臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

認知心理學與眼動行為的交互作用研究風起雲湧於1970年代中期，而網站資訊結構亦於1976年由Richard Saul Wurman所提出，本研究立基於此三大面向，以國立臺灣師範大學數位校史館網站為研究個案，進行博物館網站與使用者認知風格之大規模研究，有效樣本為127人。
研究工具採用1985年Childers、Houston與Heckler依據雙碼理論發展的認知風格量表(SOP scale)以及國立臺灣師範大學電機工程學系何宏發教授2012年自行研發之眼動儀(EyeNTNU-180)。研究方法則先以問卷調查法，探索校史館網站使用者之文字/圖像認知風格，以進行分群，後以實驗法進行網站測試，自變項包含：受試者文字/圖像認知風格、網站圖文配置與任務類型，網站圖文位置分為左圖右文與左文右圖兩種版本，任務類型則包含已知項目搜尋與探索性搜尋兩種任務；依變項則包含任務達成效率（答題秒數）與效能（正確性）、以及瀏覽歷程和眼動數據之開始時間點、第一次凝視持續時間、總凝視時間與凝視次數等七項。
具體而言，本研究發現共有十項：(1)圖像型認知風格者亦會聚焦於文字資訊，(2)文字型認知風格者對於文字資訊處理較快易聚焦，(3)開始時間點易關注於情境導覽列文字區，(4)左方資訊較易吸引使用者聚焦，(5)已知項目搜尋對受試者而言較簡單明確，(6)探索性搜尋任務瀏覽歷程視覺化呼應Pirolli與Card於1999年提出的資訊覓食理論，(7)開始時間點關注於其他區呼應Marchionini於1997年提出的個體資訊架構概念元素理論，(8)第一次凝視持續時間持續聚焦於文字資訊，(9)總凝視時間和第一次凝視持續時間相呼應，(10)對有興趣與資訊需求的區域，受試者有較多的凝視次數。茲彙整三項研究結果如下：
一、 校史館網站使用者的圖文認知風格與網站圖文配置交互影響使用者的任務達成效能。
二、 校史館網站使用者的圖文認知風格與網站圖文配置交互影響使用者的任務達成效率。
三、 校史館網站使用者的圖文認知風格與網站圖文配置交互影響其眼動行為。
針對研究結果對於個案網站提出五項建議：(1)視覺化資訊結構，幫助使用者辨識網頁資訊；(2)明確網站資訊，重組組織系統；(3)提高語意明確性、標示系統再進化；(4) 新增輔助導覽系統，建立方向感；(5)增加站內搜尋功能，強化搜尋系統；期能提升網站好用性，進而協助使用者創造更高的使用效率與效能。

The reciprocal effect study of cognitive psycology and eye movement arose from the mid-1970s, and Richard Saul Wurman at the American Institute of Architecure conference of 1976 coined the term information architecture. Bulid on above theorys, the aim of this research was focus on the reciprocal effect of museum website display and user’s cognitive style, and how to affect user’s eye movement, and task accomplishment ratio.
To address this objective, a multimethod research design was employed that involved questionnaire survey and eye tracking, and the research tools was applied the Childers, Houston, & Heckler (1985) Style of Processing (SOP) Scale and the Hong-Fa Ho, Chien Yi Liu (2012) eye-tracker (EyeNTNU-180). Moreover the user’s cognitive style, website display, and search tasks was set as independent variable, and task accuracy, finish time, task process, first fixation latency, first fixation duration, total contact time, and number of fixation was set as dependent variable.
