跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/08 02:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:戴君宴
研究生(外文):Chun-Yen Tai
論文名稱:運動商品自我一致性、品牌態度與購買行為影響之研究:計劃行為理論之應用
論文名稱(外文):Relationships among Self-Congruity, Brand Attitude and Purchase Behavior of Sport Goods using Theory of Planned Behavior
指導教授:呂慈恩呂慈恩引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:健行科技大學
系所名稱:國際企業經營系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:89
中文關鍵詞:自我一致性品牌態度購買行為計劃行為理論
外文關鍵詞:Self-CongruityBrand AttitudePurchase BehaviorTheory of Planned Behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:479
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著國人運動風氣的盛行,以及國內外優秀選手的傑出表現,引起民眾對國內外大小運動賽事的關注。在此氛圍之影響下,帶動消費者對運動產品及運動品牌的高度興趣。民眾在選購運動產品時習慣以信任的品牌進行考量因素,並因應每人的功能需求不同,而有不同的思考及消費模式。
本研究以計劃行為理論與自我一致性理論為模型,探討影響消費者購買運動品牌商品的相關因素及購買行為。本研究以臺灣地區一般消費者為研究對象進行問卷調查,共發出374份問卷,回收之有效問卷有363份,有效問卷回收率為97.05%。研究結果顯示如下:

1.真實自我一致性會正向影響功能一致性
2.理想自我一致性會正向影響功能一致性
3.功能一致性會正向影響品牌態度
4.品牌態度會正向影響購買行為
5.知覺行為控制會正向影響購買行為


Nowadays, People in Taiwan has exhibited their great interest in sports and gradually developed their sports brand loyalty. This may result from the increasing popularity of sports events plus the outstanding performances of those athlete elites. Consequently, local customers tend to look first for the brands they trust when purchasing sports related goods. People also demonstrate different mentality and consumer behavior models, based on individual needs in functions of the sports concerned.
The study use Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Self-Congruity Theory as the theoretical models to explore the factors which influence consumers’ purchase behavior on sports goods. Out of 374 questionnaires sent to the common consumers in Taiwan, 363 valid questionnaires were returned with a collection rate of 97.05%. The major findings of this study were stated as below.

1.Actual self-congruity displayed significant positive influence on functional congruity.
2.Ideal self-congruity displayed significant positive influence on functional congruity.
3.Functional congruity displayed significant positive influence on brand attitude.
4.Brand attitude displayed significant positive influence on purchase behavior.
5.Perceived behavior control displayed significant positive influence on purchase behavior.


簽名頁 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 4
1.3 研究目的 4
1.4 研究流程 5

第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 品牌態度的概念 7
2.2 自我一致性理論(Self-Congruity Theory) 10
2.3 計劃行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior) 18

第三章 研究方法 26
3.1 研究架構 26
3.2 研究假說推導 27
3.3 變數的操作型定義與衡量 33
3.4 問卷設計 39
3.5 問卷抽樣方法 39
3.6 資料分析方法 39

