跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.180) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/16 13:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林延南
研究生(外文):Yen-Nan Lin
論文名稱:組織社會資本對組織績效及R&D之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Organizational Social capital on Organization performance and R&D
指導教授:葉淑瑜葉淑瑜引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-Yu Yeh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:社會資本、Panel Data、R&D、密度矩陣、關係網絡
外文關鍵詞:social capital、Panel Data、R&D、Dense Matrix、Relationship Network
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:319
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:85
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
企業在全球化的影響下面臨高度的挑戰,而組織間網絡關係可以創造或累積社會資本及知識流通,進而提高企業本身的競爭優勢以降低衝擊。另一方面,地區群聚化對企業會產生在地關係鑲嵌的網絡效果,對企業的在R&D行為亦有影響,而企業R&D行為的目的就是維持競爭優勢,進而達到企業績效提升之目的。本研究擬從網絡觀點探討企業績效,從企業間的互動面(社會資本、知識流通)及企業個體的行為面(R&D)來探討企業績效。亦嘗試將「社會資本」分別與「R&D」及「組織績效」交互作用,探討社會資本的直接效果與干擾效果,最後依據實證結果提出相關之管理及政策建議。
本研究以國內新竹科園區高科產業為主,以國內上市、櫃的半導體製造業為研究對象,資料樣本為17家半導體製造公司,並於今(民94)年八月至十二月間進行次級資料的收集。本研究採用Panel Data模型作為研究變數關聯性的分析方法,研究結果發現:(1)社會資本有助於企業的績效之提升為社會資本的直接效果;(2)「本期社會資本」對「本期R&D」於組織的績效有加分的效果為社會資本間接效果;除了高社會資本能使組織有更佳的績效外,其R&D對企業績效因高社會資本而強化;(3) 「前期社會資本」對「前期R&D」於組織的績效有減分的效果為社會資本另一個間接效果,高的前期社會資本會減弱前期R&D的對組織績效的遞延效果。
根據研究結果,進一步提出管理及政策建議:(1)不同要素會造成績效上之差異,企業可針對不同的目標,強化其投入要素內涵;(2)若企業在所處網絡中存在豐裕之社會資本,則能加強績效表現;(3)企業在增加社會資本時,仍需注意之期社會資本對組織R&D產生之影響。
In the face of increasingly competitive environment brought about by globalization, interorganization network of relationship is able to provide value to its member firms by allowing them access to or exchange all critical resources through functioning of social capital embedded within the network. Regional Agglomeration cause of firm create effect of regional relationship embedded and influence on firm’s R&D. The study examined performance of firm by network prospect, interaction of firm (social capital), specific behavior of firms (R&D) and performance. Social capital influence on firm performance (direct effect ) and influence of social capital on R&D’s effect on firm performance (interference effect ) The moderating roles of social capital in the relationships among knowledge flow, R&D and performance are also examined so as to draw more managerial and policy implications from the empirical results.
Employing a sample of 17 semiconducting manufacturers in Hsinchu Science Park during the period 1996-04. Analysis method is Panel Data. Our results show that (1)Social Capital is positively associated with firm’s performance(direct effect), social facilitates maintain competitive advantage (2)Social Capital is facilitates R&D development, benefit on firm performance(indirect effect);(3)Past Social Capital is abates past R&D development, benefit on firm performance(indirect effect) with social capital plays an important moderating role because strategic fits of social capital and R&D are positively related to firm performance.
The research suggest : (1)different elements can affect firm performance, firm strengthened input elements by different goals; (2)if firm’s network have rich
social capital can strengthened firm performance; (3)firm invested in social capital, need to take notice of social capital affect R&D development.
目 錄
頁次
目錄 Ⅰ
圖目錄 Ⅲ
表目錄 Ⅳ
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究流程 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 社會資本之文獻回顧 4
2.1.1 社會資本的定義 4
2.1.2 社會資本與一般資本異同點 6
2.1.3 地區群聚的社會資本 6
2.1.4 社會資本對組織績效的影響 7
2.2 研究發展 8
2.2.1 研究的定義與類型 8
2.2.2 知識的定義 8
2.2.3 知識特性 9
2.2.4 組織學習 10
2.2.5 社會資本、組織網絡對知識流通的影響 10
2.2.6 R&D對組織績效之影響 11
第三章 研究方法 13
3.1 研究架構與研究假說 13
3.2 研究對像與研究期間 14
3.3 資料來源與變數定義 15
3.3.1 依變數 15
3.3.2 自變數 15
3.4 分析方法 18
第四章 實驗結果與分析 20
4.1 敘述統計 20
4.2 相關分析 20
4.3 Panel Data分析結 21
4.4 研究假設實證結果 27
第五章 結論與建議 28
5.1 本研究之結論 28
5.2 管理意函 29
5.3 本研究之限制與後續研究建議 29
5.3.1 本研究的限制 29
5.3.2 後續研究建議 30

參考文獻 31
附錄一 相關分析表 38
附錄二 社會資本次級資料 39
附錄三 各年度關係矩陣與密度矩陣 46
附錄四 產業結構圖 53
附錄五 Panel Data模型
一、英文部分
1.Alder, P. S. and Keok Seok-Woo, “Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” in Lesser E. L.,(Eds.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, Oxford: Butterworth - Heinemann, 2000, pp. 89-115.
