臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

有害廢棄物由於具有危害性，加上人口密度高及處理場分配不均，導致增添清運風險，故必須規劃適當之清運路徑以降低風險，唯國內目前尚無適當的工具可供使用，本研究因而建立一套優選有害廢棄物清運路徑之方法。本研究首先分析有害廢棄物清運風險相關因子，分為有害廢棄物物質風險、運輸風險、沿線影響人口及成本。有害廢棄物物質風險因子主要是基於有害廢棄物物化特性及運輸重量評估物質風險指標；運輸風險因子主要考量各路段運輸事故發生機率的計算方式；沿線影響人口因子則是依據有害廢棄物危害影響範圍乘上人口密度估算；而成本因子主要考量運輸距離，建立上述因子評估方法後，接著建立有害廢棄物清運路徑優選工具，分為演算法及規劃模式，演算法採用最短路徑法，並依據各路段清運風險及成本作為權重，進行路徑優選；規劃模式以最小清運風險及成本作為目標式，並利用權重法設定不同權重優選路徑。
本研究所建立的方法適用於國內不同類型有害廢棄物之清運路徑優選，並以種類複雜及產出量最多的製程有害事業廢棄物進行案例研討，並建立北部、西部及南部各一虛擬案例，以示範應用本研究所建立之方法。根據結果發現，若僅考量成本規劃清運路徑，易忽略清運風險，而各案例優選清運方案與最短路徑清運方案比較，優選清運方案可避免行經高風險路段，有效降低清運風險，針對危害性進行分析，危害性指標也明顯優於最短路徑清運方案，如南部案例優選清運方案比較最短路徑清運方案，運輸風險值由0.407%降至0.122%、沿線影響人口數也由5012人降至3146人，依P3法所估算運輸風險值因而由2099降至439，危害性指標R_POP_HP(3.22*10^3)也降為最短路徑(1.71*10^4)清運方案的五分之一倍。

Since hazardous wastes (HWs) are harmful, minimizing transportation risk is essential for HW collection routing, especially for highly populated areas with unevenly distributed treatment sites. This study is thus initiated to establish risk-based tools for routing HW collection. First, this study analyzes the risks associated with HW collection based on hazardous material (HazMat) potency, transportation risk, population exposure, and cost factors. The HazMat potency is evaluated based on the physical and chemical properties of HWs and their shipping weights. The transportation risk is estimated by the accidental probabilities of the roads passed in a collection path. The population exposed is counted by the affected areas multiplied by the associated population density. The cost factor is primarily determined by the transportation distance. Two optimization tools for routing HW collection are established, including a computer program implementing the shortest path algorithm and a mathematical programming model for selecting routes based on previously described factors with assigned weights.
Three case studies for the HWs generated from manufacturing processes were implemented to elucidate the applications of the tools for routing HWs collection. According to the results, the path selected by minimizing distance likely overlooks the risks. The paths selected by several weight sets can avoid passing through high-risk roads to reduce the risks of HW collection. The paths selected based on the hazardous index are also better than the shortest path. For instance, the path selected for the southern case, while compared with the shortest one, reduces the transportation risk from 0.407% to 0.122%, the population exposure from 5,012 to 3,146, and the transportation risk determined by the P3 method from 2,099 to 439. The path selected based on the hazardous index reduces the index value from 3.22*10^3 to 1.71*10^4, only one-fifth of that for the shortest path.

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
參數符號說明表 viii
第一章　前言 1
1.1研究緣起 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3論文內容 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 有害廢棄物清運系統 5
2.2 清運風險及成本因子 8
2.2.1有害廢棄物物質風險 8
2.2.2運輸風險 9
2.2.3沿線影響人口 10
2.2.4 成本 10
2.3 路徑優選演算法及規劃模式 11
第三章 研究流程與方法 13
3.1 研究流程 13
3.2 清運路徑優選因子 16
3.2.1 有害廢棄物物質風險分析 16
3.2.2 運輸風險因子分析 20
3.2.3 沿線影響人口估算方法 26
3.2.4 成本因子分析 32
3.3 建立路徑優選工具 34
3.3.1 演算法 34
3.3.2 規劃模式 36
3.4 綜合評估與評選 40
3.5 案例研討 40
第四章 結果與討論 41
4.1 案例說明 42
4.2 清運路徑優選 44
4.3 綜合評估 95
第五章 結論與建議 103
5.1結論 103
5.2建議 107
參考文獻 109
附錄A 113
附錄B 119


 

