跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/08 13:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳星助
研究生(外文):Hsing-Chu Chen
論文名稱:診斷關聯群前瞻性支付制度對台灣醫院經營策略及績效評估
論文名稱(外文):The Impacts of DRG Prospective Payment System on Hospital Operation Strategies and Performance in Taiwan
指導教授:朱正一朱正一引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-I Chu
口試委員:陳曉華徐祥明溫信財劉鴻文
口試委員(外文):Sheau-Hwa ChenHsiang-Ming HsuHsyien-Chia WenHung-Wan Liu
口試日期:2013-07-10
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:慈濟大學
系所名稱:醫學科學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:171
中文關鍵詞:支付制度前瞻性支付制度診斷關聯群病人分類系統
外文關鍵詞:payment systemProspective Payment SystemDiagnosis Related Groupspatient classification systemcase mix index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:1441
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:269
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
醫療照護是普世價值,亦是人類基本需求,建構良好醫療體系以達到高品質、高可近性及合理費用支出之目標則深受健康保險支付制度之影響,而各種支付制度導入之目的在促進醫療品質提昇、增加醫療服務效率及降低醫療費用支出。台灣自1995年實施全民健康保險,克服就醫障礙,達成了高納保率及高滿意度的成就,中央健康保險局亦在2010年推動前瞻性支付制度-診斷關聯群,以期降低醫療費用快速成長及促進醫療品質的提升。然而醫院針對診斷關聯群實施之經營策略主要以機構層面(Institutional Level)、管理層面(Management Level)、技術層面(Technical Level)三個層面訂定因應策略,並以醫療系統整合、醫療資源整合、經營績效提昇、醫療品質控制、住院醫療費用轉移、病歷記錄改變、專業人員培訓及醫療資訊系統建立等八個子構面進行策略因應規劃。
本研究為橫斷性研究法(Cross-Sectional Study),於診斷關聯群支付制度實施前後採分層立意取樣方式針對樣本醫院相關臨床科別醫師與管理者進行結構式問卷調查,收集台灣66家醫院,有效問卷329份進行資料分析。研究架構以醫院特性為自變項,醫院實施之經營策略及經營績效指標為依變項,已實施診斷關聯群支付制度之西醫一般醫院科別與未實施診斷關聯群支付制度之精神科專科醫院進行比較,探討台灣健保導入診斷關聯群支付制度前後,醫療提供者經營策略及其影響程度。
結果顯示已實施診斷關聯群支付制度之西醫一般醫院與未實施診斷關聯群支付制度之精神科專科醫院在實施診斷關聯群支付制度前後經營策略因應程度呈現統計上顯著差異,其中西醫一般醫院在實施前後三個主要層面呈現明顯之因應策略程度的改變,而精神科專科醫院僅在技術層面呈現統計上顯著差異。績效評估指標差異分析,西醫一般醫院在費用指標、財務指標、可近性指標在統計上並無顯著差異,但在成長指標中全院住院醫療費用成長率呈現統計上顯著差異,在品質指標中實施診斷關聯群支付制度後出院病患合併症/併發症比率呈現統計上顯著差異。不同層級醫院、不同健保分區及不同床位數醫院在診斷關聯群支付制度實施前後並無顯著差異,不同權屬別醫院及不同開院歷史醫院於技術層面呈現統計上顯著差異。
迴歸分析結果顯示實施診斷關聯群制度後,醫院特性對於績效指標預測模式,在全院編制內員工總人數、平均每月出院人次、平均每人次住院醫療費用呈現統計上顯著差異。另在全院住院醫療費用成長率、全院編制內員工總人數、平均每月出院人次、全院佔床率、平均每人次住院醫療費用、平均每人日住院醫療費用、DRG住院病患費用基準值、DRG住院病患件數佔全院費用比率、門診手術人次、出院後30日內死亡率、全院病患違背醫囑出院(AAD)比率、出院病患合併症/併發症(C/C)比率及住院病患滿意度有高解釋力(R2值>0.5)。以因應策略預測各項績效評估指標之結果顯示實施診斷關聯群DRG支付制度後在住院病患疾病嚴重度(CMI值)、平均每人次住院天數及住院病患轉診比率呈現統計上顯著差異。另在住院病患疾病嚴重度(CMI值) 、平均每人次住院天數、住院病患轉診比率有高解釋力(R2值>0.5)。以實施診斷關聯群DRG支付制度前後差異比較顯示在全院住院醫療費用成長率、全院編制內員工總人數、平均每人次住院醫療費用、住院病患疾病嚴重度(CMI值)、平均每人次住院天數及住院病患轉診比率呈現統計上顯著差異。另在全院住院醫療費用成長率、住院病患疾病嚴重度(CMI值)、平均每人次住院天數及住院病患轉診比率有高解釋力(R2值>0.5)。
本研究主題主要在探討台灣健康保險導入前瞻性支付制度診斷關聯群(DRGs)所造成對醫療提供者之衝擊影響及其相關因素分析,相關結果將提供未來台灣健康保險全面導入前瞻性支付制度之參考,並做為醫療提供者經營策略因應之建議。

Healthcare is a general value and basic need for human beings. The implementation of the prospective payment system is an essential factor to reach the goal of high quality, high accessibility and reasonable medical costs of a good healthcare system, which aims on improving the quality, increasing the effectiveness and cutting the medical expenditure. In 1995, Taiwan implemented National Health Care Insurance System that it accomplished a high-insured rate and high satisfaction, and for which, the Bureau of National Health Insurance(NHI) intended to promote prospective payment system - Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to increase medical quality and smooth the rapid growing of medical costs. Nevertheless, hospital’s strategies of DRGs comprise management level, technical level, and institutional level, and is composed by system integration, resource integration, performance increase, quality control, cost shift, medical documentation change, professional training and health information system establish.
