臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

中國大陸企業會計準則在與IFRSs接軌方面，採「趨同法」，亦即以IFRSs為基礎，參考編修後，成為中國的「企業會計準則」，以達成與IFRSs相同之目的。在金融海嘯過後，中國企業會計準跟隨IFRSs腳步修訂，而此次修訂是有史以來規模最大的一次。本文以會計準則修訂，檢視是否會對中國資本市場穩健性之影響。另外，本文進一步檢視穩健性對債務合約關聯性是否會有影響。
　　
　　在穩健性與債務合約方面，實證結果顯示，當實施新會計準則後，會計穩健性與總借款比率關係正向提高；而在短期借款比率與長期借款比率中，實證結果顯示，當實施新會計準則後，會計穩健性與長短期借款比率也是呈現正向增加，唯在短期借款比例部分缺少顯著性的支持；而單論長短期借款比率與穩健性之關係方面，短期借款比率對穩健性係數是大於長期借款比率，表示在短期借款對於債權人來說，是更容易達到監督的效果。

In terms of integration with IFRSs, China''s corporate accounting standards adopt the “convergence method”, which is based on IFRSs. After reference, it becomes China''s “Enter-prise Accounting Standards” to achieve the same objectives as IFRSs. After the financial tsu-nami, Chinese corporate accounting has followed the revision of IFRSs, and this revision is the largest ever. This paper is revised with accounting standards to examine whether it will affect the stability of China''s capital market. In addition, the paper further examines whether robustness has an impact on debt contractual relevance.

　　In terms of robustness and debt contracts, the empirical results show that the relationship between accounting conservatism and total borrowing ratio is increasing when the new ac-counting standards are implemented. In the short-term borrowing ratio and long-term bor-rowing ratio, the empirical results show that when implementing new accounting After the standard, the ratio of accounting conservatism to long-term and short-term borrowing is also positively increasing, but there is no significant support in the proportion of short-term bor-rowings; while the relationship between short-term borrowing ratio and robustness is short-term borrowing ratio versus robustness coefficient. It is greater than the long-term bor-rowing ratio, indicating that short-term borrowing is easier for creditors to achieve supervision.

目錄
摘要...............................................I
Abstract..........................................II
目錄.............................................III
表目錄............................................IV
第一章　緒論....................................1
　　第一節、研究動機及目的.......................1
　　第二節、研究架構.............................2
第二章 文獻探討及假說發展............................3
　　第一節、穩健性..................................3
　　第二節、中國背景及會計演進....................5
　　第三節、衡量穩健性之方法.........................7
　　第四節、穩健性與債務合約...................8
第三章　研究設計...................................10
　　第一節、樣本選取...............................10
　　第二節、研究模型與變數定義......................11
第四章　實證結果及分析.............................13
　　第一節、敘述性統計分析..........................13
　　第二節、實證結果及分析..........................14
　　第三節、敏感性分析..............................17
第五章　結論與建議..................................22
參考文獻...........................................23

表目錄
表3-1 樣本篩選過程....................................10
表4-1 敘述性統計.......................................13
表4-2 C-Score模型下各年結果............................14
表4-3 穩健性與總借款比率實證結果(C-Score)..............15
表4-4 穩健性與總長短借款比率實證結果(C-Score).........16
表4-5 Basu模型下迴歸結果...............................19
表4-6 穩健性與總借款比率實證結果(Basu)...............20
表4-7 穩健性與總長短借款比率實證結果(Basu) .........21

