|
Evaluating the risk of secondary cancer induction after radiation therapy is especially important in pediatric patients because the tissue of the child is in the growth phase and the survival period is longer after the cure, and the current proton therapy does not take into account the dose effects of proton-induced neutron radiation outside the field. In addition, there is also a lack of consideration in the literature to assess the conbination risk of induced cancer by inside and outside the field. Due to the above three points, the purpose of this study is to develop a suitable risk assessment module for different dose ranges inside and outside the field, using their respective risk assessment models, and to assess the secondary risk of pediatric brain tumors after wobbling proton therapy. After approval by Institutional Review Board(IRB), 11 patients' DICOM data were obtained. Patient information was extracted and the relative position between the Organ at risk (OAR) and the beam was reconstructed to define whether the OAR in the field or out of the field. Select the appropriate risk assessment model inside and outside the field respectively. For high-dose areas(in field), use the Organ equivalent dose(OED) method developed by Uwe Schneider. For low-dose areas(out-of-field) deposited dose by scattered photon, proton and second neutron, refer to the linear risk model established in the BEIR VII report. The OAR radiation-induced cancer risk inside and outside the field was weighted by the survival probability of Taiwan's Life Table, and the life attributable risk(LAR) accumulated to the average life expectancy of Taiwan was calculated as the risk analysis target. Finally, this risk calculation system was used to evaluate the secondary carcinogenic risk of 11 clinical pediatric brain tumor patients, respectively, compared with the secondary cancer risk under the treatment plan of wobbling proton and photon technology. After the construction of the clinical risk calculation system developed in this study, the feasibility of the system was verified based on the published literature, and the system was used to calculate clinical pediatric brain tumor cases. The calculation results show that the LAR of the pediatric brain OAR is between 0 % and 9 %. The LAR distribution in each case is related to the volume and location of PTV. For the risk assessment of pediatric brain tumor patients, the results of the proton and the photon treatment planning were compared. In the group which PTV locates in the out-of-center of the head or is smaller volume, the risk of wobbling proton therapy was significantly lower than that of photon therapy.
|