This study uses cross-sectional analysis and stratified purposively sampling method. Structured questionnaire was sent to clinical physicians and managers from 66 hospitals in Taiwan, and 329 questionnaires were valid. Hospital’s characteristic was independent variable, hospital management strategies and performance indicators were dependent variables relatively. This study try to analyze the differences between DRGs implemented hospitals and non DRGs implemented hospitals to see the impact on hospital strategies in Taiwan.
The results show there is a significant difference of hospital management strategy before and after DRGs implemente in DRGs and non DRGs implemented hospitals, where as there are significant differences on three levels of DRGs implemented hospitals but only technical level in non DRGs implemented hospitals. In performance evaluation indicator difference analysis, there were no significant differences on cost , financial and accessibility indicators but the increasing rate of whole hospitalization expenses on growth indicators. Moreover, the result shows there is a significant difference of complication and comorbidity rate on quality indicators for discharged patients. There were no significant differences on different ranks, health insurance divisions, and bed number of hospitals. However, the study found that there are significant differences on technical level between different hospital relegations and between different hospital backgrounds.
Results in regression analysis shows there are significant differences between hospital characteristics and performance indicator prediction model on hospital employees, monthly average discharges, and the average cost of hospitalization per person. It also expresses high correlation (R2>0.5) on hospitalization expenses growing rate, hospital employees, monthly average discharges, occupation rate, average cost of hospitalization per person, average cost of hospitalization per day per person, the base rate of DRG, the expenses ratio of hospitalization number, outpatient surgery visits, 30-day death rate after discharge, discharge against advice rate, discharged patient complication and comorbidity rate, and hospitalized patient satisfaction.As for the coping strategies to performance evaluation indicators, the results show that there are significant differences on inpatient disease severity, average length of stay , and inpatients referral rates after the DRGs was implemented. It also expresses high correlation(R2>0.5) on these three variables as well.
To investigate the differences of DRGs implementation, the study found that there are significant differences on hospitalization expenses growing rate, hospital employees, average cost of hospitalization per person per time, inpatient disease severity, average length of stay , and inpatients referral rates. It also expresses high correlation(R2>0.5) on hospitalization expenses growing rate, inpatient disease severity, average length of stay and inpatients referral rates.
This study mainly investigate the impacts on introduce of DRGs prospective payment system of Taiwan healthcare insurance to healthcare providers and analyze its’ related factors. Results will be provided as a reference to the comprehensive PPS and to the healthcare providers.
Key words: payment system, Prospective Payment System, Diagnosis Related Groups, patient classification system, case mix index

致謝 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 IV
