跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.88) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/02/15 18:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:魏宇佑
研究生(外文):WEI,YU-YU
論文名稱:製造業供應鏈風險評估- 太陽能基板為例
論文名稱(外文):An Assessment Model of Supply Chain Risk Management– The Solar-panel Factory as an Example
指導教授:王妙伶王妙伶引用關係
指導教授(外文):WANG,MIAO-LING
口試委員:郭財吉呂博裕
口試委員(外文):KUO,TASI-CHILEU,BOR-YUH
口試日期:2016-06-14
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:明新科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系碩士在職專班
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:98
中文關鍵詞:德菲法供應鏈風險太陽能產業層級分析法
外文關鍵詞:Delphi methodSupply Chain RiskThe solar industryAnalysis Hierarchy Process
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:333
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:46
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
以往企業對供應鏈管理並非全面性,考量不夠周延,往往等到事件發生後,如作業因素、政治因素等,而導致物料及零件短缺,造成企業嚴重損失,故採取有效的供應鏈風險管理,成為產業維護競爭優勢的重大挑戰。
本研究主要是以供應風險的概念,建立太陽能基板產業的供應鏈管理風險評估決策因子,以太陽能基板廠的請購部門、採購部門、品保部門、會計部門為研究對象,共發放10份問卷,回收10份問卷。先以三回合德菲法專家問卷調查進行,分析結果取得共識後修正形成層級分析法專家問卷。第四回合專家問卷採層級分析法進行調查,藉以取得影響供應鏈風險中評估考量因素中整體分數排序。
研究結果,依風險層級之不同歸納出共計三種風險類型、十項風險構面和三十五項風險績效評估指標。經層級分析法分析後,考量因素中整體分數排序前十名因素,如未建構內控評價體系、市場趨勢預測錯誤導致損失等,作為主要之風險因子,並找出相對的風險回應計畫。



Business on the supply chain management is not comprehensive or considered un-distributively in the past. When the risks happened, they led to the materials and spare parts shortages and resulted serious losses of the enterprise. Therefore, managing supply chain risk effectiveiy will maintain the competitive advantage of major challenges for an enterprise.
This study is mainly used the concept of supply chain risk to establish the important upply chain management risk assessment decision factors for the solar silicon wafer industry. A total of 10 questionnaires is issued for substrate solar plant purchasing department, purchasing, quality assurance department, accounting department as the research object. Three rounds of Delphi expert questionnaires are used to obtain the concerned criterion for analytic hierarchy process (AHP) expert questionnaire. The fourth round expert questionnaire is adopted to investigate the impact of the supply chain risk assessment factors in the overall score ranking.
The results of the study, according to the different levels of risk, summed up a total of three types of risk, ten risk dimensions and thirty-five risk performance evaluation indicators. The results of analytic hierarchy process, AHP are obtained as the overall ranking scores. For the purpose of further control, the top ten factors, such as construction internal control evaluation system, the market trend forecast error leads to the loss are proposed to be the main risk factors. Finally, the risk response plans for the main risk factors are constructed.

摘要 II
目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 8
1.1 研究背景與動機 8
1.2 研究目的 10
1.3 研究範圍與限制 10
1.4 研究流程 11
第二章 文獻探討 12
2.1 供應鏈管理相關文獻 12
2.2 風險管理相關文獻 19
2.3供應鏈風險 24
2.4風險評估相關研究 28
第三章 研究方法 31
3.1 研究架構 31
3.2 問卷調查之內容 33
3.3德菲法 (DELPHI METHOD) 34
3.4 層級分析法 38
第四章 資料分析與討論 43
4.1 辨識風險分析 43
4.1.1 第一回合德菲法問卷分析 43
4.1.2 第二回合德菲法問卷分析 50
4.1.3 第三回合德菲法問卷分析 52
4.2 AHP層級分析法問卷分析與討論 55
4.3分析AHP風險的重要性 59
4.4 風險因子的衝擊影響及回應計畫 60
第五章 結論與建議 63
5.1 結論 63
5.2建議 64
參考文獻 66
附錄 74


中文部分
1.王立志,系統運籌與供應鏈管理,台中市:滄海書局,1999。
2.王維元,商海外營運環境不確定性之認知與因應風險管理策略之研究-以資訊電子業與紡織業赴大陸投資為例,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文,2001。
3.丘昌泰,公共政策:當代政策科學理論之研究,巨流圖書公司,1995。
4.白培英,企業經營與風險管理,中國商銀月刊,15(2),1996,pp.1-6。
5.吳思華,策略九說,台北:臉譜出版,2000。
6.吳曼寧,我國綜合證券商風險管理之研究。國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,2000。
7.宋文娟,一種質量並重的研究法-德菲法在醫務管理學研究領域之應用,醫務管理期刊,2(2),2001,pp.11-19。
8.宋明哲,風險為何需要管理,企業的危機應變與風險管理,台北:中華民國管理科學學,1992。
9.林安宙,台灣創業投資業風險管理策略之研究。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,2002。
10.林政德,運動產業風險管理之研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文,2000。
11.邱美玲,製造業供應商的選擇與評估,國立台灣工業技術學院管理技術研究所碩士論文,1994。