Specifically, the research findings and results came from 127 participants using two kinds of the National Normal University Archives Websites prototypes. Our main findings have shown ten phenomenons as follows: (1) Imagers also focused on the verbal information. (2) Verbalisers processed verbal information more efficiently. (3) Based on first fixation latency, at the beginning of the tasks users tended to focus on the verbal information in the contectual navigation. (4) Based on total contact times and number of fixation, the left side information was more attractive to users. (5)To users, known-item search task was much easier. (6) Exploratory search task was echoed Pirolli, P., & Card, S.(1990) Information foraging Theory. (7) Based on first fixation latency, most users tended to focus on the others sections on the website echoing Marchionini (1997) personal information infrastructure components theory. (8) Based on first fixation duration, users tended to continue fixate on verbal information. (9) Total contact time was echoed first fixation duration. (10) Based on number of fixations, becasued of interest or information needs, the users’ number of fixations was increased.
In conclusion, the research results indicated that users’ cognitive style and university archives websites display will reciprocal affect task accomplishment effectiveness and efficiency, also influence users’ eye movement. Consequently, we propose five suggestions for improvement the National Taiwan Normal University Archives website as follow: (1) Visualize the information architecture to help users recognize. (2) Reorganize the organization system to clear and recategorize. (3) Rename the labeling system to fit in with users’ nature language. (4) Add the supplemental navigation system to build up users’ sense of direction. (5) Set up the search system to help users’ search information. Hope above suggestion can help improve university archives website usability, furthermore make progress in users’ search efficiency and effectiveness.

摘 要 v
Abstract vii
表 次 xi
圖 次 xvii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題陳述 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制 4
第五節 名詞解釋 4
第二章 文獻分析 7
第一節 認知風格 7
第二節 博物館網站之相關研究 25
第三節 大學校史館 29
第四節 資訊結構 37
第三章 研究方法與步驟 43
第一節 研究方法 43
第二節 研究步驟 55
第三節 前測過程與結果 57
第四章 結果與討論 65
第一節 受試者分析 65
第二節 任務達成率分析 68
第三節 瀏覽歷程分析 73
第四節 眼動監測分析 89
第五節 綜合討論 163
第五章 結論與建議 179
第一節 結論 179
第二節 建議 184
第三節 進一步研究之建議 193
參考文獻 194
附錄 203

一、中文部分
王司沁（2007）。認知風格對學習者於互動多媒體輔助統計學習之影響－以圖像型與文字型為例(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22096NCU05464009%22.&searchmode=basic
王思堯(2004)。學習教材與認知風格對於學習績效與教材評量的影響(碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園縣。
王靖曄（2012）。認知風格在網路多媒體食譜學習中視覺注意力分佈和學習成效之相關研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/88739692282878445994
石金富, 曹曉華, 王鋼, & 瞿彬. (2009). 網頁佈局對視覺搜索影響的眼動研究. 人類工效學, 14(4), 1-3.
林淑娟（2009）。型塑企業徵才網站以建立適合性：探討求職者認知風格、個人形象與網站資訊屬性、組織形象間適合性對組織吸引力與求職意願的影響(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22098NDHU5121103%22.&searchmode=basic
林惠卿(2014)。大學圖書館網站首頁讀者視覺注意力之眼動分析研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。
邱皓政(2007)。量化研究與統計分析。臺中市：五南。
唐牧群、謝宜瑾(2013)。從透鏡模式探討影響讀者尋書滿意度之因素─以 aNobii 為例。圖書資訊學研究，8(1)，69-119。
唐牧群、吳宛青(2009)。由透鏡理論看大學圖書館讀者選書決策過程。圖書資訊學研究，7(1/2)，37-52。
陳學志, 賴惠德, & 邱發忠. (2010). 眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用. 教育科學研究期刊 第五十五卷第四期, 55(4), 39-68.