目錄 VI
表目錄 X
圖目錄 XII
壹、緒論 1
1.1 背景及重要性 1
1.2 研究目的 5
1.2.1研究動機 5
1.2.2研究目的 6
1.3 研究流程與內容 7
1.4 研究範圍與限制 9
1.5 重要名詞定義 11
貳、文獻探討 14
2.1 診斷關聯群介紹 15
2.2 世界各國實施診斷關聯群經驗探討 20
2.3 世界各國實施診斷關聯群支付制度對醫院之影響與因應策略 27
2.4 台灣版診斷關聯群支付制度簡介與對醫院之影響及因應策略 50
2.5 世界各國診斷關聯群支付制度審查制度建立探討 57
叁、研究方法 66
3.1 理論模式與研究架構 66
3.2 研究設計 69
3.2.1前驅研究 69
3.2.2問卷設計 69
3.2.3研究設計 77
3.3 資料分析與統計方法 80
3.3.1資料分析程序 80
3.3.2 資料蒐集 83
3.3.3研究對象權益保護 84
3.4 信度與效度 86
3.4.1 信度分析 86
3.4.2 效度分析 87
3.4.3 路徑分析 88
肆、資料統計分析結果 91
4.1 描述性統計分析 91
4.2 推論性統計分析 (Inferential Statistics) 94
4.2.1 T檢定 94
4.2.2變異數分析 98
4.2.3複迴歸分析 101
伍、結論 105
5.1 結論與討論 105
5.1.1 信效度分析 105
5.1.2 一般西醫醫院與精神科醫院結果討論 106
5.1.3 一般西醫醫院績效評估指標結果討論 107
5.1.4 一般西醫醫院之醫院特性對經營策略結果討論 108
5.1.5 一般西醫醫院之醫院特性與經營策略對績效評估指標結果討論 109
5.2 研究貢獻及建議 112
陸、參考文獻
6.1 中文文獻
6.2 英文文獻 115
115
121
柒、附錄 134
7.1 診斷關聯群基本架構 134
7.2問卷內容專家審查及建議結果 136
7.3 問卷 145

中文文獻
中央健康保險局 (2002)。全民健康保險住院診療關聯群相關檔案/下載檔案/分類表版第一版。http://www.nhi.gov.tw/00chinese/c-index.asp/
中央健康保險局 (2004)。符合論病例計酬基本診療項目比率。取自
http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdate/webdata.asp?menu=9&menu_id=177&webdate_id=1762&WD_ID
中央健康保險局 (2007)。住院診斷關聯群(TW-DRGs)制度說明及民眾權益保障措施。取自http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.asp?menu=1&menu_id=8&webdate_id=2046&WD_ID=525
中央健康保險局委託研究計劃 (2010)。DRG審查制度之探討。台北市:行政院衛生署。
尤之毅 (1992) 。前瞻性付費制度(PPS/DRGs)美國實施九年後的回顧和展望。台灣醫界,
35(5)。
王品方 (2004)。醫師CMI與醫療資源耗用--以台北市六家醫學中心十項論病例計酬為例。未
出版之碩士論文,國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所。
王偉華、陳貽善、莊懷德、黃欽印、張宏華(2001)。醫療費用管理與新一代資訊系統架構。
經社法制論叢,(27),291-319。
王筱筑 (2008)。影響Tw-DRGs病例組合指標相關因素之探索性研究-以2002-2005年健保資
料庫為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所,台北市。
江雪萍(2007)。預估Tw-DRG支付制度實施後對醫院經營績效之影響-以某區域醫院為例。未
出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所,台北市。
朱澤民(2007)。住院診斷關群政策說明。醫療品質雜誌,l1(5),38-42。
李冬蜂、吳肖琪(2004)。論病例計酬實施前後冠狀動脈繞道手術病患死亡情形。台灣衛誌,23(4),305-315。
李佳霖、方莉、李聖瑤、蔡桂香、韋有升(2009)。模擬實施新制DRG(Tw-DRGs)對醫療費用之影響及因應之道-以股骨轉子間骨折(210,211)為例。醫管期刊,10(3),153-164。
沈希哲、侯勝茂、陳慶餘(1996)。省立醫院試行臨床醫療路徑之經驗。公共衛生,23(3),125-134。
李芝儀 (2001)。論病例計酬制度對醫院門、住診醫療服務移轉之影響--以長庚紀念醫院為
例。未出版之碩士論文,長庚大學醫務管理學研究所。
李妍儀 (2006)。應用決策樹於Tw-DRGs第三版醫院財務衝擊之分析。未出版之碩士論文,嘉南藥理科技大學醫療資訊管理研究所。
李逢君 (2006)。Tw-DRG支付制度下住院醫療服務之財務收益探討-以南部某三家醫學中心六
個主要診斷類別(MDC)為例。未出版之碩士論文,高雄醫學大學醫務管理研究所。
周子敬 (2004)。以統計檢定力檢測結構方程模式運用在商管研究的正確性。中原學報,32(4),
619-633。
周宜穎 (2006)。模擬DRGs實施對我國醫院的衝擊。未出版之碩士論文,台灣大學資訊工程
研究所。
吳肖琪研究主持 (1999)。評估醫院醫療品質指標。台北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會編。
吳彬安、譚開元、李三剛、張錦文(1996)。放射線診斷部門醫療品質評估指標之研究。中華民國醫院協會雜誌,29(2),16-30。
吳偉文(2007)。運用PLS探討兩岸三地千大公司經營指標之特徵。東亞論壇,(457),
13-23。
吳凱勳 (2009)。台灣健保擁有五大特色。衛生報導季刊,(140),7-9。
林文華 (2004)。分階段導入論病例計酬對醫院住院醫療費用之影響。未出版碩士論文,臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所,台北市。
林秀緞 (1998)。地區教學以上醫院臨床路徑實施現況、成效及其相關因素探討。未出版之
碩士論文,臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所,台北市。
林恆慶、揚長興、張文英、張文麗 (2002)。美國Medicare確保醫療品質計畫之發展。慈濟
護理雜誌,1(2),17-23。
林佩芬(2007)。研究工具的信效度。載於曹麗英等人(合著),護理實務研究與應用,(253-269頁)。台北縣:高立。
林富滿、黃瑞美 (2005)。台灣版DRG支付制度對醫界之影響與因應。健康保險雜誌,l(2),
63-67。
邱文達、蔡宛真、黃寶萱、張英睿 (2007)。建構以病人為中心之醫療品質服務系統。醫療品質雜誌,1(4),20-26。
范碧玉(1999)。病歷管理理論與實務。台北市:病歷管理協會。
范碧玉 (2007)。台灣病歷管理從業人員現況調查分析。病歷管理期刊,7 (1),少頁數。
范碧玉、黃麗秋、簡雅芬 (2002)。醫療院所申報住院醫療費用疾病分類編碼適當性分析。病
歷管理期刊,2(2), 34-53。
柯盈秀 (2005)。台灣版診斷關聯群權重影響因素之探討---以某醫學中心為例。未出版之碩士
論文,臺北醫學大學醫務管理研究所。
洪瀅琇 (2005)。DRG支付制度下住院醫療服務財務風險監控模式-決策支援系統之應用。未出版之碩士論文,長榮大學醫務管理學研究所。
許淑珍 (2005)。病歷完成時效對DRG與病例組合指標之影響-以某醫學中心為例。未出版
之碩士論文,國立臺中健康暨管理學院健康管理研究所。
黃于珊、施驊真 (2004)。疾病分類品質與效率。病歷管理,4(2), 58-64。
黃依珍、黃偉堯 (2004)。醫院對診斷關聯群之因應行為。醫院,37(3), 23-30。
