(2013)。我國公職人員財產申報制度之研究─兼論「財產來源不明罪」（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學法律學研究所，嘉義縣。11.莊文忠(2009)，《績效管理與衡量指標設計的議題與實務》，台北：華泰。
12.莊文忠(2015)。公民導向的績效衡量與課責模式-以透明治理與開放政府為基礎。國土及公共治理季刊，3(3)，7-19。13.陳英鈐(2010)。公職人員財產申報法施行成效檢討之研究。(法務部委託之專題研究成果報告， PG9901-0700)，未出版。
14.陳敦源(2009)。透明之下的課責: 台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎. 文官制度季刊》，第一卷第二期，頁，21-55。15.游輝城、吳怡慧(2015)。資訊透明度與企業風險之間的關聯性。商管科技季刊，16(4)，459-481。16.葉一璋、梁世武、莊文忠、陳欽春(2014)。《102年廉政民意調查及機關廉政評鑑工具研究》，法務部廉政署。
17.葛傳宇(2011)。全球反貪運動之跨國倡議網絡—以人氣政治為中心。公共事務評論，12(1)，27-51。18.葛傳宇(2014)。全球政府國防廉潔指數-以台灣參與為例。公共事務評論，15(1)，21-36。
19.廖麗娟、吳怡銘(2013)。臺灣公共治理指標調查成果研析。公共治理季刊，1(4)，168-176。20.臺灣公共治理研究中心(2015)。http://www.tpgrc.org.tw/content.php?f=93
21.臺灣透明組織（2015）。台灣國防廉潔度，排名亞洲前段班新聞稿〔摘要〕。2016年4月9日，取自http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1Qvp4Tvk7aMakhoa1d1Tl9ZVm8/view
22.蘇彩足(2013)。我國公共治理之挑戰與因應。公共治理季刊，1(1)， 52-60。23.Alkin, M. C. (Ed.). (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.Association of Certified Fraud Examiners(2016), Report To The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.2016 GLOBAL FRAUD STUDYP.21.http://www.acfe.com/rttn2016/docs/2016-report-to-the-nations.pdf資料下載日期：2016.11.20
25.Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
26.Ben Cheikh, S., Hajri-Gabouj, S., &Darmoul, S. (2015, March). Reconfiguring manufacturing systems using an analytic hierarchy process with strategic and operational indicators. In Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
27.Colazingari, S., & ROSE‐ACKERMAN, S. U. S. A. N. (1998). Corruption in a paternalistic democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America. Political Science Quarterly, 113(3), 447-470.
28.Connelly, B. L., Miller, T., & Devers, C. E. (2012). Under a cloud of suspicion: Trust, distrust, and their interactive effect in interorganizational contracting. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 820-833.
29.de la Fuente, A., Pons, O., Josa, A., &Aguado, A. (2016). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the sustainability assessment of sewerage pipe systems.Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4762-4770.
30.Dey, P. K., & Cheffi, W. (2013). Green supply chain performance measurement using the analytic hierarchy process: a comparative analysis of manufacturing organisations. Production Planning & Control, 24(8-9), 702-720.
31.Dobi, K., Gugić, J., &Kancijan, D. (2010, June). AHP as a decision support tool in the multicriteria evaluation of bids in public procurement. In Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), 2010 32nd International Conference on (pp. 447-452). IEEE.
32.Easton, David (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.
33.Ghosh, K. (2015). Benevolent leadership in not-for-profit organizations: Welfare orientation measures, ethical climate and organizational citizenship behaviour. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 592-611.
34.Govindan, K. (2015). Application of multi-criteria decision making/operations research techniques for sustainable management in mining and minerals. Resources Policy.
35.Harputlugil, T. İ. M. U. Ç. İ. N., Prins, M. A. T. T. H. I. J. S., TanjuGültekin, A., &IlkerTopçu, Y. (2011, June). Conceptual framework for potential implementations of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for design quality assessment. In Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment; MISBE 2011,(June 20-23) CIB International Conference, Amsterdam. Delft University of Technology.
36.Jain, A., Kumar, A., & Dash, M. K. (2015). Information technology revolution and transition marketing strategies of political parties: analysis through AHP. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 20(1), 71-94.
37.Liu, Q., Luo, T., & Tian, G. (2016). Political connections with corrupt government bureaucrats and corporate M&A decisions: A natural experiment from the anti-corruption cases in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 37, 52-80.
38.Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2013). Identifying and ranking of strategies to implement green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industry using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 930.
39.Madaan, J., &Mangla, S. (2015). Decision modeling approach for eco-driven flexible green supply chain. In Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility (pp. 343-364). Springer India.
40.Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., &Barua, M. K. (2015). Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 375-390.
41.Mohammed, F. A., &Hagag, M. A. E. (2013). Integrating AHP and Genetic Algorithm Model Adopted for Personal Selection. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 6(5), 247-256.
42.Nerantzidis, M. (2016). A multi-methodology on building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of academics and practitioners for firms in Greece. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(2).
43.OECD. (2000). Trust in Government: Ethics Measures in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
44.Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., &Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2013). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production (Vol. 7). Routledge.
45.Piotrowski, Suzanne J. (2009). “Is Transparency Sustainable?” Public Administration Review, 69(2): 359-361.
46.Probst, T. M. (2002). The impact of job insecurity on employee work attitudes, job adaptation, and organizational withdrawal behaviors. The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research, 141-168.
47.Pyman, M., Wilson, R. & Scott, D. (2009). The Extent of Single Sourcing in Defence Procurement and Its Relevance as a Corruption Risk: A First Look. Defence and PeaceEconomics, Vol. 20, Issue 3.
48.Rebai, S., Azaiez, M. N., &Saidane, D. (2016). A multi-attribute utility model for generating a sustainability index in the banking sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 835-849.
49.Rotberg, R. I. (2004). Strengthening governance: Ranking countries would help.Washington Quarterly, 28(1), 71-81.
50.Rubenstein, R., Schwartz, A. E., &Stiefel, L. (2003). Better than raw:A guide to measuring organizational performance with adjusted performance measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 607-615.
51.Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Re- sources Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
52.Sanger, M. B. (2008). From measurement to management:breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. Public Administration Review,68(s1), S70-S85.
53.Schillemans, T., Van Twist, M., &Vanhommerig, I. (2013). Innovations in accountability: Learning through interactive, dynamic, and citizen-initiated forms of accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 407-435.
54.Shim, D. C., &Eom, T. H. (2009). Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International review of administrative sciences, 75(1), 99-116.
55.Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope,and Cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4).
56.TI. (2015). Government Defence Anti-Corruption Index Report 2015. p.4
57.TI-DSP(2015). REGIONAL RESULTS ASIA. http://government.defencein-dex.org/downloads/docs/GI-Asia-Regional-Results-web.pdf資料下載日期：2016.08
58.Zhang, W., Lu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Comprehensive Evaluation Index System of Low Carbon Road Transport Based on Fuzzy Evaluation Method.Procedia Engineering, 137, 659-668.
59.Zhao, J. J., Zhang, Y. M., &Jin, H. (2014, August). Design of performance evaluation index system of public security financial expenditure based on analytic hierarchy process. In 2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 1965-1970). IEEE.