一、中文部分
王昭傑、陳美芳（2015）。圖像式情境脈絡數學教材對國小資優生學習成效與基模影響之實驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊，40（3），59-88。成子娟（2004）。《操作式學前數學》。香港：朗文香港教育。
成子娟（2007）。操作材料對兒童理解加減法關係和選擇計算策略的影響。Education Journal《教育學報》, 35(1)，93-111。吳事庭（2014）。以電子白板與 3D電腦圖形軟體在國小數學教學之研究－以國小六年級數學柱體體積單元為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。吳宜芳（2015）。以數學閱讀融入數學教學對國小五年級學童怎樣解題單元表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。吳宜芳（2015）。以數學閱讀融入數學教學對國小五年級學童怎樣解題單元表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。吳怡儒、蔡文榮、李林滄（2012）。彰化縣偏遠地區國中學生數學學習態度及其影響因素之研究。教育科學期刊，11（1）， 25-57。吳金聰（2013）。PPt融入數學教學之研究―以國小五年級「面積公式」單元教學為例。科學教育，37，34-65。
李威進（2004）。資訊融入九年一貫數學領域第一階段數學測驗之研究：以數字常識為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。李昱昀（2012）。圖像表徵式動畫教材對國小四年級學童數學焦慮、問題解 決能力與學習成效之影響（未出版的碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。李美慧（2015）。PISA數學與科學素養國際評比之探討—PRIDE資料庫應用。政策研究指標資料庫PRIDE電子報。2016/12/10取自http://pride.stpi.narl.org.tw/epaper/app/preview/21
沈雅慧（2012）。班級氣氛與音樂科任教師教學策略選用之行動研究:以國小五年級一個班級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gswebcgi/ccd=iKx9Rh/web。沈翠蓮（2001）。教學原理與設計。臺北市:五南圖書。
林佩璇（1992）。臺灣省高級職業學校合作學習教學法實驗研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。林奕宏、張景媛（2001）。多元智能與問題解決整合型教學模式對國小學生數學學習表現之影響。教育心理學報，33（1）， 1-29。林秋蘋（2013）。合作學習法應用於數學教學之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。佛光大學，宜蘭縣。林素雀（2011）。遊戲融入數學教學－「骰子」在「三位數加減直式計算」的應用。屏縣教育季刊，47，31-36。林淑玲（2009）。臺中市信義國小偶戲課程的發展與實施之個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=iKx9Rh/webmge?mode=basic。林雅雯、江柏叡、曾志隆（2015）。應用合作學習於國中數學課程之前實驗研究。臺灣數學教師，36（2），13-25。洪士程、洪翊平（2014）。互動式虛擬電子白板融入國小二年級數學之教學成效研究。資訊科技國際期刊，8（1），1-9。徐玉軒（2012）。探究低成就學童的數學加法遊戲之圖像式思考歷程（未出版的碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。徐南號（1989）。《有效教學之因素分析》。臺北：臺灣中國體育學會主編。
張育誠（2014）。以敘事文本進行真實數學教學之實驗研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。張淑惠（2013）。創意教學融入兒童數學之研究－以彰化縣某偏鄉小學數學教學專業社群為例（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學，新竹市。張景媛（1997）。數學學習與教學。載於林清山（主編），有效學習的方法（125-142 頁）。臺北市：教育部
張新仁、許桂英（2004）。國小數學領域採合作學習之教學成效。教育學刊，23，111-136張麗芬（2009）。結合圖畫書與數學的教學方式對幼兒數學能力之影響。臺北市立教育大學學報教育類，40（2），107-144。
梁榮彰（2005）。圖像提示對國中一年級學生理解數學圖像測驗的成效研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。許清惟（2014）。合作學習融入數學教學對偏遠地區七年級學生學習成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。陳彥君、董修齊（2010）。互動式電子白板融入數學領域對國小高年級學生學習動機之影響。工業科技教育學刊，3，1-7。陳梅仙（2014）。從操作實驗談幾何教學。臺灣數學教師電子期刊，35（1），17-29。
陳淑絹（1995）。「指導—合作學習」教學策略增進國小學童閱讀理解能力之實徵研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。陳智偉（2012）。資訊融入情境式教學對於國中生數學學習成效之影響（未出版的碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。陳瑞雯（2014）。遊戲教學電子書融入數學教學之研究－以國小二年級乘法為例（未出版的碩士論文）。亞洲大學，臺中市。陳筱佩（2014）。互動式電子白板在國小數學教學之研究—以國小數學領域四年級分數單元為例（未出版之碩士論文）。亞洲大學，臺中市。陳綵菁、蔡慕宣、吳明芬、張宇樑（2013）。繪本融入數學教學在低年級學生倍數概念學習之應用。桃園創新學報，33，259-273。彭憶珍（2013）。改良式表列法融入國中數學教學對學生學習影響之研究－以一元一次方程式為例（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。温秀敏（2015）。繪本融入數學教學之行動研究－以國小三年級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。黃一泓、王貞雯（2011）。以心智圖做為筆記工具對國小五年級學生在數學科的學習成效之研究。教育科學期刊，10（2），91-114。黃郁芝（2012）。國小英語教師教學策略運用之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。取自 http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=iKx9Rh/webmge?mode=basic。黃寶園（2017）。第七章 統合分析的影用語結果判讀。未出版之原始資料。
世帆（2015）。運用資訊科技融入高中資優數學教學－以二次曲線為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學，臺中市。
楊雅婷（2011）。幼教師運用教學策略提昇兒童語言表達能力之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=iKx9Rh/webmge?mode=basic。溫秀敏（2015）。繪本融入數學教學之行動研究－以國小三年級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。
廖國志（2013）。圖像表徵式學習策略應用於城鄉國小四年級數學學習成效之研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。廖惠認（2011）。心智圖在小學二年級數學教學的改善應用（未出版之碩士論文）。大葉大學，彰化縣。維基百科（2016）。數學。20161209 取自 https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%A6。
劉信宏（2013）。互動式電子白板運用於國中數學教學之行動研究－以嘉義縣某國中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學，嘉義縣潘怡勳（2015）。探討桌上遊戲融入於數學教學對學生學習成效之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。義守大學，高雄市。謝琇雅（2014）。資訊融入數學教學對學習成就與學習態度之影響―以「數形規律與等差數列」為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學，臺中市。蘇慧珍（2013）。探討閱讀策略融入數學教學對高中學生的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。鐘妙琴（2007）。以分組模式及操作教具之教學探討數學教學成效之研究－以二年級為例（未出版的碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。二、英文部分
Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2010). The effect of problem posing oriented analyses-II course on the attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy of elementary prospective mathematics teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 60-75.
Awofala, A. O. A. (2007). Women and the learning of mathematics. African Journal of Historical Sciences, 3(1), 195-213.
Awofala, A. O. A., & Nneji, L. M. (2012). Effect of framing and team assisted individualised instructional strategies on students’ achievement in mathematics. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 43(3),20-28.
Awofala, A. O. A., Arigbabu, A. A., & Awofala, A. A. (2013). Effects of framing and team individualised instructional strategies on senior secondary school students' attitudes toward mathematics. Acta Didactica Naponcensia, 6(1), 1-22.
Awofala, A. O. A., Arigbabu, A. A., & Awofala, A. A.（2013）. Effects of framing and team assisted individualised instructional strategies on senior secondary school students' attitudes toward mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6(1), 1-22.
Barley, Z., Lauer, P. A., Arens, S. A., Apthorp, H. S., Englert, K. S., Snow, D., & Akiba, M. (2002). Helping at-risk students meet standards: A synthesis of evidence-based classroom practices. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from the Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Web site: http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/Synthesis/5022RR_RSHelpingAtRisk.pdf
Barton, M. L., & Heidema, C. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics (2nd ed.). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2014).Comprehensive meta analysis version 2: A computer program for research synthesis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
Brown, M. C., McNeil, N. M., & Glenberg, A. M. (2009). Using concreteness in education: real problems, potential solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 160–164.
Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 99-111.
Capar, G., & Tarim, K.(2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and attitude: A meta-analysis research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 553-559.Clark, K. R.(2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91-115.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2005). Young children's abstract mathematical thinking. Hong Kong Journal of Early Childhood, 4(1), 5-10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duru, A., & Koklu, O.(2011). Middle school students' reading comprehension of mathematical texts and algebraic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(4), 447-468.
Fister, K. R., & McCarthy, M. L.(2008). Mathematics instruction and the tablet PC. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(3), 285–292.
Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., & Son, J. Y.(2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9-25.
Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1997). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Gersten, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Benbow, C., Clements, D., Loveless, T.,Williams, V., Arispe, I., & Banfield, M. (2008). Report of the task group on instructional practices (National Mathematics Advisory Panel). Retrieved September 20, 2016, from the U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/instructional-practices.pdf
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Education Researcher, 5, 3-8.
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424– 436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Reid, R. (1992). Developing self-regulated learners. Focus on Exceptional hildren, 24(6), 1-16.
Hall, T. (2002). Explicit instruction. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from the CAST Web site: http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_explicit.html
Halladay, J. L., & Neumann, M. D.(2012). Connecting reading and mathematical strategies. Reading Teacher, 65(7), 471-476.
Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for students at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.