黃光華(2004)。醫院策略群組與績效之縱貫性研究。未出版之博士論文,陽明大學公共衛生
研究所。
陳佩妮、鄭守夏、鍾國彪、林王美園(1997)。台灣地區醫療品質指標適用性之探討。中華衛誌,16(2),133-142。
陳怡蒼(2003)。醫師對論病例計酬醫療品質認知之探討。未出版之碩士論文,臺北醫學大學
醫務管理學研究所。
陳怡蒼、林恆慶 (2004)。診斷關聯群前瞻性支付制度對醫療品質影響之探討。醫院,37(1),
16-25。
陳星助、曾瓊禎 (2005)。台灣健保前瞻性支付制度導入之衝擊-診斷關係群醫院因應策略之探討。健康保險雜誌,l2(1),58-72。
陳婉茗 (2004)。模擬DRGs實施對我國醫院的衝擊。未出版之碩士論文,國立陽明大學醫務
管理研究所。
陳婉茗、吳肖琪 (2005)。模擬DRGs實施對我國醫院的財務衝擊。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(4),306-314。
陳寶如 (2005)。某區域醫院疾病分類編碼品質與其DRGs分派之影響-以膽結石病例為例。未
出版之碩士論文,嘉南藥理科技大學醫療資訊管理研究所。
張佳琪、黃文鴻 (2001)。健保支付制度對全髖及全膝關節置換手術醫療利用情形之影響。台灣衛誌,20(6),440-450。
張隆鐘 (2006)。DRGs支付制度下住院醫療服務之財務風險分析 -以南部某區域教學醫院為
例。未出版之碩士論文,長榮大學醫務管理研究所。
溫信財 (2005)。疾病分類編碼與診斷關聯群(DRGs)-美國之經驗。病歷管理,5(1), 43-54。
傅懷慧 (2004)。全民健康保險醫療費用給付稽核流程之研究。未出版之博士論文,中山大學
企業管理學系。
游志強 (2006)。論病例計酬制度實施前後醫院選擇病患與申報行為改變之研究,1996~2004。
未出版之碩士論文,陽明大學衛生福利研究所,台北市。
楊培銘 (2004)。建立以實證醫學為基礎之審議運作模式及成效評估。行政院衛生署。
楊錦豐 (2002) 。論病例計酬實施對醫療費用及品質之影響-以冠狀動脈繞道手術為例。未出版之碩士論文,高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所,高雄市。
鄭金英 (2004)。病歷品質對編碼品質、DRGs與健保給付之影響-以某區域教學醫院為例。未
出版碩士論文,中國醫藥學院醫務管理學研究所,台中市。
鄭貴真 (2004)。DRG線上稽核系統服務品質之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學資訊
管理學系。
蔡依珍 (2004)。論病例計酬下醫院選擇病患之行為分析-以腹腔鏡膽囊切除術為例。未出版之
碩士論文,長榮大學醫務管理學系。
蔡淑鈴、龐一鳴、劉家慧 (2008)。支付制度下之審查模式與品質機監測機制報告。行政院衛生署中央健康保險局。
賴憲堂、楊志良、范碧玉 (1998)。全民健康保險下疾病分類編碼品質與相關影響因素研究。
中華公共衛生雜誌,17(4),337 -348。
薛貴霞 (2006)。住院診斷關聯群支付制度對中型公立醫院財務短期衝擊的預估-以某醫院為
例。未出版之碩士論文,長庚大學醫務管理研究所。
魏秀美 (2004)。某醫學中心申報與疾病分類一致性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立陽明大學
醫務管理研究所。
韓揆 (1994)。醫療品質管理及門診服務品質定性指標。中華公共衛生雜誌,13(1),35-53。
韓揆 (2001)。土、洋DRG-全民健保論病例計酬如何為繼。醫務管理期刊,l2(3),27-46。
韓揆 (2002)。台灣論病例計酬之實施及其變革展望。醫院,35(2),15-27。
韓揆 (2005)。診斷組合在台推行問題(上)-DRGs之支付精神、支付邏輯及侷限。醫務管理期刊,6(1),1-19。
韓揆 (2005)。診斷組合制在台推行問題(下)-論病例計酬及實施準備。醫務管理期刊,(6)1,20-36。
韓揆 (2009)。診斷組合(DRGs)在美國本土外之發展。醫院,41,1-17。
簡麗年、吳肖琪 (2003)。論病例計酬實施前後全股(髖)關節置換術病患出院後30內的再住院情形。台灣衛誌,22(1),69-78。
藍忠孚(1990)。勞保實施診斷關聯群(DRGs)制度之研究。行政院勞委員會委託計劃。
藍忠孚(1996)。全民健康保險診療報酬預估支付制度之研究。行政院衛生署委託計劃。
饒玲瑜 (2005)。以Tw-DRGs分類探討全民健保住院日,疾病嚴重度及醫療費用之相關性。未
出版之碩士論文,亞洲大學健康管理研究所。
龔惠娟 (2010)。病歷書寫品質對疾病分類編碼及Tw-DRGS分派的影響。未出版之碩士論文,嘉南藥理科技大學醫療資訊管理研究所。

英文文獻
Aba, S., Goodman, W. D., & Mintz, J. M. (2002). Funding public provision of private health: The
case for a copayment contribution through the tax system. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, 163, 1-20.
Abdelhak, M., Grostick, S., Hanken, M. A., & Jacobs, E. (2001). Health information: management of a strategic resource. 2nd Ed. Saunders.
Alberta. (2001). A framework for reform. Edmonton, Premier’s Advisory Council on Health [Chair, Don Mazankowski].
Alberta. (2002). A sustainable health system for Alberta: Report of the M.L.A. task force on health care funding and revenue generation. Edmonton, Alberta Health and Wellness.
Additional Documentation Limits for FY 2010 for institutional providers (2010.1),
www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC.
Amatayakul, M. (1993). DRG miscoding: Error or intend?. Journal of American medical Association , 269(7), 867-868.
Anonymous. (2008). Collecting root cause to improve coding quality measurement. Journal of
AHIMA, 79(3), 71-75.
Ansell, D. A. & Schiff, R. L. (1987). Patient dumping status, implications, and policy
recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Association, 257(11), 1500-1502.
Arpita, C. & Andrew, B. (2005), Accuracy of Medicaid Payer Coding in Hospital Patient Discharge Data: Implications for Medicaid Policy Evaluation, Medical Care, 43(6), 581-591.