第四章 資料分析 44
4.1 敘述性統計分析 44
4.2 信度與效度分析 51
4.3 相關分析 57
4.4 結構方程式 58
4.5 研究假說驗證 62

第五章 結論與建議 65
5.1 研究結論 65
5.2 研究意涵 68
5.3 研究限制 72
5.4 未來研究建議 72

參考文獻 74
附錄 85
簡歷 89



一、中文部分
1.丁基意 (2007)。自我形象一致性與功能一致性對旅遊滿意度及忠誠度的影響。高雄市:國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所。
2.王妙如 (2004)。消費者自我意象一致性與旅遊目的地選擇行為之研究。高雄市:國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所。
3.王偉臣 (2005)。品牌形象與消費者自我概念一致性之研究-以青少年使用手機行為為例。臺北市:國立臺北大學企業管理學系研究所。
4.王禹驊 (2015)。品牌依附對於品牌延伸評價之影響:以7-11和7-SELECT為例。臺中市:國立臺中科技大學企業管理系研究所。
5.中時電子報楊佳真 (2016)。2015全世界最有價值的10大品牌。取自http://magazine.chinatimes.com/riskmanagement/20160112005732-300208
6.卞廣祥 (2013)。球鞋之品牌形象、品牌態度、從眾行為對消費者行為意圖之影響。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所。
7.何雨虹 (2006)。以計畫行為理論探討消費者購買炫耀性商品之意圖。嘉義縣:國立中正大學行銷管理研究所。
8.吳明隆 (2009)。結構方程模式方法與實務應用。高雄市:麗文。
9.吳昭賢 (2007)。自我一致性、品牌態度與品牌忠誠度關係之研究。臺中市:朝陽科技大學企業管理系研究所。
10.李可立 (2014)。自我一致性與情感品牌依附對Apple消費者購買行為之研究。高雄市:國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所。
11.李茂能 (2006)。結構方程模式之軟體AMOS之簡介及其測量編制上之應用。臺北市:心理。
12.沈翠玫 (2016)。以計畫行為理論探討臺北市、新北市消費者購買公平貿易商品的影響因素。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學社會與區域發展學系研究所。
13.林妙雀、李建裕 (2010)。吞世代青少年品牌形象及品牌態度之研究-以同儕從眾行為為干擾變數。行銷評論,7(4),525–555。
14.林建文 (2004)。原品牌態度、知覺契合度與促銷活動形式對品牌延伸後品牌態度與購買意願之研究。臺北市:實踐大學企業管理研究所。
15.林惠玲、陳正倉 (2006)。應用統計學。臺北市:雙葉。
16.林裕豐 (2013)。自我形象ㄧ致性對顧客態度影響之研究-以王品牛排餐廳為例。臺北市:國立臺北大學企業管理學系研究所。
17.邱瑋珍 (2004)。品牌形象與品牌態度對購買意圖之影響研究。新北市:淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業研究所。
18.洪上祐 (2013)。以計畫行為理論探討影響消費者購買食品類伴手禮之因素-以台南安平老街為例。臺南市:康寧大學餐飲管理研究所。
19.洪進雄 (2015)。LINE用戶之購買行為研究-以透過官方帳號購物之消費者為例。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學會計學系研究所。
20.孫宇萱 (2014)。品牌個性與消費者自我概念一致性對於品牌態度之影響-以台灣購物網站為例。新竹市:國立交通大學傳播研究所。
21.徐明郁 (1999)。消費者自我概念與品牌個性一致性對購買意願之影響。臺南市:成功大學企業管理學系研究所。
22.徐慧娟 (2009)。消費者購買綠色產品之意願實證研究-計畫行為理論觀點。臺南市:成功大學國際企業研究所。