Hasselbring, T. S., Lott, A. C., & Zydney, J. M. (2005). Technology-supported math instruction for students with disabilities: Two decades of research and development. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (p. 371–404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Ifamuyiwaa, S. A., & Akinsola, M. K.(2008). Improving senior secondary school students' attitude towards mathematics through self and cooperative-instructional strategies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(5), 569-585.
Isik, D., & Tarim, K.(2009). The effects of the cooperative learning method supported by multiple intelligence theory on Turkish elementary students' mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(4), 465-474.
Jitendra, A. K. (2002) Teaching students math problem-solving through graphic representations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 34-38.
Julie, C. (2012). The stability of learners’ choices for real-life situations to be used in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(20), 196-203.
Julie, C., & Holtman, L. (2008). The relevance of school mathematics education (ROSME). In L. Holtman, C. Julie, Ø. Mikalsen, D. Mtetwa, & M. Ogunniyi (Eds.), Some developments in research in science and mathematics in Sub-Saharan Africa: Access, relevance, learning, curriculum research (p. 379–405). Somerset West, South Africa: African Minds.
Kacerja, S. (2011). Albanian students’ motives for preferring certain real-life situations for learning mathematics. Pythagoras, 32(2), 50-59.
Kacerja, S., Julie, C., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2010). The contexts Albanian students prefer to use in Mathematics and relationship to contemporary matters in Albania. Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1, 319-328.
Kenney, J. M., Hancewicz, E., Heuer, L., Metsisto, D., & Tuttle, C. L. (2005). Literacy strategies for improving mathematics instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping students learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K.(2015). Design and implementation of integrated instruction of mathematics and science in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 3-14.
Kim, S. (2012) Preferred contexts of Korean youth for the learning of schoolmathematics. Unpublished doctoral theses. Bellville: University of the Western Cape.
Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97–114.
Kunsch, C., Jitendra, A., & Sood, S. (2007). The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 1-12.
Larson, M.（2002）. Essential characteristics of effective mathematics instruction. Retrieved September 15, 2016, from http://www.eduplace.com/state/pdf/author/larson1.pdf
Lefrancois, G. R. (1997). Psychology for teaching. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Manalo, E., Bunnell, J. K., & Stillman, J. A. (2000). The use of process mnemonics in teaching students with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(2), 137–156.
Matsumara, L. (2002). Measuring instructional quality in accountability systems: Classroom assignments and student achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 207–229.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology：A cognitive approach. Bosten：Little Brown and Company.
Mckenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D.（2002）.Teaching through texts: Reading and writing in the content areas. Boston: A Pearson Educational Company.
Memnum, D. S., & Akkaya, R. (2012). Preservice teachers' attitudes towards mathematics in Turkey. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(9), 90-99.
Meyer, L., Wardrop, J., Hastings, C., & Linn, R. (1993). Effects of ability and settings on kindergarteners’ reading performance. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 142–160.
Ndemo, Z., & Mtetwa, D. (2010). Preferences of contexts for learning mathematics expressed by students in rural secondary school environments of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 22(1), 1-15.
Ngcobo, M., & Julie, C. (2012). Contexts preferred for use in mathematics by Swaziland high performing public schools’ junior secondary learners. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), 289-301.
NICHD. (2005). A day in third grade: A large-scale study of classroom quality and teacher and student behavior. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 305–323.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). Education for all: The report of the expert panel on literacy and numeracy instruction for students with special education needs, kindergarten to Grade 6. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Ottmar, E. R., Decker, L. E., & Cameron, C. E.(2014). Classroom instructional quality, exposure to mathematics instruction and mathematics achievement in fifth grade. Learning Environments Research, 17(2), 243-262.
Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2005). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2006-453). U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.
Pianta, R., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Classroom effects on students’ achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 365–397.
Rabab'h, B., & Veloo, A.(2015). Spatial visualization as mediating between mathematics learning strategy and mathematics achievement among 8th grade students. International Education Studies, 8(5), 1-11.
Richardson, J. S., Morgan, R. F., & Fleener, C. (2006). Reading to learn in the content areas (6th ed.) Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. (1982).A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experiment effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
Spradlin, K., & Ackerman, B.(2010). The effectiveness of computer- assisted instruction in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(2),12-18.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M.(2010) . Educational psychology (2nd Edition). Boston: A Pearson Educational Company.
Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129-140.
Swanson, H. L. (2001). Searching for the best model for instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(2), 1-15.
Swanson. H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.
Vilardi, R., & Rice, M. L.（2014） . Mathematics achievement: Traditional instruction and technology-assisted course delivery methods. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 16-28.
Walker, D. W., & Poteet, J. A. (1989). A comparison of two methods of teaching mathematics story problem-solving with learning disabled students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 1, 44–51.
Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121–131.
Yüksel, I.（2014）. Impact of activity-based mathematics instruction on students with different prior knowledge and reading abilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1445-1468.