環保署，(102年)事業廢棄物申報及管理系統，http://waste.epa.gov.tw/prog/IndexFrame.asp?Func=5 (accessed on 2013/8/16)。
環保署，(98年)，「有害事業廢棄物認定標準」，台北。
環保署，(95年)，「事業廢棄物貯存清除處理方法及設施標準」，台北。
林宏嶽，(88年)，廢棄物掩埋場選址及清運分區空間模式，國立交通大學，博士論文，新竹。
黃莛涵，(102年)，有害廢棄物新處理場址之系統效益評估，國立交通大學，碩士論文，新竹。
楊舒閔，(99年)，有害廢棄物清運風險分析，國立交通大學，碩士論文，新竹。
Gupta, J. P. and Babu, B. S. (1999). “A new hazardous waste index.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, A67, pp. 1-7.
Alumur, S. and Kara, B. Y. (2005). “A new model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem.” Computers & Operations Research, 34, pp. 1406-1423.
AICE. (1994). DOW’s Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide, 7th edn., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, USA.
Erkut, E. and Verter, V. (1998). “Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials.” Operations Research, 46(5), pp. 625-642.
Zografos, K. G. and Davis, C. F. (1989). “Multi-objective programming approach for routing hazardous materials.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 115(6), pp. 661-673.
Erkut, E.(1994). “On the credibility of conditional risk model for routing hazardous materials.” Operations Research Letters, 18, pp. 49–52.
Erkut, E. and Verter, V. (1995). “A framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment.” Risk analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 15, pp. 589-601.
Ashtakala, B. and Eno, L. A. (1996). “Minimum risk route model for hazardous materials.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122, pp. 350-357.
Marianov, V. and ReVelle, C. (1998). “Linear, non-approximated models for optimal routing in hazardous environments.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, pp. 157-164.
Shih, L. H. and Lin, Y. T. (1999). “Optimal routing for infectious waste collection.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125, pp. 479-484.
Erkut, E. and Ingolfsson, A. (2000). “Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning.” Journal of the Transportation Science, 34, pp. 165-179.
Verter, V. and Kara, B. Y. (2001). “A GIS-based framework for hazardous material transport risk assessment.” Risk Analysis, 21(6), pp. 1109-1120.
Kara, B. Y. and Verter, V. (2003). “Accurate calculation of hazardous materials transport risks.” Operations Research Letters, 31, pp. 285-292.
Nema, A. K. and Gupta, S. K. (2003). “Multiobjective risk analysis and aptimization of regional hazardous waste management system.” Practive periodical of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste management., 7, pp. 69-77.
Erkut, E. and Ingolfsson, A. (2005). “Transport risk models for hazardous materials: revisited.” Operations Research Letters, 33, pp. 81-89.
Alagoz, A. Z. and Kocasoy, G. (2007). “Improvement and modification of the routing system for the health-care waste collection and transportation in Istanbul.” Waste Management, 28, pp. 1461-1471.
Shang, H., Dong, Q., Wang, X. and Wu, X. (2008). “The risk evaluation for hazardous materials transportation.” Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 3, pp. 1553 - 1558
Qiao, Y., Keren, N. and Mannan, S. M. (2009). “Utilization of accident databases and fuzzy sets to estimate frequency of HazMat transport accidents.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167, pp. 374-382.
Barilla, D., Leonardi, G. and Puglisi, A. (2009). “Risk assessment for hazardous materials transportation.” Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3, pp.2295-2309.
Monprapussorn, S., Watts, D. J. and Banomyong, R. (2009). “Sustainable hazardous materials route planning with environmental consideration.” Asian Journal on Energy and Environment, 10(02), pp. 122-132.
Reniers, G. L. L., Jongh, K. D.,Gorrens B., Lauwers D., Leest, M. V. and Witlox, F. (2010). “Transportation risk analysis tool for hazardous substances (TRANS) – A user-friendly, semi-quantitative multi-mode hazmat transport route safety risk estimation methodology for Flanders.” Transportation Research Part D, 15, pp. 489-496.
Yuejie, Z., Jing, Z. and Kai, K. (2010). “A routing model for the transportation of hazardous materials under load-varied network.” Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Hebei Province, 10, pp. 1-4.
Lozano, A., Munoz A., Macias L. and Antun, J. P. (2011). “Hazardous materials transportation in Mexico City: Chlorine and gasoline cases.” Transportation Research Part C, 19, pp. 779-789.
Ma, C., Guo, Y. and Qi, B. (2011). “Study on the transportation route decision-making of hazardous material based on N-shortest path algorithm and entropy model.” Information and Management Engineering Communications in Computer and Information Science, 236, pp. 282-289.
Das, A., Mazumder, T. N. and Gupta, A. K. (2012). “Pareto frontier analyses based decision making tool for transportation of hazardous waste.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 10, pp. 341-352.
Srivastava, A. K. and Nema, A. K. (2005). “Discussion of “Multiobjective vehicle routing and scheduling problem with time window constraints in hazardous material transportation” by Qiang Meng, Der-Horng Lee, and Ruey Long Cheu.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131, pp. 699-707.
Meng, Q., Lee, D. and Cheu, R. L. (2005). “Multiobjective vehicle routing and scheduling problem with time window constraints in hazardous material transportation.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131, pp. 699-707.
Zografos, K. G. and Androutsopoulos, K. N. (2008). “A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions.” Transportation Research Part C, 16, pp. 684-703.
Hunag, B., Fery, P., Xue, L. and Wang, Y. (2008). “Seeking the Pareto front for multiobjective spatial optimization problems.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22, pp. 507-526.
Das, A. Gupta, A. K. and Mazumder T. N. (2012). “A comprehensive risk assessment framework for offsite transportation of inflammable hazardous waste.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 227-228, pp. 88-96.
Xie, Y., Lu, W., Wang, W. and Quadrifoglio, L. (2012). “A multimodal location and routing model for hazardous materials transportation.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 227-228, pp. 135-141.
Samanlioglu, F. (2013). “A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem.” European Journal of Operational Research, 226, pp. 332-340.
Musee, N., Lorenzen, L. and Aldrich, C. (2006). “An aggregate fuzzy hazardous index for composite wastes.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, A137, pp. 723-733.
Das, A., Gupta, A. K. and Mazumder, T. N. (2012). “Vulnerability assessment using hazard potency for regions generating industrial hazardous waste.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 209-210, pp. 308-317.
Bunke, D. and Oldenburg, C. (2005). “Indicators for chemicals: Sources, impacts and policy performance.” ESPR-Environ Science and Pollution Research, 12(5), pp. 310-314.
Rao, K. R., Rao, S. V. and Chary, V. (2004). “Estimation of risk Indices of chemicals during transportation.” Process safety Progress, 23(2), pp. 149-155.
Cohon, J. L. (1978). “Multiobjective Programming and Planning.” Academic Press, New York.