張安明(1997)。大學校史檔案館-大學記憶的保存者。大學圖書館1(3)，110-126。
張家豪（2013）。以動畫及擴增實境學習漢字對不同認知風格學生之影響(碩士論文)。 取自http：//ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22100LTC00641012%22.&searchmode=basic
張素芬(2010)。視覺程式語言Scratch適性化教學之研究(碩士論文)。取自http：//nhcuer.lib.nhcue.edu.tw/handle/392440000Q/694
黃郁晴（2011）。多點觸控手勢與使用者心智表徵研究(碩士論文)。 取自http：//handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/39466884673481464810
謝寶煖(2012)。組織系統Organization System。國立臺灣大學民國100年第二學期。圖書資訊學研究所碩士班。「資訊結構與網站設計」課程講義。
謝寶煖(2012)。標示系統Labeling System。國立臺灣大學民國100年第二學期。圖書資訊學研究所碩士班。「資訊結構與網站設計」課程講義。
謝寶煖(2012)。導覽系統Navigation System。國立臺灣大學民國100年第二學期。圖書資訊學研究所碩士班。「資訊結構與網站設計」課程講義。
謝寶煖(2012)。搜尋系統Search System。國立臺灣大學民國100年第二學期。圖書資訊學研究所碩士班。「資訊結構與網站設計」課程講義。
簡薇紋（2012）。圖/文認知風格與圖/文搜尋情境之適配性對自我效能、線上搜尋行為及表現之影響(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22100NTUS5395007%22.&searchmode=basic
國立政治大學(2006)。關於校史網。2014年4月5日，取自http://archive.nccu.edu.tw/about.htm
國立政治大學秘書室(2006)。校史館介紹。2014年4月5日，取自http://archive.nccu.edu.tw/archive/index.html
國立清華大學(2007)。數位校史館。2014年4月5日，取自http://archives.lib.nthu.edu.tw/history/
國立臺灣大學(2010)。認識校史館。2014年4月5日，取自http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/gallery/01_about.html
國立臺灣師範大學(2014)。數位校史館。2014年4月5日，取自http://archives.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.jsp

二、西文部分
Abdullah, N., Wan Adnan, W., & Md Noor, N. (2011). Towards a Cognitive-Based User Interface Design Framework Development. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches (Vol. 6761, pp. 17-24): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Agosto, D. E. (2002). Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people''s Web‐based decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 16-27.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.
Alwi, A. (2012). Interactive effects between cognitive preferences and instructional strategies in museum learning experiences.
Alwi, A., & McKay, E. (2009). Investigating online museum exhibits and personal cognitive learning preferences. Paper presented at the ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference.
Athukorala, K., Oulasvirta, A., Głowacka, D., Vreeken, J., & Jacucci, G. (2014). Narrow or Broad?: Estimating Subjective Specificity in Exploratory Search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
Bourlon, C., Oliviero, B., Wattiez, N., Pouget, P., & Bartolomeo, P. (2011). Visual mental imagery: What the head''s eye tells the mind''s eye. Brain research, 1367, 287-297.
Brouard, M. A., Hernanz, E. A., & lbafiez Etxeberria, A. (2009). Websites and Museums: New Informal Learning Applications. Paper presented at the The Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on E-Learning: University of Bari, Italy, 29-30 October 2009.
Callaway, C., Kuflik, T., Not, E., Novello, A., Stock, O., & Zancanaro, M. (2005). Personal reporting of a museum visit as an entrypoint to future cultural experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces.
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 125-134.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210.
Crane, S. A. (2006). The conundrum of ephemerality: Time, memory, and museums. A companion to museum studies, 98-109.
Cutrell, E., & Guan, Z. (2007). What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Deshpande, S., Geber, K., & Timpson, C. (2007). Engaged dialogism in virtual space: An exploration of research strategies for virtual museum. Theorising digital cultural heritage, 261-277.
Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization.
Elsom-Cook, M. (2001). Principles of interactive multimedia: McGraw-Hill.
Fischer, H. (2010). A history of the central limit theorem: from classical to modern probability theory: Springer.
Gould, S. J. (1990). Style of Information Processing Differences in Relation to Products, Shopping, and Self-Consciousness. Advances in consumer research, 17(1).
Graff, M. (2003a). Cognitive style and attitudes towards using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of e-learning, 1(1), 21-28.
Graff, M. (2003b). Learning from web‐based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 407-418.