Avillach, P., Joubert, M., & Fieschi, M. (2008). Improving the quality of the coding of primary diagnosis in standardized discharge summaries. Health Care Management Science, 11(2), 147–151.
Assaf, A. R., Lapane, K. L., McKenney, J.L., M. P. H., & Carleton, R. A. (1993). Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329(13), 931-935.
Barer, M. L., Pulcins, I. R., & Evans, R. G.., Hertzman, C., Lomas, J., & Anderson, G. M. (1989).
Trends in use of medical services by the elderly in British Columbia. CMAJ; 141(1), 39-45.
Benbassat, J., & Taragin, M. (2000). Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: advantages and limitations. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(8), 1074-1081.
Berliner, H. S.(1988). Patient dumping-no one wins and we all lose. American Journal of Public
Health, 78(10), 1279-1280.
Bitonte, D. A., Curry, P., Butler, P., Michael, J., Jean-Baptiste, R., & Feigenbaum, R.(2001).
The payment error prevention program (PEPP): reducing medicare payment errors. Topics in Health Information Management, 21(4) , 50-62.
Bowman, E.D. (2001). Coding Classification, and Reimbursement Systems. In Abdelhak,
Brantes, F. de., Rosenthal, M. B., & Painter, M. (2009). Building a bridge from fragmentation to accountability – The Prometheus payment model. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1033-1036.
Busse, R., Nimptsch, U., & Mansky, T. (2009). Measuring, monitoring, and managing quality in Germany’s hospitals. Health Affairs, 28(2), 294-304.
Carter GM, Newhouse, J. P., & Relles, D. A. (1990). How Much Change in the Case Mix Index is
DRG creep? Journal of Health Economics, 9(4), 411-428.
Case-mixed index (patient atlas), up-coding & miss-coding, patient dumping, common indicators, individual indicators, Quality Improvement Organizations (QIO) -2001
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2002). Peer Review Organization Manual. http://cms.hhs.com.
Chen, L., Yip, W., Chang, M. C., Lin, H. S., Lee, S. D., Chiu, Y. L., & Lin, Y. H. (2007). The effects
of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance on access and health status of the elderly. Health
Economics , 16(3), 223–242.
Cheng, S. H., Chen, C. C., & Chang, W. L. (2009) Hospital response to a global budget program under universal health insurance in Taiwan. Health Policy , 92(2), 158–164.
Cheng, S. H., Hou, Y. F., & Chen, C. C. (2011). Does continuity of care matter in a health care system that lacks referral arrangements? Health Policy and Planning, 26(2), 157–162.
Chin, W. (1998). Issues and 0pinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Chuang, K. H., Covinsky, K. E., Sands, . P., Fortinsky, R. H., Palmer, R. M., & Landefeld, C. S. (2003). Diagnosis-Related Group–Adjusted hospital costs are higher in older medical patients with lower functional status. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(12), 1729-1734.
CMS office of public affairs (2008.10). CMS announces new recovery audit contractors to help identify improper medicare payments, www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/RAC%20Expansion%20Schedule%20Web.pdf
Cohen, B. B. (1987). How will diagnosis-related groups affect epidemiologic research. Journal of Epidemiology , 126(1), 1-9.
Cromwell, J., Trisolini, M. G., Pope, G.. C., Mitchell, J. B., & Greenwald, L. M. (2012). Pay for Performance in Health Care: Methods and Approaches. USA: RTI Press Book Series.
David. D., Katherine. L.K., Ellen. J. R., Marjorie. J. S., Maureen. F. C., Jacqueline. K., Emmett. B. K., William. H. R., Harry. S., Harris. A., Kenneth. B. W., David. R., & Robert. H. B. (1990). Studying the effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15), 1956-1961.
Department of Health and Human Services(1998.2). Office of Inspector General’s Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (1998.8). Using software to detect upcoding of hospital bills OEI 01-97-00010.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (2002.7). Using software to detect upcoding of hospital bills OEI 01-98-00420.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (2005.12). Using software to detect upcoding of hospital bills OEI 03-99-00240.
Department of Health and Human Services (2006).Short-Term, Acute-Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (ST PEPPER) User’s Guide.
Deppe, S., Truax, C. B., Opalek, J. M., & Santanello, S. A. (2009) Speaking the same language:
underestimating financial impact when using diagnosis-related group versus ICD-9-based
definitions for trauma inclusion criteria. The Journal of Trauma Injury Infection & Critical Care, 66(4), 1184-1188.
Derby, C. A., Lapane, K. L., Feldman, H. A., & Carleton, R. A. (2001). Possible effect of DRGs on the classification of stroke: Implications for epidemiological surveillance. Stroke, 32, 1487
-1491.
DesHarnais, S., Chesney, J., & Fleming, S.(1988).Trends and regional variations in hospital
utilization and quality during the first two years of the prospective payment system. Inquiry, 25(3), 374-382.
DesHarnais, S. I., Forthman, T. M., Homa-Lowry, J. M., & Wooster, D. L. (2000). Risk-adjusted clinical quality indicators: indices for measuring and monitoring rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions. Quality Management in Health Care. 9(1), 14-22.
DesHarnais, S., Kobrinski, E., Chesney, J., Long, M., Ament, R., & Fleming, S.(1987).The early
effects of the prospective payment system on inpatient utilization and the quality of care. Inquiry, 24(1), 7-16.
DeWoody, S., & Price, J. (1994). A systems approach to multidimensional critical paths. Nursing
Management, 25(11), 47-51.
Dirschedl, P., Funk. R., Heine, U., & Mohrmann, M. (2007). DRG evaluation results--state comparisons: MDK Baden-Wurttemberg versus MDK Westfalen-Lippe. Das Desundheitswesen ,69(3), 141-145.