12.邱淑芬、蔡欣玲,得爾菲預測術—一種專家預測的護理研究方法,護理研究1996,4(1),pp.92-98,。
13.胡志宏,新版巴塞爾資本協定對我國金融業信用風險管理之衝擊,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
14.高建偉、賀登才,基於風險矩陣的企業採購風險評估,物流科技,31(7),2008,pp.133-135。
15.張維容、鍾信成,以德飛法建立醫院內部評估社區健康服務成效之指標。澄清醫務管理雜誌,5(1),2009,pp.45-51。
16.許碧芳、許美菁,應用德菲法與層級分析法建構基層醫療機構醫療資訊系統外包商評選模式,醫務管理期刊,第7卷,第1期,2006,pp.40-56。
17.陳家祥、許吉男、張厚瑩,台灣零售通路供應鏈管理應用特性與展望,1999國際物流研討會論文集,1999,pp.144-151。
18.黃俊英,企業研究方法,台北:東華出版社,1996。
19.黃智偉,供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究—以臺灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例,國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,2000。
20.黃繼弘,線上學習內容提供業者的經營風險與因應策略,元智大學資訊傳播學系碩士班碩士論文,2002。
21.楊明璧、吳信宏,醫院貴重儀器投資及更新之決策模式,醫務管理期刊,3 (3),,2002,pp.81-100。
22.箇井信行,風險管理(賴青松譯),台中:日之昇文化,1999。
23.鄭燦堂,風險管理---理論與實務,台北:翰林出版社,1998。
24.鄧家駒,風險管理,台北:華泰文化,2000。
25.鄧振源、曾國雄,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統訊學報,27 (6),1989,pp.13707-13724。
26.黎漢林、許景華、李明純、張李志平,供應鏈管理與決策:最佳化方法之運用,台北:儒林圖書,2000。
27.蕭佑竹,海運承攬運送業風險管理之研究,國立海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文,2001。
28.謝劍平,財務管理新觀念與本土化,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司,2002。
29.鍾慧儀,我國企業風險管理之研究---以生物科技公司為例,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所碩士論文,2002。
30.蘇雄義,物流與運籌管理:觀念機能與整合,台北:華泰書局,2000。



西文部分
1.Baird, I.S., and Thomas, H.. “What is risk anyway?” in Bettis, R. A., and Thomas, H. (eds.), Risk, Strategy, and Management, 1990, pp.21-52
2.Barbarosoglu, G., and Yazgac, T. , An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38, 1997, pp. 14-21.
3.Bridleman, D. and Herrmann, J. , “Supply chain management in a make-to order world,” APICS: The Performance advantage, March, 1997, pp. 32-38.
4.Cavinato, J. L., Supply chain logistics risk: From the back room to the board room, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 2004, pp.383-387.
5.Cavinato, J. L..Supply chain logistics risks: from the back room to the board room. International journal of physical distribution and logistics management, 34(5) ,2004, pp.383-387.
6.Cooper, M. C., and Ellram, L. M. , Characteristics of supply chain management and the implications for purchasing and logistics strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 4(2), 1993, pp. 13-24.
7.Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M. and Pagh, J. D., Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics, International Journal of Logistics Management, vol.8, no.1, 1997, pp.1-14.
8.Couper, M.,The delphi technique-characteristics and sequence model. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 7, 1984, pp.72-77.
9.Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R. and Cowles, D. ,Relationship quality in service selling: an interpersonal influence perspective, Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 1990, pp 68-81.
10.Dey, P. K Project risk management using multiple criteria decision-making technique and decision tree analysis: a case study of Indian oil refinery.Production Planning & Control, 23(12), 2012, 903-921.
11.Delbecq, A. L, Van de Ven, A. H. and Gustafson, D. H. , Group Techniques for program Planning. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1975.
12.Dickson, G.W., An Analysis of Vendor Selection System and Decisions, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 1966, pp.5-17.
13.Disney, S. M., and Towill, D. R., The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains. International journal of production economics, 85(2), 2003, pp.199-215.
14.Dowlatshahi S.,”Designer-buyer-supplier interface: Theory versus practice”, International journal of production economics,(63), 2000, pp.111-130
15.Ellram, L.M., A Managerial Guideline for the Development and Implementation of Purchasing Partnerships, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(3), 1991, pp.2-8.
16.Fitzpatrick, M.,The definition and assessment of political risk in international business: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 1983, pp.249-254.
