臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　近年來，酒後駕車一直是國內死亡交通事故的首位，民國107年警察取締件數約為101,000件，其中因酒後駕車受傷人數為12,385人和死亡人數為315人，平均每日有三十五人因酒駕肇事而傷亡。
　　本研究針對受訪者的背景資料、個人主觀認知風險、守法指數、酒駕連坐法情境以及對台灣酒駕看法等因素，來探討酒後駕車的可能性，此外台灣民眾普遍認為酒駕罰則太輕，因此利用此研究來調查受訪者對其他國家酒駕刑責的相關看法。
　　本研究採用網路問卷的方式，透過SPSS統計軟體進行多項統計，研究結果發現「性別」方面，男性比女性更容易酒後駕車，而在「飲酒次數」、「守法指數」、「主觀認知風險」和「對台灣酒駕看法」會顯著影響受訪者酒後駕車的可能性。

　　In recent year, drunk driving has been the main reason of motor vehicle accidents in Taiwan. In 2018, there are approximately 101 thousands of motor vehicle accidents that are cracked down by cops, including 12,385 are injured and 315 are dead by drunk driving. On average, there are 35 people injured or dead because of drunk driving.

　　This study based on interviewers’ background, intensity of personal subjective perception of enforcement of drunk driving, law-abiding index, the situation of collateral penalty and the perception of drunk driving of Taiwan to discuss the probability of drunk driving. In addition, due to the citizen of Taiwan normally consider the penalty of drunk driving is insufficient. Hence, this study is utilized to investigate interviewers’ perception of other countries’ penalties of drunk driving.

　　This study adopts the online questionnaire to carry out statistical analysis through statistical software SPSS. The consequences of the study expose that male is easier to drive while intoxicated than female, and the frequency of drinking, law-abiding index, intensity of personal subjective perception of enforcement of drunk driving and the perception of drunk driving of Taiwan will significantly influence interviewers’ probability of drunk driving.

論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖次 vi
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 酒後駕駛之定義和罰則 4
第二節 相關文獻 6
第三章 研究方法 8
第一節 研究對象與樣本抽樣 8
第二節 研究架構 9
第三節 分析方法 10
第四章 研究結果 12
第一節 敘述性統計分析 12
第二節 交叉統計分析 23
第三節 項目分析 25
第四節 因素分析 32
第五節 信度分析 34
第六節 羅吉斯分析 35
第七節 酒後駕車刑責看法 36
第五章 研究結果與建議 38
第一節 研究結果 38
第二節 建議 40
參考文獻 41
中文部分 41
英文部分 41
網路資料 43
附錄 問卷內容 44

中文部分
葉寶文、傅祖壇(2007)，酒後駕車行為之取締的願付風險價值研究，運輸計劃季刊， 509-533頁
蔡偉德（2019），酒駕罰則是否有效抑制酒駕？中斷點迴歸設計的應用，經濟論文叢刊， 75-126頁
英文部分
Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior.”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), pp.179-211
Arnett, J. (1990), “Drunk driving, sensation seeking, and egocentrism among adolescents.”, Personality and individual differences, 11(6), pp.541-546.
Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006), “The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving.”, Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), pp.903-915.
Dobson, A., Brown, W., Ball, J., Powers, J., & McFadden, M. (1999), “Women drivers’ behaviour, socio-demographic characteristics and accidents.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31(5), pp.525-535.
Donovan, D. M., & Marlatt, G. A. (1982), “Personality subtypes among driving-while-intoxicated offenders: Relationship to drinking behavior and driving risk.”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(2), pp.241-249.
Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005), “Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study.”, Developmental psychology, 41(4), pp.625.
González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Luengo, M. Á. (2014), “Sensation seeking and drunk driving: The mediational role of social norms and self-efficacy.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 71, pp.22-28.
Lonczak, H. S., Neighbors, C., & Donovan, D. M. (2007), “Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(3), pp.536-545.
Newnam, S., Watson, B., & Murray, W. (2004), “Factors predicting intentions to speed in a work and personal vehicle.”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(4-5), pp.287-300.
Parker, D., Manstead, A. S., Stradling, S. G., & Reason, J. T. (1992), “Determinants of intention to commit driving violations.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 24(2), pp.117-131.
E.J.PedreroPérez, M.T.RodríguezMonje, F.GallardoAlonso, M.Fernández Girónb, (2007), “Validacióndeun instrumento paralasensccióndetrastornos de control de impulsos y adicciones”, Trastornos Adictivos, 9(4), pp.269-278.
Schwebel, D. C., Severson, J., Ball, K. K., & Rizzo, M. (2006), “Individual difference factors in risky driving: The roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking.”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(4), pp.801-810.
Snow, R. W., & Wells-Parker, E. (2001), “Relationships between drinking problems and drinking locations among convicted drinking drivers.”, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 27(3), pp.531-542.
Wagenaar, A. C., Zobeck, T. S., Williams, G. D. and Hingson, R.(1995), “Methods used in studies of drink-deive control efforts: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1960 to 1991”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(3), pp.307-316.
Zuckerman, M., & Neeb, M. (1980), “Demographic influences in sensation seeking and expressions of sensation seeking in religion, smoking and driving habits.”, Personality and Individual Differences, 1(3), pp.197-206.
網路資料
今周刊，「酒駕修法三讀 同車者連坐開罰、累犯須加裝酒精鎖」，2019年3月26日，取自https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/20
1903260028，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/18。
中華民國內政部警政署警政治安全球資訊網，取自https://www.npa.gov.tw/NP
AGip/wSite/mp?mp=1，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/28。
交通安全入口網，取自https://168.motc.gov.tw/?aspxerrorpath=/News.aspx，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/2。
交通資訊網，取自http://www.inmjh.kh.edu.tw/project/traffic2015/file/0206.html，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/5。
風傳媒，「恐怖酒駕傷亡大數據，實際人數高出警方統計5倍以上」，2018年 1月29日，取自https://www.storm.mg/article/387754?srcid=7777772e73746f72
6d2e6d675f63653466363362373162633965386666_1560172813，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/25。
商業週刊，「提高罰款、更嚴格法律，都無法減少酒駕悲劇？加拿大警察決定這樣做，讓罪犯被羞辱」，2019年3月19日，取自https://www.businesswe
ekly.com.tw/article.aspx?id=25277&type=Blog
蘋果日報，「酒駕殺婦，葉少爺飆130 搶過4路口毀2個家」，2012年5月16日，取自https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20120516/34232158/，最後瀏覽日期：2019/5/15。