跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.49) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/30 19:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉育霖
研究生(外文):Liu, Yu-Lin
論文名稱:四軸混合式火箭引擎推進平台推進系統之開發
論文名稱(外文):Development of the Quad Hybrid Rocket Engine Levitating Platform Propulsion System
指導教授:吳宗信吳宗信引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wu, Jong-Shinn
口試委員:陳宗麟吳宗信廖英皓何明字
口試委員(外文):Chen, Tsung-LinWu, Jong-ShinnLiao, Ying-HaoHo, Ming-Tzu
口試日期:2018-08-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:機械工程系所
學門:工程學門
學類:機械工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:143
中文關鍵詞:混合式火箭推進平台推進系統可控性雙氧水
外文關鍵詞:Propulsion systemHybrid rocketLevitating platformThrottling capabilityHydrogen peroxide
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:538
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究專注於發展四軸混合式火箭引擎推進平台之推進系統。四軸混合式火箭引擎推進平台依其特性及任務需求劃分為以下三個次系統:推進、結構及航電,其中航電系統又包含導航與控制、通訊及供電系統。由於混合式火箭引擎擁有安全性、可存放性、成本低廉與取得容易及可控性等優勢,四軸火箭引擎推進平台選擇了混合式火箭引擎做為推進之核心。混合式火箭通常使用液態氧化劑及固態燃料做為推進劑,因此設備需求包含高壓氣瓶、管路及燃燒艙。本研究使用了氮氣(N2)做為加壓氣體、90 wt%高濃度雙氧水(H2O2)做為氧化劑以及固態聚丙烯做為燃料。
為了達成四軸混合式火箭引擎推進平台之規格需求,推進系統主要目標為提供240公斤全推力並且在全推力的狀態下達到30秒的續航力。本系統共搭載四顆引擎和六個10公升複合材料高壓氣瓶,其中兩組高壓氣瓶充填高壓氣體,另外四組充填氧化劑並分別供給四顆引擎。因此,每組引擎必須針對不同推力需求提供一定範圍之推力,其中最大推力為60公斤且最大燃燒艙壓為40巴。在最大推力情形下,每組引擎須維持30秒的續航力。以上提及之設計參數會藉由引擎之地面測試取得並進行最佳化。地面測試場所安裝之感測器包含荷重元、壓力計、機械式流量計、差壓式流量計及熱電偶,分別用於推力、壓力、流量及溫度之量測。由於飛行測試階段推力值無法直接藉由感測器量測取得,因此將藉由流量計及壓力計所量測之流量及艙壓值進行推力之估算。推力的控制是藉由控制閥控制進入燃燒艙之氧化劑流量來改變推力大小,此時控制閥亦造成管路壓損變化間接導致艙壓的改變。
首先,藉由地面測試可以獲得引擎燃燒時的氧化劑與燃料用量之比值、氧化劑質量通量與燃料退縮率之關係及燃燒穩定度等性能。地面測試結果顯示,在最大推力60公斤時燃燒艙壓達40巴,如同設計時所設定之參數,且續航力可維持30秒符合需求。在完成全推力及長時間燃燒的研究及分析後,接著測試並分析推力控制之引擎性能,其中包含控制閥角度控制及氧化劑流量控制。地面測試數據顯示,氧化劑流量與推力和燃燒艙壓是成線性關係。這結果驗證了混合式火箭之可控性以及藉由改變氧化劑流量即可進行推力控制之特性。
This research focuses on developing the propulsion system for the Quad Hybrid Rocket Engine Levitating Platform (4-HELP). The 4-HELP is designed to demonstrate and verify the feasibility of developing a levitating and flight platform using hybrid rocket technology. The overall system includes three major subsystems, which are propulsion, structure and avionics. The avionics system include guidance navigation and control, telecommunication and electrical power system. The hybrid rocket engine is applied for the 4-HELP propulsion due to its safety, storable, cost effective and throttling capability characteristics. The equipment of the hybrid rocket propulsion system can be divided into few parts, which are tanks, plumbing and combustion chambers. The nitrogen (N2) is used as the pressurant for pressurizing the 90 wt\% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution used as the oxidizer into the engine to mix with the solid polypropylene (PP) used as the fuel for combustion.

The 4-HELP requires total thrust of 240 kgf with 30 s endurance at maximum mass flow rate of oxidizer, where four engines and six composite tanks of 10 L volume are equipped. Among them, two tanks containing pressurant and four tanks containing oxidizer in order to supply the four engines simultaneously. Therefore, each engine could be operate at the various range of thrust and chamber pressure with the maximum value of 60 kgf and 40 bar respectively. The combustion endurance of each engine is 30 s under the conditions of maximum thrust and maximum oxidizer mass flow rate. To test the performance, this engine is mounted on a thrust stand with load cell, pressure transducers, turbine flow meter, balance flow meter and thermocouple. During a typical flight test, the thrust produced by the engine is not directly obtainable. Therefore, the feedback value of oxidizer mass flow rate and chamber pressure are essential in evaluating the instantaneous performance of the combustion engine during the flight. The thrust is throttled by controlling the oxidizer mass flow rate into the combustion engine using a control valve, where the chamber pressure changes due to the pressure drop created by it.