17.Frazier, Gary L., On the Measurement of Interfirm Power in Channels of Distribution, Journal of Marketing Research, 20(3), 1983, pp.158-166.
18.Gummesson, E., The new marketing – developing long-term interactive relationships, Long Range Planning, 24(4), 1987, pp.10-20.
19.Hadavi,C.,Tightening the Supply Chain Using Real-Time Information, APICS: The Performance Advantage,January, 1996, pp.34~37.
20.Harland, C., Brenchley, R., and Walker, H. Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply management, 9(2) ,2003, pp.51-62.
21.Hartman, A., Reaching Consensus Using the Delphi Technique. Educational Leadership, 38(6), 1981, pp.495-497.
22.Houlihan, J., Supply Chain Management", Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference of the British Production and Inventory Control Society, 1984, pp.101-110.
23.Johnson, M. E., Learning from toys: lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry. California Management Review, 43(3), 2001, pp.106-124.
24.Jones, T. C., and Riley, D. W. , Using inventory for competitive advantage through supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 15(5), 1985, pp.16-26.
25.Jüttner, U., Peck, H. and Christopher, M., “Supply chain risk management: outlining and agenda for future research”, Proceedings of the Logistics Research Network 7th Annual Conference, 2002, pp.443-50.
26.Klinke, A., and Renn, O., Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks. Journal of Risk Research, 4(2), 2001, pp.159-173.
27.Kobrin, S. J. Political assessment by international firms: Models or methodologies?. Journal of Policy Modeling, 3(2), 1981, pp.251-270.
28.Linstone. H. A and M. Turoff, Introduction to The Delphi Metbod: Techniques ancl Applications," in H. A. Linstone ancl M. Turoff (ecls), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Reacling, MA, 1975, pp. 3-12. Addison-Wesley Publisbing Company.
29.Maloni, M. J., and Benton, W. C., Supply chain partnerships: opportunities for operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 101(3), 1997, pp.419-429.
30.Meulbrook, L., Total Strategies for Company-Wide Risk Control, Financial Time, May 9, 2000, 2002.
31.Novak, V. , Fuzzy Approach to Reasoning and Decision-Making: Selected Papers of The International Symposium Held at Bechyne. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
32.Pill, J., The Delphi method: substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5(1), 1971, pp.57-71.
33.Remenyi, D., and Heafield, A., Business process re-engineering: some aspects of how to evaluate and manage the risk exposure. International Journal of Project Management, 14(6), 1996, pp.349-357.
34.Robock, S. ,Political risk identification and assessment, Columbia Journal of World Business, 7, 1971, pp.6-20.
35.Rowe, G., Wright, G., and Bolger, F., Delphi: a reevaluation of research and theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(3), 1991, pp. 235-251.
36.Sarkis, J., and Talluri, S. , A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(1), 2002, pp.18-28.
37.Satty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1980.
38.Schorr, J.E., Purchasing in the 21st century: a guide to state-of-the-art techniques and strategies, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1998, pp.20-21.
39.Shefer, D. and Stroumas J.,The Delphi Method: A Planning. Socio -Econo. Planning Science. 15(5), 1981, pp.236-276.
40.Simons, R. , How risky is your company?. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 1999, pp.85-94.
41.Smeltzer, L. R., and Siferd, S. P. , Proactive supply management: the management of risk. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(4), 1998, pp.38-45.
42.Stevens, Intergrating the Supply Chain, Internation Journal of Purchasing Distribution and Material Management, 19/8, 1989, pp.3-9.
43.Stevenson, W.J., Operations Management, McGRAW-HILL, 1999.
44.Sutcliffe K. M. and Akbar Z., Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test, Strategic Management Journal,(19) , 1998, pp.1-23.
45.Thomas, D. J. and Paul M. Griffin, Coordinated supply chain management, Europenan Journal of operational research, 1996, pp.1-15.
46.Toni, A.D. Nissimbeni, G. and Tonchia, S., ”New trends in supply environment,” Logistics Information Management, 7(4), 1994, pp.41-50.
47.Watts, C.A., Kim, K.Y. and Hahn C.K., Linking Purchasing To Corporate Competitive Strategy, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1992, pp.2-8.
48.Weber, C.A., Current, J. R. and Benton, W.C. ,“Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 1991, pp.2-18.
49.Zeithaml V.A., How Consumer Evaluation Processes Differ between Goods and Services, reprinted in Lovelock, C.(1991),Services Marketing, 2nd Edition,Upper Saddle River,New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1981.
50.Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., and Ogden, J. A., The relationship between purchasing and supply management's perceived value and participation in strategic supplier cost management activities. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 2003, pp.129.
51.Zweben, M.,Enterprise Resource Optimization: A New Supply Chain Business Model, The Performance advantage, October, 1997, pp.44-49.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top