Harvard University. (2013). About the Archives. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from http://library.harvard.edu/university-archives
Huffman, C. M., & WEAVER, K. A. (1996). Autobiographical recall and visual imagery. Perceptual and motor skills, 82(3), 1027-1034.
Jacob, E. K., & Loehrlein, A. (2009). Information architecture. Annual review of information science and technology, 43(1), 1-64.
Karrandinos, M. G. (1976). Optimum sample size and comments on some published formulae. Bulletin of the ESA, 22(4), 417-421.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.
Krug, S. (2000). Don''t make me think!: a common sense approach to Web usability: Pearson Education India.
Krug, S. (2006). Don’t make me think:A Common Approach to Web Usability (2nd edn ed.).
Kules, B., & Capra, R. (2012). Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 114-138.
Kules, B., Capra, R., Banta, M., & Sierra, T. (2009). What do exploratory searchers look at in a faceted search interface? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies: Psychology Press.
Lehman, K., & Roach, G. (2011). The strategic role of electronic marketing in the Australian museum sector. Museum Management and Curatorship, 26(3), 291-306. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2011.585806
Lightner, N. J., & Eastman, C. M. (2002). User Preference for Product Information in Remote Purchase Environments. J. Electron. Commerce Res., 3(3), 174-186.
Liu, H.-C. (2009). Eye-tracking viewers'' processing of web-based multimedia information. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing (JCPC), 2009 Joint Conferences on.
Maher, W. J. (1992). The management of college and university archives: Rowman & Littlefield.
Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments: Cambridge University Press.
Marquette University. (2014). University Archives. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from http://www.marquette.edu/library/archives/about_marquette_archives.shtml
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
McKay, E. (2003). Managing the interactivity of instructional format and cognitive style construct in Web-mediated learning environments Advances in Web-Based Learning-ICWL 2003 (pp. 308-319): Springer.
Mehigan, T. J., Barry, M., Kehoe, A., & Pitt, I. (2011). Using eye tracking technology to identify visual and verbal learners. Paper presented at the Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2011 IEEE International Conference on.
Morville, P., & Rosenfeld, L. (2008). Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites: O''Reilly Media, Inc.
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. User centered system design, 31-61.
Ohio State University Library. (2012). Univerisity Archives. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://library.osu.edu/find/collections/the-ohio-state-university-archives
Outing, S., & Ruel, L. (2004). The best of eyetrack III: What we saw when we looked through their eyes. Published on Poynter Institute (not dated). Retrieved, 20(06), 06.
Oviatt, S. (2006). Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and deep structure in the recall of English nominalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(1), 1-12.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: Oxford University Press.
Pariera, K. (2009). Information literacy on the web: how visual and textual cues contribute to website credibility assessments. Georgetown University.
Peacock, D., & Brownbill, J. (2007). Audiences, visitors, users: Reconceptualising users of museum on-line content and services. Paper presented at the Museums and the Web.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological review, 106(4), 643.
Pouliot, L., & Cowen, P. S. (2007). Does perceived realism really matter in media effects? Media Psychology, 9(2), 241-259.
Prom, C. J., & Swain, E. D. (2008). College and university archives: readings in theory and practice: Society of American Archivists.
Quacquarelli Symonds, QS. (2014a). National Taiwan Normal University Rankings. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://www.topuniversities.com/node/4226/ranking-details/university-subject-rankings/2014
Quacquarelli Symonds, QS. (2014b). QS World University Rankings by Subject 2014 -Education. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2014/education-training#sorting=rank+region=71+country=+faculty=+stars=false+search=
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.
Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational psychology, 17(1-2), 5-27.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour: D. Fulton Publishers.
Riding, R. J. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational psychology, 17(1-2), 29-49.
Riding, R. J., & Calvey, I. (1981). The assessment of verbal‐imagery learning styles and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by 11‐year‐old children. British Journal of Psychology, 72(1), 59-64.
Riding, R. J., & Taylor, E. (1976). Imagery performance and prose comprehension in seven‐year‐old children. Educational Studies, 2(1), 21-27.