DRG Validation(1985)- Health Care Excel, Medicare Peer Review Organization for Indiana and Kentucky Payment Error Prevention Program, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA).
Duncan, W. J. Ginter, P. M. & Swayne, L. E. (1998). Strategic management of health care organizations. Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers.
Dykes, P. C., Acevedo, K., Boldrighini, J., Boucher, C., Frumento, K., & Gray, P. et al (2005).
Practice guideline Adherence Before and After Implementation of the HEARTFELT (HEART
Failure Effectiveness & Leadership Team) Intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(5), 306–314
Ellis, R.P. (1998). Creaming, skimping and dumping: provider competition on the intensive and
extensive margins. Journal of Economics; 17, 537-555.
Ellis, R. P, & McGuire, T. G.. (1996). Hospital response to prospective payment: Moral hazard,
selection, and practice-style effects. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 257-277.
Epstein, A. M.(2002). Volume and outcome- is it time to move ahead. New England Journal of
Medicine, 346, 1171-1163.
Estrella, R. ( 2003). What happened to PEPP ? Journal of American Health information Management Association , 74, 43-44.
Feinglass, J. & Holloway, J. J. (1991). The initial impact of the medicare prospective payment system on U.S. health care: a review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review , 48(1), 91-115.
Fetter, R.B., Shin, Y., Freeman, J. L., Averill, R.F., & Thompson, J. D. (1980). Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Medical Care, 18(2), 1-53.
Fisher, E. S., Whalry, F. S., Malenka, D. J., Fleming , C., Baron, J. A., & Hsia, D. C. (1992). The accuracy of Medicare’s Hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. American Journal of Public Health 82,(2), 243-248.
Fitzgerald, J. F., Fagan, L. F., Tierney, W. M., & Dittus, R. S. (1987). Changing patterns of hip
fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. Journal of American Medical Association, 258(2), 218-221.
Forgione; D. A. & D'Annunzio, C. M. (1999). The use of DRGs in health care payment systems around the world. Journal of Health Care Finance; 26(2), 66-78.
Forgione, D. A.; Vermeer; T. E., Surysekar; K., Wrieden; J. A., & Plante, C. A. (2004). The impact of DRG-based payment systems on quality of health care in OECD countries. Journal of Health Care Finance; 31(1), 41-54.
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981a). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981b).Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Gertman, P. M.,& Restuccia, J. D. (1981). The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for
assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Medical Care, 19(8), 855-871.
Gillick, M. R. (2000). Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. New
England Journal Medicine, 342(3), 206-210.
Goldfield, N. (2010). The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs):from Its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital. Quality Management Health Care, 19(1), 3-16.
Grandjour, A., Bannerberg, A., & Lauterbach, K. W. (2003). Threshold volumes associated with
higher survival in health care. Medical Care, 41(10), 1129-1141.
Hauck, L. D., Adler, L. M., & Mulla, Z. D. (2004). Clinical pathway care improves outcomes among patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Annals of epidemiology, 14(9), 669–675.
Hellander, I.(2004). A review of data on the U.S. health sector. International Journal of Health Services ,34(4), 731-49.
Hensen, P., Beissert, S., Bruckner-Tuderman, L., Luger, T. A., Roeder, N., & Müller, M. L. (2008). Introduction of diagnosis-related groups in Germany: evaluation of impact on in-patient care in a dermatological setting. European Journal of Public Health, 18(1), 85-91.
Hensen, P., Fürstenberg, T., Luger, T. A., Steinhoff, M., & Roeder, N. (2005). Case mix measures and diagnosis-related groups: opportunities and threats for inpatient dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 19(5), 582-588.
Hsia, D. C. (1992). Diagnosis related group coding accuracy of the peer review organization. Journal of AHIMA, 63(9), 56-64
Hsia, D. C., Ahern; C. A., Ritchie; B. P., Moscoe; L. M., & Krushat, W. M. (1992). Medicare reimbursement accuracy under the prospective payment system, 1985 to 1988. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 268(7), 896-899.
Hsia, D. C., Krushat, W. M., Fagan, A. B,. Tebbutt, J. A., & Kusserow, R. P.(1988). Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. The New England Journal of Medicine, 318(6), 352-355.
Hsiao, W.C. & Dunn, D. L. (1987). The impact of DRG payment on New Jersey Hospital, Inquiry, 24(3), 212-220.
Huang, N., Yip, W., Chang, H. J., & Chou, Y. J. (2006). Trends in rural and urban differentials in
incidence rates for ruptured appendicitis under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Public Health, 120(11), 1055–1063.
Iezzoni, L. I.( 1995). Risk adjustment for medical effectiveness research: an overview of conceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 43(2), 136-150.
Jacqueline. Kosecoff, Kathenine. L. Kahn, William. H. Rogers, Ellen. J. Reinisch, Marjorie. J. Sherwood, Lisa.V. Rubenstein, David Draper, Carol. P. Roth, Carole. Chew, Robert. H. Brook. (1990), Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15), 1980-83.
Kagan, R. J. (1992). Diagnosis related group coding accuracy of the peer review organization.
Journal of AHIMA, 63(9), 56-64.
Kahn, K. L., Keeler, E. B., Sherwood, M. J., Rogers, W. H., Draper, D., & Bentow, S. S. et al. (1990a). Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15), 1894-88.
Kahn, K. L., Rubenstein, L. V., Draper, D., Kosecoff, J. Rogers, W. H., & Keeler, E. B. et al. (1990b). The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized medicare patients. The Journal of the American Medical Association , 264(15), 1953-55.
