臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

自2008年世界金融危機、財務報表舞弊頻傳，造成投資人對財務報表信心不足面對全球性之金融風暴對投資人與金融市場帶來劇烈的影響，各界呼籲會計師查核報告應提供財報使用者更多攸關資訊。2012年英國參考國際審計準則ISA700修訂查核報告相關審計準則，新式查核報告制度之關鍵查核事項(Key Audit Matters)之說明我國亦自2016始實施新式查核報告制度。此新式查核報告之落實必須搭配良好之公司治理，我國則有相關法規規範審計委員會制度以加強公司財報監督之機制，藉以提升財報資訊揭露品質。本研究探討關鍵查核事項與審計委員會品質之關聯性，並以2016年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本，其實證研究結果顯示，審計委員會成員實際出席率較高、成員具備財會專長者較多，影響關鍵查核事項個數較多；另外，審計委員會成員任期較長，影響產業關鍵查核事項之報導較佳。

The investors have lost their confidences in financial statements resulted from several financial statement fraud since the global financial crisis in 2008, they started to expecting higher quality of audit reports to provide more relevant and transparent audit information. The government of United Kingdom proposed the extended audit report referred to the International Auditing Standards ISA700 in 2012, which the biggest change is the Key Audit Matters (KAM), this extended audit report had implemented in Taiwan since 2016. The implementation of extended audit report must be coordinated with good corporate governance. In Taiwan, the relevant regulations of audit committee system had introduced in order to strengthen supervision over corporate governance and improve the quality of earnings disclosure. Therefore, we used the size and the frequency of audit committee, the actual attendance rate of audit committee members, the accounting expertise of audit committee members, and the term of the members in audit committee as proxy variables of the quality of the audit committee, and discuss the relevance of key audit matters and the quality of the audit committee. This paper examines the relationship between the KAM and the quality of the audit committee and uses the sample of companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange and the Over-the-counter market in 2016. The empirical results show that higher actual attendance rate and accounting expertise of audit committee members are significantly positively related to the numbers of the key audit matters disclosed. In addition, the longer tenure of audit committee member is significantly positively related to the industrial key audit matters.

目錄
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第貳章 文獻探討 5
第一節 審計委員會 5
一、各國設置審計委員會之沿革及相關規範 5
二、我國設置審計委員會制度之發展背景及現況 10
三、審計委員會品質之相關文獻 12
四、審計委員會品質與財務報告品質 13
第二節 新式會計師查核報告暨關鍵查核事項 15
一、新式會計師查核報告 15
二、關鍵查核事項 17
三、新式會計師查核報告之關鍵查核事項揭露品質 19
第三節 研究假說 21
第參章 研究方法 27
第一節 變數定義及模型 27
一、關鍵查核事項之分類 27
二、應變數之衡量 28
三、實驗變數之衡量 30
四、控制變數 32
五、研究模型 33
第二節 樣本資料來源 38
第肆章 實證結果 41
第一節 敘述性統計分析 41
第二節 相關性分析 45
第三節 單變量檢定 49
第四節 迴歸分析 54
一、第一階段模型：審計委員會品質之決定性因素 54
二、審計委員會品質與關鍵查核事項(H1至H5) 56
第伍章 結論 66
第一節 研究結論 66
第二節 研究限制與建議 67
第三節 研究貢獻 68
參考文獻 69
附錄 73