2.Alder, P. S. and Kwon Seok-Woo, “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 17-40.
3.Anand, V., Glick, W. H. and Manz, C. C., “Thriving On the Knowledge of Outsiders: Tapping Organizational Social Capital,” Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, pp. 21-31.
4.Anand B. N. and Khanna T., “Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 295-315.
5.Badaracoo, J., The Knowledge Link: How Firm Compete Through Strategic Alliances, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School press, 1991.
6.Baker, W., “Market Networks and Corporate Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 96, 1990, pp. 589-625.
7.Baltagi, B. H., Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed., England: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
8.Becattini, G., “The Development of Light Industry in Tuscany: An Interpreation,” Economic Notes, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1978, pp. 107-123.
9.Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., Miller, B. L. and Yeh, S., “The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2002, pp. 971-996.
10.Bhargava, A., Franzini, L. and Narendranathan, W.,“Serial Correlation and Fixed Effect Model,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 49, 1982, pp.533-549.
11.Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D., An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1992.
12.Breiger, R. L., Boorman, S. A., and Arabie, P., “An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data, and Applications to Social Network Analysis and Comparison with Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 12, 1975, pp. 326-383.
13.Brenner, M. S. and Rushton, B. M., “Sales Growth and R&D in the Chemical Industry,”Research-Technology Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1989, pp. 8-15.
14.Breuch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R.,“The Lagrange Multiplier Test and it’s Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, 1980, pp. 239-253.
15.Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P., “Mysteries of the Region: Knowledge Dynamics in Silicon Valley,” in Lee C.-M. et al., (Eds.), in The Silicon Vallery Edge, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 2000, pp. 16-45.
16.Brow S. L. and Eisenhardt K. M., Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos, Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA, 1998.
17.Burt, R. S., “The Contingent Value of Social Capital,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, 1997, pp. 339-365.
18.Burt, R. S., Structural holes: The Social Structural of Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge: MA, 1992.
19.Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T., Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA, 1991.
20.Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A., “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1990, pp: 125-152.
21.Coleman, J. S., “Social Capital In the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, 1988, pp. 95-120.
22.Davenport, T., and Prusak, L., Working knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press: 1998.
23.Dodgson M., “Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures,” Organization Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1993, pp. 375-394.
24.Dyer, J. H. and Nobeoka, K., “Creating and managing a high-performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 345-467.
25.Feltham, G., and Ohlson, J., “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, 1995, pp. 689-731.
26.Gabbay, S. M. and Leenders, R. Th. A. J., “CSC: The Structure of Advantage and Disadvantage,” in Leenders, R. Th. A. J. and Gabbay, S. M., (Eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, Boston: Kluwer, 1999, pp. 154-180.
27.Griliches, Z., “The Research for R&D Spillovers,”NBER Working Paper, No. 3768, 1991.
28.Granovetter, M., “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, 1973, pp. 1360–1380.
29.Grant, R. M., “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 109–122.
30.Greene, W. H., Limdep Version 7.0 User’s Manual, New York: Econometric Software, Inc, 2000.
31.Hamel G., “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, special issue, Vol. 12, 1991, pp. 83-103.
32.Hansen, M. T., “Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies,” Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 232 -248.
33.Hansen, E. I., “Entrepreneurial Network and New Organization Growth,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1995, pp. 7-19.
34.Hart M. M., Founding Resource Choices: Influence and Effects on Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital, Cotoral Dissertation, Harvard University, 1995.
35.Hausman, J.A.,“Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1978, pp. 1251-1271.
36.Hoopes, D. G. and Postrel, S., “Shared Knowledge, Glitches, and Product Development Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, 1999, pp. 837-865.
37.Ibarra, H., “Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1993, pp. 471-501.
38.Jacobs, J., The death and life of great American cities, London: Penguin Books, 1965.
39.Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H., “Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 217-237.
40.Kalton, G., Kasprzyk, D., and McMillen, D.,“Nonsampling Errors in Panel Surveys,”in Kasprzyk, D., Duncan, G. J., Kalton, G., and Singh, M. P., (Eds.), Panel Surveys, John Wiley Co., New York, 1989, pp. 249-270.
41.Kildegaard, A., and Williams, P., “Banks, Systematic Risk, and Industrial Concentration: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 47, 2002, pp. 345-358.
42.Kogut, B., and Zander, U., “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology,” Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1992, pp. 383-397.
43.Koka, B. R. and Prescott, J. E., “Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 795-816.
44.Kotabe, M., Martin, X., and Domoto, H., “Gaining from Vertical Partnerships: Knowledge Transfer, Relationship Duration, and Supplier Performance Improvement in the U.S. and Japanese Automotive Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, 2003, pp. 293-316.