First, the performances of the designed engine, including the oxidizer to fuel mass ratio, the relationship between oxidizer mass flux and solid fuel regression rate, and the stability of the combustion are investigated at full thrust via hot fire tests. At the state of full oxidizer flow rate, the thrust and chamber pressure of the engine reached 60 kgf and 40 bar respectively as designed and the endurance is able to reach 30 s as required. After investigating the engine performances at full thrust and long combustion duration, the throttling performances of the engine are investigated. The data obtained from the hot fire test results are analyzed, where the chamber pressure and the thrust are found to be proportional to the oxidizer mass flow rate. These results verified that the hybrid rocket engines are capable of throttling simply by controlling the mass flow rate of oxidizer into the combustion chamber.
摘要 i
Abstract iii
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
List of Figures ix
Nomenclature xiii
Acknowledgments xviii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.1.1 Rocket Propulsion 1
1.1.2 Quad Hybrid Rocket Engine Levitating Platform 2
1.2 Literature Survey 4
1.2.1 Planetary Landers 4
1.2.2 Hybrid Rocket Engines 4
1.2.3 Throttling Abilities of Hybrid Rocket Engines 5
1.3 Objectives 5
Chapter 2 Research Methods 7
2.1 Propulsion System Design and Analysis 7
2.1.1 Engine Design 7
2.1.2 UNIC Simulations 9
2.1.3 Pressure Drop Analysis for Plumbing System 10
2.1.4 Control Algorithm Design for Control Valve 13
2.2 Experimental Facility and Instrumentation 18
2.2.1 General Description 18
2.2.2 Test Instrumentation 18
2.2.3 Test Facility 20
2.3 Test Procedures and Test Conditions 21
Chapter 3 Results and Discussion 23
3.1 Engine Combustion Simulations 23
3.2 Engine Performances 25
3.3 Control Valve Performances 28
3.4 Engine Throttling Capabilities 32
Chapter 4 Conclusion 37
Chapter 5 Recommendations for Future Work 39
References 41
Tables 46
Figures 71
[1] Beér, J. M. and Chigier, N. A., Combustion Aerodynamics, Applied Science Publishers, 1972.
[2] Cavalleri, R. J. and Loehr, R. D., “Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Performance Prediction,” 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July 2005.
[3] Chavers, D. G., Ess, K., Moore, J., Dervan, M., Ondocsin, W. P., Carson, J. M. and Johnson, W. L., “Status of NASA’s Lander Technologies Project,” AIAA SPACE 2016 Conferences and Exposition, September 2016.
[4] Chen, Y.-S., Chou, T.-H., Gu, B.-R., Wu, J.-S., Wu, B., Lian, Y.-Y. and Yang, L., “Multiphysics Simulations of Rocket Engine Combustion,” Computers & Fluids, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 29-36, June 2011.
[5] Chinatsu, S., Masafumi, S., Kohsuke, H., Saburo, Y., Takashi, S. and Noriko, S., “Measurement of Axial-Direction Fuel Regression Rate of Swirling-Oxidizer-Flow-Type Hybrid Rocket Engines,” 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July 2010.
[6] Cimbala, J. M. and Cengel, Y. A., Essentials of Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008.
[7] Donahue, B. B., Caplin, G. N. and Smith, D. B., “Lunar Lander Concept Design for the 2019 NASA Outpost Mission,” AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference and Exposition, September 2007.
[8] Estey, P. N. and Whittinghill, G. R., “Hybrid Rocket Motor Propellant Selection Alternatives,” AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July 1992.
[9] Farmer, R. C., Cheng, G. C., Jones, S. H. and Arves, J. P., “A Practical CFD Model for Simulating Hybrid Motors,” JANNAF 35th Combustion, Airbreathing Propulsion, and Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Joint Meeting, December 1998.
[10] Fisackerly, R., Pradier, A., Gardini, B., Houdou, B., Philippe, C., De Rosa, D. and Carpenter, J., “The ESA Lunar Lander Mission,” AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference and Exposition, September 2011.
[11] Frampton, R., Oittinen, K., Ball, J. M., Khodadoust, A., Kirshman, D., Grayson, G., Sundaram, P., Goff, J. and Masten, D., “Planetary Lander Dynamic Model for GN&C,” AIAA SPACE 2009 Conference and Exposition, September 2009.
[12] Golnaraghi, F. and Kuo, B. C., Automatic Control Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.