王怡心，2016，CFO觀點：善用「內控評估」強化專業判斷，會計研究月刊第373期：56。
江承儒，2004，審計委員會獨立性與專業性對盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究，輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
李建然，2016，財務報表使用者如何解讀上市(櫃)公司新式無保留意見查核報告，證券暨期貨月刊第34期第9卷：16-29。
徐永堅，2016，審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、影響與建議，證券暨期貨月刊第34卷：30-41。
張佳惠，2012，公司設置審計委員會之決定因素，中原大學會計研究所論文
陳逸仲，2009，審計委員會與資訊透明度、財務報導品質與股價反應之探討，成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
曾乾豪，2014，審計委員特性與會計師特性之關聯性研究，國立臺北大學會計研究所博士論文。
游博凱，2012，審計委員會特性對公司經營績效與資訊揭露品質之影響，國立臺中科技大學會計資訊研究所碩士論文。
黃仲豪，2016，推動我國採用新式會計師查核報告-由英國實施經驗論起，證券暨期貨月刊第34期第9卷：5-14。
黃劭彥、李宗霖、林思綺，2015，IAASB發布新會計師查核報告－提高資訊價值及透明度，會計研究月刊第352期：16-21。
黃劭彥、李宗霖、林陣蒼，2016，淺析新式會計師查核報告之「關鍵查核事項」，會計師季刊第268期：18-28。
黃劭彥、李宗霖、賴怡君，2015，會計師查核報告新時代－提升資訊價值及透明度，會計師季刊第262期：11-16。
葉銀華、柯承恩，2006，德日美韓各國獨立董事、審計委員會及其他專門委員會法制規範及實務運作情況，中華公司治理協會。
蔡佳育，2012，公司自願設置審計委員會及審計委員會品質之決定因素，國立臺北大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
薛敏正、張瑀珊、高君慈，2008，公司自我選擇聘任會計師與審計公費，當代會計第9卷第2期：167-200
Abbott, L. J., and S. Parker. 2000. Auditor selection and audit committee
characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19(2): 47-66.
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and
restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23(1): 69-87.
Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2012. Investors'', auditors'', and lenders'' understanding
of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements.
Accounting Horizons 26 (2): 193-217.
Baxter, P. 2010. Factors associated with the quality of audit committees. Pacific
Accounting Review 22(1): 57-74.
Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson and T. L. Neal. 2009. The audit
committee oversights processs. Contemporary Accounting Research. Vol.26
No.1 65-22.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of
director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71
(4): 443-465.
Bradbury, M. E., Y. T. Mak, S. M. Tan. 2006. Board characteristics, audit committee
characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review 18(2): 47-68.
Carcello, J. V., T. L. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting.
The Accounting Review 75(4): 453-467
Carcello, J. V., T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and auditor
dismissals following "new" going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78(1): 95-117.
Chaari, M., M. Hamberg, and D. Johanson. 2011. Economic determinants of audit
committee quality. The 6th EAR Net Symposium
Chtourou, S. M., Bédard, J., and Courteau, L. 2001. Corporate Governance and
Earnings Management.
Cohen, J. R., U. Hoitash, and A. M. Wright. 2014. The effect of audit committee
industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting processs. The
Accounting Review 89(1): 243-273.
Defond, M. L. 1992. The association between changes in client firm agency costs and
auditor switching . Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11(1): 16-31.
Defond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the market value financial
expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting
Research 43 (2): 153-193.
Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, F. Navissi. 2010. The association between accruals quality
and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit
committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 787-827.
Eng, L.L., Y. T. Mak. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal
of Accounting and Public Policy 22(4): 325-P.345.
Ferris, S. P., M. Jagannathan, and A. C. Pritchard. 2003. Too busy to mind the
business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The
Journal of Finance 58(3): 1087-1112.
Fich, E. M. 2006. Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from
director appointments by fortune 1000 Firms. Journal of Business 78:
1943-1971.
FRC. 2016. Extended auditor’s reports: A further review of experience. Financial
Reporting Council.
Heckman, J. J..1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica
47(1): 153-162.
Hermalin, B. E., and M. Weisbach. 1991. The effects of board composition and
direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, Vol.20:
101-112.
Hoitash, U. R. Hoitash, and K. M. Johnstone. 2009. Internal control material
weaknesses, CFO compensation, and the moderating effects of CFO
characteristics and board of director strength. Working paper, Northeastern
University.Hribar.
Kachelmeier, S. J., J. J. Schmidt, and K. Valentine. 2016. The disclaimer effect of
disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report. Working paper, The
University at Texas at Austin.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings
management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(3): 375-400.
Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors'' incentives on
corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal 33(1):
129-150.
Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical
analysis.The Accounting Review 80(2): 649-675.
Krishnan, G. V., and G. Visvanathan. 2008. Does the SOX definition of an accounting
expert matter? The association between audit committee directors accounting
expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(3): 827-857.
Morton, Richard, M., Anwer, S. Ahmed, Bruce, K. Billings, and Mary
Stanford-Harris. 2004. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating
bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt
costs. The Accounting Review 77(4): 867-891.
O’Reilly, V. M., P. J. McDonnell, B. N. Winograd, J. S. Gerson, and H. R. Jaenicke.
1998. Montgomery''s auditing. 12th edition. New York, NY: John Wiley and
Sons.
Reid, Lauren C., J. V. Carcello, C. Li, and T. L. Neal. 2015. Are auditor and audit
committee report changes useful to investors? Evidence from the United
Kingdom.
Reid, Lauren C., J. V. Carcello, C. Li, and T. L. Neal. 2015. Impact of auditor and
audit committee report changes on audit quality and costs: Evidence from
the United Kingdom
Vafeas, N. 2005. Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings.
Contemporary Accounting Research 22(4): 1093-1122.
Sharma, V., V. Naiker, B. Lee. 2009. Determinants of audit committee meeting
frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons
23(3): 245-263.
Willekens, M.,H. V. Bauwhede, and A. Gaeremynck,2004, Voluntaryaudit committee
formation and practices among Belgian listed companies. International Journal
of Auditing 8: 207-200.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson III, and P. J. Dadalt. 2003. Earnings management and
corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of
Corporate Finance 9(3): 295-316.
Yang, J. S. and J. Krishnan. 2005. Audit committees and quarterly earnings
management. International Journal of Auditing 9: 201-219.