45.Lane P J. and Lubatkin M., “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1998, pp. 467-477.
46.Lazerson, M. H., “Organizational Growth of Small Firm,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 53, 1998, pp. 330-342.
47.Lee, C., Lee K., and Pennings Johannes M., “Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study on Technology-Based Ventures,” Strategic management Journal, 2001, Vol. 22, 2001, pp. 615-640.
48.Leenders, R. Th. A. J. and Gabbay, S. M., “CSC: An Agenda for the Future,” in Leenders, R.Th. A. J., and Gabbay, S. M., (Eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, Boston: Kluwer, 1999b, pp. 483-494.
49.Lorrain, F., and White, H. C., “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 1, 1971, pp. 49-80.
50.Mansfield, E.,“Contribution of Research and Development to Economic Growth of the United States,”Papers and Proceedings of a Colloquium on Research and Development and Economic Growth Productivity, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, 1972.
51.Marshall, A., Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan, 1920.
52.McEvily, B., and Zaheer, A., “Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1999, pp. 1133–1156.
53.Moran P., and Ghoshal S., “Theories of Economic Organizations: The Case for Relism and Balance,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, 1996, pp. 58-72.
54.Mundlak, A., “On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross-Section Data,”Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1978, pp. 69-85.
55.Nadiri, M. I.,“Contributions and Determinants of Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Manufacturing Industries,”in Furstenberg G. M., (Eds.), in Capital, Efficiency and Growth, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1980b, pp. 361-392.
56.Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S., “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organization Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 1998, pp. 242–266.
57.Nohria, N., and Garcia-Pont C., “Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, 1991, pp. 105-124.
58.Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi H., The Knowledge-Creating Company, N.Y.: oxford University press, 1995.
59.Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1994, pp. 14-37.
60.OECD, “Innovation Network Co-Operation in National Innovation System,” OECD, Paris, 2001.
61.OECD, “The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development,” OECD, Paris, 1974.
62.Ohlson, J., “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, 1995, pp. 661-687.
63.Pennnings, J. M. and Kyungmook L., “Social Capital of Organizatios: Conceptualization, Level of Analysis, and Performance Implications,” in Leenders, R.Th. A. J., and Gabbay, S. M., (Eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, Boston: Kluwer., 1999, pp. 43-67.
64.Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967.
65.Porter, M., The Competitive Advantages of Nations, New York: Free Press, 1990.
66.Powell, W. W. and Smith-Doerr. L., “Networks and Economic Life,” in Smelser N., and Swedberg R., (Eds.), Hardbook of Economic, New York:Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton University, 2005, pp. 379-402.
67.Powell, W. W., Kenneth W. Koput, and Smith-Doerr. L., “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, 1996, pp. 116-145.
68.Putnam, R. D., “Bowling Alone: America''s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995, pp. 65-78.
69.Putnam, R. D., “The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life,” American Prospect, Vol. 13, 1993, pp. 35-42.
70.Reagans, R., and Zuckerman, E. W., “Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams,” Organization Science, 2001, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp: 502-517.
71.AnnaLee, S., Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Vallery and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press., 1994.
72.Schrum, W. and Withnow, R., “Reputational Status of Organizations in Technical Systems,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, 1988, pp. 882-912.
73.Schulz, M., “The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge flow,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No.4, 2001, pp. 661–681.
74.Szulanski, G., “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 27–43.
75.Takeishi, A., “Bridging Inter- and Intra-Firm Boundaries: Management of Supplier Involvement in Automobile Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2001, pp. 403-433.
76.Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S., “Social Capital and Value Creation: the Role of Intrarfirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, 1998, pp. 464-476.
77.Uzzi, B., “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, 1996, pp. 674–698.
78.Walker G., Kogut B., and Shan W., “Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network,” Organization Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1997, pp. 109-125.
79.White, H., “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity,” Econometrica, Vol. 48, 1980, pp. 817-838.
80.Wooldridge, J.M., Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2002.
81.Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., and Sapienza, H.J., “Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, 2001, pp. 587-613.
82.Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., and Tontti, V., “Social Capital, Knowledge, and the International Growth of Technology-Based New Firms,” International Business Review, Vol. 11, 2002, pp. 279-304.

















二.中文部份
1.Drucker, P. F.著,劉如真譯,下一個社會,台北:商周出版,民國91年。
2.丁明勇,「高科技廠商特性、研究發展活動與成效之研究—以科學園區廠商實證」,交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文,民國86年。
3.王威能,「企業資本投資與研發支出的效益分析—以台灣製造業上市公司為例」,台北大學(原中興大學法商學院)會計研究所碩士論文,民國86年。
4.吳仁杰,「時間序列及橫斷面評價模式應用之比較」,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文,民國92年
5.陳俊銘,「全球銀行業財務危機與風險管理之研究」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國92年。
6.陳茂耀,研究與開發管理,台北:華泰出版社,民國84年。
7.遠見雜誌,「策略創新要能持續」,第158 期,民國88年8月,頁118-120。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