23.高慈薏 (2008)。線上運動商品消費意向與行為之研究。新北市:輔仁大學體育學系研究所。
24.排行榜123 (2016)。2015世界十大運動品牌排名。取自http://www.phb123.com/shenghuo/fushi/3670.html
25.許芙綿 (2015)。探討品牌態度、品牌關係及品牌忠誠度的關聯模式-以運動品牌為例。屏東縣:屏東大學國際貿易學系研究所。
26.崔爾雅 (2008)。品牌個性與自我一致性對品牌忠誠度影響之研究-以國際連鎖餐廳為例。高雄市:高雄餐旅學院餐旅管理研究所。
27.張春興 (1984)。心理學(初版)。臺北市:東華。
28.張偉漢 (2005)。品牌個性與真實自我之一致性、情境理想自我一致性對消費者品牌態度之影響。臺北市,國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
29.張偉豪 (2011)。論文寫作SEM不求人。臺北市:鼎茂。
30.張紹勳 (2004)。研究方法。臺中市:滄海。
31.張惠娟 (2012)。有機商品消費者之態度、知覺行為控制、主觀規範對購買意圖影響之研究-以TPB模式進行探討。新北市:淡江大學國際企業學系研究所。
32.郭為藩 (1996)。自我心理學(初版)。臺北市:師大書苑。
33.陳佳琳 (2012)。自我形象調和度與功能調和度對部落客社會影響力之影響:以關係品質為中介變數。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學管理研究所。
34.陳順宇 (2005)。多變量分析。臺北市:華泰。
35.陳筱琪 (2013)。農會伴手禮的品牌形象對消費者購買行為之影響-以魚池鄉為例。臺中市:國立中興大學生物產業管理研究所。
36.陳寬裕、王正華 (2013)。結構方程模式分析實務:AMOS的運用(初版)。臺北市:五南。
37.傅莉雅 (2015)。運動商品品牌依附、品牌偏好與購買意圖影響之研究:計畫行為理論之應用。桃園市:健行科技大學國際企業經營系碩士班。
38.黃芳銘 (2003)。結構方程模式理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
39.黃金得 (2012)。影響綠色商品再購意願之因素探討-以環境態度為干擾變數及再生碳粉匣為例。高雄市:國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系高階經營管理研究所。
40.黃惟嘉 (2014)。高雄都會區消費者機車購買行為模式之研究:以計畫行為理論實證。臺南市:國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班。
41.黃惠卿 (2008)。綠色品牌知識、綠色品牌態度與綠色購買行為關聯性之研究-以綠色清潔用品之消費者為例。高雄市:國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營所。
42.黃詩穆 (2012)。以計畫行為理論探討大學生對於生活環保之行為意向。嘉義縣:南華大學旅遊管理學系休閒環境管理研究所。
43.楊秋雲 (2014)。應用計畫行為理論探討彰化縣國中青少年學生生態旅遊行為意圖。彰化縣:大葉大學管理學院碩士在職研究所。
44.管治平 (2015)。運用科技接受模型與計劃性行為理論分析綠色商品購買意圖之研究。桃園市:健行科技大學國際企業經營系碩士班。
45.維基百科 (2016)。運動品牌。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C
46.鄧郁萱 (2014)。自我一致性對品牌依附之影響:品牌概念形象與產品顯眼性的干擾效果。臺中市:東海大學企業管理學系研究所。
47.鍾沛樺 (2014)。自我一致性、情感性品牌依附、顧客滿意度與再購意願之關係-以產品涉入與自尊為調節變數。臺北市:大同大學事業經營學系研究所。
48.顏漢平 (2013)。以計劃行為理論驗證高中生參與觀賞美國籃球聯盟(NBA)林書豪行為模式之研究。屏東縣:大仁科技大學休閒健康管理研究所。
49.Upshaw, L. B. (2004)。品牌優生學,(范文毅譯)。臺北市:美商麥格羅希爾、滾石文化共同出版。(原著出版於2000)

