臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近期市面上許多公司開始銷售智慧型手錶，許多公司紛紛看好這塊市場，其中蘋果公司率先推出奢侈品定位的智慧型手錶Apple Watch精品款，其他不論是手錶精品公司或是科技大廠也紛紛推出奢侈品等級的智慧型手錶，謠傳智慧型手錶會動搖發展多年的手錶精品產業，然而Apple Watch精品款銷售不如預期，本研究則從中進行研究。
新科技產品智慧型手錶和奢侈品定位下消費者的使用意願，使用Apple Watch精品款進行研究。本研究使用Davis（1989）提出的科技接受模式為架構加入奢侈品牌量表（Brand Luxury Index）進行結構方程模型（Structural equation modeling）統計分析。
本研究結果證實，科技接受模式中的知覺有用性顯著影響使用態度，但知覺易用性並不顯著，其中奢侈品牌也正向影響使用態度，研究結果與使用奢侈品牌量表的結果也可提供給學術界或業界工作者參考。

Many companies recently began focusing on smart watches, and Apple took a lead to launch luxury smart watch, Apple Watch Edition. Either boutique of watch or technological company launched luxury smart watch, too. It has rumors that luxury smart watch will affect boutique of watch industry, but sales of Apple watch Edition are poor, so this study begin from this.
This study research consumer’s using intention under new technological product and position of luxury. This study uses Davis’s technology acceptance mode and BLI (Brand Luxury Index) to run structural equation modeling (SEM)
   The results of this study indicated that PU (perceived usefulness) of technology acceptance model has significant influences on attitude, but PEOU (perceived ease of use) of technology acceptance model didn’t have significant influences on attitude and then influences on intention. The company's brand luxury also affected the attitude and then influences on intention. The result assist luxury smart watch company and academia to research.

目錄
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機 2
1.3研究目的 3
1.4研究範圍 4
1.5研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1奢侈品 5
2.2科技接受模式 9
第三章 研究方法 15
3.1研究架構與研究假說 15
3.2研究變數之操作型定義 18
3.3問卷設計與資料收集方法 24
3.4前測分析 25
3.5資料分析方法 26
第四章 實證分析 29
4.1.敘述統計分析 29
4.2信度分析 38
4.3因素分析 39
4.4相關分析 47
4.5結構方程式模式 47
4.6假說驗證 55
第五章 結論與建議 59
5.1管理意涵 59
5.2研究限制與建議 61
參考文獻 62
附錄一（市售智慧手錶簡介） 68
附錄二（問卷） 74

（一）中文部分
1.許士軍，1987，管理學(第七版)，台北：東華書局。
2.洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘，（2005）科技接受模式之彙總研究. 資訊管理學報，12卷4期，211-234
3.陳協勝、蔡璧卉， (2010). 精品特質，衝動性特性，虛榮心對精品購買意願影響之研究. 行銷評論， 7卷4期， 447-470。
4.劉宗宜、邱榆淨、蔣鵬， (2016). 銀髮族購買具醫療照護功能之智慧型手錶關鍵因素. 中原企管評論， 第十四卷第一期， 1-24。
（二）英文部分
1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
2. Alexander, M. (2016). Apple Watch Campaign April 22, 2016 Megan Alexander, Sammi Cowger, Brett Haskell, Kylie Leonard, and Abbey Venable.
3. Assael, H. (1984). Consumer behavior and marketing action. Kent Pub. Co..
4. Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of consumer marketing, 15(1), 32-43.
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
6. Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes (No. 736). HEC Paris.
7. Fiske, N., & Silverstein, M. (2004). Trading up: Trends, brands, and practices 2004 research update. May, Boston Consulting Group.
8. Gartner, W. C. (1986). Temporal influences on image change. Annals of Tourism research, 13(4), 635-644.
9. Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of retailing, 74(3), 331-352.
10. Guielford, J. P. (1965) Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education.
11. Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson College Division.
12. Joo, J., & Sang, Y. (2013). Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2512-2518.
13. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
14. Kapferer, J. N. (1998). Why are we seduced by luxury brands?. Journal of Brand Management, 6(1), 44-49.
15. Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527-541.
16. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. The quarterly journal of economics, 183-207.
17. Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. NA-Advances in Consumer Research Volume 10.
18. Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 41(6),61-68.
19. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods.
20. Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15-27.
21. Ponce, L. B., Méndez, J. A. J., & Peñalvo, F. J. G. (2014, October). First approach of mobile applications study for medical education purposes. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 647-651). ACM.
22. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 253-264.
23. Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123-148.
24. Riley, F. D. O., Lomax, W., & Blunden, A. (2004). Dove vs. Dior: Extending the brand extension decision-making process from mass to luxury. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 12(3), 40-55.
25. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170.
26. Štrach, P., & Everett, A. M. (2006). Brand corrosion: mass-marketing's threat to luxury automobile brands after merger and acquisition. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(2), 106-120.
27. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management science, 42(1), 85-92.
28. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
29. Thakor, M. V., & Katsanis, L. P. (1997). A model of brand and country effects on quality dimensions: issues and implications. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 79-100.
30. Veblen, T. (1965). The Theory of the Leisure Class. 1899. AM Kelley, bookseller.
31. Veblen, T. B (1899). Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, NY: Macmillan,: 56-58.
32. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484-506.
33. Westbrook, R. A., & Oliver, R. L. (1991). The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. Journal of consumer research, 18(1), 84-91.
34. Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2007). Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 7(7), 333-361.
35. Wolfgang Reitzle. (2005) “Luxus schafft Wohlstand”. China Citic Press,
36. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.