王泰昌、林修葳、許文馨、陳漢鐘、劉嘉雯， 2017，會計穩健性：基於亞洲國家資料　　研究之回顧，臺大管理論叢第27 卷第4 期，1-48。
王貞靜、潘虹華、戚務君，2012，以C-Score衡量會計穩健性在臺灣的適用性，會計審計論叢，2(2)，1-31。
官月缎、陳麗雯，2007，中國財務報導穩健性實證分析，會計與公司治理 第4卷 第2期：81-104。
洪孟詒，2005，台灣上市公司之公司特性對會計資訊穩健原則的影響，南華大學企業管理學類碩士班研究所碩士論文。
孫錚、劉鳳委、汪輝，2005，債務、公司治理與會計穩健性，中國會計與財務研究，第　　　　　
　　6期：112-141。
耿慶武，2001，《大陸區域經濟發展》，台北：聯經出版社。
陶曉慧、柳建華，2010，會計穩健性、債務期限結構與債權人保護，山西財經大學學報，第32卷第4期：93-97。
張德修，2003，〈論 FDI 在中國與亞洲國家(地區)之間經濟合作中的地位和作用〉， 收錄於曹和平主編，《新世紀亞洲經濟合作：中國地位與影響》，北京：北京大學出版社。
趙雅男、張翼、安然，2015，上市公司債務契約與會計穩健性的實證分析，經管研究，第1期：120-123
劉文軍，2014，會計穩健性與銀行借款合約，山西財經大學學報，第36卷第7期：105-114。
Ahmed,A.S.,B.K.Billings,R.M.Morton.,M.Stanford-Harris.(2002). The　role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review 77 (4), 867-890.
Ahmed,A.S.,andS.Duellman. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of di-rector characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43 (2-3): 411-437.
Basu,S.,(1997), The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1), 3-37.
Beatty,A. ,and S.Liao. (2011). Do delays In expected loss recognition affect banks'' willingness to lend? Journal of Accounting and Economics 52 (l): 1-20.
Ball,R.,A.Robin, and G.Sadka. (2008). Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies 13 (2-3): 168-205.

Ball,R., and Shivakumar,L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1): 83-128.
Beaver,W.H.,and　Ryan,S.G.(2005).Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism: Concepts and Modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10(2): 269-309.
Beaver,W.,andRyan,S.G. (2000) H.,Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research,38(1): 127-148
Callen,J.L.,Y.Guan, and J.Qiu. (2011). The market for corporate control and accounting conservatism. Working paper, University of Toronto.
Callen,J.L.,D.Segal,andO.Hope.(2010).The pricing of conservatism accounting and the measurement of conservatism at the firm-year level. Review ofAccounting Studies ,15 (1):145-178
Chen,H.,Chen,J.Z.,Lobo,G.J.,andWang,Y. (2010). Association between borrower and lender state ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Ac-counting Research, 48(5): 973-1014.
Givoly,D.,andHayn,C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (3): 287-320.
Givoly,D.C.,K.Hayn,andA.Natarajan.(2007).Measuring reporting conservatism. The Accounting Review ,82 (1): 65-106.
Khan M.,andR.L.Watts. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of conservatism. Journal ofAccounting and Economics ,48 (2-3): 132-150
Kothari,S.,S.Shu,andP.Wysocki.(2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1): 241–276
LaFond,R.,andS.Roychowdhury.(2008). Managerial Ownership and Accounting Conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1):101–135
LaFond,R.andR,Watts.(2008). The information role of conservatism. The Ac-counting Review 83(2): 447-478.
Li,X.(2010).Accounting conservatism and cost of capital: An international analysis. Working paper, Temple University.
Pae,J.(2007).Unexpected accruals and conditional accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting ,34 (5-6): 681-704.
Pae,J.D.B.,Thornton,and M.,Welker.2005..The link between earnings conser-vatism and the price-to-book ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22 (3): 693-717.

Paek,W.,L.HChen,andH.Sami.(2007).Accounting conservatism, earnings persis-tence and pricing multiples on earnings. Working paper, Sungkyunkwan University Business School.
Roychowdhury,S.,andR.L.Watts.(2007).Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting. Journal of Ac-counting and Economics ,44 (1-2): 2-31.
Ryan,S.G.(2006).Identifying conditional conservatism. European Accounting Review ,15 (4) :511-525.
Wang,R.Z.,Hógartaigh,C.Ó.,and van Zijl,T.(2009). Measures of accounting conservatism: A construct validity perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 28: 165-203.
Watts,R.L.(2003a). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and im-plications. Accounting Horizons ,17 (3): 207-221
Watts,R.L.(2003b). Conservatism in accounting part Il: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17 (4): 287-301
Watts,R.L.andZimmerman,J.L.(1986). PositiveAccounting Theory.Accounting Review,65(1):131-156.
Zhang,J.(2008).The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (1): 27-54.