二、英文部分
1.Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York, NY: Free Press.
2.Aaker, D. A. (1995). Building Strong Brand. New York, NY: Free Press.
3.Aaker, J. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 45-57.
4.Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl, and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
5.Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago, IL: The Dorsey Press.
6.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
7.Ajzen, I. (2001). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(1), 438-459.
8.Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1975). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.American Marketing Association. (1960). Marketing Definitions: A Glossary of Marketing Terms. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
11.Arjun, C. (1999). Dose brand loyalty mediate brand equity outcomes? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(2), 136-146.
12.Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
13.Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., and Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473-481.
14.Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
15.Biel, A. L. (1992). How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), 6-12.
16.Biel, A. L. (1997). Discovering brand magic: the hardness of the softer side of branding.
International journal of the Addictions, 16(3), 199-210.
17.Birdwell, A. E. (1968). A Study of the Influence of Image Congruence on Consumer Choice. Journal of Business, 41(1), 76-88.
18.Bollen, K. A., and Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.Browne, M.W., and Cudeck, R. (1989). Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(4), 445-455.
20.Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., and Garretson, J. A. (1998). A Scale for Measuring Attitude Toward Private Label Products and an Examination of Its Psychological and Behavioral Correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293-306.
21.Chernatony, L. D., and McWilliam, G. (1989). Branding Terminology-The Real Debate. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 7(8), 29-32.
22.Chon, K. S., and Olsen, M. D. (1991). Functional and Symbolic Congruity Approaches to Consumer Satisfaction / Dissatisfaction in Consumerism. Journal of the International Academy of Hospitality Research, 3, 2-22.
23.Doyle, P. (1990). Building Successful Brands: The Strategic Options. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(2), 5-20.
24.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Journal of Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
25.Dusek, J. B. (1996). Adolescent Development and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.Fan, X., Thompson, B., and Wang, L. (1999). Effects of Sample Size, Estimation Method, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83.
27.Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 24-33.
28.Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (2005). Theory-based Behavior Change Interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 27-31.
30.Forbes. (2016). The World’s Most Valuable Brands. from http://www.forbes.com/powerful-brands/list/2/#tab:rank
31.Forbes. (2016). The World’s Most Valuable Sports Brands 2015. from http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2015/10/22/the-forbes-fab-40-the-most-valuable-brands-in-sports-2015/#32a4017e2e2a
32.Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
33.Graeff, T. R. (1997). Consumption Situations and the Effects of Brand Image on Consumers’ Brand Evaluations. Psychology and Marketing, 14(1), 49-70.
34.Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.Han, H., and Back, K. J. (2008). Relationships Among Image Congruence, Consumption
Emotions, and Customer Loyalty in the Lodging Industry. Journal of Hospitality and
Tourism Research, 32(4), 467-490.
36.Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., and Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! one, two, three-Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841-850.
37.Howard, J. A. (1989). Customer Behavior in Marketing Strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-Off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
39.Huber, F., Vollhardt, K., Matthes, I., and Vogel, J. (2010). Brand Misconduct: Consequences on Consumer-Brand Relationships. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1113-1120.
40.Jamal, A., and Goode, M. M. H. (2001). Consumers and Brands: A Study of the Impact of Self-Image Congruence on Brand Preference and Satisfaction. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19(7), 482-492.
41.James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
42.Johar, J. S., and Sirgy, M. J. (1989). Positioning Models in Marketing: Toward a Normative-Integrated Model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3(4): 475-485.
43.Joreskog, K.G., and Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User''s Reference Guide. Mooresville, NC: Scientific Software.
44.Kassarjian, H. H. (1971). Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 409-418.
45.Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
46.Keller, K. L. (2001). Building Customer-Based Brand Equity. Marketing Management, 10(2), 14-19.
47.Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
49.Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann A., Huber F., Huber S., and Lee, D.-J. (2006). Direct and Indirect Effects of Self-Image Congruence on Brand Loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 955-964.
51.Lee, C., and Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 289-305.
52.MacCallum, R. C., and Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
53.Malar, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. H., and Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35-52.
54.Malhotra, N. K. (1988). Self-concept and product choice: An integrated perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 1-28.
55.Markus, H., and Sentis, K. (1982). The Self in Social Information Processing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.Morris, J. D., Chongmoo, W., Geason, J. A., and Jooyoung, K. (2002). The power of affect: Predicting Intention. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(3), 7-17.
57.Mulaik, S. A., and James, L. R. (1995). Objectivity and Reasoning in Science and Structural Equation Modeling. In Hoyle, H. (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
58.Neal, W. D. (2000). For Most Customers, Loyalty isn''t an Attitude. Marketing News, 34(8), 7.
59.Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.O’Cass, A. (2000). An Assessment of Consumer Product, Purchase Decision, Advertising and Consumption Involvement in Fashion Clothing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(5), 545-576.
61.Rook, D., and Fisher, R. (1995). Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305-313.
62.Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
63.Schumacker, R. E., and Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner''s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64.Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300.
65.Sirgy, M. J. (1986). Self-Congruity: Toward a Theory of Personality and Cybernetics. New York: Praeger.
66.Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., and Mangleburg, T. (2000). Retail environment, self-congruity, and retail patronage: An integrative model and a research agenda. Journal of
Business Research, 49(2), 127-138.
67.Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J.-O., Chon, K.-S., Claiborne, C. B., Johar, J. S., and Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the Predictive Validity of Two Methods of Measuring Self-Image Congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 229-241.
68.Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J., Samli, A., and Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-Congruity Versus Functional Congruity: Predictors of Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 363-375.
69.Sirgy, M. J., and Samli, A. C. (1985). A Path Analytic Model of Store Loyalty Involving Self-Concept, Store Image, Geographic Loyalty, and Socioeconomic Status. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(3), 265-291.
70.Sirgy, M. J., and Su, C. (2000). Destination Image, Self-Congruity, and Travel Behavior: Toward an Integrative Model. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 340-352.
71.Solomon, M. R. (2002). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
72.Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., and Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
73.Trafimow, D., and Trafimow, S. (1999). Mapping Perfect and Imperfect Duties onto Hierarchically and Partially Restrictive Trait Dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 687-697.
74.Wilkie, W. L. (1986). Consumer Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
75.Wylie, R. C. (1979). The Self-Concept: Theory and Research on Selected Topics. Volume Two. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
76.Yim, C. K., Chan, K. W., and Hung, K. (2007). Multiple Reference Effects in Service Evaluations: Roles of Alternative Attractiveness and Self-Image Congruity. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 147-157.
77.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.



QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top