跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.177) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/26 04:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:徐政勝
研究生(外文):Hsu, Cheng-Sheng
論文名稱:關係學習中知識分享認知及信任對知識分享意願之研究–以h公司為例
論文名稱(外文):Effect of Intension and Trust on Knowledge Sharing among Relationship Learning–a Case of h Company
指導教授:李維鈞李維鈞引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lee, Wei-Chun
口試委員:羅新興朱志忠李維鈞
口試委員(外文):Lo, Hsin-HsinChu, Chih-ChungLee, Wei-Chun
口試日期:2014-07-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:龍華科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:42
中文關鍵詞:知識分享信任關係學習
外文關鍵詞:Knowledge SharingTrustRelationship Learning
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:303
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:41
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究以h公司之供應廠商為研究對象,探討關係學習中知識分享認知及信任如何影響知識分享意願之高低程度。本研究採用問卷進行研究之調查,共發出160份問卷,有效問卷133份,有效率83.1%。所得到資料以敘述統計分析、信效度分析、迴歸分析等統計方法進行檢驗本研究之假設。經資料分析後獲致以下結論:首先,供應商人口統計變項在知識分享認知威脅構面上大部份高階主管顯著性明顯的低於其他位階;而年資超過21年以上的顯著性明顯的低於其他年齡層。其次,知識分享認知成長對於信任、外顯知識分享意願及內隱知識分享意願有顯著之正向影響力。再者,知識分享認知威脅對於信任具有顯著正向影響力。第三,信任對於內隱知識分享意願具有正向影響力,及信任對於知識分享認知與知識分享意願有中介之效果。第四,知識分享認知成長在所有自變項之構面中對於全體人員之知識分享意願之影響最大。
In this study, h Company's suppliers as a target, to Effect of Cognition and Trust on Knowledge Sharing among Relationship Learning. This study used questionnaire survey, issued a total of 160 questionnaires, 133 valid questionnaires, efficiency is 83.13%. In this study, use reliability and validity analysis, regression analysis, hypothesis testing to analyze the data. The conclusions are following: First, about demographic variables, the senior managers of the knowledge sharing cognitive are significantly lower than the other and the 21 years of seniority are obviously significantly lower than other groups. Secondly, the knowledge sharing cognitive growth has significant influence to Trust, explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge sharing intension. Moreover, the knowledge sharing cognitive threat has significant positive influence to Trust. Third, the trust has a positive influence to implicit knowledge sharing intension. And trust has mediate effect for knowledge sharing cognitive and knowledge sharing willingness. Fourth, knowledge sharing cognitive growth has greatest impact to the knowledge sharing willingness in all afcets.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
1. 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究流程 3
1.4 研究對象 4
1.5 研究限制 5
2. 文獻探討 6
2.1 h公司的簡介 6
2.2 關係學習 6
2.2.1 關係學習的定義 6
2.2.2 關係學習的內涵 7
2.2.3 關係學習的相關研究 9
2.3 知識分享 9
2.3.1 知識的定義 9
2.3.2 知識分享的定義 10
2.3.3 知識分享的內涵 11
2.3.4 知識分享的相關研究 11
2.4 信任 12
2.4.1 信任的定義 12
2.4.2 信任的內涵 12
2.4.3 信任的相關研究 13
3. 研究方法 14
3.1 研究架構 14
3.2 研究假設 14
3.3 問卷設計及構面操作性定義與衡量 15
3.4 抽樣設計方法 16
3.5 資料分析方法 17
4. 研究結果 19
4.1 描述資料分析 19
4.2 信度與效度分析 21
4.3 差異性分析 22
4.4 相關分析 29
4.5 迴歸分析 30
4.6 中介效果驗證 31
4.7 小結與討論 33
5. 結論與建議 34
5.1 結論 34
5.2 管理意涵 34
5.3 未來研究方向與建議 35
參考文獻 36
附錄 40

王文彥(2002)。知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究—以A公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
朱素玥(2006)。關係信任與關係學習對關係績效影響之研究—結合交易成本理論與社會交換理論觀點(博士論文)。國立台北大學企業管理研究所。
汪金城(2001)。研發機構分享機制之研究—以工研院光電所研發團隊為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
佘馥芳(2009)。知識分享態度與意圖的影響因素之探討—經濟與社會觀點的整合性研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學管理研究所。
吳有順(2000)。網路社群知識分享過程之研究—以企業管理教學網站為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
吳萬益(2011)。企業研究方法。台北:華泰文化。
吳盛、林東清、林杏子(2006),以社會交換理論觀點探討影響虛擬團隊 成員知識分享行為,資訊管理學報,第13卷,第1期,頁193-219。
童世遠(2008)。探討企業之供應商關係、信任與知識分享對組織績效的影響。(碩士論文)。國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
劉怡君(2007)。中小企業製造商與供應商關係知識庫之探討--信任與組織學習能力之干擾效果(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所。
葉建亨,黃文禎(2011)。整合社會資本與社會交換理論--探討虛擬社群知識分享意願。資訊管理學報,第18卷,第3期,頁75-99。
董玉娟(2004)。知識分享意願影響前因之研究:威脅之情境效果。人力資源管理學報,第4卷,第3期,頁117-137。
夏侯欣鵬(2000)。權力與信任對組織內部知識分享意願影響之研究---以銀行放款部門主管為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
蔡昕妤(2007)。知識心理所有權對知識分享的影響-以知識分享認知為干擾變項(碩士論文)。義守大學管理研究所。
Anderson, J. C. & Narus, J. A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm & Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
Argote. L., Beckman, S. L. & Epple, D. (1999). The Persistence & Transfer fo Learning In Industrial Settings, Management Science, 36(2), 140-154.
Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation & Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427.
Bock, G. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing, Information Resource management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Costarelli, S. & Colloca, P. (2007). The moderation of ambivalence on attitude-intention relations as mediated by attitude importance, European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 923-933.
Crosby, L. A., Evans K. R. & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective, Journal of Marketing, 4(3), 68-81.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Information Ecology. Oxford University Press.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Doney, P. M. & Cannon J. P. (1997), An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. (1998). The Re1ationa1 View: Cooperative Strategy & Sources of 1nterorganizational Competitive Advantage, Academy of Managent Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning, The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
Garbarino, E. & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, & Commitment in Customer Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70-87.
Håkansson, H. & Snehota I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. London: International Thomson Business Press.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Heide, J. B. & John, G. (1990). Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships, Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.
Hendricks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge & Process Management. 6(2), 91-100.
Hidding, G. & Shireen, M. C. (1998). Anatomy of a Learning Organization: Turning Knowledge into Capital at Andersen Consulting, Knowledge & Process Management, 5(1), 3-13.
Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory & Philosophical Ethics, The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
Jacobs, R. S., Hyman, M. R. & McQuitty, S. (2001). Exchange-Specific Self-Disclosure, Social Self-Disclosure & Personal Selling, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 9(1), 261-262.
Jap, S. D. (2001). Perspectives on Joint Competitive Advantages in Buyer- Supplier Relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, l8(1-2), 19-35.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity, Psychomerika, 39(1), 31-36.
Krauss, R. M. & Fussel, S. R. (1990). Mutual Knowledge & Communications Effectiveness, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social & Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, N.J.: Hillsdale.
Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K. & Steenkamp, J-B. E. M. (1995). The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers, Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54-65.
Lam, A. (1997). Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration & knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies, 18(6), 973-996.
Levitt, B. & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing & Maintaining Trust In Work Relationships, In Trust In Organizations: Frontiers of Theory & Research, Kramer, R. M. & Tayor, A. R. (Ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lord, M. D., & Ranft A. L. (2000). Organizational learning about new international markets: Exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 573-589.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoolman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L., (1998). Inital trust formation in new organization relationship. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473-490.
Moorman, C., Deshpande, R. & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.
Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks & Organizations: Structure, Form & Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, MA.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust, The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
Selnes, F. & Sallis, J. (1999). Relationship Learning with Key Customers, Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, Report No. 99-103.
Selnes, F. & Sallis, J. (2003). Promoting Relationship Learning, Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 80-95.
Senge, P. (1998). Sharing Knowledge, Executive Excellence, 15(6), 11-12.
Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market information processing & organizational learning, Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35-45.
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer Trust, Value, & Loyalty in Relational Exchanges, Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
Smith, J. B. & Barclay, D. W. (1997). The effects of Organizational Differences & Trust on the Effetiveness of Selling Partner Relationship, Journal of Mraketing, 61(1), 3-21.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments To The Transfer of Best Practice Within The Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special issue), 27-43.
Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky Information & the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation, Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.
Walsh, J. P. & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational Memory, The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
Warrington, T. B., Abgrab, N. J. &. Caldwell, H. M. (2000). Building Trust to Develop Competitive Advantage in E-Business Relationships, Competitive Review, 10(2), 160-168.
Zander, U. & Kogut, B. (1993). Knowledge of the firm & the evolutionary theory of the multinational. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625-645.
Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge & the speed of transfer & imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 信任關係、知識分享意圖及知識分享行為關聯性研究-以創新組織氣候為調節變數
2. 顯性知識分享與隱性知識分享對創新和組織績效影響之研究
3. 領導風格與知識分享關係之探討:個人及環境因素之調節作用領導風格與知識分享關係之探討:個人及環境因素之調節作用領導風格與知識分享關係之探討:個人及環境因素之調節作用
4. 人際信任、知識分享動機與知識分享行為關聯性之研究
5. 知識分享機制與知識分享成效關係之研究-以組織文化為干擾變項
6. 高意願知識分享者在網路社群上知識分享行為之探討
7. 團隊知識分享、個人知識分享與個人工作績效之相關性研究:服務品質氣候的調節效果
8. 知識分享平台接受度及知識分享行為之探討
9. 公部門團隊成員行動化知識分享行為之研究-科技信任與雙元性知識分享之調節效果
10. 以關係模式理論探討知識分享行為:實體企業與奇摩知識+之知識分享行為比較研究
11. 花蓮縣國民小學教師知識分享需求與知識分享行為之相關研究
12. 知識心理所有權對知識分享的影響-以知識分享認知為干擾變項
13. 人際網絡與知識分享行為:知識分享動機調節效果之研究
14. 感知社會賦閒與學習目標導向對於知識分享意圖之影響:以知識分享態度為中介
15. 從個人層次探討知識管理機制、知識分享意圖與知識分享行為對吸收能力之影響