[13] Hyatt, C. D., Riccio, J. R. and Moore, L., “Common Lunar Lander Vehicle Propulsion System Conceptual Design,” AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, June 1993.
[14] Kafafy, R., Azami, M. H. and Idres, M., “Performance of Hybrid Rocket with Varying Additive Concentrations,” 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2013.
[15] Kang, S., Lee, D., Lee, E. and Kwon, S., “Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Rocket using 95 wt.% H2O2,” 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2016.
[16] Kousuke, H., Chinatsu, S., Saburo, Y., Noriko, S. and Takashi, S., “Fuel Regression Rate Behavior for Various Fuels in Swirling-Oxidizer-Flow-Type Hybrid Rocket Engines,” 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July-August 2011.
[17] Liaw, P., Chen, Y.-S., Shang, H. M. and Doran, D., “Particulate Multi-Phase Flowfield Calculation with Combustion/Breakup Models for Solid Rocket Motor,” 30th AlAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, June 1994.
[18] Maia, F. F., Gouvea, L. H., Pereira, L. G. F., Vieira, R. and Costa, F. d. S., “Development and Optimization of a Catalytic Thruster for Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition,” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 61-67, January-March 2014.
[19] Miho, M., Tatsuya, I., Saburo, Y., Takashi, S., Noriko, S. and Toru, S., “Visualization of Flames in Combustion Chamber of Swirling-Oxidizer-Flow-Type Hybrid Rocket Engines,” 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July 2010.
[20] Mills, G. A. and Riesco, M. E., “Propellant Selection for the Lunar Lander Ascent Stage,” AIAA SPACE 2008 Conference and Exposition, September 2008.
[21] Morita, T., Yuasa, S., Shimada, T. and Yamaguchi, S., “Model of Hybrid Rocket Combustion in Classical Hybrid Rocket Motors,” 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2013.
[22] Motoe, M. and Shimada, T., “Large Eddy Simulation of Swirling Combustion Flow in a Modeled Hybrid Rocket with Wall Fuel Blowing,” 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2013.
[23] Olansen, J. B., Munday, S. R. and Devolites, J. L., “Project Morpheus: Lander Technology Development,” AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition, August 2014.
[24] Paccagnella, E., Barato, F., Pavarin, D. and Karabeyoğlu, A., “Scaling of Hybrid Rocket Motors with Swirling Oxidizer Injection,” 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2015.
[25] Pasini, A., Pace, G. and Torre, L., “Propulsive Performance of a 1 N 98% Hydrogen Peroxide Thruster,” 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2015.
[26] Rønningen, J. E., Berger, M. and Vesterås, R., “Development of a Student Hybrid Rocket,” 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July-August 2012.
[27] Saburo, Y., Noriko, S. and Kousuke, H., “Controlling Parameters for Fuel Regression Rate of Swirling-oxidizer-flow-type Hybrid Rocket Engine,” 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, July-August 2012.
[28] Sakurai, T., Yuasa, S., Ando, H., Kitagawa, K. and Shimada, T., “Performance and Regression Rate Characteristics of 5-kN Swirling-Oxidizer-Flow-Type Hybrid Rocket Engine,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 891-901, July-August 2017.
[29] Schuh, S., Bartok, T., Koopmans, R.-J. and Scharlemann, C., “Experimental Assessment of Hydrogen Peroxide Compatibility,” 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2015.
[30] Strand, L. D., Ray, R. L. and Cohen, N. S., “Hybrid Rocket Combustion Study,” AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, June 1993.
[31] Sutton, G. P. and Biblarz, O., Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
[32] Tao, G. and Kokotović, P. V., “Adaptive Control of Systems with Backlash,” Automatica, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 323-335, March 1993.
[33] Wang, T.-S., Canabal, F., Chen, Y.-S. and Cheng, G., “Multiphysics Computational Analysis of a Solid-Core Nuclear Thermal Engine Thrust Chamber,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 407-414, May-June 2010.
[34] Wang, T.-S. and Chen, Y.-S., “Unified Navier-Stokes Flowfield and Performance Analysis of Liquid Rocket Engines,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 678-685, September-October 1993.
[35] Wang, T.-S., Chen, Y.-S., Liu, J., Myrabo, L. N. and Mead Jr., F. B., “Advanced Performance Modeling of Experimental Laser Lightcraft,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 1129-1138, November-December 2002.
[36] Wernimont, E. J. and Meyer, S. E., “Hydrogen Peroxide Hybrid Rocket Engine Performance Investigation,” 30th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, June 1994.
[37] Wongyai, P. and Greatrix, D. R., “Regression Rate Estimation for Swirling-Flow Hybrid Rocket Engines,” 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2014.
[38] Zhao, S., Cai, G., Tian, H., Yu, N. and Zeng, P., “Experimental tests of throttleable H2O2/PE hybrid rocket motors,” 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 2015.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top