臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過往文獻對親密關係中衝突議題的探討大多聚焦在個體層次，而忽略親密關係中雙方的互動及對方對自身可能造成的影響。近年雖有學者開始以對偶資料分析親密關係議題，但在華人親密關係文獻中以成對資料進行對偶分析的研究仍屬少量。本研究對未婚情侶互動行為進行資料收集，探討親密關係衝突中的建設性轉化歷程，主張個體會對親密關係中發生的衝突進行認知評估，並在評估後採取相對應的衝突因應策略，進而影響自身的關係滿意度與安適幸福感。然而，個體衝突因應策略的效果不只會影響自身，也會影響對方的關係滿意度與安適幸福感。因此，本研究採用行動者與伴侶相依模式與結構方程模型分別進行個體模型與對偶模型的分析，以便了解親密關係雙方在面臨衝突時交互行為所產生的影響。經由對189對未婚情侶對偶資料進行分析，本研究結果分為兩個部分，在個體層次分析結果顯示：採取功能性評估的個體會藉由兼容並蓄因應策略的中介進而提升自身的關係滿意度；然而個體的競爭性評估、規避逃離因應策略會降低自身的關係滿意度；另外，男性的自我犧牲因應策略會提升自身的關係滿意度，女性則無顯著效果；男性的功利主義因應策略會降低自身的關係滿意度，女性則無顯著效果。在對偶資料分析顯示：男性的兼容並蓄因應策略會提升女性的關係滿意度；不論性別，個體的自我犧牲因應策略會降低對方的安適幸福感，但規避逃離因應策略對彼此的關係滿意度與安適幸福感並無顯著的伴侶效果；另外，男性的功利主義因應策略會提升女性的關係滿意度與安適幸福感。最後本文對研究結果進行討論並提出未來研究方向。

Most prior researches of intimate relationship ignored the effect that caused by the partner and the interaction effect between the relationship. In recent years, researchers have started to use dyadic analysis to study intimate relationship, but there are still few Chinese literatures that collect dyadic data for studying intimate relationship. This thesis collects dyadic data of unmarried lovers to explore the constructive transformation process of the conflict in intimate relationship. This research supposes that the functional-orientated appraisal on conflict will positively affect the person’s relationship satisfaction and will be mediated by conflict resolution strategies when the individual solves conflict in compatible or sharing resolution strategy. Moreover, these effects will not only affect the individuals themselves, but also affect their partners’ relationship satisfaction and personal peacefulness. Therefore, the study used Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) and Structure Equation Model (SEM) to analyze the dyadic data. Data was collected from 189 pairs unmarried lovers. The results are split into two levels, the individual analysis and the dyadic analysis. The level of individual analysis indicated that functional appraisal will increase personal relationship satisfaction. Competitive appraisal and escape strategy will decrease personal relationship satisfaction. Male’s self-sacrificing strategy will increase his relationship satisfaction, but females’ won’t. Male’s utilitarian strategy will decrease his relationship satisfaction, but females’ won’t. The level of dyadic analysis indicated that male’s compatible strategy will increase female’s relationship satisfaction; no matter gender, individual’s self-sacrificing strategy will decrease partern’s peacefulness; male’s utilitarian strategy will increase female’s relationship satisfaction and peacefulness. Based on these findings, limitations and suggestions to future direction are discussed.

摘要i
ABSTRACTii
目次iv
表目次vi
圖目次vii
第一章 緒論1
第二章 文獻回顧3
第一節 親密關係的衝突與建設性轉化3
第二節 衝突因應策略6
第三節 行動者與伴侶相依模式10
第三章 研究方法16
第一節 研究程序與對象16
第二節 研究量表16
控制變項－親密關係狀態16
衝突屬性認知評估量表17
衝突因應策略量表18
關係滿意度量表18
安適幸福感量表19
第三節 研究分析策略19
第四節 分析與結果20
描述統計與t檢定20
個體研究變項之相關21
結構方程模型－個體層次22
對偶研究變項之相關25
結構方程模型－對偶層次26
綜合討論32
研究貢獻38
研究限制與未來發展39
參考文獻41
附錄一－情侶相處問卷47
附錄二－衝突因應策略因素分析53