Kahn, K. L., Rogers, W. H., Rubenstein, L. V., Sherwood, M. J., Reinisch, E. J., & Keeler, E. B. et al. (1990c). Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(15), 1969-1973.
Kawabuchi, K. (2000). Payment systems and considerations of case mix-are diagnosis-related groups applicable in Japan? Pharmacoeconomics, 18(Suppl 1), 95-110.
Keeler, E. B., Kahn, K. L., Draper, D., Sherwood, M. J., Rubenstein, L. V., Reinisch, E. J., Kosecoff, J., & Brook, R. H.(1990). Changes in sickness at admission following the introduction of the prospective payment system. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15): 1962-1968.
Kellermann, A. L. & Hackman, B. B.(1988). Emergency department patient 'dumping': an analysis of interhospital transfers to the regional medical center at Memphis, Tennessee. American Journal of Public Health, 78(10), 1287-1292.
Kenny, S. (1989, June)。總額預算制度簡介。加拿大總額支付制度研討會會議,台北市,台灣。
Klaus, B., Ritter, A., Grosse, Hülsewiesche H., Beyrle, B., Euler, H. U., & Fender, H. et al. (2005).
Study of the quality of codification of diagnoses and procedures under DRG conditions.Article
in German, 67(1), 9-19.
Kosecoff, J., Kahn, K. L., Rogers, W. H., Reinisch, E. J., Sherwood, M. J., Rubenstein, L. V. et al. (1990), Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15), 1980-1983.
Kwon, S. (2005). Payment system reform for health providers in Korea. Health policy and planning ,18(1), 84-92.
Lave, J. R. (1989). The effect of the medicare prospective payment system. Annual review of public health,10, 141-161.
Lee, Y. C., Huang, Y. T., Tsai, Y. W., Huang, S. M., Kuo, K. N., McKee, M., & Nolte, E. (2010). The impact of universal National Health Insurance on population health: the experience of Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research, 10(225).
Lin, H. C., Tung, T. C., Kuo, N. W., Yang, C. M., & Hsu, Y. H. E. (2002). Identifying quality
dimensions for quality assurance under the case payment system in Taiwan. New Taipei
Journal of Medicine, 4(1), 34-43.
Ljunggren. B., & Sjödén, P. O. (2001). Patient reported quality of Care vs. after the implementation
of a diagnosis related groups (DRG) classification and payment system. in one Swedish county. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 15(4), 283-294.
Lüngen, M., & Lauterbach, K. W. (2001). Extent and causes of coding problems for total compensation on the basis of Diagnosis-Related Groups. Article in German, 126(51-52),
1449-1453.
Lynk, W. J. (2001). One DRG, One Price? The effect of patient condition on price variation within
DRGs and across hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 1,
111–137.
Maarse, H., Rooijakkers, D., & Duzijn, R. (1993). Institutional response to Medicare’s prospective payment system. Health policy, 25, 255-270.
Marrie, T. J., Lau, C. Y., Wheeler, S. L., Wong, C. J., Vandervoort, M. K., & Feagan, B. G.. (2000).
A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(6), 749-755.
Mainz J. (2003). Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer.
International Journal for Quality Health Care.15(suppl 1), i5-i11
Maslove, L. & Fooks, C. (2004). Our health, our future: Creating quality workplaces for Canadian nurses. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Mayer-oakes, S. A., Oye, R. K., Leake, B., & Brook, R.H. (1988).The early effect of Medicare’s
prospective payment system on the use of medical intensive care services in the three
community hospitals. Journal of American Medical Association, 260(21), 3146-3149.
Mayo, N. E., Nadeau, L., Levesque, L., Miller, S., Poissant, L., & Tamblyn, R. (2005). Does the addition of functional status indicators to case-mix adjustment indices improve prediction of hospitalization, institutionalization, and death in the elderly?. Medical Care, 43(12), 1194-1202.
McCarthy, E. P., (2000). Dose clinical evidence support ICD-9CM diagnosis coding of complication? Medical care,38(8), 785-795.
McGuire, T. E.(1991). DRGs: The state of the art, circa 1990. Health Policy, 17(2), 97-119.
McNutt, R., Johnson, T. J., Odwazny, R., Remmich, Z., Skarupski, K., & Meurer, S. et al. (2010). Change in MS-DRG assignment and hospital reimbursement as a result of centers for medicare & medicaid changes in payment for hospital-acquired conditions: is it coding or quality? Quality Management in Health Care, 19(1), 17-24.
Menke, T. J., Ashton, C. M., Petersen, N. J., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1998). Impact of an all-inclusive diagnosis-related group payment system on inpatient utilization. Medical care, 36(8), 1126-1137.
Mullin, R. L. (1985). Diagnosis-related groups and severity-ICD-9-CM, the real problem. Journal of the American Medical Association, 254(9), 1208-1210.
Naughton, D. S. (1999). Coding & Reimbrusement. Chicago: An American Hospital Association
Company.
PICQ 2008 performance indicators for coding quality, user guide, Version 6.0
Parsons, T .(1956). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to a Theory of Organizations-I, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (June) : 63-85
Preyra, C. (2004). Coding response to a case-mix measurement system Based on multiple diagnoses. Health Services Research, 39(4), 1027-1046.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS–Version 2.0. Universitat, Hamburg, Hamburg.
Rock, R. C. (1985). Assuring quality of care under DRG-based prospective payment. Medical Decision Making, 5(1), 31-34.
Rogers, W. H., Draper, D., Kahn, K. L., Keeler, E. B., Rubenstein, L. V., Kosecoff, J., & Brook, R.
H. (1990) Quality of Care Before and After Implementation of the DRG-Based Prospective
Payment System. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(15), 1989-1994.