Riley-Huff, D. A. (2009). Design insights and inspiration from the Tate: What museum Web sites can offer us. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 79-98.
Rosenfeld, L. (1998). Information architecture for the world wide web: Cambridge ; Sebastopol, CA : O''Reilly
Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the world wide web: " O''Reilly Media, Inc.".
Sadler-Smith, E., & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional science, 27(5), 355-371.
Samouelian, M. (2009). Embracing web 2.0: archives and the newest generation of web applications. American Archivist, 72(1), 42-71.
Sfintes, A.-I. (2013). THE ARCHITECTURE OF VIRTUAL SPACE MUSEUMS. European Scientific Journal, 9(21).
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference: Wadsworth Cengage learning.
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Sirevaag, E. J., & Stern, J. A. (2000). Ocular measures of fatigue and cognitive factors. Engineering psychophysiology: Issues and applications, 269-287.
Society of American Archivists, SAA. (1979). Guidelines for college & university archives: Society of Amer Archivists.
Society of American Archivists, SAA. (2005). Guidelines for college & university archives: Society of Amer Archivists.
Sojka, J. Z., & Giese, J. L. (2001). The influence of personality traits on the processing of visual and verbal information. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 91-106.
Soren, B., & Canadian heritage information network. (2005). Best practices in creating quality online experiences for museum users. Museum Management and Curatorship, 20(2), 131-148. doi: 10.1016/j.musmancur.2005.03.001
Stefl‐Mabry, J. (2003). A social judgment analysis of information source preference profiles: An exploratory study to empirically represent media selection patterns. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 879-904.
Stout, L. (1995). The role of university archives in the campus information environment. American Archivist, 58(2), 124-140.
Styliaras, G. D. (2007). A web-based presentation framework for museums. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 Euro American conference on Telematics and information systems.
Sun, Y.-C., & Chen, C.-M. (2010). Assessing learning emotion for both the cognitive styles of visualizer and verbalizer distributed to different types of multimedia learning materials. Paper presented at the Computer Communication Control and Automation (3CA), 2010 International Symposium on.
Tennant, M. (2006). Psychology and adult learning: Taylor & Francis.
Times Higer Education. (2013). Asia University Rankings 2013 Top 100. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia
Tsai, W.-H., & Chen, L.-S. (2010). A study on adaptive learning of scratch programming.
Tsianos, N., Germanakos, P., Lekkas, Z., Mourlas, C., & Samaras, G. (2009). Eye-Tracking Users'' Behavior in Relation to Cognitive Style within an E-learning Environment. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009. ICALT 2009. Ninth IEEE International Conference on.
Tuomi, I. (1999). Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. Paper presented at the Systems Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
UK, G. (2013). Taking Part 2012/13 Quarter 3: Statistical Release. GOV.UK: GOV. UK Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/taking-part-2012-13-quarter-3-statistical-release.
University of Illinois. (2012). About US. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from http://archives.library.illinois.edu/about-us/
University of Wisconsin. (2012). University Archives. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from http://archives.library.wisc.edu/ua.html
Venkatraman, M. P., Marlino, D., Kardes, F. R., & Sklar, K. B. (1990). Effects of individual difference variables on response to factual and evaluative ads. Advances in consumer research, 17(1), 761-765.
White, H. V. (1978). Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism (Vol. 70): Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore.
White, R. W., Bilenko, M., & Cucerzan, S. (2007). Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.
Witcomb, A. (2007). The materiality of virtual technologies: A new approach to thinking about the impact of multimedia in museums. Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse, 35-48.
Xing, J. (2007). Information complexity in air traffic control displays: Springer.
Yakel, E., Rieh, S. Y., St. Jean, B., Markey, K., & Kim, J. (2008). Institutional repositories and the institutional repository: College and university archives and special collections in an era of change. American Archivist, 71(2), 323-349.
Yale University. (n.d.). About Manuscripts & Archives. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://web.library.yale.edu/mssa/about