吳志文、莊詩怡、葉光輝（2012）。兩種觀點，親子衝突歷程大不同：功能性與防衛性評估對衝突消解策略與生活適應的作用效果。第51屆台灣心理學會暨學術研討會，亞洲大學，台灣。
吳志文、葉光輝（2015）。親子衝突的功能性評估與建設性轉化歷程：雙元孝道信念的正向促進效果。第6屆社會思想暨首屆華人應用心理國際研討會，私立輔仁大學，台灣。
李怡真（2009）。安適幸福感的構念發展與情緒調控機制之探討。國立臺灣大學心理研究所博士論文。
李怡真、林以正（2006）。愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突之縱貫研究。「中華心理衛生學刊」，48（1），53-67。
李美枝（1993）。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限。「本土心理學研究」，（1），267-300。
利翠珊、蕭英玲（2008）。華人婚姻品質的維繫：衝突與忍讓的中介效果。「本土心理學研究」，（29），77-116。
周玉慧（2009）。夫妻間衝突因應策略類型及其影響。「中華心理衛生學刊」，51（1），81-99。
卓紋君（2000）。從兩性關係發展模式談兩性親密關係的分與合。「諮商與輔導」，（174），25-29。
張妤玥、陸洛（2007）。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。「中華心理衛生學刊」，20（2），155-178。
張喬媚（1999）。以社會學角度探討溝通之差異。「國教新知」，45，78-87。
黃囇莉（1996）。中國人的和諧觀／衝突觀：和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑。「本土心理學研究」，（5），47-71。
葉光輝（1995）。孝道困境的消解模式及其相關因素。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」，79，87-118。
葉光輝（1997）。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式：孝道觀點的探討。「中央研究院民族學研究所集刊」，82，65-114。
葉光輝（2012）。青少年親子衝突歷程的建設性轉化：從研究觀點的轉換到理論架構的發展。「高雄行為科學學刊」，（3），31-59。
葉光輝、曹惟純（2014）。成人親子衝突之建設性轉化路徑：功能性衝突評估，共享式解決策略與個人生活適應的關聯。「中華心理衛生學刊」，27（2），173-199。
劉惠琴（2003）。夫妻衝突調適歴程的測量。「中華心理衛生學刊」，16（1），23-50。
陳富美、利翠珊（2004）。不同情感組型夫妻在家事分工上的差異：對偶資料的分析。「應用心理研究」，（24），95-115。
鐘冠群（2004）。部門內人際衝突與員工效能：調節變項之研究。中原大學心理學研究所學位論文，1-88。
蕭英玲、黃芳銘（2010）。婚姻滿意度與憂鬱傾向：貫時性對偶分析。「中華心理學刊」，52（4），377-396。

Berry, D. S., Willingham, J. K., & Thayer, C. A. (2000). Affect and personality as predictors of conflict and closeness in young adults'' friendships. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(1), 84-107.
Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4), 877-891.
Braiker, H. B., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. Social exchange in developing relationships, 135-168.
Cahn, D. D. (1992). Conflict in intimate relationships. Guilford Press.
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101-109.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Eight ages of man. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
Fisher, L., Kokes, R., Ransom, D., Phillips, S., & Rudd, P. (1985). Alternative strategies for creating "relational" family data. Family Process, 24, 213-224.
Fowers, B. J., Montel, K. H., & Olson, D. H. (1996). Predicting marital success for premarital couple types based on PREPARE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22(1), 103-119.
Gray, J., Adams, A., Jacobs, B. D., & Jacobs family. (1993). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Harper Audio.
Geist, R. L., & Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 49-60.
Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61(1), 6-15.
Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: a longitudinal view. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 57(1), 47-52.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61(1), 16-27.
Hojjat, M. (2000). Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(4-5), 598-617.
Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20(4), 312-326.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. SPSS.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(5), 1075-1092.
Kashy, D. A., Kenny, D. A., Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 38, 451-477.
Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 359-366.
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 279-294.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Bane, C., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. B. (2003). Love, marriage, and divorce: newlyweds'' stress hormones foreshadow relationship changes. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 71(1), 176-188.
Kurdek, L. A. (2008). Change in relationship quality for partners from lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(5), 701-711.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and non-distressed marital partners. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 49(4), 554-567.
McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(4), 587-604.
McNulty, J. K. (2010). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current directions in psychological science, 19(3), 167-171.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological bulletin, 132(5), 641-666.
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(3), 620-639.
Peterson, D. R. (1983). Conflict. Close relationships, 360-396.
Powers, S. I., Pietromonaco, P. R., Gunlicks, M., & Sayer, A. (2006). Dating couples'' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(4), 613-628.
Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports, 1323-1344.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management journal, 26(2), 368-376.
Raven, B. H., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Conflict and power. The structure of conflict, 69-109.
Rogge, R. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: the differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 67(3), 340-351.
Rusbult, C. E., & Zembrodt, I. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3), 274-293.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899 –914.
Weiten, W., & Lloyd, M. A. (2008). Psychology Applied to Modern Life. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.