Rösler, N., Berge, T., & Ritzki, M. (2010). German diagnosis related groups (G-DRG): results of
sociomedical expertises in acute cerebrovascular diseases. Gesundheitswesen, 72(7), 419-424.
Rubenstein, L. V., Kahn, K. L., Reinisch, E. J., Sherwood, M. J., Rogers, W. H., Kamberg, C., Draper, D.; & Brook, R. H.(1990). Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 264(15), 1974-1979.
Russell, L. B., & Manning, C. L. (1989). The effect of prospective payment on Medicare expenditures. The New England Journal of Medicine, 320(7), 439-444
Sager, M. A., Leventhal, E. A., & Easterling, D.V. (1987). The impact of medicare’s prospective
payment system on Wisconsin nursing homes. Journal of American Medical Association, 257(13), 1762-1766.
Schraffenberger, L. A. (2005). Effective Management of Coding Services. Chicago: American Health Information Management Association.
Schreyögg, J., Stargardt, T., Tiemann, O., & Busse, R. (2006). Methods to determine reimbursement rates for diagnosis related groups (DRG): a comparison of nine European countries. Health Care Management Science, 9, 215–223.
Schütz, U., Dreinhöfer, K., & Reichel, H (2007). Significance of a coding engaged orthopaedic
surgeon for the illustration quality and compensation of an orthopaedic university department
in the German DRG System 2005. Z Orthop Unfall, 145(3), 348-355.
Serden , L., Lindqivst,R. & Rosen, M. (2003). Have DRG-based prospective payment system influenced the number of secondary diagnosis in health care administrative data?. Health policy, 65, 101-107.
Sloan, F. A., Morrisey, M. A., & Valvona, J. (1998). Case shifting and the medicare prospective
payment system. American Journal of Public Health, 78(5), 553-556.
Starr, P. (1995). What happened to health-care reform?. The American Prospect , 20, 20-31.
Steinwald, B., Dummit, L. A. (1989). Hospital case mix change: sicker patient or DRG Creep, Health Affairs, 8, 35-47.
Stephen M.Shortell, Ellen M. Morrison, & Shelley Robbins(1985). Strategy Making in Health Care Organizations: A Framework and Agenda for Research, Medical Care Review 42(2), 219-266
Tierney, W. M., Fitzgerald, J. F., Miller, M. E., James, M. K., & McDonald, C. J. (1995). Predicting
inpatient costs with admitting clinical data. Medical Care.; 33(1), 1-14.
Vetter, S. Y., Studier-Fischer, S., Wentzensen, A., & Frank C. (2009). The challenge of auditing by medical health insurance inspectors: development of individual case inspections according to 275ff SGB V. Der Unfallchirurg, 112(8), 756-758.
Weingart, S. N., Mukamal, K., Davis, R. B., Davies, D. T., Jr., Palmer, R. H., Cahalane, M., Hamel, M. B., Phillips, R. S., & Iezzoni, L. I. (2001). Physician‐reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13(5), 357-365.
Wen, C. P., Tsai, S.P., & Chung, WSI. (2008). A 10-year experience with Universal Health Insurance in Taiwan: measuring changes in health and health disparity, Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(4), 258-267.
Wynia, M. K., Cummins, D. S., VanGeest, J. B., & Wilson, I. B.(2000). Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients. The Journal of the American Medical Association; 283(14), 1858-1865.
Wynne, M. & Armstrong, W. (2003). Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Health Issues, 74, 9-13.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 簡麗年、吳肖琪 (2003)。論病例計酬實施前後全股(髖)關節置換術病患出院後30內的再住院情形。台灣衛誌,22(1),69-78。
2. 韓揆 (2009)。診斷組合(DRGs)在美國本土外之發展。醫院,41,1-17。
3. 韓揆 (2005)。診斷組合制在台推行問題(下)-論病例計酬及實施準備。醫務管理期刊,(6)1,20-36。
4. 韓揆 (2005)。診斷組合在台推行問題(上)-DRGs之支付精神、支付邏輯及侷限。醫務管理期刊,6(1),1-19。
5. 韓揆 (2002)。台灣論病例計酬之實施及其變革展望。醫院,35(2),15-27。
6. 韓揆 (2001)。土、洋DRG-全民健保論病例計酬如何為繼。醫務管理期刊,l2(3),27-46。
7. 韓揆 (1994)。醫療品質管理及門診服務品質定性指標。中華公共衛生雜誌,13(1),35-53。
8. 賴憲堂、楊志良、范碧玉 (1998)。全民健康保險下疾病分類編碼品質與相關影響因素研究。
9. 鄭貴真 (2004)。DRG線上稽核系統服務品質之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學資訊
10. 溫信財 (2005)。疾病分類編碼與診斷關聯群(DRGs)-美國之經驗。病歷管理,5(1), 43-54。
11. 陳婉茗、吳肖琪 (2005)。模擬DRGs實施對我國醫院的財務衝擊。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(4),306-314。
12. 張佳琪、黃文鴻 (2001)。健保支付制度對全髖及全膝關節置換手術醫療利用情形之影響。台灣衛誌,20(6),440-450。
13. 陳婉茗 (2004)。模擬DRGs實施對我國醫院的衝擊。未出版之碩士論文,國立陽明大學醫務
14. 陳星助、曾瓊禎 (2005)。台灣健保前瞻性支付制度導入之衝擊-診斷關係群醫院因應策略之探討。健康保險雜誌,l2(1),58-72。
15. 陳怡蒼、林恆慶 (2004)。診斷關聯群前瞻性支付制度對醫療品質影響之探討。醫院,37(1),